WA legislators hear bill to lengthen sentences for organized retail theft
The Brief
WA legislators are hearing House Bill 1276, which would create a new sentencing enhancement for anyone convicted of stealing or possessing a large amount of goods.
The bill currently has some bipartisan support, but it still faces some resistance from lawmakers and legal experts.
A 2021 Forbes study found Washington was the state most impacted by retail crime.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - Some people convicted of organized retail theft could get a longer prison sentence under a proposal making its way through the legislature.
Heard in the House Committee on Community Safety Monday afternoon, House Bill 1276 would create a new sentencing enhancement for anyone convicted of stealing or possessing a high value of goods.
Twelve months would be added to the sentence of a person guilty of organized retail theft where the property is worth $20,000 or more. If the property has a value of $50,000 or more, 24 months would be added to the sentence.
Currently, a person could get up to ten years in prison for organized theft, based on the seriousness of the crime.
Dig deeper
A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers have signed onto the bill. People who testified in support at Monday's hearing said money made from organized theft funds other criminal activity, often involves a great deal of violence and pointed to a 2021 Forbes study which found Washington was the state most impacted by retail crime.
"It impacts our businesses who can't absorb the loss and may have to lay off workers," said prime sponsor State Representative Mari Leavitt (D-University Place). "It impacts our state by having lost tax dollars that could go back into the strength of our economy. And it impacts consumers who may not feel safe as a result, to do their shopping."
A representative from the state Sentencing Guidelines Commission testified in opposition, saying existing aggravating factors already allow for stiffer punishments for crimes with a large economic impact or with sophisticated planning.
Other opponents say organized theft isn't as large of a problem as retailers say it is, and question the impact of longer sentences.
What they're saying
"It isn't helpful because we've known for years that sentence length is not a deterrent to crime, neither for the general public or for the person caught," said David Trieweiler with the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "Yet here we are again, falsely claiming that increasing sentence lengths will deter these crimes and increase public employee safety. It will not."
One King County prosecutor testified more resources are needed as they face an increase in all types of cases. Leavitt acknowledged the proposal is just one tool needed to address organized theft.
It is currently unclear when the community safety committee could vote on the bill.
Albert James is a television reporter covering state government as part of the Murrow News Fellowship program – a collaborative effort between news outlets statewide and Washington State University.
The Source
Information comes from original reporting by Murrow News fellow Albert James.
Politics: WA Senate passes changes to parental rights in education
Local: Japan Airlines plane clips tail of Delta plane at Sea-Tac
Travel: Here's when you'll need REAL ID to get through US airport security
Food: New restaurants coming to Seattle in 2025
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily Fox Seattle Newsletter.
Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Is The Juice Worth The Squeeze: Energy-Efficiency Projects Make Cents
Homeowners can have both energy efficient heating/cooling and savings with the help of an energy ... More analyst. With the burden of rising energy costs, many homeowners are feeling the pinch in their pockets. The National Foundation for Credit Counseling reports that 'Government agencies define utilities above 6% of your income as a high energy burden.' However, it is not just the high energy costs that are the issue, but also the site's energy consumption that is driving up the bill. But there is hope—energy efficiency projects can provide relief from this financial strain. According to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), the average U.S. household spends about 3.1% of income on energy, while low-income households spend more than 8%, with some exceeding 16%. To resolve high energy utilization, homeowners should look into home energy-retrofit projects that are cost-effective—meaning that the investment has a positive impact on the household budget. Take a look at the Forbes article in April titled, 'Our Energy Bills Are High, And This Is Why,' to learn about the 'why' behind high energy bills. After an energy audit, the building science practitioner should review the report with the homeowner. The report should capture all diagnostic testing and show where the customer should start investing. The energy-modeling software report should provide detailed information to empower customers to make informed decisions. The solutions often come with cost-benefit metrics such as 'Simple Payback,' 'Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR),' and 'Return on Investment (ROI),' all of which can give homeowners a sense of control over their energy usage and costs. Simple payback is a financial metric that calculates how quickly an investment is recovered. This may be important to some people, as money has more value today than it will in the future due to inflation. This concept is known as the 'Time Value of Money.' For commercial projects, the ideal goal is for a project to pay for itself within five years. In the residential sector, projects are considered fair if they pay for themselves within 10 years or less. Example: Retrofit costs $1,000 and saves $100 per year. Payback = (1,000/100) = 10 years The SIR metric indicates that a project will pay for itself. To calculate the SIR, divide a project's savings by its initial investment. The SIR considers the life cycle cost of the retrofit project. An SIR of 1 means that the project will pay for itself in its useful life. The higher the number, the more the project will pay for itself. SIR may not matter to some customers, as comfort may be what they value. For example, in the Midwest region of the country with short summers, an air conditioner, even if considered high efficiency, will not run long enough to offset its initial investment. Despite this, customers still want to be comfortable and will purchase the system anyway. $30,000.00 (existing system) - $20,000.00 (cost of the new system) = $10,000.00 (savings) $10,000.00 (savings) ÷ $5,000.00 (initial cost) = 2 SIR 2 SIR means the retrofit will pay for itself twice during its life cycle. The Annual Return is the interest rate your money earns on your retrofit project. It is similar to returns in a 401(k) or investment account. The Annual Return is the reciprocal of the SIR. To calculate the Annual Return, take the annual savings of a project and divide it by the initial investment of the project. Example: Retrofit costs $1,000 and saves $100 per year. Annual Return = (100/1,000) = 10% The energy savings from the project can often cover the financing payments, making the retrofit budget-neutral. In conclusion, energy-efficiency retrofit projects are not just practical—they are essential. They empower homeowners to lower utility costs, increase comfort, and invest wisely in their property's future. With supportive data, financing options, and a clear return on investment, the case is clear: energy efficiency is a smart financial move and a step toward a more sustainable, affordable lifestyle.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canada's Borderland Pride scraps Minnesota leg of Pride March due to anxiety over U.S. policies
Canada's Borderland Pride scraps Minnesota leg of Pride March due to anxiety over U.S. policies originally appeared on Bring Me The News. Anxiety over current U.S. border and LGBTQ policies under the Trump administration has led a Canadian group to scrap the Minnesota leg of its annual cross-border Pride parade. Borderland Pride has announced that its cross-border Pride March will not start in International Falls this year. The event will instead take place entirely within Fort Frances on the Canadian side of the border. The announcement was made in late February, about five weeks after the return of President Donald Trump to the White House. His administration has issued a series of orders, including ones targeting the transgender and non-binary community, and has removed more than $125 million in federal funding for LGBTQ health. Borderland Pride said the decision to cancel its cross-border march was not made lightly, saying it recognizes "the ongoing need for a strong presence for 2SLGBTQIA+ people in the United States and the International Falls area." "However, we cannot, in good conscience, subject gender diverse members of our community to discrimination, misgendering, or uncertain treatment by U.S. border officials or other institutions, in light of the bigoted and transphobic policy edicts of the Trump administration," it continues. "We also have growing safety concerns in the current political climate, including the potential for threats or actual incidents of harassment or violence targeting our participants. We are fearful, given the U.S. government's actions since the inauguration, that our complaints, or even a crisis, could be met with indifference." Executive Director Douglas Judson told the Star Tribune that the organization doesn't feel it can ask march participants – particularly those who identify as transgender or non-binary – to cross the border, where they "may be confronted with uncomfortable questions, or worse, by U.S. border police." There has been a significant decrease in travel from Canada to U.S. since January, with President Trump angering a significant proportion of the population north of the border with comments suggesting Canada could be annexed by the U.S. and become the 51st U.S. state, as well as sparking a trade war by imposing tariffs on imports to the U.S. Forbes reports that border crossings from Canada to the U.S. by car and air travel has dropped by 35% and 20% respectively, which has the potential to have an economic impact to the U.S. of $7.4 billion this year alone. This story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
IDOL recovers unpaid wages for workers on Saline County solar project
HENDERSON, Ky. (WEHT) – The Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) has recovered over $85,000 in unpaid wages. The IDOL has recovered these unpaid wages for 17 workers that were employed on a construction project in Saline County. IDOL also recovered more than $17,000 in penalties from D&D Electric, LLC (D&D). Eggs sold at Walmart, other grocers in 9 states recalled amid salmonella outbreak 'Illinois law requires that employees on publicly funded projects be paid a fair wage for their skilled work,' said Illinois Department of Labor Director Jane Flanagan. 'Making these workers whole reflects IDOL's commitment to enforcing the Prevailing Wage Act and holding employers accountable when they violate workers' rights.' IDOL says it began its investigation of the Harrisburg, Illinois-based contractor in 2024 for its work on a solar panel installation. The department says it determined D&D violated the State's Prevailing Wage Act by allegedly failing to properly classify workers and correctly compensate them for fringe benefits and overtime. IDOL explains the Prevailing Wage Act requires contractors and subcontractors to pay laborers, workers and mechanics employed on public works projects no less than the general prevailing rate of wages, which consists of hourly cash wages plus fringe benefits, for work of similar character in the locality where the work is performed. U.S. Supreme Court to hear Representative Bost's case on mail-in voting IDOl says the Illinois Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) ensured that new clean energy construction jobs are also quality high-wage jobs by requiring that contractors pay prevailing wages for workers on projects receiving incentives through the Illinois Power Agency. Officials say if a worker believes they have not been properly compensated for work performed in Illinois, they can file a complaint online or call 312-793-2800 with questions. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
