Caroline O'Reilly obituary
In the 1970s, when I first met her, Caroline was active in Southall, west London, helping to establish Rock Against Racism and the Anti-Nazi League, and was with her friend Blair Peach when he was killed by police in 1979. Later, having moved to Hackney, in east London, she organised against the poll tax. Caroline was a member of the Socialist Workers party from 1977 until she died, and was fond of paraphrasing Rosa Luxemburg that 'revolutionaries are the best fighters for reform'.
In 1985 she toured South Africa on a covert solidarity visit, and in 1990 worked in Johannesburg with accountants who assisted 'struggle organisations'. In 1998 she and I moved to South Africa on a permanent basis. Caroline was involved in implementing the government-funded Community Work Programme, which, by 2012, employed 93,000 people in the most marginalised parts of the country.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, Caroline played a pivotal role in the two most successful organisations to emerge from grassroots activity, the Community Organising Working Group and #PayTheGrants, both based in townships and informal settlements.
Born in Cork, she was the oldest of the six children of Frank O'Reilly, a bank official, and Anne, a housewife; she went to school there, and, later, to schools in Carlow and Bundoran. She attended University College Cork, where she was involved in starting one of the first women's groups in Ireland, but at the end of her second year she moved to Britain.
She worked in a canning factory in Lincolnshire, and then a pub in London, and from 1973 was employed by the Allied Irish Bank in the City, where she was a union representative. Seeking to develop herself intellectually, in 1990 she began to study information and communication at the University of North London. Later, while working for Christian Aid, she completed an MSc in development studies at the School of Oriental and African Studies.
For most of our 27 years in South Africa Caroline and I lived in the Johannesburg suburb of Brixton, where she was part of the Community Forum. Before our return to London in 2024, she was honoured with a quilt made by community members.
Caroline was adventurous and courageous. She stood up to violence, was shot at by soldiers in Belfast, ran out of breath on Mount Kenya, was charged by elephants in Botswana, was caught in sudden snow blizzards on the Cairngorms and in the Drakensberg mountains, and coped with me coming out as transgender. She could stun with one sentence, but was funny and warm. She made you laugh at yourself but you never felt ridiculed, just grateful for her advice, support, friendship and love.
She is survived by me, and by her siblings Michael, Mary, Conor and Sally.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rampant shoplifting is the ultimate symbol of our descent into anti-Western decadence
Theft is wrong. Private property is sacrosanct. Shoplifting must be stamped out. We are governed by malicious, ignorant fools who cannot grasp the importance of such precepts, and who are vandalising our social order through their negligence, arrogance and suicidal empathy. Take the grotesque moral inversion exhibited by Labour when it tells shopkeepers not to place 'high value' items close to store entrances, in effect blaming the victims of crime for enticing shoplifters. A minister, Dame Diana Johnson, complained that 'some stores…put bottles of alcohol at the front of the store which obviously people will nick.' Note the use of the colloquial 'nick', which trivialises the violation, demonstrates an inability to take shoplifting seriously and implies that it is a cheeky, opportunistic, almost child-like act of rule-bending. The rest of Johnson's intervention is equally reprehensible. Why would a passer-by 'obviously' feel compelled to grab a bottle if they happen to see it? What kind of excuse is that? Why couldn't they choose not to steal? Do they entirely lack agency? Are we 'noble savages', unable to control our impulses, or are we civilised, demanding self-control, deferred gratification and respect for moral tenets such as 'thou shall not steal'? Labour, in common with many Tories, civil servants, charities and the police establishment, succumbed long ago to 'progressive' woke ideology. This divides the world into oppressors and oppressed, powerful and powerless, bad and good. Shop-owners are part of the capitalist class, and regardless of whether they are a major chain or the local independent corner shop, are tainted: they control the 'power structure' and are inherently guilty of racism, sexism and every sin. Shoplifters are defined, equally reflexively, as oppressed, latter-day Jean Valjeans, after Victor Hugo's character in Les Misérables jailed for 19 years for stealing bread for his sister's starving children.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour ‘misled' public over NHS waiting lists
Labour has 'misled' the public about the reasons why the NHS waiting list has fallen, two leading think tanks have warned. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, had said the 260,000 drop in the NHS backlog since the general election 'was not a coincidence', adding that it was because of 'record investment and fundamental NHS reform'. But a new Quality Watch report – a joint project between the Nuffield Trust and Health Foundation think tanks – found 245,000 appointments were being removed every month because patients died, had treatment elsewhere or moved abroad, rather than because treatment had finished. Some 2.4 million appointments and operations have been removed from the NHS backlog since Labour took power as part of a so-called 'validation process', which involves deleting any appointments for patients hospitals no longer think need to be seen. The researchers had to calculate the figures manually because they are not explicitly reported in NHS data, and said ministers should be more 'transparent' in their paper, first reported by the Health Service Journal on Wednesday. They calculated the total removals by looking at the number of appointments taken from the 'expected waiting list' that then did not appear in the 'reported waiting list' as either waiting or having finished treatment. The authors pointed out that even the NHS's 'own data shows it is still treating fewer patients than are being referred'. 'Government was not clear' For example, when Mr Streeting said the waiting list had fallen during April 'for the first time in 17 years', the researchers pointed out that on an average working day that month, there were 13,141 people being added to the backlog but 14,608 being deleted without undergoing treatment. The Quality Watch report said the Government does not make the impact of validation and other 'unreported removals' sufficiently clear. The research, authored by Georgia Watson and Dr Elizabeth Fisher of the Nuffield Trust, said: 'Until more transparent reporting is provided, accountability around unreported removals remains impossible and the planned care waiting list will continue to be a misleading indicator of how the NHS is dealing with demand. 'While the waiting list has started to go down, unreported removals have gone up. In fact, they have repeatedly outnumbered the additional incomplete referrals that join the waiting list every month,' they wrote. 'This tells us that, across several months, there were more [appointment referrals] being removed from the waiting list without being marked as complete than [new referrals] joining the list.' They said the monthly removals of almost a quarter of a million equate 'to around 3 per cent of the waiting list'. Patients who no longer need appointments have always been removed from the waiting list but they have recently had a 'more noticeable impact'. 'Since September 2023, this shift has helped the NHS get control of the waiting list, even while according to its own data it is still treating fewer patients than are being referred,' the report said. 'We are freeing up capacity' A Department of Health spokesman said: 'Our drive to clear the huge waiting list backlog we inherited includes making sure all patients are getting the right treatment as quickly as possible. 'That's why we are supporting GPs to seek specialist advice before making referrals, and screening existing waiting lists to check that all patients need to be on there, freeing up capacity to get more people seen more quickly. 'This is one element of our wider work to cut waiting times for patients and improve productivity through our Plan for Change, through which we have already delivered over 4 million extra appointments and cut the waiting list by 260,000.' An NHS spokesman said: 'NHS staff have made significant progress in reducing waiting lists in the last year – down by more than 260,000 since June 2024 – and this is driven by the fact that 2,300 more patients are receiving treatment every day compared to last year. 'While the validation process has a small impact on the overall waiting list – as is made crystal clear in our published monthly waiting list data – it's right we regularly clinically review those waiting so hospitals can prioritise patients more accurately and deploy their resources efficiently.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
BBC's Thought for the Day shouldn't sell wokery
Radio Four's Today programme is the BBC's current affairs flagship, a three-hour set that seeks to establish the political agenda with interviews and discussions. Thought for the Day, broadcast at around 7.45 each morning, is supposed to offer some reflective relief from the normal cut and thrust. The slot, which began life in 1939 under the title Lift Up Your Hearts, was once almost exclusively Christian in its output but is now often occupied by representatives of other faiths. The BBC says it offers 'reflections from a faith perspective on issues and people in the news'. Clearly, it will be the opinion of the contributor but it must still conform to the non-partisan requirements of a public service broadcaster funded by licence-fee payers who don't have the luxury of getting their two minutes and 45 seconds on the air. Wednesday's Thought for the Day was given by a hitherto little-known refugee charity founder called Krish Kandiah. He proceeded to deliver a sustained attack on the Conservative front-bencher Robert Jenrick over a newspaper article about illegal immigration. He said the shadow justice secretary had fuelled 'fear of the stranger' by saying he did not want his children 'to share a neighbourhood with men from backward countries who broke into Britain illegally'. Mr Kandiah commented: 'The technical name for this is xenophobia.' Since the Government has asked a panel to produce a new definition of Islamophobia we can now see how it could be used by some to shut down legitimate points of view expressed in a newspaper. These segments on Today are scripted and screened in advance so how did this get through? It has subsequently been edited; but since no one who read it requested any changes we must infer they thought it contained nothing untoward. There is a set of assumptions that underpins far too much of the BBC's news output, ranging from welfare and the NHS to climate change and immigration. An in-built bias against anything that challenges lazy Left-of-centre nostrums suffocates broader debate on issues that matter to the great majority of listeners. The Thought for the Day fiasco is on a par with the failure to pull the live anti-Israeli ranting of rap group Bob Vylan during Glastonbury. Will the BBC ever learn, or is it simply incapable of doing so?
