These are the Edmonton Oilers who made the grade (and didn't) in 2025 The Stanley Cup Playoffs
Article content
Through the NHL regular season and The Stanley Cup Playoffs at The Cult of Hockey we assigned grades from 1-10 after each game to every Edmonton Oiler who played an official game.
In that spirit, this article assigns a final 'grade' to each man reflecting their over-all post-season performance. Peak performance is an 'A+'. And an 'F' is, obviously, a failing grade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
36 minutes ago
- National Post
Canucks: The ownership chatter is not going away
Article content The Griffiths' ownership era plays different from the Aquilinis'. Frank Griffiths bought the team with a partner in 1974, but controlled the team until 1988 when he handed it to his son Arthur, who expanded the family's sports holdings to include the Grizzlies and build what is now Rogers Arena. But as everyone knows, between building the arena, paying a higher-than-expected expansion fee to the NBA, plus the sagging Canadian dollar, Arthur Griffiths had over-extended himself and started running short on cash. So entered Seattle billionaire John McCaw and, for a time, his brother Bruce. Article content They were supposed to be silent partners, providing a needed cash injection at a moment when the team needed one. But the project stayed big and so did the expenses. By 1997, it was all over for Griffiths, who sold his remaining shares to McCaw, who, as the story goes, never really wanted to own the Canucks and Grizzlies. Seven years later, McCaw began to offload what was then called Orca Bay to the Aquilinis, a now infamous transaction that blindsided Tom Gaglardi and Ryan Beedie, who had originally been negotiating with McCaw. Francesco Aquilini was the third member of their trio, but he left those talks and, it turned out, cut a deal of his own in 2004. Article content Article content The Aquilinis took full control of the Canucks in 2006. The early years of their ownership carried much hope, and for a time, the Canucks were a leading light in the NHL. Article content Since the heights of the 2011 season, the Canucks have been on a downward slide. Fans remember what those days were like. They want them back. And they have come to dream of a new reality. Article content Article content Could the Aquilinis really sell, as these perpetuals rumours pre-suppose? It's highly doubtful. The arena and its adjacent towers are a high-value proposition, ones that bring big value to the family. It's hard to imagine them moving on — and their denial of looking to sell makes sense. Article content The arena is a big profit-maker for them, even if the building is aging and needs repairs. Concerts are lucrative. The Canucks have been a money-printing machine at times as well, although an expensive machine even when times were good. The team's huge increase in value has tracked well with Luigi Aquilini's guiding philosophy: 'There's no money in the sell, only in the buy.' In other words, look for value when you buy something, play the long game, sit on it, and watch it appreciate in value. Article content
National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Colby Cosh: Taxing away the Stanley Cup
The other day a U.S. news network emailed me to see if I wanted to do a radio interview about Canada's Stanley Cup drought, which, as you all know, has just had its 32nd birthday; I presume somebody has done the decent thing and gone out and bought it a nice terry-cloth bathrobe or perhaps a stylish quarter-zip. I begged off from the request, citing pathological gloom, and resumed staring at the ceiling, an activity I intend to resume after I've written a few hundred words here. Nice to be back, by the way: please don't ask how my little Oiler-fan break went. Article content Article content The email brought a thought I've often had back to the surface of my mind, like a hunk of strawberry in a smoothie. People often blame high Canadian taxation for our Stanley Cup crisis; in a league bound by a collectively bargained salary cap, U.S. states with low income taxes have an obvious advantage in attracting free-agent players, an advantage generally accompanied by nicer weather, prettier golf courses and other features of American economics and culture. Article content Article content Article content There can't be any doubt that this is a real contributing factor to the ongoing drought, although when I look at the roster of the victorious Florida Panthers I don't see the cruel talon of the taxman. Honesty requires me to report that Florida's just effing full of tough, capable players that other teams, mostly Canadian ones, flat-out gave up on and dealt away. Article content But this reminds you that the tax burden influences every level of a competitive business that is even a little bit complicated. When it comes to the effects of onerous Canadian taxes, it's relatively easy to see that a free-agent player facing near-equal contract offers is likely to be tempted by the lower-tax jurisdiction. And the thought that keeps recurring to me is: 'We could fix that part. We could fix it easily. We could fix it overnight.' Article content I'm frankly amazed that some banzai backbencher with ambitions hasn't picked up this flag — advocating a large, explicit tax cut for NHL players in Canada, with the stated goal of giving Canadian teams a positive advantage in contesting the Cup (which, you will surely recall, is morally and lawfully the property of the Canadian people and not the National Hockey League). Article content Oh, sure, our governments would be forgoing some tax revenue from a particular category of rich people that we have decided we want to encourage, reward and retain; I suppose we can't countenance that sort of thing, except when it comes to, say, the inclusion rate on capital-gains taxes paid by corporations and trusts. If a government wanted to give more favourable tax treatment to professional hockey players, it could probably do so in a shrewdly disguised way. But it might be smarter to do it openly: declare that we're not going to fight for the Cup with one hand tied behind our backs.
Edmonton Journal
7 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
These are the Edmonton Oilers who made the grade (and didn't) in 2025 The Stanley Cup Playoffs
Article content Through the NHL regular season and The Stanley Cup Playoffs at The Cult of Hockey we assigned grades from 1-10 after each game to every Edmonton Oiler who played an official game. In that spirit, this article assigns a final 'grade' to each man reflecting their over-all post-season performance. Peak performance is an 'A+'. And an 'F' is, obviously, a failing grade.
