logo
Harvard secures extension of court order blocking Trump's international student ban, World News

Harvard secures extension of court order blocking Trump's international student ban, World News

AsiaOne5 hours ago

BOSTON — A federal judge said on Monday (July 16) that she would issue a brief extension of an order temporarily blocking President Donald Trump's plan to bar foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard University while she decides whether to issue a longer-term injunction.
US District Judge Allison Burroughs, at the end of a hearing in Boston in Harvard's legal challenge to the restrictions, extended to June 23 a temporary restraining order that had been set to expire on Thursday. She said she wanted to give herself more time to prepare a ruling.
"We'll kick out an opinion as soon as we can," she said.
The judge scheduled the hearing after issuing a temporary restraining order on June 5 preventing the administration from implementing a proclamation that Trump had signed a day earlier. A preliminary injunction would provide longer-term relief to Harvard while its lawsuits proceeds.
Almost 6,800 international students attended Harvard in its most recent school year, making up about 27 per cent of the student population of the prestigious Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school.
The judge, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, did not indicate how she would ultimately rule. But she said a US Department of Justice attorney defending Trump's policy faced an "uphill battle" convincing her that Harvard would not be irreparably harmed if the proclamation was implemented.
Ian Gershengorn, the school's lawyer, told the judge the "impact of the proclamation is devastating to Harvard and its students."
He said Trump signed the proclamation to retaliate against Harvard in violation of its free speech rights under the US Constitution's First Amendment for refusing to accede to the administration's demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students.
Justice Department attorney Tiberius Davis countered that Congress had given Trump "sweeping authority" under the Immigration and Nationality Act to suspend the entry of specific categories of foreign nationals, which the president relied on to address national security concerns at Harvard.
"We don't trust them to host foreign students," Davis said.
The Trump administration has launched a multifront attack on the oldest and wealthiest US university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges.
Harvard has filed two separate lawsuits before Burroughs seeking to unfreeze around US$2.5 billion (S$3.2 billion) in funding and to prevent the administration from blocking the ability of international students to attend the university.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on May 22 announced that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification, the governmental mechanism that allows it to enroll foreign students.
Her action was almost immediately blocked by Burroughs. While the Department of Homeland Security has since shifted to challenging Harvard's certification through a months-long administrative process, Burroughs at a May 29 hearing said she planned to issue a "broad" injunction to maintain the status quo.
A week later, though, Trump signed his proclamation, which cited national security concerns to contend that Harvard is "no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programmes."
The proclamation suspended the entry of foreign nationals to study at Harvard or participate in exchange visitor programmes for an initial period of six months and directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to revoke visas of international students already enrolled at Harvard.
At Monday's hearing, Davis cited Harvard's acceptance of foreign money including from China and what he said was an inadequate response to the administration's demand for information on foreign students who engaged in illegal activity during a period of "increased unrest" on its campus as examples of those national security concerns.
Trump has accused Harvard of creating an unsafe environment for Jewish students and allowing antisemitism to fester on its campus. Protests over Israel's treatment of Palestinians during its war with Hamas in Gaza have roiled numerous universities' campuses, including Harvard's.
[[nid:718336]]

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Whither the G7 (now G6?) summit
Whither the G7 (now G6?) summit

Business Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Whither the G7 (now G6?) summit

WHAT is the G7– the elite grouping of advanced economies – good for? Conventional wisdom has it that this is about setting the economic direction for everyone else. Trade, international security, climate change and gender equality are core issues. This year, energy security, critical minerals supply and artificial intelligence are added to the list of topics. How the current meeting of leaders from the US, Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Japan in a small Canadian town square those lofty subjects with the situation that they actually find themselves in now is worth watching, even if only for its entertainment value. After all, before he left in a hurry, US President Donald Trump was briefly in a country that he wants to annex. He has also launched a pervasive trade war against all his allies there, as well as most of the world. He denies climate change and has no time for gender issues. On top of that, the leaders have to grapple with the Ukraine war, the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, and outbreak of another war between Israel and Iran. On every count, Trump's position, as the presumptive G7 leader, differs markedly from the rest. And now that the US president has left the meeting, presumably to handle the latest edition of the Middle East conflict, what can the others say that will make an iota of difference on these issues? At the end of two days of discussion, the G7 usually issues a statement. It typically outlines the consensus on issues raised, and provides a road map for how the summiteers intend to handle them. This time the host, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, seems to have decided that there will only be a summary from the chair. There is a good reason for his circumspection: At a previous G7 meeting in Canada in 2018, during Trump's first term, he refused to endorse the final communique, and described then host Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau as 'very dishonest and weak' in social media. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It is a tradition to invite some other world leaders to the talks. This time, the assemblage will hear from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, among others. The presence of these other leaders lends a veneer of inclusiveness. How much weight their inputs are given is open to debate. On the flip side, most of the invited guests had come with an eye to hold a bilateral meeting with Trump on the sidelines, which is no longer an option. China, the world's second-largest economy by one measure or the largest by another, has never been invited, but is likely to be the focus of talks. An earlier meeting of G7 finance ministers provides a pointer to where the current summit is likely to be heading. After that May meeting, a joint communique (yes, there was one) stated that the G7 would continue to monitor 'non-market policies and practices' which contribute to global trade imbalances. China was not named, but 'non-market policies' is the Western code used to refer to China's trade practices. The G7 represents 44 per cent of global gross domestic product, and its meetings showcase its status at the apex of the global economic hierarchy. But, as Trump's abrupt departure shows, not much else.

China accuses Trump of ‘pouring oil' on Iran, Israel conflict
China accuses Trump of ‘pouring oil' on Iran, Israel conflict

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

China accuses Trump of ‘pouring oil' on Iran, Israel conflict

China urged all parties to take immediate measures to de-escalate tensions, and prevent the conflict from expanding and spreading. PHOTO: AFP BEIJING - China on June 17 accused President Donald Trump of 'pouring oil' on the mounting conflict between Iran and Israel, after the US leader warned Tehran residents to 'immediately evacuate'. Following decades of enmity and a prolonged shadow war, Israel launched a surprise aerial campaign last week against targets across Iran, saying it aimed to prevent its arch-foe from acquiring atomic weapons – an ambition Tehran denies. The sudden flare-up in hostilities has sparked fears of a wider conflict, with Mr Trump urging Iran back to the negotiating table after Israel's attacks derailed ongoing nuclear talks. Mr Trump also issued an extraordinary warning on his Truth Social platform: 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Asked about Mr Trump's remarks, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said: 'Fanning the flames, pouring oil, making threats and mounting pressure will not help to promote the de-escalation of the situation, but will only intensify and widen the conflict. 'The Chinese side calls on all relevant parties, especially countries with special influence on Israel, to shoulder their responsibilities, take immediate measures to de-escalate tensions, and prevent the conflict from expanding and spreading.' China's embassy in Israel on June 17 also urged its citizens to leave the country 'as soon as possible', after Israel and Iran traded heavy strikes. 'The Chinese mission in Israel reminds Chinese nationals to leave the country as soon as possible via land border crossings, on the precondition that they can guarantee their personal safety,' the embassy said in a statement on WeChat. 'It is recommended to depart in the direction of Jordan,' it added. The embassy warned the conflict was 'continuing to escalate'. 'Much civilian infrastructure has been damaged, civilian casualties are on the rise, and the security situation is becoming more serious,' it said. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trust in news in Singapore higher than global average, ST is most trusted news brand: report
Trust in news in Singapore higher than global average, ST is most trusted news brand: report

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Trust in news in Singapore higher than global average, ST is most trusted news brand: report

Trust in news here has stayed consistent in the last eight years, and is up slightly from the 42 per cent recorded in 2017. PHOTO: ST FILE Trust in news in Singapore higher than global average, ST is most trusted news brand: report SINGAPORE - Singaporeans' trust in the news continues to be higher than the global average, while news avoidance behaviour remained low, according to an annual survey by the Reuters Institute. It also found that mainstream media outlets remained the most trusted news brands in Singapore, with The Straits Times coming out tops. The news organisation is trusted by 75 per cent of audiences here, followed by CNA with 74 per cent, and Channel 5 News with 73 per cent, among the 15 brands included in the survey for Singapore. The Digital News Report surveyed 100,000 people in 48 markets, including 2,014 people in Singapore, and found that 45 per cent here said they trust the news most of the time. This puts Singapore 15th worldwide, and 3rd in the Asia-Pacific region, behind Thailand (55 per cent) and Hong Kong (52 per cent). Trust in news here has stayed consistent in the last eight years, and is up slightly from the 42 per cent recorded in 2017. The survey found that overall trust in the news around the world has kept at 40 per cent for a third year in a row, which is still lower than the 44 per cent recorded in 2021 at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, news avoidance, which typically grows as trust declines, is at the highest level in this year's report by the Oxford-based institute. Worldwide, some 40 per cent of respondents said they sometimes or often avoid the news, up slightly from 39 per cent in 2024 and 29 per cent in 2017. The top reasons given by respondents around the world for avoiding news were the negative effect on mood, feeling worn out by the amount of news, and too much coverage of conflict and war. But the proportion of respondents in Singapore who said they sometimes or often avoid the news was 27 per cent, which was the fifth lowest of the 48 countries and territories surveyed. Places with the lowest news avoidance were Japan (11 per cent) and Taiwan (21 per cent), while those with the highest news avoidance were Bulgaria (63 per cent), Turkey and Croatia (61 per cent). The report noted that Singapore's legacy news brands had largely retained or improved their brand trust scores, while alternative and independent outlets still rank lower, partly due to their limited track record and emphasis on viral news. Audiences of all generations still prize trusted brands with a track record for accuracy, even if they do not use the brands as often as they once did, it added. The report found that around the world, trusted news brands are the ones that people most frequently turn to when they want to check whether a piece of news or information is true or false, along with official sources. This year's report included a question about what people do to gauge the veracity of a piece of information, and the biggest proportion of respondents (38 per cent) said they would first look to news outlets they trust, followed by official sources (35 per cent) and fact-checkers (25 per cent). In Singapore, ST and CNA were tied for the highest offline reach, with 33 per cent of respondents reporting that they used both outlets weekly. CNA was the most used online news source (47 per cent), followed by Mothership (46 per cent) and the ST website (41 per cent). Online and social media remain the most common ways of accessing news in Singapore, while both TV and print have declined significantly over the last few years. Whatsapp (33 per cent) remained as the top social media network people turned to for news in Singapore, though platforms such as YouTube (32 per cent), Instagram (24 per cent) and TikTok (18 per cent) have grown in popularity as news sources compared to the year before. Data for the report was gathered by research firm YouGov through an online questionnaire, with sampling designed to be nationally representative by age, gender, and region. The Reuters Institute said that for countries with lower internet penetration, the results should be interpreted as representative of the online population rather than the national population. The institute also cautioned that its use of a non-probability sampling approach meant it was not possible to compute a conventional margin of error, and that small differences are very unlikely to be statistically significant. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store