Ireland sees record number of abortions as figures reach over 10,000
Figures released by the Department of Health this week reveal that 10,852 terminations were carried out across the country in 2024.
This is a marked increase on the 8,156 abortions reported in 2022.
The majority of the terminations were early medical abortions, involving the use of tablets prescribed by a doctor within the first couple of months of pregnancy.
A small percentage were carried out due to fatal foetal abnormalities, risk to the life of the mother or emergency medical interventions.
The report further revealed that of the women who had terminations 4,125 were based in Dublin, followed by 957 in Cork, 507 in Galway, and 441 in Limerick.
A total of 450 women did not disclose their county, and eight women travelled from Northern Ireland for an abortion.
The Department of Health's annual report also noted that the highest number of terminations occurred in January, followed closely by May.
Dr. Shirley McQuade, medical director of the Well Woman Centre, expressed surprise at the scale of the increase, suggesting that factors beyond population growth may be at play.
She pointed to the availability of free contraception for women aged 17 to 35 and said that while contraceptive failure is possible, it's generally rare.
The use of online consultations, introduced during the pandemic, has also made access to abortion services easier.
One of the two required doctor appointments can now take place over the phone or by video.
Meanwhile, the number of Irish women travelling to Britain for abortions has dropped dramatically from 2,879 in 2018 to just 201 in 2022.
In 2022, 63 percent of these British and Northern Ireland based abortions fell under 'Ground C,' a legal provision allowing termination if continuing the pregnancy poses a greater risk to a woman's physical or mental health than ending it.
That figure rose from 50 percent the previous year.
Abortions under 'Ground E,' which covers cases involving serious foetal issues, dropped from 50 to 37 percent.
While Ireland's abortion numbers continue to rise, Britain is undergoing its most important reform of abortion law in nearly six decades.
In a landmark vote last month, the House of Commons approved legislation that decriminalises self-managed abortions in England and Wales.
The new law ensures that no woman can be investigated, prosecuted or imprisoned for ending her own pregnancy - regardless of how far along she is.
Previously, women who took abortion pills later in pregnancy faced criminal charges.
The most high-profile example of this was Nicola Parker, who was arrested and jailed after taking medication at home at around 26 weeks, mistakenly believing she was only six weeks pregnant.
She was ultimately acquitted, but her case sparked widespread criticism of Britain's outdated abortion laws.
MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who championed the reform, told Parliament that the new law is about support, not criminalisation, and called the previous rules 'outdated' and 'Victorian.'
However, critics argue the reform doesn't go far enough.
Abortions in clinical settings must still be approved by two doctors, and medical professionals who assist in late-term abortions could still be prosecuted.
A broader amendment to fully decriminalise abortion and enshrine it as a legal right was blocked from a vote, leading MP Stella Creasy to call it a missed opportunity.
The new law still requires approval from the House of Lords but is expected to pass.
Because of the UK's devolved system of government, the legislation will apply only to England and Wales, with Scotland and Northern Ireland maintaining their own abortion rules.
These reforms are the biggest change to British abortion policy since the 1967 Abortion Act.
Similarly, Ireland has also been facing calls to reform their laws, seven years after legalisation.
A Department of Health commissioned review led by barrister Marie O'Shea recommended several changes, including removing the mandatory three-day waiting period, eliminating potential criminal sanctions for doctors and clarifying what constitutes a fatal foetal abnormality.
The Oireachtas health committee supported these reforms, but the current Programme for Government has not committed to implementing them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
8 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
‘Stop using' alert to Irish parents as popular children's items sold in Next recalled over choking & strangulation fears
AN urgent warning has been issued to Irish parents after several children's clothing items were recalled over choking and strangulation fears. The affected kids clothes, made by the brand Miss, were sold online through 3 The items pose a possible risk of choking or strangulation Credit: CCPC 3 Parents have been warned to stop using immediately Credit: CCPC Miss dresses, knitted top, shorts and headband outfits were included in the The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission alerted parents of the recall due to choking and strangulation concerns today. The affected items have been found to feature excessively long decorative cords. According to READ MORE IN MONEY The products do not meet the required The CCPC said: "Jainco UK Limited is carrying out a recall of Miss Dresses and Knitted Top, Shorts and Headband Outfit Set. "The product poses a strangulation and choking hazard due to excessively long decorative cords that do not comply with safety standards." The affected products were sold online via retailer Next Retail Limited. Most read in The Irish Sun There are approximately 11 affected products in the Republic of Ireland. The brand is Miss and the item numbers are F83773, F83782, F83775, F83781 and F85623. Aldi urgently recalls £3.29 freezer essential over dangerous disease that affects 1 in 100 of Brits The CCPC said that parents should keep their And they said buyers can contact Next Ireland for a refund. They added: "If you purchased one of these products, please discontinue use immediately and keep it out of the reach of children. "If customers have given any of these items as a gift, please ask the recipient to dispose of the item safely. "Please contact Next Ireland to arrange a refund." It comes after a The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission issued the recall due to safety concerns. REGULATIONS The Hedkayse Rugby Headguard has been recalled due to non-compliance with the essential It is understood there are approximately 3 affected products in the Republic of Ireland. The brand is Hedkayse and the model is R1 Youth/Adult. The CCPC said: "Hedkayse Limited are carrying out a recall of Hedkayse Rugby Headguard. "The product has been recalled due to failure to demonstrate conformity assessment, invalid CE marking affixed and non-compliance with the essential health and safety requirements of the PPE Regulations. "The brand is Hedkayse. The model is R1 Youth/Adult." They continued: "Customers should stop using the product immediately. "Hedkayse asks customers to contact them at info@ to discuss a product recall/replacement service." 3 Some children's clothes sold via Next's online platform have been issued a recall Credit: Reuters
Irish Independent
9 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Irish linked study reveals why working a four-day week is good for your health
That's according to a study of workers in the USA, UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Ireland reported in Nature Human Behaviour. Up to now, research conducted into the benefits of four-day weeks had been mostly done on a single case basis, rather than across sectors or countries. The researchers involved were based in Boston College, the University of Cambridge and included Orla Kelly, Professor in Social Policy at UCD. Prof Kelly's research shows, she said that most organisations that have implement a four day week on a trial basis, continue after the trial ends. 'Organisations' choice to keep this new working model supports employees' subjective assessment of productivity gains,' said Prof Kelly 'Irish companies were actually among the first cohort to participate in the trials, said Wen Fan, Associate Professor of Sociology at Boston College, who was first author on the paper. 'In February 2022, 12 companies out of the 16 companies in the very first cohort were from Ireland and trials were supported by Forsa trade union.' 'In terms of industry composition, the largest group comes from the administrative, IT and telecom sectors.' In the study, workers said their job satisfaction and work performance had increased and fatigue and sleep problems decreased with a four-day week. The findings highlight the potential for organisations to improve the well-being of employees by reducing workplace hours, said the researchers. Trial results The scientists ran six month trials involving 2,896 employees in 141 organisations across seven English speaking countries, including Ireland. They compared work and health related indicators - such as burnout, job satisfaction, and mental health– before and after the intervention. The researchers also compared these results with the data generated from 285 employees at 12 companies that did not introduce a four-day week. Employees who had eight or more hours shaved off their working week, reported larger reductions in burnout and improvements in mental health compared to workers at companies who kept a five-day working week. There were similar, but smaller, effects seen for workers that had 1-4 or 5-7 hour reductions in their working week. The benefits, the researchers state, can be at least partially explained by less sleeping problems and fatigue, and improved individual work ability. Stress, burnout, fatigue and work-family conflict declined, as did the numbers experiencing sleep deprivation. Employees used the day off for hobbies, household work, grooming and increased the time they spent exercising. 'We have large well-being improvements over a range of metrics,' said Professor Wen. 'We find that the bigger the worktime reduction in hours, the bigger the well-being increase,' said Prof Wen. The researchers are calling for more future, randomised studies on worktime reductions, and possibly government sponsored trials. 'One of the most pressing questions is how worktime reduction can be scaled to non-office-based jobs where productivity gains are less tangible,' said Prof Kelly. 'A good first step would be for the government to provide support for a trial among these sectors to better understand how this opportunity to work less for the same pay can be universalised,' she added.
Irish Examiner
13 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Superbugs could kill millions more and cost $2tn a year by 2050, study shows
Superbugs could cause millions more people to die worldwide and cost the global economy just under $2tn a year by 2050, modelling shows. A British government-funded study shows that without concerted action, increased rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) could lead to global annual GDP losses of $1.7tn over the next quarter of a century. The research, by the Center for Global Development thinktank, found the US, British and EU economies would be among the hardest hit, prompting accusations that recent swingeing aid cuts are self-defeating. The Trump administration has confirmed $9bn in cuts to its foreign aid budget, while a number of European countries have also reduced spending on overseas aid. Anthony McDonnell, the lead author of the research and a policy fellow at the Center for Global Development, said: 'When we conducted our research on the economic impacts of antimicrobial resistance, it was anticipated that resistance rates would continue to follow historical trends. 'However, the sudden cuts to Official Development Assistance by the US, which has cut its aid spend by roughly 80%; the UK, which has announced aid cuts from 0.5% to 0.3% of gross national income; and substantial reductions by France, Germany, and others, could drive up resistance rates in line with the most pessimistic scenario in our research. 'Even countries that have been successful in keeping AMR rates under control cannot afford to be complacent. Unless AMR programmes are protected from aid cuts, resistance rates across the world will likely increase at a rate in line with the worst-affected countries. This would result in millions more people dying worldwide, including across G7 nations. Investing in treatment for bacterial infections now will save lives and deliver billions in long-term economic returns. The research calculated the economic and health burden of antibiotic resistance for 122 countries and forecast that in this most pessimistic scenario, by 2050, GDP losses in China could reach just under $722bn a year, the US $295.7bn, the EU $187bn, Japan $65.7bn and Britain $58.6bn. According to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), deaths from AMR are expected to increase 60% by 2050, with 1.34 million people in the US and 184,000 in Britain alone predicted to die each year from antibiotic-resistant bugs, while numbers of those becoming seriously ill from drug-resistant bacteria are also expected to jump. Superbugs increase the number of hospital admissions and lead to longer and more intensive hospital stays, costlier second-line treatments and more complex care, meaning resistant infections are roughly twice as expensive to treat as those for which antibiotics are effective. The study estimates global health costs of treating AMR could increase by just under $176bn a year. Higher rates of resistant bugs would also shrink the British, EU and US workforces by 0.8%, 0.6% and 0.4% respectively, the study found. The Guardian
