logo
Thousands could be due car insurance compensation over ‘unfair' claims as Admiral sets aside £50m

Thousands could be due car insurance compensation over ‘unfair' claims as Admiral sets aside £50m

Scottish Sun2 days ago
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THOUSANDS of drivers could be owed compensation after being underpaid by their car insurer, as Admiral has set aside £50m to cover claims.
A review of the 12 biggest car insurers by the City watchdog last March found some customers were being offered settlements worth less than their car's value when making a claim on stolen or written-off vehicles.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Admiral has set aside £50million to compensate customers who may have been affected by the overpayments
Credit: Alamy
Admiral has now become the first insurer to set aside cash to compensate customers who may have been impacted.
In its half-year results on Thursday, the company admitted to failing to respond quickly enough to rising used car prices when settling claims.
Admiral customers who made a claim on a stolen or written-off vehicle between 2019 and 2025 will be contacted by the company if they're owed compensation, the FCA said.
It's expected that other insurance firms will follow suit in announcing their redress plans.
When drivers claim on their car insurance where their vehicle is written off or stolen, they should be offered a payout equivalent to the fair market value of their car.
This is the amount their car should have been worth at the time it was stolen or damaged.
The FCA looked at the 12 biggest car insurers, which it said make up around 70% of the total market.
The watchdog said it had since set clearer expectations for how these sorts of claims should be handled in the future.
An FCA spokesperson said: 'We're pleased that Admiral is acting on our findings to put things right for its customers.
'Customers should wait to be contacted by Admiral and we're working with the firm to make sure that those affected get compensation if they're due it.'
Supreme Court blow for finance compensation
Admiral boss Milena Mondini de Focatiis said just 3% of motor loss claimants had been affected, adding that it was of "paramount importance" for the claims to be handled fairly.
The company said it would begin contacting impacted customers during H2 2025.
Admiral, which has 9.3million customers in the UK, reported strong first-half results this week.
This was led by growth in its motor insurance business, where profits leapt 56 per cent year-on-year.
The FTSE 100-listing said pre-tax profit rose 67% to £516.1 million in the six months to June 30 from £309.8 million the year prior.
It comes after the Supreme Court ruled last month that millions fewer drivers will be entitled to compensation over "hidden commission" payments in a landmark case.
The decision avoided a major headache for chancellor Rachel Reeves, as a major financial redress scheme for victims is no longer needed.
However, millions of drivers are still in line to get up to £950 in compensation for car finance loans.
The City watchdog is set to launch a refund scheme for motorists stung by 'hidden' commission payments, with up to £18billion expected to be paid out as early as next year.
In 2023, Direct Line was forced to pay out £30million in compensation to customers after they were overcharged.
The redress involved home and car policyholders who were charged more than new customers after renewing their policies, which broke rules introduced by the FCA in 2022.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chancellor could hike cost of everything from alcohol to pizza and gambling
Chancellor could hike cost of everything from alcohol to pizza and gambling

Daily Mirror

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Chancellor could hike cost of everything from alcohol to pizza and gambling

Rachel Reeves may use new 'sin taxes' to increase how much you have to pay for cigarettes, junk food, chocolate and booze Rachel Reeves is set to hit British consumers with extra 'sin taxes', leading forecasters have predicted, which are widely seen as regressive taxes that could hit people on lower incomes. The Chancellor faces having to raise £20bn in taxes at this year's Autumn Budget to restore her 'already paltry' margin of £9.9bn in headroom, according to Pantheon Macroenomics. ‌ Its UK economists Robert Wood and Elliott Jordan-Doak said the costs incurred from U-turns on welfare savings and lower tax receipts than expected could erode her fiscal buffer. They said Reeves could look to sin taxes, which could include adding levies on gambling and junk food, to rebuild her buffer while a 'stealth tax' by extending a freeze on income tax thresholds could help her fill an estimated £13bn fiscal hole. ‌ Axing the two child benefit cap, which would cost around £3.2bn, and a move to pull a rabbit out of the hat at the Budget could lead to higher costs for the government. ‌ With the backing of the progressive think tank Institute for Public Policy Research, Former Prime Minister and Chancellor Gordon Brown argued increasing levies on online casinos and slots machines to 50 per cent could get the Treasury enough to cover the costs of scrapping the cap. Other 'sin' taxes beyond gambling may include higher duties on tobacco, alcohol or sugar, as well as junk food. The government has already moved to reduce sales of junk food by adding to red tape on supermarkets on healthy food standards. Charities and health groups including Diabetes UK and the World Cancer Research Fund have previously called for higher levies on soft drinks and salty food. Some duties rise with inflation but Rachel Reeves could move to raise taxes higher. The government has also opened consultations on proposals to end the exemption from sugar taxes on milk-based drinks, suggesting that milkshakes and lattes could be subject to higher taxes. The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), a free market think tank, has described sin taxes as regressive as they take a 'greater share of income from the poor than from the rich in all plausible scenarios'. ‌ Christopher Snowdon, head of lifestyle economics at the IEA, said: 'The sugar tax has been such a dramatic failure that it should be repealed, not expanded. It has been costing consumers £300 million a year while childhood obesity rates have continued to rise.' Tobacco companies have meanwhile argued that the existence of a tax gap worth £1.4bn between 2023 and 2024, which shows the difference between the tax paid to HMRC versus the tax that should be paid based on consumption, is evidence of a booming black market for cigarettes and tobacco. The alternative option for Rachel Reeves would be to adjust fiscal rules by bringing forward a rule, which is set to come in 2027, that allows her to have a forecast deficit of 0.5 per cent of GDP in day-to-day government spending, according to Pantheon Macroeconomics. This change could allow her to build £17bn in headroom but it could spook bond traders due to the impact of higher borrowing and her betrayal of 'non-negotiable' rules.

Millions will have to pay more in Rachel Reeves inheritance tax plan
Millions will have to pay more in Rachel Reeves inheritance tax plan

Daily Mirror

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Millions will have to pay more in Rachel Reeves inheritance tax plan

The changes will mean you lose more of your estate when you pass it on to the next generation Rachel Reeves is reportedly exploring measures to increase revenue from inheritance tax by tightening gift rules, a move that may disproportionately affect the middle class. The Guardian has reported the Treasury, ahead of the Autumn Budget, is considering tightening the rules surrounding the use of gifts of money to circumvent IHT. ‌ Currently, cash gifts are exempt from tax as long as they are made more than seven years prior to the person's death. Then, gifts made within three to seven years are taxed based on how close the recipient is to death. This move comes as Reeves is seeking to gather £50bn in new taxes before her next Budget to avoid breaking the government's fiscal rules. ‌ Gifting is a legitimate form of inheritance tax planning, not just for the super-rich, but also for middle-income taxpayers, explained a lawyer. Duncan Mitchell-Innes, partner and deputy head of private client at TWM Solicitors, said: 'Gifting assets is a legitimate and long-established way for middle-income households to reduce IHT, it's not a complex tax scheme reserved for the super-rich.' ‌ According to HMRC inheritance tax data for 2020/21, families gave away over £2.1bn in cash gifts each year to reduce their IHT bills. However, the rumoured move may disproportionately affect middle-class families than ultra-high net worth individuals. 'This is because their wealth is often less diversified, thus presenting fewer options for how to make tax-efficient gifts from it,' Mitchell-Innes explained. He highlighted that people have expectations that they are free to give away their assets as they wish. 'The rumoured changes are causing people concern that their freedom to engage in prudent and sensible estate planning may be severely curtailed,' he added. If the rules are changed, middle-class families will be more exposed, 'as many ultra-high-net-worth individuals are very mobile and can restructure or relocate to mitigate tax exposure, perhaps more easily than most middle-class families.'

DWP State Pension age could rise to 70 as people will have to work longer
DWP State Pension age could rise to 70 as people will have to work longer

Wales Online

time40 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

DWP State Pension age could rise to 70 as people will have to work longer

DWP State Pension age could rise to 70 as people will have to work longer The UK state pension age is currently 66, rising to 67 by 2028 - but the Chancellor has said a review into raising the state pension age is needed to ensure the system is "sustainable and affordable" Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves (Image: 2025 Getty Images) Specialists suggest the State Pension age could be poised to increase to 70 years old, forcing individuals to work considerably longer before they can retire. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has indicated that an examination into raising the state pension age is necessary to guarantee the system remains "sustainable and affordable". ‌ The Government assessment is scheduled to report in March 2029 and Ms Reeves stated it was "right" to examine the age at which individuals can claim the state pension as life expectancy grows. ‌ The state pension age currently stands at 66, climbing to 67 by 2028 and the Government is legally obligated to regularly assess the age. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here ‌ Speaking to Newspage, Samuel Mather-Holgate, an independent financial adviser at Mather and Murray Financial, said: "The state pension system is ripe for squeezing, so an increase to the state pension age is coming down the tracks, probably to 70. Changing the triple lock would save a fortune, but it would be politically difficult as the older generation votes." The pension scheme consumes nearly 5% of the UK's GDP and this figure is anticipated to climb to almost 8% over the next 50 years. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) cautioned that the expense will surpass earlier projections by £10billion annually. A Government assessment of the state pension age will be released in 2027. Unions have warned that any rise in the pension age could trigger strikes, reports Lancs Live. Article continues below Eddie Dempsey, the general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union, stated: "The UK state pension is already one of the worst in the entire developed world, which is a direct result of decades of governments transferring both our national and personal wealth to the super rich. "Any decision to squeeze more out of working people by forcing us to work even longer would be a national disgrace." He added: "Our members work in physically demanding, round-the-clock, safety-critical jobs. Many already struggle to reach retirement in good health, especially shift workers. ‌ "Raising the pension age even further isn't just cruel and unnecessary, it's a slap in the face to the very people who keep this country running. If this government makes any move to drastically increase the retirement age, we intend to lead our movement onto the streets and will not hesitate to protest nationally and take co-ordinated direct action." In response, a Government spokesperson said: "Supporting pensioners is a top priority, and thanks to our commitment to the triple lock, millions will see their yearly state pension rise by up to £1,900 by the end of this parliament. We have also run the biggest-ever campaign to boost pension credit take-up, with nearly 60,000 extra pensioner households being awarded the benefit, worth on average around £4,300 a year. "But we know there is a real risk that tomorrow's pensioners will be poorer than today's, which is why we are reviving the Pension Commission, to tackle the barriers that stop too many people from saving." Article continues below

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store