US government review found no evidence of widespread Hamas theft of Gaza aid
Federal agenciesFacebookTweetLink
Follow
An internal US government review found no evidence of widespread theft by Hamas of US-funded humanitarian aid in Gaza, contradicting the State Department's claims that were used to justify backing a controversial private organization that took over aid distribution in the enclave.
The analysis, conducted by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), looked into 156 incidents of waste, fraud, and abuse reported by partner organizations between October 2023 and May 2025.
The review of the incidents, which was first reported by Reuters, 'found no affiliations' with sanctioned groups or foreign terrorist organizations, according to a presentation seen by CNN.
'There was no indication that there was a systemic loss due to Hamas interference or theft or diversion,' a source familiar with the report told CNN.
The Trump administration has repeatedly claimed there is widespread theft of humanitarian aid by Hamas. They have said that only the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF), a private US and Israel-backed organization, is able to distribute assistance to the besieged enclave without such theft occurring.
'We want to see as much aid getting into Gaza as possible in a way that is not being looted by Hamas, and this mechanism, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, has been a way to do that,' State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott said Thursday. 'We're calling for additional support of that foundation to deliver that aid.'
The USAID findings were presented to officials working in the State Department's Middle East bureau, as well as people working on humanitarian aid and the USAID Office of the Inspector General. USAID ceased operations on July 1 and some of its work was transferred to the State Department. However, the USAID watchdog remains operational. It is unclear if the findings have been relayed to State Department leadership.
More than 1,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces while seeking aid, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry and the United Nations, with 60% killed while trying to reach GHF sites. Thousands are suffering from malnutrition and more than a dozen people have starved to death this week amid ongoing Israeli restrictions on aid.
A State Department spokesperson claimed there is 'endless video evidence of Hamas looting' and 'intelligence' showing that 'a significant portion of non-GHF aid trucks have been diverted, looted, stolen, or 'self-distributed.'' The spokesperson did not provide examples of the video evidence. They also accused aid workers of lying about looting 'in a poor attempt at an aid corruption coverup.'
'As the situation on the ground develops, we will continue to assess the most effective way to deliver aid to the people of Gaza,' the spokesperson said.
The USAID analysis, which was completed in late June, noted that 'the majority of incidents could not be definitively attributed to a specific actor.'
'Partners often largely discovered that commodities had been stolen in transit without identifying the perpetrator,' the presentation said.
Given the perpetrator could not be identified, it is possible that Hamas has stolen aid, two sources said. However, they cast doubt on the idea that there would be systemic theft without any evidence. Humanitarian officials in the past have also said they did not experience widespread diversion.
One of the sources noted that USAID does not vet the beneficiaries of its aid, so in theory, the families of Hamas government officials in Gaza could have received aid, 'but that's not an armed faction of Hamas. That's the population of Gaza.'
The USAID analysis found that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) 'was either directly or indirectly responsible for the loss' of US-provided aid in 28% of incidents of theft or waste between October 2023 and May 2025. The finding was based on the reports from partners organizations.
According to a presentation of the analysis, this included the loss of goods due to 'airstrikes, evacuation orders, or IDF direction to use high risk delivery routes against partner requests.'
'Partners often noted that looting occurred en route (to distribution sites) despite extensive coordination with the IDF,' the presentation said. 'When partners desired to take alternate routes due to high risk of theft or looting, they were forced by the IDF to take riskier routes with known threats putting commodities at risk.'
CNN has reached out to the IDF for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas just banned smartphones at school. I regret ever buying my kids one.
I have a love-hate relationship with my kids' smartphones. So I was relieved when I saw that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott recently signed legislation that bans cell phones in public schools. School starts soon for us, and as a parent with children who have had phones at school, I'm glad to see the ban go into effect this 2025-26 school year. 'Educators and researchers have raised concerns about the impact that smartphones have on student learning and student engagement,' Abbott said. 'Experts have explained that smartphones and social media affect the mental health of children. If we are going to be number one in education, it is going to require the undivided attention of our students in the classroom.' In my kids' district, elementary and middle school students previously have been discouraged from using phones. But high school students were allowed to use them in class. In fact, it seemed as if some teachers encouraged cell phone use for schoolwork. I would receive texts from my kids at school about all manner of things and an occasional email from a teacher that one of my children had been on their phone when they were supposed to be listening. Some parents have concerns about whether their children would be able to reach them during emergencies. I hope they still can. But I also hope that schools remain firm in enforcing the new state policy. If students cannot arbitrarily access their phones during school hours, it will be a net good for everyone. States banning phones in schools is a growing trend Texas joins more than a dozen states that have enacted bans on phones. More states have some kind of anti-cell phones in school policy than don't. In 2023, Florida banned phones in middle and elementary schools, with looser restrictions in high schools. Now Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin has signed a bill that requires "bell-to-bell" cell phone-free classrooms in public K–12 schools. New York has a similar policy. Opinion newsletter: Sign up for our newsletter on conservative values, family and religion from columnist Nicole Russell. Get it delivered to your inbox. Most educators agree with these measures, perhaps because they've seen firsthand the problems with kids having phones. According to Pew Research Center's 2024 polling data, 72% of high school teachers say phone distractions are a major problem. A June 2025 Pew poll found that 74% of U.S. adults say they support banning middle and high school students from using phones during class, up from 68% the prior year. Opinion: School cell phone bans are a distraction. The real crisis isn't in your kid's hand. Smartphones are a land mine for kids, parents and educators As a parent, phones have been more of a land mine than I thought they would be. I was cautious at first about their use, but I also could see the practical benefits, especially for logistics. What if my child needs to be picked up from practice early? What if my child needs to contact me while at a friend's house? But smartphones also open a world of issues I couldn't have predicted when I purchased them for my older children years ago. I now regret that I did − and not even because of the worst dangers such as online predators. Opinion: My 4-year-old asked for a smartphone. Here's what I did next as a parent. One of the hardest things to combat is how phones rewire kids' brains, so that they crave 24/7 access to the internet for entertainment and connecting with friends. Few things can capture a kid's attention faster than a notification on their phone. Even with house rules in place, it's an ongoing matter of discussion and tension. Using phones at school exacerbates the problems. But bans on the use of smartphones at school give me hope that students will begin to connect with the real world. Research backs this up. In an Aug. 4 article in The Atlantic, "What Kids Told Us About How to Get Them Off Their Phones," writers Lenore Skenazy, Zach Rausch and Jonathan Haidt noted that many children have more freedom to roam virtual worlds than the real one we inhabit. But deep down, the writers conclude, children want and need real-life interactions. Without phones in school, students are more likely to socialize with their peers. They're more likely to have real experiences and make real friends. And that's better for educators, parents and kids. Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Should schools ban phones? As a parent, I'm all for it | Opinion
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Al Jazeera correspondent among journalists killed in Gaza City air strike
Israel's military has targeted a prominent Al Jazeera correspondent with an air strike, killing him, another journalist and at least six other people. Anas al-Sharif and his Al Jazeera colleague Mohamed Qureiqa were among those killed while sheltering outside the Gaza City Hospital complex late on Sunday. Officials at Shifa Hospital confirmed the deaths and said the strike also killed four other journalists and two other people. It also damaged the entrance to the hospital complex's emergency building. Israel's military described Mr al-Sharif as the leader of a Hamas cell – an allegation that Al Jazeera and Mr al-Sharif had previously dismissed as baseless. The incident marked the first time during the war that Israel's military has swiftly claimed responsibility after a journalist was killed in a strike. It came less than a year after Israeli army officials first accused Mr al-Sharif and other Al Jazeera journalists of being members of the militant groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. In a July 24 video, Israel's army spokesman Avichay Adraee attacked Al Jazeera and accused Mr al-Sharif of being part of Hamas's military wing. Al Jazeera called the strike a 'targeted assassination' and accused Israeli officials of incitement, connecting Mr al-Sharif's death to the allegations that both the broadcaster and correspondent had denied. 'Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people,' Al Jazeera said in a statement. Mr al-Sharif reported a nearby bombardment minutes before his death. In a social media post that Al Jazeera said was written to be posted in case of his death, he bemoaned the devastation and destruction that war had wrought and bid farewell to his wife, son and daughter. 'I never hesitated for a single day to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification,' the 28-year-old wrote. The journalists are the latest to be killed in what observers have called the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern times. The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that at least 186 have been killed in Gaza. Mr al-Sharif began reporting for Al Jazeera a few days after war broke out. He was known for reporting on Israel's bombardment in northern Gaza, and later for the starvation gripping much of the territory's population. In a July broadcast he cried on air as a woman behind him collapsed from hunger. 'I am talking about slow death of those people,' he said at the time. Al Jazeera is blocked in Israel and soldiers raided its offices in the occupied West Bank last year, ordering them to close. Mr al-Sharif's death comes weeks after the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said Israel had targeted him with a smear campaign. 'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' Sara Qudah, the group's regional director, said.
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Israeli strike kills Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif as toll on journalists in Gaza worsens
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel's military targeted an Al Jazeera correspondent with an airstrike Sunday, killing him, another network journalist and at least six other people, all of whom were sheltering outside the Gaza City Hospital complex. Officials at Shifa Hospital said those killed included Al Jazeera correspondents Anas al-Sharif and Mohamed Qureiqa. The strike also killed four other journalists and two other people, hospital administrative director Rami Mohanna told The Associated Press. The strike also damaged the entrance to the hospital complex's emergency building. Both Israel and hospital officials in Gaza City confirmed the deaths, which press advocates described as retribution against those documenting the war in Gaza. Israel's military later Sunday described al-Sharif as the leader of a Hamas cell — an allegation that Al Jazeera and al-Sharif had previously dismissed as baseless. The incident marked the first time during the war that Israel's military has swiftly claimed responsibility after a journalist was killed in a strike. It came less than a year after Israeli army officials first accused al-Sharif and other Al Jazeera journalists of being members of the militant groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad. In a July 24 video, Israel's army spokesperson Avichay Adraee attacked Al Jazeera and accused al-Sharif of being part of Hamas' military wing. Al Jazeera calls strike 'assassination' Al Jazeera called the strike 'targeted assassination' and accused Israeli officials of incitement, connecting al-Sharif's death to the allegations that both the network and correspondent had denied. 'Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people,' the Qatari network said in a statement. Apart from rare invitations to observe Israeli military operations, international media have been barred from entering Gaza for the duration of the war. Al Jazeera is among the few outlets still fielding a big team of reporters inside the besieged strip, chronicling daily life amid airstrikes, hunger and the rubble of destroyed neighborhoods. The network has suffered heavy losses during the war, including 27-year-old correspondent Ismail al-Ghoul and cameraman Rami al-Rifi, killed last summer, and freelancer Hossam Shabat, killed in an Israeli airstrike in March. Like al-Sharif, Shabat was among the six that Israel accused of being members of militant groups last October. Funeral-goers call to protect journalists Hundreds of people, including many journalists, gathered Monday to mourn al-Sharif, Qureiqa and their colleagues. The bodies lay wrapped in white sheets at Gaza City's Shifa Hospital complex. Ahed Ferwana of the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate said reporters were being deliberately targeted and urged the international community to act. Al-Sharif reported a nearby bombardment minutes before his death. In a social media post that Al Jazeera said was written to be posted in case of his death, he bemoaned the devastation and destruction that war had wrought and bid farewell to his wife, son and daughter. 'I never hesitated for a single day to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification,' the 28-year-old wrote. The journalists are the latest to be killed in what observers have called the deadliest conflict for journalists in modern times. The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that at least 186 have been killed in Gaza, and Brown University's Watson Institute in April said the war was 'quite simply, the worst ever conflict for reporters.' Al-Sharif began reporting for Al Jazeera a few days after war broke out. He was known for reporting on Israel's bombardment in northern Gaza, and later for the starvation gripping much of the territory's population. Qureiqa, a 33-year-old Gaza City native, is survived by two children. Both journalists were separated from their families for months earlier in the war. When they managed to reunite during the ceasefire earlier this year, their children appeared unable to recognize them, according to video footage they posted at the time. In a July broadcast al-Sharif cried on air as woman behind him collapsed from hunger. 'I am taking about slow death of those people,' he said at the time. Al Jazeera is blocked in Israel and soldiers raided its offices in the occupied West Bank last year, ordering them closed. Al-Sharif's death comes weeks after a U.N. expert and the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists said Israel had targeted him with a smear campaign. Irene Khan, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, on July 31 said that the killings were 'part of a deliberate strategy of Israel to suppress the truth, obstruct the documentation of international crimes and bury any possibility of future accountability.' The Committee to Protect Journalists said on Sunday that it was appalled by the strike. 'Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom,' Sara Qudah, the group's regional director, said in a statement.
