child damages multi-million-pound rothko painting at rotterdam museum
Listen to article
A painting by renowned American artist Mark Rothko, valued at up to €50 million (£42.5 million), has been damaged by a child at the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam.
The artwork, "Grey, Orange on Maroon, No. 8", suffered superficial scratches during what the museum described as an 'unguarded moment'.
A spokesperson for the museum confirmed that small scratches are visible in the lower, unvarnished portion of the canvas. The piece had been on public display in the Depot, the museum's accessible storage facility.
'We are currently researching the next steps for the treatment of the painting,' the spokesperson said. 'Conservation expertise has been sought both in the Netherlands and internationally.'
Despite the damage, the museum remains hopeful. 'We expect that the work will be able to be shown again in the future,' the spokesperson added.
Sophie McAloone, conservation manager at the Fine Art Restoration Company, noted that Rothko's "modern unvarnished" paintings are particularly fragile. 'Even the smallest areas of damage are instantly perceptible,' she said.
"In this case, scratching of the upper paint layers can have a significant impact on the viewing experience of the piece," Ms McAloone said.
Jonny Helm a market manager at the art restorers Plowden & Smith said the incident raises concerns for UK institutions considering more open-access displays. 'How will this event affect other UK institutions who are opening up their archives in the same way?' he asked.
Helm added that restoring a Rothko is no easy feat. 'His mixture of pigments, resins and glues were quite complex. The lack of varnish makes it more vulnerable.'
The incident echoes a previous case in 2012 when another Rothko painting, "Black on Maroon", was defaced at Tate Modern. The vandal, Wlodzimierz Umaniec, was sentenced to two years in prison, and it took 18 months and roughly £200,000 to restore the work.
The current damage is less severe, but experts acknowledge that even minor imperfections can significantly affect the viewing experience of Rothko's abstract pieces.
Rachel Myrtle, Head of Specie and Fine Arts at insurance broker Aon, said that fine art policies generally provide comprehensive cover for physical loss or damage, including accidental harm caused by children or other visitors, although some exclusions may apply.
In the event of damage, insurers typically assign a fine art loss adjuster to assess the situation on site. The adjuster will examine the artwork, review available CCTV footage to identify the cause, and explore appropriate conservation methods, Myrtle explained.
The Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen has not disclosed who might be held liable for the recent incident involving Rothko's 1960 work, reportedly acquired by the museum in the 1970s.
The institution has previously asked visitors to cover repair costs following damage to artworks.
In 2011, a tourist who accidentally stepped on Pindakaasvloer (Peanut Butter Floor), a conceptual piece by Dutch artist Wim T. Schippers, was asked to pay for restoration.At the time, museum spokesperson Sharon Cohen told Algemeen Dagblad: 'It is normal procedure for people to pay if they damage art.'
Grey, Orange on Maroon, No. 8 is an example of colour field painting, a style defined by large areas of solid colour that dominate the canvas. The painting is one of several high-profile modern works to have been damaged in the Netherlands in recent years.
In late 2024, several Andy Warhol screen prints were harmed during a failed robbery at the MPV gallery in Oisterwijk. Separately, a Dutch town hall acknowledged last year that it had likely thrown away 46 artworks—including a Warhol print of the former Dutch queen—during building renovations.
Museums vary in how they respond to incidents involving children. In August 2024, a four-year-old boy accidentally shattered a 3,500-year-old jar at the Hecht Museum in Israel. Staff chose not to pursue the matter strictly, instead inviting the child and his family back for a guided tour.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
29-04-2025
- Express Tribune
child damages multi-million-pound rothko painting at rotterdam museum
Listen to article A painting by renowned American artist Mark Rothko, valued at up to €50 million (£42.5 million), has been damaged by a child at the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam. The artwork, "Grey, Orange on Maroon, No. 8", suffered superficial scratches during what the museum described as an 'unguarded moment'. A spokesperson for the museum confirmed that small scratches are visible in the lower, unvarnished portion of the canvas. The piece had been on public display in the Depot, the museum's accessible storage facility. 'We are currently researching the next steps for the treatment of the painting,' the spokesperson said. 'Conservation expertise has been sought both in the Netherlands and internationally.' Despite the damage, the museum remains hopeful. 'We expect that the work will be able to be shown again in the future,' the spokesperson added. Sophie McAloone, conservation manager at the Fine Art Restoration Company, noted that Rothko's "modern unvarnished" paintings are particularly fragile. 'Even the smallest areas of damage are instantly perceptible,' she said. "In this case, scratching of the upper paint layers can have a significant impact on the viewing experience of the piece," Ms McAloone said. Jonny Helm a market manager at the art restorers Plowden & Smith said the incident raises concerns for UK institutions considering more open-access displays. 'How will this event affect other UK institutions who are opening up their archives in the same way?' he asked. Helm added that restoring a Rothko is no easy feat. 'His mixture of pigments, resins and glues were quite complex. The lack of varnish makes it more vulnerable.' The incident echoes a previous case in 2012 when another Rothko painting, "Black on Maroon", was defaced at Tate Modern. The vandal, Wlodzimierz Umaniec, was sentenced to two years in prison, and it took 18 months and roughly £200,000 to restore the work. The current damage is less severe, but experts acknowledge that even minor imperfections can significantly affect the viewing experience of Rothko's abstract pieces. Rachel Myrtle, Head of Specie and Fine Arts at insurance broker Aon, said that fine art policies generally provide comprehensive cover for physical loss or damage, including accidental harm caused by children or other visitors, although some exclusions may apply. In the event of damage, insurers typically assign a fine art loss adjuster to assess the situation on site. The adjuster will examine the artwork, review available CCTV footage to identify the cause, and explore appropriate conservation methods, Myrtle explained. The Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen has not disclosed who might be held liable for the recent incident involving Rothko's 1960 work, reportedly acquired by the museum in the 1970s. The institution has previously asked visitors to cover repair costs following damage to artworks. In 2011, a tourist who accidentally stepped on Pindakaasvloer (Peanut Butter Floor), a conceptual piece by Dutch artist Wim T. Schippers, was asked to pay for the time, museum spokesperson Sharon Cohen told Algemeen Dagblad: 'It is normal procedure for people to pay if they damage art.' Grey, Orange on Maroon, No. 8 is an example of colour field painting, a style defined by large areas of solid colour that dominate the canvas. The painting is one of several high-profile modern works to have been damaged in the Netherlands in recent years. In late 2024, several Andy Warhol screen prints were harmed during a failed robbery at the MPV gallery in Oisterwijk. Separately, a Dutch town hall acknowledged last year that it had likely thrown away 46 artworks—including a Warhol print of the former Dutch queen—during building renovations. Museums vary in how they respond to incidents involving children. In August 2024, a four-year-old boy accidentally shattered a 3,500-year-old jar at the Hecht Museum in Israel. Staff chose not to pursue the matter strictly, instead inviting the child and his family back for a guided tour.
Express Tribune
21-04-2025
- Express Tribune
What happens when a Pope dies: Vatican protocol explained
Listen to article Following the passing away of a reigning pope, such as Pope Francis whose death was announced earlier today, the Roman Catholic Church has initiated a detailed and centuries-old process to honour the deceased pontiff and prepare for the election of his successor. Here is a guide to what happens after the death of a Pope: The procedure begins with the camerlengo, currently Irish-American Cardinal Kevin Farrell, who officially confirms the pope's death. Traditionally, this involves gently tapping the pope's head three times with a silver hammer and calling out his name. The camerlengo then seals the pontiff's private apartments and organises the funeral. A group comprising the camerlengo and three cardinal electors—chosen by lot—determines when the body will be moved to St. Peter's Basilica for public viewing. The pope's Fisherman's Ring and official lead seal are ceremonially destroyed to prevent misuse. No autopsy is carried out. A nine-day mourning period follows, with the funeral typically held four to six days after death in St. Peter's Square. While most popes are interred in the crypt beneath St. Peter's Basilica, Pope Francis previously indicated his preference for burial at St. Mary Major Basilica in Rome. The burial involves three coffins: an inner one of cypress, sealed inside a lead casket, and finally enclosed within a wooden outer coffin. During the interregnum, the College of Cardinals takes over administrative functions, though their powers are limited. Succession A conclave is then convened in the Sistine Chapel between 15 and 20 days after the pope's death to elect his successor. Cardinals under 80 years of age participate in the secret ballot, which requires a two-thirds majority plus one to elect a new pope. The voting may extend over several days. Once a candidate accepts the role and selects a papal name, he dons the papal vestments and is received by the cardinals, who pledge their allegiance. The world is informed of a successful vote when white smoke emerges from the Sistine Chapel chimney, created by burning the ballots with special chemicals. Black smoke indicates that no decision has yet been reached. Shortly after, the dean of the College of Cardinals appears on the central balcony of St. Peter's Basilica to announce 'Habemus Papam' ("We have a pope"). The newly elected pontiff then steps forward to deliver his first blessing to the crowds gathered in the square.
Express Tribune
20-04-2025
- Express Tribune
Efficiency vs effectiveness
The writer is an educationist based in Kasur City. He can be reached at Listen to article Making efforts to achieve quantified targets is the zeitgeist of today's world. Our obsession with metrics, targets and standardised indicators creates an illusion of progress. The same mentality has crept into our complex and often chaotic educational ecosystem. It is imperative to understand the difference between efficiency and effectiveness to learn the ropes of production systems. Peter Drucker, an Austrian-American educator and leader in management education, says in his famous dictum, "Efficiency is doing things right; effectiveness is doing the right things." Efficiency in education is specifically related to inputs and outputs. Contrarily, effectiveness probes deeper. It underlines: What is the quality of student learning? Are they learning critical thinking, moral judgement, decision making, civic sense, or real-world problem solving? Where efficiency requires teachers to follow run-of-the-mill pedagogy, effectiveness banks upon teachers' empowerment and ability to teach, inspire and guide. The difference is not merely theoretical. Their tangible consequences can be observed in that a school may efficiently register thousands of students, but their inability to read, write, or think independently after years of instruction falsifies the effectiveness of the pedagogical toil and moil. This parameter of efficiency and effectiveness can be employed to taxonomise the result-orientated and effect-based educational institutions. The look-busy-do-nothing approach to teaching enhances the efficiency of the working units of a school. Loads of homework and tests are assigned to students to create a facade of efficient teaching and learning. Oblivious of the AI-generated writing tools like ChatGPT and DeepSeek, schools appreciate teachers who assign activities to foster creative writing, but students whose parents are not educated enough to help them in dealing with such creative tasks get the tasks done with the help of writing tools and hand them over to their teacher with aplomb. Efficiently done but devoid of all effectiveness. Here, parents too share the blame for putting a premium on efficiency. Parents rate higher those schools whose students keep their nose to the grindstone of homework and assignments. Students who enjoy few moments of leisure time lag far behind in making the most of whatever is taught and learnt. Our testing and examination systems, the most fossilised organs of the education system, happen to be the hatcheries of efficiency-based drills requiring the regurgitation of unassimilated information and facts that never go beyond the bounds of textbooks. The rocketing changes in curriculum triggered by political upheavals focus primarily on the projection of political or individual identity rather than content relevance. Effectiveness demands a curriculum that cultivates critical thinking and social relevance. Instead, we have books advertising ideological posturing, outdated facts and mechanical exercises. Moreover, a burgeoning chasm dominates between the teachers' expertise and the conceptual complexity of the books. This scenario is mostly prevalent in the low-cost English medium schools which select the books of foreign publishers. Here, effectiveness is the first thing to suffer. Another inevitable fallout of promoting efficiency is the wilful neglect of the intelligence differences among students. Whereas efficiency owes to the one-size-fits-all pedagogical obsession, effectiveness prioritises individual physical and mental differences of students. Comparisons are blatantly made among students, apparently to promote competition which, when individual differences are ignored, turns into a rat race for grades. Teachers might be "doing things right" without reflecting on whether they are "doing the right things". Teachers who join and continue the teaching profession without investing any passion in it always target achieving efficiency and amassing accolades from school administrations. As the achievement of effective goals in education is a long, slow and steady process, efficiency capitalises on the currency of this fast-paced age – quick results. Efficiency is the hare of Aesop's fables, while effectiveness is the tortoise.
