Trump suggested Biden hid cancer diagnosis. Here's what we know about the timeline
In May 2025, four months after his term ended, the office of former U.S. President Joe Biden announced he was diagnosed with Stage 4 metastatic prostate cancer. Skeptics, including President Donald Trump, questioned the timing of the announcement, suggesting it was improbable the cancer was not diagnosed earlier, while Biden was in office, but hidden from the public.
A Biden spokesperson claimed he was most recently tested for prostate cancer in 2014, when he was 71 or 72 and still vice president.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force suggests doctors not test men over 70, given the risks associated with cancer treatment and the likelihood an individual of that age will die from other competing factors before prostate cancer ends his life. Similarly, the American Cancer Society suggests doctors not test men with a life expectancy of less than 10 years for prostate cancer.
Given the aggressive nature of Biden's cancer (9 out of 10 on the Gleason scale), it's not implausible that malignant cells developed more recently and metastasized at a faster rate, though it's impossible to assess the details of Biden's case without publicly available test records.
Given the dearth of actual evidence to date, it's also impossible to ascertain whether Biden's prostate cancer was diagnosed earlier than was claimed and was kept from the public.
Four months after former U.S. President Joe Biden left the White House in January 2025, his office announced he had received a diagnosis of aggressive prostate cancer. Immediately, social media users (archived, archived, archived) and public detractors, including President Donald Trump, suggested Biden received a diagnosis while in office and hid it from the American public. Dozens of Snopes readers also inquired as to the timing of Biden's diagnosis.
(X user @quay_dr)
Biden's disclosure of his diagnosis came around the time a book by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson published, titled, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again." In it, the authors claimed Biden's office attempted to hide the extent of Biden's "serious decline."
In a news conference on May 19, Trump further suggested Biden may have hidden test results from the public. "I think it's very sad, actually. I'm surprised that the public wasn't notified a long time ago because to get to Stage 9 [sic], that's a long time," Trump said. At minute 3:00, he added, "Somebody is not telling the facts." (For the record, there is no such thing as "Stage 9 cancer"; Biden received a Stage 4 diagnosis.)
Biden's office rebutted these allegations on May 20. Chris Meagher, a Biden spokesperson, said in a statement that Biden's last prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test took place in 2014, when Biden was 71 or 72 years old, meaning Biden did not receive a diagnosis while serving as president. We reached out to Biden's office seeking confirmation and will update this story if we receive a response.
Certain questions persist. For example, given the importance of the president's health, why didn't Biden's medical team regularly screen him for one of the most common types of cancer among older men? Why wasn't it caught earlier? Below, we break down what we know about the timing of Biden's diagnosis, how quickly Biden's cancer could have spread, and whether law requires U.S. presidents to disclose information about their health to the American public.
The cancer had already spread to the former president's bones at the time his illness was announced, meaning the disease was aggressive and likely incurable at that point. Biden's detractors claimed he should have received regular screenings for prostate cancer, which is the second most common form of cancer in American men next to skin cancer (which Biden has also received treatment for in the past). The truth is a little more complicated.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the most common risk factor for prostate cancer is age. "The older a man is, the greater the chance of getting prostate cancer," its website reads. The American Cancer Society posits that "most prostate cancers are found in men over the age of 65."
Biden received testing after he reported "increasing urinary symptoms." If he hadn't shown physical symptoms, it's unlikely he would have undergone PSA testing or caught the cancer.
So then why would the U.S. president — who turned 82 in November 2024 and was the oldest serving U.S. president in history — have skipped this test for more than a decade as he got older?
There are a number of factors that can contribute to older individuals not undergoing PSA tests. Biopsies following a positive PSA test can be harmful and lead to bleeding, infection, etc., and only 25% of patients who have biopsies following elevated PSA levels actually have prostate cancer. Treatment (such as radiation) for a positive biopsy result is also significantly taxing on the body, especially for an older individual, and can lead to a number of harms, including a 50% risk of long-term sexual erectile dysfunction and up to a one in six chance of long-term irritable bowel symptoms, according to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF, or Task Force). The Task Force is an independent, volunteer panel of national experts, according to its website.
Additionally, the government-backed Task Force — which The New York Times, CDC and others cited — recommends against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in "men 70 years and older." This is because, while the risk of prostate cancer peaks above age 75, according to the CDC, there is a competing risk of other causes of death and life expectancy is, on the whole, not higher than the typical time it would take for the cancer to physically affect an individual.
The reasoning the Task Force gave in 2018 is as follows:
PSA-based screening for prostate cancer leads to the diagnosis of prostate cancer in some men whose cancer would never have become symptomatic during their lifetime. Treatment of these men results in harms and provides them with no benefit. This is known as overdiagnosis, and follow-up of large randomized trials suggests that 20% to 50% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer through screening may be overdiagnosed.3 Overdiagnosis rates would be expected to increase with age and to be highest in men 70 years and older because older men have high risk of death from competing causes.
Not all doctors agree with this suggestion, especially as the life expectancy ceiling continues to rise. The American Cancer Society suggests that doctors not test individuals with a life expectancy of less than 10 years for prostate cancer. It does not specify an exact age.
"[Biden] could be receiving the best medical care that we have to offer as a nation and not be screened for prostate cancer," Dr. Michael Morris, a Memorial Sloan Kettering oncologist who specializes in treating prostate cancer, told USA Today in a story on May 20, 2025. "Excellent care means not under-testing. It also means not over-testing."
In 2019, Biden received a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a nonthreatening overgrowth of prostate cells common in older men. According to the Canadian Cancer Society, BPH does not increase the risk of prostate cancer.
Despite the risks associated with biopsies and treatment, many individuals do choose to undergo testing anyway. A number of factors can influence this decision, including genetic predisposition, resources available or out of an abundance of caution. Former presidents have published their PSA results, given that their health is a matter of national interest. Trump, who is 78, has received regular PSA screenings. His last report, published in April 2025, shows his PSA level was normal. Former President Barack Obama also published his PSA test results while in office.
The X post displayed above — which had accumulated more than 5.6 million views as of this writing — claimed that "for even with the most aggressive form, it is a 5-7 year journey without treatment before it becomes metastatic." (Metastatic means that the cancer has spread from the primary site to other places in the body.)
Biden scored a level 9 out of 10 on the Gleason scale, which means that the prostate cancer cells look very different from healthy cells, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The higher the score, the more aggressive and lethal the cancer.
Prostate cancer cells develop at different rates. While it is true that prostate cancer can develop very slowly — so slowly that an individual is more likely to die from another cause before the cancer cells metastasize — that is not always the case. "Most high-grade prostate cancers are also born that way and will behave aggressively," Dr. Marc B. Garnick, a prostate cancer specialist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center said in a story for Harvard Health Publishing.
The X post claimed that "it would be malpractice for this patient to show up and be first diagnosed with metastatic disease in May 2025." However, based on the medical considerations enumerated above, such a late diagnosis does not necessarily indicate malpractice.
U.S. law does not require presidents to disclose details regarding their health to the public, though it is not uncommon to do so. Multiple U.S. presidents throughout history have kept details of their personal health from the public, including former President Woodrow Wilson, who hid the results of a stroke from the public from 1919 through the end of his presidency in 1921, and former President John F. Kennedy, who hid multiple diseases, including Addison's disease, from the public to maintain his youthful image.
Alleged signs of Biden's mental and physical decline were a constant source of criticism during his administration, particularly after he announced his run for reelection. Biden refused to take a cognitive test throughout his presidency, and after a debate performance in which his voice trailed off mid-response more than once, then-Vice President Harris took over the campaign.
In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, Harris made her medical information public in an effort to draw attention to Trump's refusal to do so, according to Reuters.
A Biden spokesperson claimed the former president's most recent test for prostate cancer took place in 2014, when he was 71 or 72. Although the risk of prostate cancer increases with age, the American Cancer Society suggests doctors not test men with a life expectancy of less than 10 years for prostate cancer, given the harms associated with treatment and the likelihood that an individual over a certain age is prone to die from other competing factors before prostate cancer poses a serious risk to their life.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force more specifically suggests that men over the age of 70 skip testing altogether. Given the aggressiveness of Biden's cancer, it's possible the cancerous cells developed more recently and metastasized at a faster rate, but it's impossible to know the details without publicly available test records. U.S. law doesn't require presidents to disclose details regarding their health to the public, though it is not uncommon to do so. Biden's health in particular, as the oldest serving president in U.S. history, drew extra scrutiny.
Alltucker, Ken. 'Biden Has an Aggressive Form of Prostate Cancer. Should It Have Been Caught Earlier?' USA TODAY, https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/05/20/why-bidens-cancer-wasnt-caught-earlier-psa/83722037007/. Accessed 22 May 2025.
American Cancer Society Recommendations for Prostate Cancer Early Detection. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/acs-recommendations.html. Accessed 22 May 2025.
'Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)'. Canadian Cancer Society, Feb. 2021, https://cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-types/prostate/what-is-prostate-cancer/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia.
'Biden's Disastrous Debate Performance Offers Lessons for Harris and Warnings for Trump'. AP News, 7 Sept. 2024, https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-debate-d62e8e7281fff34be8925adc9b4e6dc2.
Cancer Facts for Men | Common Cancers in Men. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/understanding-cancer-risk/cancer-facts/cancer-facts-for-men.html. Accessed 22 May 2025.
CDC. 'Prostate Cancer Risk Factors'. Prostate Cancer, 27 Aug. 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/prostate-cancer/risk-factors/index.html.
Dai, Xiaoyu, et al. 'Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and the Risk of Prostate Cancer and Bladder Cancer'. Medicine, vol. 95, no. 18, May 2016, p. e3493. PubMed Central, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003493.
Desk, NPR Washington. 'Biden's Team Refutes Trump's Suggestion That Biden Hid His Cancer Diagnosis'. NPR, 20 May 2025. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2025/05/19/nx-s1-5403887/trump-biden-cancer.
Desk, Washington. 'Biden Had Skin Cancer Removed from Chest during His Physical, White House Says'. NPR, 3 Mar. 2023. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2023/03/03/1161049252/biden-skin-cancer.
'Fact Check: Misinformation after Biden's Cancer Diagnosis – DW – 05/20/2025'. Dw.Com, https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-misinformation-after-bidens-cancer-diagnosis/a-72605716. Accessed 22 May 2025.
Grubb, Robert L., et al. 'Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Update on Findings from the Initial Four Rounds of Screening in a Randomized Trial'. BJU International, vol. 102, no. 11, Dec. 2008, pp. 1524–30. PubMed, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08214.x.
Healthy Men Over 75: Don't Stop PSA Screening. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/2016/12/healthy-men-over-75-dont-stop-psa-screening. Accessed 22 May 2025.
Https://Www.Cancer.Gov/Publications/Dictionaries/Cancer-Terms/Def/Metastatic. 2 Feb. 2011, https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/metastatic.
Mason, Jeff, and Jeff Mason. 'Harris Releases Medical Report, Drawing Contrast with Trump'. Reuters, 12 Oct. 2024. www.reuters.com, https://www.reuters.com/world/us/harris-release-medical-report-drawing-contrast-with-trump-2024-10-12/.
Mistry, Sandeep, et al. 'Who's Too Old to Screen? Prostate Cancer in Elderly Men'. Canadian Urological Association Journal, vol. 3, no. 3, June 2009, pp. 205–10. PubMed Central, https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.1071.
Pager, Tyler. 'Biden Did Not Get Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Before Last Week, Spokesman Says'. The New York Times, 20 Mar. 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/20/us/politics/biden-prostate-cancer-psa-test.html.
Pendick, Daniel. 'Prostate Cancer Lives as It Is Born: Slow-Growing and Benign or Fast-Growing and Dangerous'. Harvard Health, 14 Aug. 2013, https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/prostate-cancer-lives-as-it-is-born-slow-growing-and-benign-or-fast-growing-and-dangerous-201308146604.
Rackley, Fay. 'What Does Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Mean?' Boston University, 21 May 2025, https://www.bu.edu/articles/2025/what-does-bidens-cancer-diagnosis-mean/.
'Read the Report on President Trump's Annual Physical Exam'. The New York Times, 13 Apr. 2025. NYTimes.com, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/04/13/us/1.html.
Recommendation: Prostate Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/prostate-cancer-screening. Accessed 22 May 2025.
Resources for News Media - NCI. 23 Apr. 2015, https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/media-resources.
Tapper, Jake, and Alex Thompson. Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. Random House, 2025.
Treisman, Rachel. 'How Treatable Is Prostate Cancer? A Doctor Reacts to Biden's Diagnosis'. NPR, 19 May 2025. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2025/05/19/nx-s1-5403446/biden-metastatic-prostate-cancer-diagnosis-survival-rate.
'Trump Allies Shift from Well-Wishes to Suggesting Biden Hid His Cancer Diagnosis'. NBC News, 19 May 2025, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/trump-allies-suggest-biden-hid-cancer-diagnosis-rcna207659.
'Until What Age Should You Be Screened for Prostate Cancer?' Keck Medicine of USC, https://www.keckmedicine.org/blog/until-what-age-should-you-be-screened-for-prostate-cancer/. Accessed 22 May 2025.
What Is Prostate Cancer? | Types of Prostate Cancer. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/about/what-is-prostate-cancer.html. Accessed 22 May 2025.
'What's a Gleason Score?' Cleveland Clinic, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22087-gleason-score. Accessed 22 May 2025.
- YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA_D5dXFgu0. Accessed 22 May 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Gavin Newsom stands up to President Trump
Neither Newsom, nor Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, nor Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell was consulted by the White House about federalizing the Guard, who arrived after protesters gathered in opposition to Immigration and Customs Enforcement's workplace raids in and around the city. Advertisement Newsom spent days jousting with Trump. When the president said it would be 'great' if border czar Tom Homan had Newsom Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up 'If some of us can be snatched off the streets without a warrant, based only on suspicion or skin color, then none of us are safe,' Newsom said. 'Authoritarian regimes begin by targeting people who are least able to defend themselves. But they do not stop there.' Advertisement Neither did Newsom. 'I ask everyone: Take time, reflect on this perilous moment,' he said. 'A president who wants to be bound by no law or constitution, perpetuating a unified assault on American traditions.' Newsom ticked off the harms Trump has inflicted in his second term, from threatening to defund media organizations to waging 'a war on culture, on history, on science, on knowledge itself.' 'The rule of law,' After encouraging Americans 'to stand up and be held to account,' Newsom said, " I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress, and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and that anxiety. What Donald Trump wants most is your fealty, your silence, to be complicit in this moment. Do not give in to him.' Like Trump, Newsom understands optics and how to seize a moment. But this time, the personal and political stakes are much greater. Newsom is now the face and voice of the Democrats' anti-Trump fury. In addition to Rob Bonta, the California attorney general When Advertisement On Thursday's edition of The New York Times podcast ' He also defended his conversations with far-right extremists, saying that Democrats can learn from how they mobilized Trump's support. (Incessant lies, racism, and anti-trans hate aren't, though, a path his party can take to consolidate its base and reclaim power.) But Newsom, who never met a camera or microphone he didn't like, clearly wants to be the Democrats' point man in challenging Trump. Much the way the president's 'I'm going to continue to push back, and I'm going to stay on the offense, Newsom said on 'The Daily.' For a time, the governor's voice was no longer one that some Democrats wanted. But so long as Trump's venomous policies continue to roil this nation, Newsom's, for now, has become the voice America needs to hear. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
China Revoked My Visa, and Came to Regret It
President Trump's first term gave us the 'China Initiative,' a government program intended to root out Chinese espionage. The result was ethnic profiling of Chinese and Asian American researchers, flimsy cases that were eventually dropped and no prosecutions of scholars for spying or theft of secrets. President Joe Biden wisely eliminated it. Mr. Trump's current administration is back at it, however, demonizing Chinese citizens once again with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's announcement on May 28 that the United States would 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students. While it appears that Mr. Trump's team may have backed off on that measure for now after trade negotiations last week, the threat lingers and damage may have been done already. Targeting Chinese students, researchers and academics was a horrible idea the first time around and still is. It would harm America academically, economically and strategically. It will leave us more ignorant about our biggest rival and fuel paranoia while doing little to safeguard sensitive information. We should of course be concerned about China's wide-ranging espionage efforts. Much of this is focused on the U.S. government or corporations. But universities are targets too. Chinese government tactics are known to include pressuring students from China to gather information on American know-how and innovation from their U.S. colleges, coupled with threats against their families in China if they don't comply. Innocent students like these are China's victims, too. We should be devising ways to protect their academic freedom and safety while on U.S. soil. Excluding them en masse blames the victim and throws the baby out with the bath water. Very little of the research that happens on American campuses is classified, anyway. Many universities forbid it under the principle that academic research should be openly available. Some areas of study are more sensitive than others, but U.S. restrictions and screening procedures already block or restrict visas for Chinese researchers in certain fields. A 2020 Trump executive order, for example, limits entry by graduate students with past or present links to Chinese entities that the United States determines are involved with technologies that have potential military use. Mr. Rubio's announcement added worryingly vague new criteria to these already robust standards. He singled out students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party,' which is almost meaningless for a country where the party runs everything. Just as every American is connected to the U.S. government in some way — getting a driver's license, paying taxes, going to public schools — dealing with the Communist Party is a fact of life for Chinese citizens, not an ideological commitment. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Trump moves to restore Confederate names on 3 Va. Army bases
President Trump announced this week that he wants to restore the original names of seven Army bases, including three in Virginia, that once honored Confederate leaders. Why it matters: A federal law bans U.S. military bases from being named after Confederates. But the Trump administration is working around it by designating the bases after other people with the same names or initials. Catch up quick: Trump vetoed that bill in 2020 but was overridden in a bipartisan vote from Congress. Then in 2023, Virginia's Fort Lee became Fort Gregg-Adams, named after two Black officers — including the first Black woman in the Women's Army Corps and a three-star general. Fort A.P. Hill, named after the same A.P. Hill who once had a Richmond statue dedicated to him, became Fort Walker, after the Army's first female surgeon. Fort Pickett was redesignated as Fort Barfoot, the first Army base in the U.S. to be named after a Native American soldier. By the numbers: The cost of renaming nine bases honoring Confederates was estimated to total nearly $40 million, per the Military Times. To change the names of the three Virginia bases: at least $4.7 million, per a congressional report estimate. Zoom in: It's unclear how much it'll cost to change them back, but here's who they're technically named after now, per the Army: Fort Lee won't be honoring Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, who had the largest Confederate monument in the country before its 2021 removal in Richmond. Instead, it'll be named after Pvt. Fitz Lee, a Black soldier from Dinwiddie who fought in the Spanish-American war. Fort A.P. Hill is now named after Pvt. Bruce Anderson, 1st Sgt. Robert A. Pinn and Lt. Col. Edward Hill.