Trump v 60 Minutes is a stunning battle for the soul of US media
Donald Trump's battle with a US media he considers an 'enemy of the people' has been a signature fight of his second term in office, sparking warnings of an erosion of press freedoms in the US and fears over the independence of key publications owned by billionaires seeking to become close to the president.
But one struggle that has taken center stage puts one of the most prestigious brands in US journalism in a direct legal fight with the White House, which has also dragged in a gigantic multibillion-dollar Wall Street deal by the corporate owners of one of the US's main broadcast networks.
At the center of the fight is 60 Minutes, the brand-leading news program for CBS, which once employed Edward R Murrow – whose reporting on the senator Joseph McCarthy's investigation into alleged communism became the subject of the movie and play Good Night, and Good Luck – and Walter Cronkite – who for two decades hosted CBS Evening News and was described as 'the most trusted man in America'.
Related: Trump sharpens attacks on US media as Voice of America employees put on administrative leave
Last week, a longtime executive producer for 60 Minutes resigned because he concluded he could not run the show free of pressure from a parent corporation that is working to settle Trump's lawsuit concerning an interview the show did with Kamala Harris during the presidential campaign.
Shari Redstone, who controls CBS's parent company, Paramount, wants to sell it to Skydance, an entertainment company backed by the billionaire Larry Ellison, and needs approval from federal regulators. So she is reportedly trying to settle the lawsuit, despite opposition from employees and the fact that Trump's complaint has little merit, according to legal experts.
'Over the past months, it has also become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I have always run it. To make independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes, right for the audience,' Bill Owens, who spent 37 years at CBS News, wrote in a memo to staff obtained by the New York Times. 'So, having defended this show - and what we stand for – from every angle, over time with everything I could, I am stepping aside so the show can move forward.'
The resignation reflects larger concerns about the weakening of the US democratic system of government due to prominent news organizations, law firms and a university capitulating to Trump's lawsuits and executive orders, which critics say are authoritarian.
'If Donald Trump or some other powerful individual could hold news organizations hostage to their whims as to whether they think news and editorial judgments flatter them or make their enemies look bad', then 'the news organization would effectively be working for them', said Heidi Kitrosser, a Northwestern University law professor.
In 1968, the network debuted 60 Minutes, a primetime news show that became one of the most successful programs in broadcast history. It made its name with investigative reporting on subjects such as the My Lai massacre in Vietnam; the tobacco industry; and then presidential candidate Bill Clinton's alleged affair, along with the more lighthearted weekly segment A Few Minutes with Andy Rooney.
'Its ratings success convinced CBS and the other networks that TV news could grab audiences and be a profit center, just like entertainment,' said Marty Kaplan, who holds the Norman Lear chair in entertainment, media and society at the University of Southern California's Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. 'Many of its journalists have become stars, and its stopwatch is a pop culture icon.'
In October 2024, the show conducted an interview with Harris and aired a more concise, different version of the vice-president's response to a question on Israel and the war in Gaza than what appeared in a trailer.
Related: 'Revenge is his number one motivation': how Trump is waging war on the media
Trump sued the network for $10bn and claimed the interview amounted to election interference. A court filing stated that the segment was intended to 'confuse, deceive and mislead the public' and 'tip the scales in favor of the Democratic party'.
In March, Paramount filed motions to dismiss the suit on the grounds that it was an 'affront to the First Amendment and is without basis in law or fact'.
The lawsuit has 'absolutely no merit' because the first amendment protects the 'ability of the people to speak about matters of public importance and to speak about those who govern them', Kitrosser said.
She pointed out that news organizations routinely edit interviews for timing and coherence.
'Trump himself benefits very much from news editing that takes what might kindly be called 'word salads' and cuts them down,' Kitrosser said.
But Redstone, who would make billions of dollars in the sale, told the Paramount board that she wanted to settle with Trump, according to the Times. The deal requires approval from the Federal Communications Commission, which is chaired by Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee.
'The only reason to settle this case would be to bribe the administration for favorable treatment, whether it be with respect to the merger or any other business that the CBS parent company might have in front of the administration,' said Seth Stern, the director of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
Redstone recently started to request information on which upcoming 60 Minutes stories were about Trump, which made Owens uncomfortable, Semafor reported.
During a meeting with CBS staff, including famous journalists such as Anderson Cooper, Lesley Stahl and Scott Pelley, Owens became emotional and said: 'It's clear that I've become the problem. I am the corporation's problem,' according to Status.
'I really, really, really believe that this will create a moment where the corporation will have to think about the way we operate, the way we've always operated, and allow us to operate like that,' Owens said.
If Paramount settles the lawsuit, it would continue a trend since Trump took office of companies and a university giving in to his demands to avoid punishments such as losing federal funding or access to federal buildings.
For example, law firms agreed to do $940m in pro bono work for the Trump administration and to not consider race in hiring, among other concessions.
ABC News and anchor George Stephanopoulos also agreed to give $15m to a foundation and museum to be established by Trump to settle a lawsuit over an interview in which Stephanopoulos said a jury had found the president 'liable for rape', when in fact he had been found liable of sexual assault.
Related: 'An existential battle': how Trump's win is shifting the US media landscape
Kitrosser said that case also had little merit.
'I see them much more as shakedowns than legal settlements,' she said.
There are examples of companies and schools standing up to Trump, including Harvard University, which filed a lawsuit against the administration over its threats to review $9bn in federal funding after the school refused to comply with a list of demands. And like Owens, others have resigned over their employers' acquiescence to the president.
Stern, of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, also argues that settling with Trump hasn't necessarily protected companies from him. In March, the FCC opened an investigation into whether ABC was 'promoting invidious forms of DEI discrimination'.
'In addition to all the principled reasons to not cave to Trump, there's also the practical one that it doesn't work,' Stern said. 'He will be right back at your door with his hands out the next day.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk
Federal officials at NASA and the Pentagon moved swiftly this week to urge competitors to Elon Musk's SpaceX to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft after President Donald Trump threatened to cancel Space X's contracts and Musk's defiant response. Government officials were especially stunned after Musk responded to Trump with a salvo of his own: SpaceX would stop flying its Dragon spacecraft, a move that would leave the space agency with no way to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
The White House is challenging the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's assessment that President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending package will raise the federal deficit by trillions of dollars throughout the next decade. The national debt, currently $36.2 trillion, tracks what the U.S. owes its creditors, while the national deficit measures how much the federal government's spending exceeds its revenues. So far, the federal government has spent more than $1 trillion more than it has collected this fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an analysis Wednesday predicting that the so-called "big, beautiful, bill" the House passed in May would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. But according to the White House, the CBO's analysis is based on a faulty premise because it assumes that Republicans in Congress will fail to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Rather, the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forecasts that the tax and spending measures would independently reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion. Senate Weighs Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' As Policy Group Backs Cbo, Projects $3 Trillion Debt Increase Read On The Fox News App Additionally, the White House argues that the measure, coupled with other initiatives like tariffs and other spending cuts, will lead to reducing the deficit by at least $6.6 trillion over 10 years. The "big, beautiful, bill" has faced criticism from figures including SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who labeled the measure an "abomination" and argued that the bill would increase the federal deficit. The measure now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-K.Y., have voiced opposition to the legislation. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Resistance From Republican Senators Over Debt Fears Meanwhile, OMB Director Russell Vought told lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee Wednesday that he believed the CBO's analysis was "fundamentally wrong." "It will lead to reduced deficits and debt of $1.4 trillion," Vought said. "It will reduce mandatory savings of $1.7 trillion. I don't think the way they construct their baseline, not only does it not give a fair shake to economic growth, but it fundamentally misreads the economic consequences of not extending the current tax relief." Failure to pass Trump's tax package would trigger a recession, according to Vought. "We'll have a recession," Vought told lawmakers. "The economic storm clouds will be very dark. I think we'll have a 60% tax increase on the American people." Meanwhile, the White House has accused the CBO of employing those who've contributed to Democratic campaigns, even though CBO Director Phillip Swagel served in former President George W. Bush's administration. Price Tag Estimate For House Gop Tax Package Rises To $3.94T "I don't think many people know this: There hasn't been a single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000," Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. "But guess what, there have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democratic candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political." The CBO director is appointed according to the recommendations of the House and Senate Budget Committees. Then-Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming, first recommended Swagel in 2019, and then Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, recommended Swagel again in 2023. The CBO did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital on OMB's analysis or claims from the White House about the office being full of staffers who've backed Democrats. Fox News' Deirdre Heavey contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hours before WorldPride, US Park Police, NPS reopen key Pride gathering spot
Hours before the Capital Pride Parade during WorldPride in Washington, D.C., fencing at a key gathering spot for Pride celebrations is being taken down, two sources told ABC News. The decision comes following public outcry and a reversal by the U.S. Park Police and the National Park Service, which had made the decision to close off Dupont Circle Park ahead of Saturday's parade, which marks the 50th anniversary of Capital Pride. Two sources confirmed to ABC News that the park, long the site of unofficial Pride parties and gatherings in the city, is being reopened ahead of the event. The fencing was initially requested by the Metropolitan Police Department in April due to safety concerns following past incidents during Pride events, though there are no known credible threats to the nation's capital as tens of thousands gather to celebrate, officials told ABC News. After a debate between federal officials, city police and LGBTQ+ activists, the U.S. Park Police announced the park would close from 6 p.m. on Thursday, June 5, through approximately 6 p.m. on Sunday, June 8. MORE: Trump's military parade includes a dog and pony show. And the dog is named Doc Holliday While D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith later rescinded the request to close the park, the National Park Service continued with the plan, prompting backlash from local politicians and activists. "D.C. is no stranger to high-profile gatherings," said Smith, the first African American woman to lead the U.S. Park Police in its 200-year-plus history, after attempting to get the closure rescinded after public backlash. "We have a proven track record of hosting them safely and successfully, and this year will be no different." Mayor Muriel Bowser then called for the decision to be reversed, and the reversal was granted. Preparations for the international celebration have been years in the making, and at least one party promoter had already advertised an event in the park before the closing was announced. Federal officials had said that closing the park was part of a broader federal security plan amid what they said were concerns about crowd control and potential disruptions. In recent years, the space has seen several incidents that that officials say prompted concern from law enforcement. According to authorities, in 2019, a person was arrested after gunshots caused crowds to flee. In 2023, the park was vandalized, resulting in $175,000 in damage to the historic fountain. In 2024, a group of minors was found drinking, smoking marijuana and fighting in the park. They later ran into nearby businesses and reportedly stole items. In a letter obtained by ABC News, the U.S. Park Police initially wrote that the closure was necessary to "secure the park, deter potential violence, reduce the risk of destructive acts and decrease the need for extensive law enforcement presences." MORE: 'We see you': In Trump-era Washington, World Pride 2025 organizers aim to bring 'hope' to LGBTQ+ community MPD will have an increased presence throughout D.C. during WorldPride and Capital Pride. It will coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and activate special units to assist with crowd management and traffic. Police will also increase patrols in high-crime areas starting this weekend through the end of August. "MPD, alongside all of our district agencies and public safety partners, have been working for many months to plan for these large-scale events that are happening this summer, and our joint planning efforts have included site visits, tabletop exercise, intelligence coordination and layered security strategies tailored uniquely to these events to ensure that we can keep our city safe for World Pride 2025," Smith said. "We have been planning for over a year." Days after WorldPride, the nation's capital will host a June 14 military parade marking the 250th anniversary of the Army, though officials said there aren't any known credible threats for that event either. That Army parade will be the sixth National Special Security Event that Washington has hosted this year. "There's no place more experienced than the District of Columbia in executing these large-scale events," Deputy Mayor for Public Safety and Justice Lindsey Appiah said last week.
