
Canton plans public education initiative before property revaluation starts
According to Canton Town Supervisor Mary Ann Ashley, the revaluation project has been five years in the making and stems from significant tax roll inequities that have not been addressed since a 2008 assessment.
The COVID-19 pandemic initially stalled efforts, but the town has since committed to a $180,000, two-year evaluation process.
"This is about fundamental fairness," Ashley said at the Town Board meeting May 14.
The committee aims to create and distribute easily understandable materials explaining the revaluation process, increase outreach efforts to aid resident comprehension, and emphasize the importance of responding to official notices.
Educational materials will also clarify the revaluation's significance and timeline, while addressing common misconceptions about property assessments.
At the meeting, Deputy Village Mayor Anna Sorenson said that the collective decision was to collaborate on a public education project concerning the property revaluation. The aim is to create accessible and comprehensive materials to educate the public on this matter.
The material will be developed in June by the committee working alongside GAR Associates and will be available online and in the village and town offices later in the summer when GAR starts reaching out to property owners.
GAR Associates is in the data collection phase and is relying on publicly available data and the work of town assessor Cindy Brand. Brand has collected information from every property in the town by visiting each one, taking a photo from the road and updating the information.
There are more than 4,000 properties in the town.
GAR will compile its information and mail it to each property owner to verify its accuracy sometime around the end of the summer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey resigns to take a top FBI position
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, a Republican who has been an ardent backer of President Donald Trump, said Monday that he is resigning to take a leadership position at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The move is the latest in a series of changes at the FBI under Director Kash Patel. Numerous senior officials, including top agents in charge of big-city field offices, have been pushed out of their jobs, and Justice Department officials have sought the names of agents who participated in investigations related to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Bailey said he is stepping down effective Sept. 8 to serve as the FBI's co-deputy director, alongside Dan Bongino. Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe is to announce a new appointee as attorney general on Tuesday. 'My life has been defined by a call to service, and I am once again answering that call, this time at the national level,' Bailey said in a statement. In a little over two-and-a-half years in the job, Bailey pursued numerous lawsuits challenging former President Joe Biden's administration on an array of policies, including immigration actions,student loan forgiveness,environmental rules,gun safety initiatives and transgender rights measures. He also threatened legal action against private gyms over bathroom policies, demanded that public schools ban drag shows and sued New York state, claiming that Trump's 2024 hush money criminal trial was 'overt meddling' in the 2024 election that limited Missouri voters' information. Most recently, Bailey's office has defended the state's anti-abortion regulations in the face of a voter-approved constitutional amendment establishing a state right to abortion. Earlier this year, Bailey's office won a $24.5 billion award against China for the COVID-19 pandemic in a case that originally was filed by his predecessor, Eric Schmitt, who won election to the U.S. Senate in 2022. Bailey was serving as general counsel to Republican Gov. Mike Parson when his boss appointed him to replace Schmitt. An Army veteran, Bailey won a full four-year term as attorney general last November.


Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Thanks to a $5,000 rebate and DIY skills, their L.A. yard has it all — except grass
Water-hungry lawns are symbols of Los Angeles' past. In this series, we spotlight yards with alternative, low-water landscaping built for the future. When it's hot in Los Angeles, hummingbirds, butterflies and bees flock to the gardens that Lexie Glass and her husband, Evan Hursley, have been building in Harvard Park for the past three years. 'Their garden is a good example of how your landscape can be a universe for wildlife,' says Katie Tilford, development director at Theodore Payne Foundation for Wild Flowers and Native Plants, which has featured Glass and Hursley's garden on its annual Native Plant Garden Tour. For Glass, the gardens are not just 'their space,' but an environment to be shared with the natural world. 'The [COVID-19] pandemic really stressed the importance we hold for the landscape around Southern California,' says Glass, who is originally from Arkansas, 'so creating our own around our house was an exciting opportunity.' When the couple purchased the 900-square-foot Craftsman in late 2021, their front and back lawn were primarily brown and dead, and concrete was prevalent. A creative couple — Glass is a designer and Hursley is an architect — the 31-year-olds were accustomed to creating plans and managing projects. So when they learned that the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's turf replacement program would pay them to convert their grass into a low-water landscape with California-friendly plants, they were excited to spearhead a DIY project for themselves and use the rebate to cover their expenses. Soon after the two bought the property, they started their yard project by removing the L-shaped strip of concrete in the backyard with a sledgehammer. Next, they dug a pathway through the back and side yards, installing the broken pieces of concrete to form 'sinuous paths that would lead to moments of discovery,' Glass says. After laying the groundwork for their paths, the couple removed a gnarled fig tree stump and covered the grass and weeds with leftover cardboard boxes from their move. This process, known as sheet mulching, involves layering cardboard or newspaper over the grass and weeds to smother them, creating a natural compost that enriches the soil and suppresses weed growth. Despite their initial lack of gardening knowledge, Glass and Hursley caught on quickly by watching YouTube videos on how to plant a native garden in Los Angeles by filmmaker Loren Johnson, who had torn out his lawn. They also attended online lectures on the Waterwise Community Center and California Native Plant Society channels. Similarly, they taught themselves how to install drip irrigation, select native plants and design their garden using resources such as the Waterwise Garden Planner and Calscape websites. 'Evan and I spent many Saturday mornings, eating breakfast and watching the native garden design lectures during our planning phase,' Glass says. Given the compact size of their bungalow, the couple saw their garden as more than just a wildlife habitat. It was an extension of their home. In the backyard, where they planned to spend most of their time, they included a lounge area next to a fire pit, complete with Adirondack-style chairs they built with redwood. They also added an outdoor dining area, a birdbath and an alcove with a bench, all situated in the shade of fragrant natives. The backyard is anchored around an open-air pavilion that serves as a dining room, which was created from existing four steel columns and steel beams installed on a concrete pad. To give it a more streamlined look, they removed the corrugated sheet metal roof and added 2-by-8 foot wood members across the beams, painting both the wood and steel black. Next, they attached string lights along the bottom of the wooden members and installed tension cables from the ground to the end members in a zigzag pattern, allowing the five morning glory plants they planted to climb up the wires and over the trellis. Working on weekends, the couple installed the pathways and mulched the soil after it had decomposed under the weight of the sheet mulching. To add rocks to their design, the couple transported them on a stretcher. 'That was a lot of work,' Hursley says. They then moved on to planting, sourcing primarily from Theodore Payne, Plant Material and Artemisia native plant nurseries in Los Angeles. When it came to choosing the plants, the couple aimed to create a dynamic garden by varying the heights and widths of the plants to achieve a visually appealing effect. They strategically placed some of the tall plants to screen unsightly views and create shady moments. 'You have to walk around the plants, which helps to create intrigue,' Glass says. 'This was a tip we learned while watching the lecture series held by the California Native Plant Society on YouTube.' According to Tilford, the couple chose a plant palette that is easy to maintain and recommended in Theodore Payne's 'Easy Native Plants for Southern California' list, which includes several varieties of sage, apricot mallow, De La Mina lilac verbena and bush sunflower, with California native wildflower seeds filling in the gaps. The couple chose these plants not only for their low-maintenance requirements but also for their leaf textures, flower colors and the timing of when the plants will flower or go dormant. In the front yard, where they installed a dry creek bed that collects stormwater, the couple was inspired by Cues to Care, landscape architect Joan Nassauer's theory that visible human care for a landscape can effect change in the neighborhood. 'We added lots of fragrant varieties to the front yard to greet us and our guests home, but also to hopefully spark intrigue with neighbors as they walk by,' Glass says. 'We hoped they would enjoy both the site and the smells of native plants and begin to appreciate native plants if they didn't already.' Glass and Hursley planted 250 mostly one-gallon plants, 80% of which are native to California, while the others are drought-tolerant plants from countries with similar climates. Three years in, they admit they made mistakes along the way. 'Everything grew much larger than the literature we read predicted,' Hursley says. 'Coyote mint is taking over our creek bed.' Also, some plants didn't survive. Trial and error is to be expected in a garden, Tilford says. 'That's part of the experience. Allowing yourself to fail is a way of permitting yourself to learn something new. That is a valuable lesson: Everything is going to get bigger than you think, especially if it's next to a path or sidewalk.' After submitting Glass and Hursley plans to the LADWP's replacement program, which currently offers a $5-per-square-foot rebate, the $5,100 they received covered all their material expenses. 'All we had to supply was the labor,' Glass says. When nearly 300 tour-goers visited the garden in the spring, they were treated to bright orange California poppies, cobalt-blue ceanothus flowers — a fan favorite, the couple says — yellow bush sunflowers and the bold pink flowers of hummingbird sage. Come summer, some plants are dormant, but the wildlife, and in some instances, flowers like De La Mina verbena continue to bloom. Although they added plants to nearly half the property, the couple likes that the garden feels much larger than it did before. 'Our theory is that our brains soak in all these new layers of visual interest and perceive multiple outdoor rooms,' Glass says. At one point, when the front yard was covered in mulch and the plants were going in, some neighbors questioned the project, saying the grass looked better. But as the plants started coming in and colorful native plants lined the sidewalks, their neighbors were charmed. 'It gives you a reason to explore the garden,' Hursley says, smiling. 'We can walk around for hours.' 'We hope that everyone can see that you can do it yourself,' adds Glass. 'You do not need ample space to create your oasis — just a bit of planning and an appetite for experimentation.' Peppermint Tree, Agonis flexuosa Desert Museum Palo Verde, Cercidium 'Desert Museum' 'Eureka' Semi Dwarf Lemon, Citrus X Limon 'Eureka' Washington Navel Dwarf Orange, Citrus Sinensis, Washington Dwarf Bartlett Pear, Pyrus Communis Morning Glory, Calystegia purpurata Howard McMinn Manzanita, Arctostaphylos 'Howard McMinn' Concha Ceanothus, Ceanothus 'Concha' Firecracker Penstemon, Penstemon Eatonii Desert Spoon, Dasylirion Wheeleri 'Desert Spoon' California Buckwheat, Eriogonum fasciculatum Scarlet Columbine, Aquilegia formosa Moonshine Yarrow, Achillea 'Moonshine' Desert globemallow, Sphaeralcea ambigua Coyote Mint, Monardella Villosa Parry's Agave, Agave Parryi California Fuchsia, Epilobium canum Star Jasmine, Jasminum multiflorum Narrow Leaf Milkweed, Asclepias fascicularis Margarita BOP Penstemon, Penstemon heterophyllus 'Margarita BOP' White Sage, Salvia Apiana De La Mina Verbena, Verbena lilacina 'De La Mina' Bush Sunflower, Encelia californica Common Yarrow, Achillea millefolium Everett's Choice California Fuchsia, Epilobium canum 'Everett's Choice' Hummingbird Sage, Salvia Spathacea California Poppy, Eschscholzia Californica Brittlebush, Encelia farinosa Allen Chickering Sage, Salvia 'Allen Chickering' Palmer's Indian Mallow, Abutilon palmeri Elegant Clarkia, Clarkia unguiculata Bird's Eyes, Gilia tricolor Iris Pacific Coast Hybrids Wendy Alumroot, Heuchera 'Wendy' Coral Bells, Heuchera Yerba Buena, Clinopodium douglasii Seaside Daisy, Erigeron glaucus Catalina Currant, Ribes viburnifolium Safari Sunset Conebush, Leucadendron 'Safari Sunset' San Miguel Island Buckwheat and Red Buckwheat, Eriogonum grande var. rubescens Germander Sage, Salvia chamaedryoides Cow's Horn Cactus, Euphorbia grandicornis Variegated African Candelabra, Euphorbia ammak variegata Blue Flax, Linum lewisii Turf Replacement Rebate Program Planting a Native Garden in Los Angeles Waterwise Garden Planner Green Gardens Group Education California Friendly and Native Landscape Training California Native Plant Society Theodore Payne Foundation for Wildflowers and Native Plants Plant Material Artemisa Nursery


Scientific American
3 hours ago
- Scientific American
Investing in Public Education Will Strengthen the U.S.
Public education in the U.S. is under attack. Whether at the local, state or federal level, political and religious groups have pushed for funding cuts while diverting more money to private-school vouchers, trying to alter curricula and removing books from children's reading lists. By not prioritizing free and equitable public education, the U.S. government is robbing our youths of the critical-thinking skills and knowledge that drive innovation and democracy. These efforts fall heavily on science education in our classrooms, if not directly on classwork, then on its fundamental drivers—curiosity, imagination, ingenuity and innovation. To ask the kinds of questions of our natural world that would produce such things as artificial intelligence, spacecraft, medicines, and more, children need exposure to the ideas that have shaped our progress as a society, the status quo we have bucked against to bring about great changes for humanity, the declarations we have questioned and then reshaped. The attempt to quell and control taxpayer-funded education is antithetical to a society that values evidence and knowledge. It's a concerted effort in thought control, racism, classism and sexism. It's not very democratic—or very smart. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. About 50 million children in the U.S. attend public school, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. That number was closer to 51 million in 2019, but many kids who left public school during the COVID pandemic didn't come back to public education. Children attending public school exercise a right that used to be a privilege, as schooling in the U.S. was generally tuition-based until the mid- to late 1800s. By 1870, about 78 percent of children ages five to 14 were enrolled in taxpayer-funded schools. In 2019 and 2020, between 80 and 90 percent of children who went to public school in the U.S. graduated from high school, depending on the locale. Critical thinking and exposure to different ideas are fundamentals of not only democracy but also creativity and innovation. Some of the biggest battles about the right to comprehensive knowledge have been waged in public schools. They include the fight over the ability to teach evolution at Rhea County High School in Tennessee, which was at the center of the Scopes Trial 100 years ago, and clashes over the inclusion of climate change science in textbooks that serve millions of public school students in Texas and elsewhere. School districts nationwide have removed school library books that contain information on changing bodies or that explore mental health, not to mention ones that discuss slavery, race and gender identity. Under the guise of protecting children from harm, censors instead seek to whitewash the inconvenient truths that make it harder for them to maintain their profiteering and social hegemony: Earth is warming, and humans are responsible; slavery did happen; neither race nor gender is hierarchical. Among the most egregious examples of the drive to undermine public education are school voucher programs. These efforts funnel taxpayer dollars to private and parochial schools, frequently at the expense of the long-term funding of public education. Often sold as 'school choice,' these legislative initiatives are championed as a way to help students escape poorly performing public schools or to give families of lesser means more options in education. But problems abound. Arizona is hemorrhaging money to keep its voucher program afloat. In Indiana, educational gains in voucher-eligible schools are debatable. Joseph Waddington, an education researcher at the University of Notre Dame, says his and others' examination of Indiana's program showed that when children initially transitioned to private schools, their math scores fell significantly. It took a while for them to rebound. The researchers found no difference in English scores. The idea in some corners has been that voucher programs will stimulate the development of more religious or for-profit schools, which would, of course, enrich the entities opening the schools. But in many rural areas, there are no such schools. Many Texas counties have no private option. This lack was the basis for one of the bigger criticisms of Texas's new voucher program, passed during the state's January 2025 legislative session. Such examples beg the question of why these funds shouldn't just be used for public education that everyone can benefit from. Critical thinking and exposure to different ideas are fundamentals of not only democracy but also creativity and innovation. For the U.S. to maintain its status as an economic powerhouse and driver of the global economy, we need problem-solvers, inventors, iterative thinkers and people who view failure as part of progress. This is the realm of science and mathematics, the realm of history and geography, the realm of a broad-based and well-rounded education. Diverting funds from public education while stifling certain ideas in public schools would certainly diminish our footprint in the world. And although public education in the U.S. is a local and state issue, federal support does matter. Efforts to dismantle the Department of Education, which helps students with disabilities, gives grants and funds to equalize educational opportunity, and carries out research on different aspects of education, leave students at every level in the lurch, especially in less affluent school districts. Schooling may be local, but national support is critical. What does appropriate funding for public education look like? Higher teacher salaries. Better buildings, not just stadiums. More reliable transportation. More comprehensive, influence-free textbooks. Better laboratories. More subject options. Better training in trades. More preschool. Mental health services. Physical health services. More nutritious meals. Better and free after-school programs. The idea that we can defund public education in favor of alternatives belies reality and common sense. Public education provides community, refuge and opportunity. It is a common good that we must nurture. The U.S. became a world leader thanks in no small part to universal, standard public education. We owe it to future generations to keep it that way.