
For 18 Million Student Loan Borrowers, The Government Is Coming For Your Paycheck
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) speak to ... More reporters following a closed-door meeting with House Republicans on May 20, 2025 on Capitol Hill in Washington. The Trump administration and House Republicans have taken steps to ramp up collections and payments for millions of federal student loan borrowers. (Photo by Tom Brenner For The Washington Post via Getty Images)
The Trump administration is clamping down on federal student loan defaults; at the same time, Republican lawmakers in Congress just took a major step to narrow affordable repayment plan options. Taken together, this could mean that millions of borrowers will see substantial cuts to their paychecks in the coming months.
Despite an unexpected collections reprieve for Social Security benefits recipients announced by the Department of Education earlier this week, the broader collections crackdown against student loan borrowers appears to be moving forward. More than five million borrowers are currently in default on their federal student loans and may soon be subject to wage garnishment and federal offset. That figure could jump to 10 million borrowers by the end of the year, according to department officials, as Americans struggle to navigate a repayment plan system facing serious legal and administrative challenges.
Meanwhile, if legislation recently passed by the House of Representatives becomes law, an additional eight million borrowers enrolled in the SAVE plan could be forced to make significantly higher payments under different repayment plans by the end of the year.
Here's what student loan borrowers need to know.
In May, the Department of Education officially resumed activities to collect on defaulted federal student loans. The government has vast powers to force student loan borrowers to pay under these circumstances, without needing to go through the formal court system.
The department has first initiated Treasury Offset for approximately 5.3 million borrowers. Treasury Offset allows the U.S. Department of Treasury to forcibly intercept federal income streams before they can reach a borrower's bank account. For example, the government can garnish up to 15% of federal employee wages, and can seize up to 100% of payments owed to federal contractors and vendors. The government can also intercept up to 100% of a federal tax refund, and offset up to 15% of Social Security benefits, although Social Security offset is now temporarily paused following this week's announcement.
The department began sending Treasury Offset warnings to defaulted student loan borrowers last month. Once a borrower receives an official notice prior to Treasury Offset, they have a brief window of time (typically 60 days) to take steps to avoid offset. This can include requesting an administrative hearing to dispute the debt or requesting an exemption based on financial hardship; getting out of default through federal default resolution programs like student loan rehabilitation or Direct loan consolidation; filing for bankruptcy; or applying for an administrative discharge if eligible.
The next step the Department of Education will take against defaulted federal student loan borrowers is administrative wage garnishment. This is a separate process from Treasury Offset, and allows the government to order private employers to withhold up to 15% of a defaulted borrower's earnings and apply it involuntarily to their student debt. Importantly, the department can pursue administrative wage garnishment in addition to Treasury Offset – they are not mutually exclusive programs (except for federal employees). That means if you are in default on your loans, the government could take 15% of your pay, and also seize your entire tax refund, for instance.
As with Treasury Offset, the government is required to send out initial notifications to borrowers, typically titled a 'Notice Prior To Wage Withholding.' This notice will outline a borrower's options to avoid wage garnishment. These can include notifying the department that the borrower has only recently become employed following a period of unemployment; disputing the student loan debt; requesting an administrative hearing based on hardship; filing for bankruptcy; applying for federal default resolution programs like loan rehabilitation or Direct loan consolidation; or applying for an administrative discharge if applicable. Borrowers have only a limited time to act, typically 30 days, before the garnishment will begin.
Importantly, borrowers may still have options to end wage garnishment and get out of default after wage garnishment has begun, but it can be much more difficult at that stage of the process. For example, to pursue loan rehabilitation, borrowers may have to make monthly rehabilitation payments in addition to their garnishment payments for a period of at least five months before the garnishment can be suspended. Direct loan consolidation may not be an option at all while a borrower is in active wage garnishment. And many borrowers pursuing administrative discharge or a hardship exemption will continue to be garnished until and unless they ultimately receive a favorable determination.
The department has indicated that administrative wage garnishment could begin as soon as the end of this month.
Meanwhile, more than eight million non-defaulted federal student loan borrowers who had enrolled in the SAVE plan may be hit with massively higher monthly payments later this year. That's because House Republicans just passed legislation that would repeal the SAVE plan and force these borrowers into a modified version of IBR that might be far more expensive. Here are some examples of how this may significantly increase monthly student loan payments based on income:
Under the GOP bill, borrowers would have the option of forgoing IBR and instead enrolling in a new income-driven repayment plan called the Repayment Assistance Plan, or RAP. RAP may be more affordable in some cases, but it might be more expensive for other borrowers, and the plan would keep borrowers in repayment for up to 30 years before they could qualify for student loan forgiveness – far longer than any other current IDR plan:
The House-passed legislation has not become law yet, as it must now be considered by the Senate, which may make changes to the bill's provisions. But it appears increasingly likely that the SAVE plan will not survive. As a result, millions of student loan borrowers will have to contend with much higher payments in as soon as six months, as well as delayed student loan forgiveness, under any of the alternatives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
18 minutes ago
- New York Times
Canada coach Jesse Marsch condemns U.S. treatment, ‘lack of respect' for Ukraine
Canada men's national team coach Jesse Marsch offered his support for Ukraine and the Ukrainian national team on Friday while also taking aim once again at United States President Donald Trump. 'As an American, the treatment that we have given the President of the Ukraine and the lack of respect really bothers me. Without having to know what it's like to go through something like what these players, this coach and this federation has been through, I am just really excited to be able to show our support,' Marsch said in his opening remarks at a Friday morning event with the Canada Ukraine Foundation. Advertisement Marsch is likely referencing a tense and fiery exchange between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Feb. 28 that made global headlines. Marsch has previously taken aim at Trump, saying in February that Trump should 'lay off the ridiculous rhetoric about Canada being the 51st state; as an American, I'm ashamed of the arrogance and disregard we've shown one of our historically oldest, strongest and most loyal allies.' Due to the Russian invasion, the Ukrainian national team is required to play its matches in neutral venues. 'If you think about the challenges that the players from Ukraine have been through, they haven't played a home match in several years, they've had to play World Cup qualifiers on foreign soil, they've had players playing professionally and internationally with the concern of the safety of their country and their family and their friends,' Marsch said. 'In general, the ability for us to have empathy and sympathy for everything that their team, their nation, their team, their players have gone through is really important at a time like this.' Ukraine's upcoming home matches in UEFA Group D of 2026 World Cup qualification do not yet have a location. 'As the Canadian national team coach, to show how much we are behind them, we are with them, that we want to do everything we can,' Marsch said, noting that one of the beauties of international football is that it 'can take on so much more than what the sport is.' Ukraine is in Toronto to play Canada in the Canadian Shield friendly tournament on Saturday. Ukraine will play its second match of the Canadian Shield friendly tournament on Tuesday against New Zealand, while Canada plays Ivory Coast also on Tuesday. 'It's really a pleasure and an honour to show that friendship and respect are at the core of everything we try to do in this sport,' Marsch said.


American Military News
21 minutes ago
- American Military News
New bill introduced on D-Day anniversary would ‘strengthen' US, UK partnership
A new bill introduced by a Republican congressman on the 81st anniversary of D-Day would allow the United States to share military technology with the United Kingdom. On Friday, Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) announced in a press release that he had reintroduced the Special Relationship Military Improvement Act of 2025 to strengthen the country's relationship with the United Kingdom on the 81st anniversary of D-Day. 'Our nation can never forget the sacrifice of thousands of Allied soldiers who lost their lives on D-Day and the invasion of Normandy. The price they paid ensured that millions could live free from tyranny,' Green said. 'And the best way to commemorate this momentous day is to strengthen our partnership with the United Kingdom—and that's exactly what this bill does.' In Friday's press release, the Republican congressman explained that advancements in military technology currently become the 'exclusive property' of the United States when sold to the federal government under the rules established by the International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Green said that while Canada is provided exemptions under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the United Kingdom is not provided exemptions. READ MORE: D-Day hero receiving medals for saving 200 lives If the Special Relationship Military Improvement Act of 2025 was passed, it would implement a change to the Arms Export Control Act to allow military technology to be shared between the United States and the United Kingdom. In Friday's press release, Green said advancements in U.S. military technology 'should be available to our allies' and that sharing military technology with allies was 'common sense.' Green explained, 'The U.S. and the U.K. work together in almost every aspect to share intelligence, fight terrorism around the globe, and ensure that, through our combined military strength, the world can enjoy unprecedented peace.' In a statement to Fox News on Friday, Green said, 'On the beaches of Normandy, it was British soldiers who ran in the sand alongside Americans.' He added, 'When we were attacked on 9/11, it was the United Kingdom that sent soldiers into Afghanistan to help us destroy al-Qaeda and the Taliban that gave them safe haven.' Green emphasized that the United States will 'never forget' the friendship it shares with the United Kingdom. The Republican congressman added that sharing military technology is 'crucial' in the face of increasing threats across the globe.


Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
More Musk-Trump Fallout: Tesla Sales Will Shrink At Historic Pace, Goldman Says
A pessimistic prediction for Tesla sales from Goldman Sachs added further fuel to the Tesla fire, as the unraveling relationship between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his former close ally President Donald Trump plays out publicly, accelerating Wall Street's concerns about the increasing exposure of Tesla to Musk's outspoken politics. Elon Musk has alienated 'multiple sides of the political spectrum' from Tesla, according to one ... More prominent Wall Street analyst. In a late Thursday note to clients, Goldman Sachs analysts led by Mark Delaney slashed their forecast for second-quarter Tesla vehicle deliveries to 365,000, far below consensus analyst forecasts of 405,000, according to FactSet. That would be an 18% decline from the same period last year, equating to by far the weakest quarterly deliveries growth since at least 2015, the extent of quarterly delivery data available on Tesla's investor relations website. It's another knock for Tesla as analysts warn this week's quarrel between Musk and the president, who Musk donated $288 million last year to help elect alongside other Republican candidates, could further weigh on Tesla, which is already grappling with declining brand sentiment on the left, historically the base for EV purchasers. This disagreement 'could potentially (temporarily) alienate multiple sides of the political spectrum," warned Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas in a Friday note. Tesla stock bounced back Friday, gaining 6% by early afternoon as part of a broader rally. That only recovered a small portion of Thursday's historic loss, as the Musk-led firm's share price is down 9% since Wednesday. The Musk-Trump division "clearly raises the degree of [near-term' uncertainty' for Tesla, according to TD Cowen analyst Itay Michaeli. Amid the kerfuffle, Trump threatened to cancel all of the federal government's contracts with Musk's portfolio of companies. That would likely impact the private aerospace and communications firm SpaceX far more than Tesla, which does not rely on government contracts for a significant portion of its revenues, but there is a way Trump could target Tesla's bottom line directly. Trump could restrict Tesla's ability to sell its automotive regulatory credits, according to Morningstar strategist Seth Goldstein, referring to the essentially free profit Tesla gets from selling its emissions credits to gas-powered automakers. That could dramatically reduce Tesla profits, as it reported $595 million in those regulatory credits compared to a $934 million net income during 2025's first quarter, meaning the credits directly contributed about two-thirds of its net profit. Since Musk announced his purchase of Twitter (now X) in 2022, Tesla stock has frequently faced downward pressure as its top decisionmaker and shareholder Musk became increasingly outspoken on politics to much controversy. Musk endorsed Trump in July and rose to become perhaps the most prominent and powerful figure in the early days of Trump's second administration, though the perceived impact of Musk's buddying up to Trump turned negative this year as sales globally for the automaker tumbled. In a further sign of fray in the relationship between Musk and Trump, the president has decided to sell his Tesla Model S, according to the New York Times. Tesla is expected to report its Q2 delivery numbers July 2.