Brexit spin doctor 'among MSPs who made Gnasher jibe' about Nicola Sturgeon
Former Tory MSP and Brexit spin doctor Brian Monteith was among the MSPs making jibes about the Nicola Sturgeon 'Gnasher' rumour it is claimed.
Sources told the Sunday Mail Monteith was 'the most prominent' of those remarking on the nickname in the Holyrood corridors during Sturgeon 's first term.
The former First Minister revealed in her memoir that she ended up crying in the toilet after learning of a derogatory rumour about her injuring a former boyfriend.
The gossip led to her being referred to as 'Gnasher' by some in parliament and the media, with Sturgeon revealing an MSP repeatedly made reference to the nickname, her teeth and dentists when she was around.
A former journalist who covered parliament at the time and was based at Holyrood said: 'Monteith was the most prominent MSP I remember who was saying things about this rumour and seemed to enjoy making remarks about Sturgeon's teeth and mouth.
'Most people would accept he was quite aggressive as a politician and I can see why Sturgeon could have felt intimidated or bullied by him.
'At the time I think many people just took the comments as the nature of politics even if it was a particularly disgusting rumour, but looking back on it it was sexist and wrong.'
Several former MSPs said they also recalled Monteith mentioning the rumour in parliament or commenting on Sturgeon's teeth.
Monteith was the MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife between 1999 and 2007. In 2005 he was ousted from the Tories after plotting the downfall of then-leader David McLetchie, who he referred to as "The Letch".
He later went to work as a spin doctor for Nigel Farage's Leave.EU campaign and became a Member of the European Parliament for the Brexit Party in 2019.
In her book Sturgeon wrote of an unnamed MSP: 'I was subjected to some nasty bullying by a male MSP of another party.
'At some stage over this first term in Parliament he started calling me 'Gnasher' both to other people and occasionally to my face. Whether he was the instigator of the story or just enjoyed referencing it to make me feel uncomfortable I don't know.
'His behaviour got steadily worse. He would often make 'jokes' about teeth or dentists when I was within earshot. He seemed to revel in my discomfort and I became quite scared of him.'
Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community!
Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today.
You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland.
No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team.
All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in!
If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like.
To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
Sturgeon said she chose not to identify the MSP who bullied her, concerned about the 'backlash he might whip up against me'.
A trawl of Holyrood's official report from the first term of the Scottish Parliament shows Monteith was the only MSP who commented publicly on Sturgeon's teeth. During an education debate on September 30, 1999, in which there had been no mention of teeth previously, Monteith said: 'Nicola Sturgeon may have perfect teeth, but she does not give me the ring of confidence when it comes to education policy.'
MSP Fiona Hyslop immediately interjected and asked if he would say the same thing 'about a male member of this chamber'
Monteith replied: 'Yes—if the SNP passes the brief to a male member, I would be happy to make that statement in the future. I say that as someone who does not have perfect teeth.'
Lib Dem MSP Jamie Stone said that the session was turning into a 'dental debate'.
Stone said he remembered Monteith's comments at the time and that they caused 'quite an uproar, particularly with female MSPs in the chamber.'
Sturgeon ally and former SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said: 'This was appalling behaviour by Monteith. It is not acceptable, offensive and bullying.
'We rightly call out all forms of abuse and it is the case that attacks on women in public life seem to be more prevalent than those on men. He should have been called to account.
'There is no place for such behaviour in our public life. We ought to think of those who can be traumatised by such unacceptable behaviour.'
A spokeswoman for Sturgeon said she would be making no further comment other than what is in her book.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Fix visa problems to allow Gaza students to study in Scotland
The Sunday Mail reports that Shaymaa, 32, who is using her first name due to safety concerns, is one of 10 Palestinians in Gaza who have been accepted onto fully-funded courses in Scotland. There are understood to be 78 Palestinians who have been accepted onto University courses in the UK. But, due to the only biometric processing centre in Gaza being closed – and all routes out of the country blocked by Israel - there is no way for the students to be allowed to complete the visa checks. READ MORE: Police Scotland 'breaching human rights to subdue Palestine protests' The UK requires visa applicants to provide fingerprints and photographs. The First Minister said he is 'appalled' that students are being prevented from reaching safety in Scotland. Edinburgh University and LibDem MP Christine Jardine have been lobbying the UK Government over the issue but fear time is running out as courses start in just a few weeks. Shaymaa is due to begin her PhD in English literature at Edinburgh University on September 1. She told the Sunday Mail: 'Education is the path to the future. It is one of the few remaining pathways to survival and dignity for Palestinians right now. 'The UK has an opportunity to offer practical, life-saving solutions to students like me. 'I urge him to implement an emergency route for students and researchers from Gaza, including biometric deferral and safe passage, so we are not excluded from opportunities we have rightfully earned.' Swinney said: 'I am appalled at the situation Shaymaa and other students from Gaza are facing. We must see urgent action from the UK Government to support them in taking up their university places in Scotland. 'The people of Gaza are already suffering unimaginably at the hands of the Israeli government – the idea that these students could also be denied the chance to take up the university places in Scotland they have worked so hard to attain is not acceptable to me.' The First Minister said Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth had contacted UK officials over the issue on August 13, and added that France, Ireland and Italy had managed to successfully evacuate students from Gaza. Gilruth has not yet received a reply, it is understood. 'The UK Government cannot simply duck its responsibilities here,' he added. 'Where there is a political will, a resolution can be found – and failure to act is literally putting these people's lives at risk. READ MORE: Alex Salmond's niece speaks out after Nicola Sturgeon memoir attacks 'I am clear that the international community must put a stop to Israel's killing in Gaza and that we must see the immediate recognition of a sovereign, independent Palestine. But until that point, the UK Government must do everything it can to ensure ordinary Gazans are not punished further.' Swinney said that the UK should do 'everything in its power' to get the students to safety. Earlier this month, 80 MPs signed an open letter to the Prime Minister urging him to take action to help the 78 students. SNP MP Pete Wishart, LibDem Wendy Chamberlain and Brian Leishman were among those who signed the letter. Shaymaa, originally from Absan al-Kabira, in the south of Gaza, was forced to flee her home when Israeli strikes started and has been displaced multiple times in the past 18 months. She is now living in a tent on a beach in al-Mawasi, Khan Younis, with 11 others. 'Coming to Scotland wouldn't just allow me to continue my academic journey– which has been severely disrupted – but would also give me the chance to live and study in physical safety,' she said. "It's not just about personal safety either. It would be a chance to reclaim a sense of direction, to write and think and teach without fearing for my life every second. It would allow me to begin healing and to carry the stories of Gaza into spaces where they urgently need to be heard.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are aware of these students and are actively considering how we can best support.'
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Moira Salmond resumes legal action over harassment case
Finance for the revived case — which originally sought around £3 million in damages and loss of earnings — has been secured, with wealthy supporters of Mr Salmond understood to be backing the proceedings. READ MORE The case accuses ministers of misfeasance — the wrongful exercise of lawful authority. Before his sudden death from a heart attack in North Macedonia last October, Mr Salmond had warned of a 'day of reckoning'. 'Attacks by the living on the dead will seem to many as deeply unfair.' (Image: PA) A family friend told the Sunday Mail: 'Moira is upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book — much of which is ridiculous and inaccurate. It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure that the full truth comes out and that Alex's name is cleared.' They added: 'Her case against the Scottish Government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him. 'There is an adjustment period ongoing until September where updates can be made by either side to their paperwork. It takes time, but the ball is rolling. Anyone who thinks this is just going to go away is wrong.' Ms Salmond has also previously urged for restraint. 'Attacks by the living on the dead will seem to many as deeply unfair,' she said in January. 'My wish, and sincere hope, is that these attacks will now stop.' The book, in which Ms Sturgeon denies a conspiracy to bring down her predecessor, but paints a damning portrait of him as a bully and a drunk, has prompted angry responses from Mr Salmond's family. His niece, Christina Hendry, branded Frankly "distasteful" and "cruel." She told the Scottish Sun on Sunday: '[Nicola Sturgeon] is using his name for relevance, to promote her book, to earn money — she could have said these things in the past few years. 'She has chosen to wait until he is no longer here to defend himself. It's left to the family to deal with this and there's an element of cowardice to that.' She added: 'My uncle spent his career bigging up Scotland and looking to the future — looking to make change for the better. 'He did not spend his time cashing in on others' legacy or using their name or dragging their name through the dirt.' Ms Hendry added: 'Many people are struggling to understand why she would do this and why she would have such disregard for the family and their feelings. 'Not once have I seen her mention any thought to the family and what they're going through with these headlines about my uncle. 'There's a question of jealousy and bitterness — she was not able to achieve the same and her political career does not have the same legacy as his.' Asked if she believed Ms Sturgeon was cashing in on her infamous fall-out with her uncle, Ms Hendry replied: 'Yes. I can't see any other reason. 'It seems quite a coincidence that the time she is saying this is the time she is selling her book.' Asked if she believed Ms Sturgeon was cashing in on her infamous fall-out with her uncle, Ms Hendry replied: 'Yes. I can't see any other reason. 'It seems quite a coincidence that the time she is saying this is the time she is selling her book.' Ms Hendry said Ms Sturgeon's actions were dissapointing (Image: Supplied) In the memoir, Ms Sturgeon claims Mr Salmond had not read the SNP's 650-page white paper on independence and left her to write much of it alone. She describes her 'cold fury' when he jetted to China, vowing to read the document on the plane, which she believed 'would not survive contact with the first glass of in-flight champagne'. READ MORE She also alleges he was 'implacably opposed' to gay marriage, tolerated rumours of 'consensual affairs' during his marriage, and 'failed to show contrition' for 'inappropriate' behaviour towards women. She suggests he may even have leaked news of the government investigation into him in 2018 to cast himself as a victim — a claim dismissed by his allies. Mr Salmond was acquitted of 13 charges of sexual assault, including attempted rape, at the High Court in 2020. A separate judicial review that year found the Scottish Government's investigation into him had been 'tainted by apparent bias', awarding him more than £500,000 in legal costs. Kenny MacAskill, Mr Salmond's successor as Alba leader, also condemned the memoir, saying: 'What has been published plumbs even lower depths than we ever imagined. Sturgeon has shown she is without honour.'
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Beyond Sturgeon, Salmond and the centrist collapse
No, we are at an interregnum, an idea from Antonio Gramsci's Prison Notebooks in which 'The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear'. In Scotland, this means a period of tittle-tattle and gossip over Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon's disputed legacy that leads us nowhere other than bitter rancour, which will not, and cannot be resolved. In place of strategy, we have anecdote; in place of meaningful dialogue or unity, we have personal animus and tribalism. The answer is not going to come from the old guard slugging it out, but an entirely new guard listening and strategising and outlining an entirely new prospectus. READ MORE: Ruth Wishart: Independence won't come to a nation feart of itself In England, the interregnum means a period of watching as a new populist Left emerges from the shambles of Keir Starmer's regime, or the country decays into Nigel Farage's fever dream. Some of the coverage of the end of the old regimes is hilarious. Alex Massie, apparently seriously, suggests that Sturgeon was sustained by something called the 'London Left', surely a phantom of the Unionist Right that doesn't bear much examination. In a massive statement of the obvious, in The Guardian, Martin Kettle writes: 'The most important thing about Sturgeon's political career is not whether she was relatable, good on television or better than the men. Pretty obviously, she was all three. "It is whether she was right to be a nationalist. In my book, she was wrong. From her teenage years, Sturgeon's overriding political goal has been to break up the United Kingdom. It still is.' Who knew? Across the pages, Iain MacWhirter takes the opposite view from Kettle, arguing that: 'The tragedy of Nicola Sturgeon: she was never a Scottish nationalist.' Too much? Not enough? It depends on where on the incredibly narrow political spectrum your white male columnists decide. None of this feeding frenzy matters. Getting On and Off THE world has moved on since Winnie Ewing uttered the immortal words 'stop the world, Scotland wants to get on' in 1967. Now, it's increasingly obvious that – in 2025 and beyond – Scotland needs to 'get off' the world that is predicated on endless growth, extractivism, fossil fuel economics and a commitment to the moral depravity that is support for, and involvement in genocide. All of this requires a complete break from the British state and a complete break from the disastrous economic orthodoxies that have led us into poverty, grotesque social inequality and a mindset which is rapidly destroying the ecological system on which, ultimately, we all depend. At some level, almost everyone knows this. 'Independence is normal', goes the slogan, and so it is. But so too is the routine abuse of power that comes with states of every size. Actually imagining and enacting something genuinely different is clearly the task at hand. This is way beyond a theatre of personality politics and tribes as we are currently seeing played out, and also way beyond the idea of 'course correction' or new strategems. It may even be beyond the idea that party politics or mainstream politics deliver change, there is no real evidence to support this claim, even if it is the operating system in which most discourse takes place. READ MORE: Rhoda Meek: Why do Scotland's islands pay the same tax for lesser services? Our colleagues in Believe in Scotland have posted on the fact that independence support jumps 5% if you tell people an independent Scotland will be a republic: 'People want radical change not an 'everything will be the same indy Scotland'. They think it's not worth the risk if nothing much is going to change!' So, let's do it. The first plank of a completely new plan for independence must be for a Scottish republic. It's 2025. Just as the disruptors of Farage or Zarah Sultana slug it out amid a failing system, so too in Scotland, we need a new politics. The old dictum (from Tony Blair and beyond) that you 'only win from the centre' is so obviously redundant to everyone apart from the commentariat that cling to old shibboleths and trundle out the same tired old prose. The centrist political project has collapsed, and this has consequences for Scotland. As Jonathon Shafi wrote a few weeks ago: 'There is no door-knocking to be done, and no community outreach to be had. Instead, this has to be a period of ideas. It is not impossible to make the independence question the gravitational pole for the most interesting and dynamic political thinking available. 'This involves opening big debates about Scotland's role in the world, and about its economic future. 'We should be producing more theorists, writers and speakers, building on the best radical traditions we have.' READ MORE: Jonathon Shafi: No referendum is coming. Let's drop 'Yes' and refocus I suspect that Shafi and I might not agree on what these might be, but I have to agree with his analysis that: 'For this to happen, we would need to escape the bandwidth as proscribed by the [SNP] on the one hand, and the main Westminster parties on the other to rebuild and rethink the foundations and principles of the project as a whole. To make them fit for the world as it is today. 'At present, it does not exist in any meaningful or political form. And here, you cannot avoid politics. 'The British state is becoming more authoritarian, so the response has to be to uphold civil liberties. Privatisation has failed, so the response has to be rooted in bringing our resources into democratic control. 'The UK Government has been arming a genocide, so the response must be to advocate for an entirely new foreign policy based on peace and justice. 'Only once the base achieves ideological coherence can there be a serious campaign which aims to reach out to wider sections of society.' He's not wrong, and this is not just the failure of a handful of personalities or a generation of political leaders. They did what they could from the world they had inherited. They failed, not out of treachery or incompetence but because they were (and are) trapped in a political system which doesn't work anymore. As the late, great Ursula Le Guin had it: 'We live in capitalism, its power seems inescapable – but then, so did the divine right of kings. Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings.' The Union seems inescapable, and a hundred scribes and more have careers dedicated to telling you this is so, even when they themselves can't believe it. Britain has changed; it has been transformed since the Blair era. The descent of British political values – and a salient reason to exit this Union as fast as possible – comes with the anniversary of Robin Cook's passing. He came from an era when Scots politicians could have serious heavyweight influence at Cabinet level, and when serious ideas, such as floating the notion of an 'ethical foreign policy', could be taken seriously. To be fair, they weren't taken too seriously, were they? His resignation in March 2003 – 22 years ago – marks a passing of time but is also a useful barometer of political change. Cook's resignation from his positions as Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons on March 17, 2003, in protest against the invasion of Iraq is unthinkable today, in an era when Labour proscribe Palestine Action and arrest grannies en masse and roll out facial recognition tech. There will not be another Cook in British history, and this is a low bar. We are where we are, but it's a long way from where we were. Back to the Future THE task ahead of us not just to re-orient ourselves around this reality, or recover from the myths and tragedies of neoliberalism, but to cast aside the gaslighting of the British state and media that there are any circumstances in which it is OK to be embroiled in genocide, or in which siding with a quasi-fascist like Donald Trump could be excused under the pretence of 'pragmatism'. Back to Shafi's idea that we should 'be producing more theorists, writers and speakers building on the best radical traditions we have'. By definition, I don't know what the future theorists, writers and speakers will be – though I do know they will be future-focused and as far from the current clutch as can be imagined. But what are the best radical traditions we might draw on? To 'escape the bandwidth', we might look to figures as diverse and iconoclastic as Jimmy Reid (below), Nan Shepherd, RD Laing, AS Neill, Mary Barbour, John Maclean, James Connolly, Elsie Inglis, John McGrath, or Geoff Shaw – or a thousand other under-recognised figures. We would need to look beyond them as individuals as beacons of clarity or insight, and see what movements they represented and came out of. Reassessing and establishing and archiving our own past would provide a rich seam to mine for, paradoxically, new ideas on social housing, land ownership, healthcare, political organisation, mental health, or our relationship with nature. This might, or might not, seem a laudable platform to transcend the current impasse. You might rule it out in favour of 'one last heave' or some other wild strategem. 'Go to the UN!' springs to mind. However, stay with me, if you can. There's another element that is going to make this difficult, and that is the calling of romance and melancholy that particularly affects the left, and regularly afflicts the Scots. We are enthralled to grandiose romantic failure, and we are addicted to it. We are enthralled with both a left and a Scottish melancholia. The Scots version: The King Across The Water, we might be familiar with, from Bonnie Prince Charlie, to John Smith, to Kate Forbes to Alex Salmond, is familiar to us all. It serves the purpose of succumbing to a state of perpetual regret. It is a romantic melancholy that allows us to dwell in the past and in victimhood. JK Gibson-Graham (a pen name shared by feminist economic geographers Julie Graham and Katherine Gibson) writes of the left equivalent: 'In which attachment to a past political analysis or identity is stronger than the interest in present possibilities for mobilisation, alliance or transformation. 'Rather than grieving and letting go, the melancholic subject identifies with lost ideals, experiencing their absence as feelings of desolation and ejection … We come to love our left passions and reasons, our left analyses and convictions, more than we love the existing world that we presumably seek to alter.' So as well as moving beyond a narrow bandwidth of political, economic and cultural thinking, we also need to transcend the tradition of melancholic victimhood and reminiscence of what 'might have been'. It's disabling and disempowering. READ MORE: Andrew Tickell: Why Darren McGarvey wants out of the prison of his own persona With this task in mind, the publication of Sturgeon's memoirs could act as a bookend to an era. We might divide recent Scottish history into phases that run from the post-war era 1945-1967, dominated by both British hegemony and cultural upheaval; the 1967-1997 period with the rise of Scottish nationalism alongside Thatcherism ultimately led to devolution, and the 1997-2026 era in which Blairism and then Tory rule culminated in the referendums for independence and Brexit. We are now in a period beyond that, a period dominated by Gramsci's 'morbid symptoms' in which everything seems moribund and stuck. However painful, this period is unlikely to last forever. The crisis of British Labour has deep consequences for the Union, and if we can go beyond the matters of personality politics and rebuild a movement for change, we can climb out of the present morass and move towards a brighter future.
