Atalanta CEO Reveals Terms Behind Lookman's Potential Exit
Atalanta CEO Reveals Terms Behind Lookman's Potential Exit
Atalanta CEO Luca Percassi's confirmed that the club had agreement in place to allow star forward Ademola Lookman to leave this summer but only under specific conditions.
Tensions Rise After Inter Milan Offer Rejected
Lookman's reportedly at odds with Atalanta after the club turned down 45 million euro offer including bonuses .. from Inter Milan. In response the Nigerian international issued official statement formally requesting transfer.
"A Deal Was Made, But With Conditions": Percassi
Speaking to Tuttomercatoweb , Percassi clarified the situation:
"It's good moment to clarify things. Last year, PSG offered 20 million euro and Lookman asked to be sold. As reliable club, Atalanta promised to let him go this summer but under 2 condition he himself asked for"
He explained those terms:
Move to major European club.
No transfer to another Italian club , out of respect for Atalanta and his journey there.
Final Say Remains with Atalanta
"Now as you can see, the situation has changed. The club always carefully evaluates player value & timing but the final decision lies with Atalanta" Percassi concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fantasy Football Mock Draft, No. 1 Pick: Full list of picks, analysis and key takeaways
Welcome to my 12-part mock draft series, where I'll be drafting from every position — 1 through 12 — in a standard 12-team Yahoo fantasy football league to uncover the optimal strategies and roster constructions at each spot. Using the Yahoo Fantasy Plus Instant Mock Draft tool, I went solo through each draft, making every pick. This series aims to provide a comprehensive breakdown of how draft strategy shifts depending on where you pick, with detailed insight into my thought process round by round. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] The scoring format is half-PPR, and the roster setup includes: QB, 2 RBs, 2 WRs, TE, FLEX, K, D/ST and six bench spots. Here's my squad from the No. 1 spot! Fantasy Football Mock Draft: Pick No. 1 Full Roster QB: Kyler Murray (ARI)RB: Kenneth Walker (SEA)RB: Aaron Jones Sr. (MIN)WR: Ja'Marr Chase (CIN)WR: Malik Nabers (NYG)TE: Brendan Strange (JAX) FLEX: Drake London (ATL)Kicker: Brandon Aubrey (DAL) D/ST: Eagles (PHI)Bench: Zay Flowers (BAL)Bench: Jordan Mason (MIN)Bench: Brian Robinson Jr. (WAS)Bench: Emeka Egbuka (TB)Bench: Tua Tagovailoa (MIA)Bench: Nick Chubb (HOU) Rounds 1–3: WR Anchor Build 1.01 – Ja'Marr Chase (WR – CIN) 2.12 – Malik Nabers (WR – NYG) 3.01 – Drake London (WR – ATL) Roster Assessment After Round 3 Holding the 1.01 pick in a 12-team half-PPR league is usually more of a curse than a gift. The pressure of hitting on that No. 1 pick, enduring the long waits and having to decide on picking value or reaching at the turn can be maddening. In this draft, I leaned into a WR-heavy approach early. Chase was a no-brainer at No. 1 overall, but I should be doing FED time after getting Nabers at 24. Consensus rankings have Nabers ADP at 10th overall, so that was the heist of the draft. Following up that pick with Drake London, I have three players with upside to finish inside the top-10 at the WR position. The downside: I have to prioritize getting an RB in the fourth round. I have a feeling there's going to be a run, so it's also important to assess what QBs and TEs are available for the turn. Rounds 4–6: Filling the RB & QB Voids 4.12 – Kenneth Walker III (RB – SEA) 5.01 – Kyler Murray (QB – ARI) 6.12 – Aaron Jones Sr. (RB – MIN) Roster Assessment After Round 6 The early WR depth allowed me to pivot to need-based picks without sacrificing upside. Murray gives me a solid floor as a dual-threat option at QB, but I was also able to address my RB concerns. I'm pro "don't leave your draft without a rushing QB." Back to the running backs. Walker's talent and big-play ability are enticing; however, I couldn't help but feel like I settled with Jones as my RB2, even though I got him three spots after his current 6.09 ADP. I'm still lacking a TE and have no depth behind my RB starters — something I plan to fix in Rounds 7–10. Rounds 7–10: Depth Building & Missed TE Window 7.01 – Zay Flowers (WR – BAL) 8.12 – Jordan Mason (RB – MIN) 9.01 – Brian Robinson Jr. (RB – WAS) 10.12 – Emeka Egbuka (WR – TB) Roster Assessment After Round 10 I missed out on my target TE tier — specifically, Tucker Kraft in Round 8 — and it hurt. That TE drop-off forced me into punting the position entirely. On the flip side, I was pleased with my expanded RB depth: adding Robinson and Mason gives me viable flex options and upside. I usually don't shore up an entire backfield, but given Jones' age and Mason's success last year with the Niners, I think he has good value relative to his ADP. I'm also expecting the Vikings to run more with sophomore QB J.J. McCarthy under center. At WR, I now had five playable assets. Flowers saw a career-best 116 targets last season and Egbuka could pop early if Chris Godwin (ankle) isn't ready by Week 1. Through Round 10, the roster is shaping up nicely minus the glaring hole at TE. Rounds 11–15: Filling Out The Unit 11.01 – Philadelphia Eagles D/ST 12.12 – Brenton Strange (TE – JAX) 13.01 – Brandon Aubrey (K – DAL) 14.12 – Tua Tagovailoa (QB – MIA) 15.01 – Nick Chubb (RB – HOU) Roster Assessment After Round 15 Usually, I wait on defense, but with the way my squad's looking, I took the plunge on a Philly defense that should generate plenty of sacks and turnovers. I'll stream if needed, but I like locking in one of the best D/STs here. Speaking of streaming, that's probably my future at TE with Strange ending up as my choice for TE. Yikes. Getting Aubrey, the highest-ranked kicker last year, ensures that I have a top asset at K. I was somewhat surprised at the QB options in Round 14, so Tua ended up being my backup selection. Chubb is a mere flier with Joe Mixon out with a foot injury during training camp. Key Takeaways Watch out for the RB runs from Round 1-4 Running backs were heavily targeted early relative to the other skill positions, especially in Round 1 (7 of 12 picks) and again in Round 4 (6 of 12). This confirms that by Round 4, the high-floor/high-volume RB2 options were vanishing. Don't wait as long as I did for a TE Unless you intend to stream the position, target a TE by the middle of Round 8. Six TEs went in Rounds 7 and 8, and I was left hanging, so that's one area where I would pivot my strategy from adding to depth and addressing a position of need. Take what the board gives you Nabbing Chase, Nabers and London was a cheat code. Yes, it's a mock draft, but it's a reminder that sometimes you have to take what the board gives you. It's not uncommon for value to fall into your lap, so act on it whenever you get the opportunity. My strategy tends to lean WR-heavy; it was a good thing I got London to sure up my core as seven WRs went in Round 3. Sometimes it's value; other times you set the tone — the beauty of drafting from 1.01.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Haydock Finance appoints new senior underwriter for structured deals
Haydock Finance has appointed Emily Barnett as a senior underwriter in its credit team, focusing on structured finance deals. With more than a decade of experience in the asset finance industry, Barnett joins Haydock after a tenure at Paragon Bank. According to Haydock, her role will involve dealing with more intricate and higher-value financial arrangements. Commenting on the appointment, Barnett said: "Haydock's strong commercial appetite and emphasis on relationship building really stood out and made the decision to join a very easy one. I am looking forward to working with our introducers and helping to deliver long-term collaborative success." Haydock Finance structured credit head Angela Hendrie stated: "We are thrilled that Emily has joined the team. Her professionalism, commerciality and dedication to delivering service excellence make her the ideal addition. I am confident she will add great value to both the team and our introducer partners." The company specialises in providing funding for various business assets with a range of financial solutions that include hire purchase, finance lease, refinance, growth guarantee scheme (GGS), and chattel mortgage. The company's financing solutions target buses and coaches, heavy commercial vehicles and trailers, cars and light commercial vehicles, agricultural and forestry equipment and others. Haydock Finance also delivers vendor finance solutions aimed at facilitating business expansion and improving cash flow. In June, Haydock Finance completed its third public securitisation, Hermitage 25, which involved the placement of £380m ($504.8m) in receivables into a public Asset-Backed Security (ABS). In May, Haydock Finance observed an increase in asset finance transactions valued over £500,000, enhancing the structuring and execution of large-ticket funding. "Haydock Finance appoints new senior underwriter for structured deals" was originally created and published by Leasing Life, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Caterpillar, Komatsu, and Volvo Dominate with Global Reach, Autonomous Tech, and Sustainable Machinery Innovations
Discover the latest insights in the Heavy Construction Equipment Companies Quadrant industry analysis, spotlighting top global players, cutting-edge innovations, and emerging trends. Recognized leaders include industry giants like Caterpillar, Volvo Group, and Komatsu, who are driving advancements in autonomous and sustainable technologies. This market analysis categorizes over 100 companies, with focus on machinery type, application, propulsion, and end-use industry such as mining and construction. Stay informed on the key developments in heavy machinery, crucial for sectors providing raw materials worldwide. Dublin, Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Heavy Construction Equipment - Company Evaluation Report, 2025" report has been added to Heavy Construction Equipment Companies Quadrant is a comprehensive industry analysis that provides valuable insights into the global market for Heavy Construction Equipment. This quadrant offers a detailed evaluation of key market players, technological advancements, product innovations, and emerging trends shaping the industry. The publisher's 360 Quadrants evaluated over 100 companies, of which the Top 12 Heavy Construction Equipment Companies were categorized and recognized as quadrant construction equipment refers to large-scale machinery, typically weighing over 12 metric tons, designed to perform specific tasks in construction, demolition, and mining operations. These machines - whether transportable, semi-permanent, or permanent - are primarily utilized for earthmoving, lifting heavy materials or containers, drilling into soil or rock, and carrying out concreting and paving work. Additionally, heavy construction equipment plays a crucial role in mining and construction activities that supply raw materials to various industrial market is segmented based on several criteria, including machinery type, application, propulsion type, power output, engine capacity, end-use industry, and geographic region. By end-use industry, the market includes sectors such as mining, infrastructure development, building & construction, forestry & agriculture, and other specialized applications. Based on machinery type, the equipment is categorized into excavation & demolition, heavy lifting, material handling, recycling & waste management, transportation, and tunneling machinery - each serving distinct functional requirements across construction and industrial PlayersKey players in the Heavy Construction Equipment market include major global corporations and specialized innovators such as Caterpillar, Volvo Group, Komatsu, Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., Terex Corporation, Liebherr Ag, Sany Group, Hd Hyundai, Xcmg Group, Cnh Industrial N.v., Wacker Neuson Se, and Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. These companies are actively investing in research and development, forming strategic partnerships, and engaging in collaborative initiatives to drive innovation, expand their global footprint, and maintain a competitive edge in this rapidly evolving 3 Companies CaterpillarCaterpillar stands as a leader, recognized for its broad range of heavy machinery, including excavators and loaders. This company excels in enhancing its Company Product Portfolio, emphasizing autonomous and sustainable technology. With a strong presence in over 500 locations worldwide, Caterpillar harnesses a vast dealer network to sustain its Company Positions globally. Its approach to integrating advanced technologies, like autonomous CAT 777 trucks, illustrates its forward-thinking strategy in Company thrives with extensive operations in the Asia-Pacific and American regions. Known for developing innovative machinery, Komatsu enhances its Company Ranking through strategic acquisitions, such as GHH Group GmbH, reflecting its commitment to expanding its Company Product Portfolio. Operating through various segments such as Construction, Mining, and Utility Equipment, Komatsu continues to gain traction by exploring electric and autonomous machine GroupVolvo Group is another pivotal player, renowned for its construction-related products. The company's focus on innovation in electric and hybrid machinery exemplifies its dedication to sustainable development. With a global footprint in multiple regions, Volvo's strategic expansions reflect its robust approach toward improving its Company Positioning. The group's advanced technology ensures efficiency and high performance, reinforcing their stronghold in the heavy construction equipment Topics Covered: 1 Introduction1.1 Market Definition1.2 Stakeholders2 Executive Summary3 Market Overview3.1 Introduction3.2 Market Dynamics3.2.1 Drivers3.2.1.1 Increasing Investments and Developments in Construction and Infrastructure Sectors3.2.1.2 Rapid Urbanization and Population Growth3.2.1.3 Technological Advancements and Upgradation of Equipment3.2.1.4 Government Investments and Supportive Policies for Sustainable Solutions3.2.2 Restraints3.2.2.1 Substantial Capital Investment3.2.2.2 Socio-Economic Effects of Heavy Construction Activities3.2.3 Opportunities3.2.3.1 Demand for Autonomous Heavy Construction Equipment3.2.3.2 Electrification and Digitization of Equipment3.2.3.3 Renting or Leasing Equipment3.2.4 Challenges3.2.4.1 Development of Alternative Optimized Solutions3.2.4.2 Lack of Skilled Labor Force and Maintenance and Repair-Related Issues3.3 Porter's Five Forces Analysis3.3.1 Threat of New Entrants3.3.2 Threat of Substitutes3.3.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers3.3.4 Bargaining Power of Buyers3.3.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry3.4 Supply Chain Analysis3.4.1 Raw Material/Component Analysis3.4.2 Final Product Analysis3.5 Value Chain Analysis3.6 Ecosystem Analysis3.7 Technology Analysis3.7.1 Key Technologies3.7.1.1 Autonomous Heavy Construction Equipment3.7.2 Complementary Technologies3.7.2.1 Connected Technologies3.7.2.2 Grade Control System3.8 Impact of Ai/Gen Ai on Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.8.1 Top Use Cases and Market Potential3.8.2 Best Practices in Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.8.3 Case Studies of Ai Implementation in Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.8.4 Interconnected Adjacent Ecosystem and Impact on Market Players3.8.5 Clients' Readiness to Adopt Generative Ai in Heavy Construction Equipment Market3.9 Patent Analysis3.9.1 Introduction3.9.2 Methodology3.9.3 Document Type3.9.4 Insights3.9.5 Legal Status of Patents3.9.6 Jurisdiction Analysis3.9.7 Top Applicants3.9.8 List of Patents by Volvo Group3.9.9 List of Patents by Doosan Infracore Co., Ltd.3.9.10 List of Patents by Korea Ind Tech Inst.3.10 Key Conferences and Events, 2024-20253.11 Trends and Disruptions Impacting Customer Business4 Competitive Landscape4.1 Overview4.2 Key Player Strategies/Right to Win4.3 Revenue Analysis, 2019-20234.4 Market Share Analysis, 20234.5 Brand/Product Comparison4.5.1 Excavators (Caterpillar)4.5.2 Excavators (Komatsu)4.5.3 Excavators (Xcmg Group)4.5.4 Excavators (Volvo Group)4.6 Company Evaluation Matrix: Key Players, 20234.6.1 Stars4.6.2 Emerging Leaders4.6.3 Pervasive Players4.6.4 Participants4.6.5 Company Footprint: Key Players, 20234.6.5.1 Company Footprint4.6.5.2 Region Footprint4.6.5.3 Machinery Type Footprint4.6.5.4 Application Footprint4.6.5.5 Propulsion Type Footprint4.6.5.6 Power Output Footprint4.6.5.7 Engine Capacity Footprint4.6.5.8 End-Use Industry Footprint4.7 Company Evaluation Matrix: Startups/Smes, 20234.7.1 Progressive Companies4.7.2 Responsive Companies4.7.3 Dynamic Companies4.7.4 Starting Blocks4.7.5 Competitive Benchmarking: Startups/Smes, 20234.7.5.1 Detailed List of Key Startups/Smes4.7.5.2 Competitive Benchmarking of Key Startups/Smes4.8 Company Valuation and Financial Metrics4.9 Competitive Scenario4.9.1 Product Launches4.9.2 Deals5 Company Profiles Caterpillar Volvo Group Komatsu Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Terex Corporation Liebherr Ag Sany Group Hd Hyundai Xcmg Group Cnh Industrial N.V. Wacker Neuson Se Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. Jc Bamford Excavators Ltd. Manitou Group Escorts Kubota Limited Deere and Company Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science & Technology Co., Ltd. Kobelco Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. Hiab Hidromek Doosan Bobcat Mahindra Construction Equipment For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
