logo
Ottawa expresses its resolve for Ukraine as Trump-Putin talks underway in Alaska

Ottawa expresses its resolve for Ukraine as Trump-Putin talks underway in Alaska

Prime Minister Mark Carney 's government says Canada's support for Ukraine is resolute ahead of talks today between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump has arranged the talks in Anchorage, Alaska, to discuss a possible land swap between territories held by Ukraine and those claimed by Russia, despite not including Kyiv in the talks.
The Kremlin says the talks are set to start this morning at 11:30 local time, which is 3:30 p.m. ET.
Putin's foreign policy adviser, Yuri Ushakov, told reporters that Trump and Putin will first sit down for a one-on-one meeting followed by a meeting between the two delegations. Then talks will continue over "a working breakfast."
A joint news conference will follow, Ushakov said, though Trump later said no decisions have been made about holding a news conference with Putin.
Trump said Thursday there was a 25 per cent chance that today's summit would fail, but he also floated the idea that, if the meeting succeeds, he could bring Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Alaska for a subsequent, three-way meeting.
Trump warned Wednesday of "very severe consequences" for Russia if Putin doesn't agree to stop his invasion of Ukraine after today's meeting, and also said Thursday he might be willing to stay in Alaska beyond Friday, depending on what happens with Putin.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov tamped down expectations for any breakthroughs from the Friday summit, saying there were no plans to sign documents and that it would be a "big mistake" to predict the results of the negotiations, according to Russian news outlet Interfax.
Both Zelenskyy and the Europeans have worried that the bilateral US-Russia summit would leave them and their interests sidelined, and that any conclusions could favour Moscow and leave Ukraine and Europe's future security in jeopardy by emboldening Russia to pursue more invasions.
Prime Minister Mark Carney took part in talks Wednesday with European leaders, and spoke directly with Zelenskyy on Monday. He said Canada's partners are "united on shared principles," particularly that Ukrainians must decide on their own future.
"Diplomatic efforts must be reinforced by military and economic pressure on Russia to end its unjustified war of aggression," Carney wrote Monday on social media.
"We welcome the leadership of the United States in working toward securing a just and lasting peace in Ukraine."
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand spoke with her Ukrainian counterpart Thursday, and said borders can't be changed by violence.
"We will continue to support Ukraine through diplomatic measures, military assistance and economic aid to hold Russia accountable for its illegal war," she wrote on social media, adding that Canada's support is "unwavering."
Analysts say western solidarity with Ukraine is crucial, as Putin seeks to break the resolve that NATO alliance members have shown.
Eitvydas Bajarunas, a former Lithuanian ambassador to Russia, told an online panel Thursday that the best thing countries like Canada can do is show unwavering commitment, because Moscow is betting western allies will eventually splinter.
"Putin (has) understood his strength is to outsmart the West, to outmanoeuvre the West, to wait until the West starts to crumble," Bajarunas told the Center for European Policy Analysis think tank.
"One of the goals of Putin is definitely to put a wedge into American-European relations, and to use all methods, including hybrid warfare and disinformation, to manipulate public opinion."
Olga Tokariuk, a Kyiv-based fellow with that think tank, told the panel that an optimal scenario for Ukraine would be if Moscow and Washington have no agreement Friday, "if there is like no pressure in Ukraine to make any territorial concessions."
Even better for Ukraine would be fresh US sanctions on Russia, if Trump feels Putin is stalling, she said.
"This war is not about territories of Ukraine. Russia has vast territories of its own," she said. "This war is about that destruction of Ukraine as a sovereign and independent state, as a state aligned with the West, as a democracy."
In recent days, Putin has expanded the scope of what the talks involve, including themes like nuclear arms control and "long-term conditions of peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole."
Jason Israel, a former adviser with the US National Security Council, said Moscow is trying to paint Russia and the US as influential countries that have restored relations after years of diplomatic chill.
He told the panel that if there is any agreement on Ukraine Friday such as a ceasefire, it remains unclear how such a deal would be implemented, as European leaders are not at the table and haven't consented to actually putting such a ceasefire into place.
Kyiv has long insisted that safeguards against future Russian attacks provided by its Western allies would be a precondition for achieving a durable end to the fighting. Yet many Western governments have been hesitant to commit military personnel.
Countries in the coalition, which includes France and the U.K., have been trying for months to secure US security backing, should it be required.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian PM's Independence Day speech highlights self-reliance
Indian PM's Independence Day speech highlights self-reliance

Canada News.Net

time2 hours ago

  • Canada News.Net

Indian PM's Independence Day speech highlights self-reliance

NEW DELHI, India: On August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi used his Independence Day address to call for greater national self-reliance, urging India to manufacture everything from fertilisers to jet engines and electric vehicle batteries. He pledged to stand firmly behind farmers as the country faces a deepening trade dispute with Washington. The speech came against the backdrop of new U.S. tariffs that threaten to slow growth in what has been the world's fastest-growing major economy. U.S. President Donald Trump's latest measures—announced last week—slap an additional 25 percent duty on Indian exports, pushing some rates as high as 50 percent, among the steepest faced by any U.S. trading partner. Washington cited India's continued imports of Russian oil as the reason for the escalation, further straining relations between the two countries. Although Modi avoided mentioning the United States or tariffs directly, he framed his nearly two-hour address from the Red Fort in New Delhi around a promise to defend rural livelihoods. "Farmers, fishermen, cattle rearers are our top priorities," he declared. "Modi will stand like a wall against any policy that threatens their interests. India will never compromise when it comes to protecting the interests of our farmers." India and the United States recently saw their trade talks collapse after five rounds of negotiations, primarily over U.S. demands to open India's farm and dairy markets and to halt Russian oil purchases. In retaliation for the tariffs, some of Modi's supporters have called for boycotts of major American brands, including McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon, and Apple. To counter the potential economic hit, Modi announced that lower goods and services tax (GST) rates will take effect from October, a move intended to boost domestic consumption. He also pressed for renewed commitment to "Swadeshi"—the promotion of Indian-made products—encouraging traders and shopkeepers to display signs marking local goods. Self-reliance has been a long-standing theme of Modi's economic policy, but the push has taken on new urgency amid global trade tensions and supply chain disruptions. He said India's first domestically produced semiconductor chips will reach the market by the end of this year, and that exploration for critical minerals is underway at more than 1,200 sites across the country. The stakes are high: in 2024, India exported nearly US$87 billion worth of goods to the U.S., with textiles, footwear, gems, and jewelry among the sectors most exposed to higher duties. While the trade rift is intensifying, New Delhi has sought to keep diplomatic channels open. On August 14, the foreign ministry expressed hope that ties with Washington would "move forward based on mutual respect and shared interests," aiming to calm fears of a deeper breakdown in relations.

Letters to the Editor, Aug. 17, 2025
Letters to the Editor, Aug. 17, 2025

Toronto Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Letters to the Editor, Aug. 17, 2025

Sunday letters Photo by Illustration / Toronto Sun BIG BLOATED GOVERNMENT As much as l don't agree with a great deal of what Trump is doing, many changes are long overdue because the system (like ours) is fraught with fraud, inefficiency, mismanagement and a bloated bureaucracy. Trump didn't create this system but is certainly giving out a large helping of tough love. If people like don't like it in their sheltered entitled world … by all means, go. Let's see how (Jimmy Kimmel) likes ltaly. He talks and talks but you notice he's still around. We need to take similar steps but our weak politicians either don't want to do anything or don't have any clue what to do. So … to you actors and entertainers, it's time to bring the curtain down and for you to exit stage left. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Bill Jamieson Toronto (Kimmel's ratings are on a steady decline. Perhaps if his show is cancelled or not renewed he will move. Trump isn't wrong to tackle government bloat – perhaps it's the process that is messy) BAD JUDGEMENT Justin Trudeau is still interfering with the internal affairs of Alberta. A Justin Trudeau government-appointed judge, Colin Feasby, has just delayed Alberta democracy by doing a full constitutional review on a referendum question that would grant Alberta the independence they desire. I'm sure the judge has heard the saying: 'Justice delayed is justice denied,' but I believe this judge will be remembered with a new phrase which will become his judicial legacy in Alberta history: 'Democracy delayed is democracy denied!' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Chris Robertson Stony Plain, Alta. (Trudeau's terrible legacy looms large with judicial appointments) LAND OF EVs China is imposing very high tariffs on Canadian canola seed and oil. This is in retaliation for Canada imposing very high tariffs on Chinese EVs. Why is Canada engaging in self-harm? EV sales in Canada are flat because they cost too much. The Chinese can produce an EV for 25K. They are way ahead of Canada and the U.S. in areas of electrical technology, cost and production time. Canada should eliminate the tariffs on these affordable Chinese EVs and alleviate the pain on western farmers. Prosperity for nations like Canada depends on strategic partnerships and reliable trading partners. Perhaps a domestic or foreign investor can get our own EV, the Arrow, into production. Let competition take its course. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Ian MacKenzie Toronto (The problem is the current Canadian government isn't thinking strategically. But we also don't want the Chinese dumping their vehicles here) SHELTER SHOCK Re 'T.O. taxpayers should demand better of city's homelessness services' (Matthew Lau, Aug. 14): Lau's argument is compelling, but Toronto's predominantly left-wing city council would probably ignore any such demand. Its ideologically driven city councillors don't like others telling them how to manage Toronto's homelessness services. This was demonstrated recently when MP Roman Baber attended City Hall to oppose a decision to locate a homeless shelter on Wilson Ave., between a daycare and a middle school. Baber was justifiably concerned about the danger that drug injection needles from the shelter would pose to children. Yet councillor Gord Perks repeatedly blocked Baber from speaking about it. That's democracy in action? Claudio Ceolin Toronto (The left only screams democracy when it suits them, otherwise they care little for it. There is legitimate concern about the location of this shelter and more people need to speak up about it) Columnists CFL Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA Crime

The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon. Europe is pushing back
The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon. Europe is pushing back

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

The Trump administration wants to end the UN peacekeeping in Lebanon. Europe is pushing back

WASHINGTON (AP) — The future of U.N. peacekeepers in Lebanon has split the United States and its European allies, raising implications for security in the Middle East and becoming the latest snag to vex relations between the U.S. and key partners like France, Britain and Italy. At issue is the peacekeeping operation known as UNIFIL, whose mandate expires at the end of August and will need to be renewed by the U.N. Security Council to continue. It was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Lebanon after Israel's 1978 invasion, and its mission was expanded following the monthlong 2006 war between Israel and the militant group Hezbollah. The multinational force has played a significant role in monitoring the security situation in southern Lebanon for decades, including during the Israel-Hezbollah war last year, but has drawn criticism from both sides and numerous U.S. lawmakers, some of whom now hold prominent roles in President Donald Trump's administration or wield new influence with the White House. Trump administration political appointees came into office this year with the aim of shutting down UNIFIL as soon as possible. They regard the operation as an ineffectual waste of money that is merely delaying the goal of eliminating Hezbollah's influence and restoring full security control to the Lebanese Armed Forces that the government says it is not yet capable of doing. After securing major cuts in U.S. funding to the peacekeeping force, Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed off early last week on a plan that would wind down and end UNIFIL in the next six months, according to Trump administration officials and congressional aides familiar with the discussions. It's another step as the Trump administration drastically pares back its foreign affairs priorities and budget, including expressing skepticism of international alliances and cutting funding to U.N. agencies and missions. The transatlantic divide also has been apparent on issues ranging from Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza and the Russia-Ukraine conflict to trade, technology and free speech issues. Europeans push back against a quick end to UN peacekeeping in Lebanon Israel has for years sought an end to UNIFIL's mandate, and renewal votes have often come after weeks of political wrangling. Now, the stakes are particularly high after last year's war and more vigorous opposition in Washington. European nations, notably France and Italy, have objected to winding down UNIFIL. With the support of Tom Barrack, U.S. ambassador to Turkey and envoy to Lebanon, they successfully lobbied Rubio and others to support a one-year extension of the peacekeeping mandate followed by a time-certain wind-down period of six months, according to the administration officials and congressional aides, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. Israel also reluctantly agreed to an extension, they said. The European argument was that prematurely ending UNIFIL before the Lebanese army is able to fully secure the border area would create a vacuum that Hezbollah could easily exploit. The French noted that when a U.N. peacekeeping mission in Mali was terminated before government troops were ready to deal with security threats, Islamic extremists moved in. With the U.S. easing off, the issue ahead of the U.N. vote expected at the end of August now appears to be resistance by France and others to setting a firm deadline for the operation to end after the one-year extension, according to the officials and congressional aides. French officials did not respond to requests for comment. The final French draft resolution, obtained by The Associated Press, does not include a date for UNIFIL's withdrawal, which U.S. officials say is required for their support. Instead, it would extend the peacekeeping mission for one year and indicates the U.N. Security Council's 'intention to work on a withdrawal.' But even if the mandate is renewed, the peacekeeping mission might be scaled down for financial reasons, with the U.N. system likely facing drastic budget cuts, said a U.N. official, who was not authorized to comment to the media and spoke on condition of anonymity. One of the U.S. officials said an option being considered was reducing UNIFIL's numbers while boosting its technological means to monitor the situation on the ground. The peacekeeping force has faced criticism There are about 10,000 peacekeepers in southern Lebanon, while the Lebanese army has around 6,000 soldiers, a number that is supposed to increase to 10,000. Hezbollah supporters in Lebanon have frequently accused the U.N. mission of collusion with Israel and sometimes attacked peacekeepers on patrol. Israel, meanwhile, has accused the peacekeepers of turning a blind eye to Hezbollah's military activities in southern Lebanon and lobbied for its mandate to end. Sarit Zehavi, a former Israeli military intelligence analyst and founder of the Israeli think tank Alma Research and Education Center, said UNIFIL has played a 'damaging role with regard to the mission of disarming Hezbollah in south Lebanon.' She pointed to the discovery of Hezbollah tunnels and weapons caches close to UNIFIL facilities during and after last year's Israel-Hezbollah war, when much of the militant group's senior leadership was killed and much of its arsenal destroyed. Hezbollah is now under increasing pressure to give up the rest of its weapons. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said UNIFIL continues to discover unauthorized weapons, including rocket launchers, mortar rounds and bomb fuses, this week, which it reported to the Lebanese army. Under the U.S.- and France-brokered ceasefire, Israel and Hezbollah were to withdraw from southern Lebanon, with the Lebanese army taking control in conjunction with UNIFIL. Israel has continued to occupy five strategic points on the Lebanese side and carry out near-daily airstrikes that it says aim to stop Hezbollah from regrouping. Lebanon supports keeping UN peacekeepers Lebanese officials have called for UNIFIL to remain, saying the country's cash-strapped and overstretched army is not yet able to patrol the full area on its own until it. Retired Lebanese Army Gen. Khalil Helou said that if UNIFIL's mandate were to abruptly end, soldiers would need to be pulled away from the porous border with Syria, where smuggling is rife, or from other areas inside of Lebanon — 'and this could have consequences for the stability' of the country. UNIFIL 'is maybe not fulfilling 100% what the Western powers or Israel desire. But for Lebanon, their presence is important,' he said. The United Nations also calls the peacekeepers critical to regional stability, Dujarric said. UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti said deciding on the renewal of the mandate is the prerogative of the U.N. Security Council. 'We are here to assist the parties in implementation of the mission's mandate and we're waiting for the final decision,' he said. ___ Associated Press writer Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store