logo
Ohio Senate votes to confine intoxicating hemp to dispensaries, make sales 21+

Ohio Senate votes to confine intoxicating hemp to dispensaries, make sales 21+

Yahoo03-05-2025

May 3—A bill banning intoxicating hemp products from being sold in gas stations, convenience stores or anywhere else outside of a licensed dispensary passed the Ohio Senate 33-0 this week.
The bill, Senate Bill 86, now heads to the Ohio House for further consideration. It's the latest in a growing line of otherwise stalled attempts to regulate intoxicating hemp in Ohio.
The bill targets "intoxicating hemp products," defined as any product with more than two milligrams of delta-9 THC (the psychoactive cannabinoid in marijuana) or more than 0.5 milligrams of any other "non-delta-9 THC" (like delta-8 or THCA, which can also make users feel high) per package.
Under current law, those products — derived from hemp and protected under the federal Farm Bill — can be sold just about anywhere in the state and to anyone at the seller's discretion.
Such products are often sold in gas stations, convenience stores or CBD stores, and have frequently been targeted by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and other opponents for their potential appeal to children through colorful packaging and subliminal branding.
Under S.B. 86, those products could only be sold by licensed cannabis dispensaries, with a 10% tax that matches the tax Ohio currently has on recreational marijuana.
"This bill simply closes loopholes that allows these dangerous products to be sold to our children," said state Sen. Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City, who jointly sponsors the bill.
Robert McClure, a veteran and owner of a boutique "SunMed — Your CBD Store" in Centerville, told this news outlet that it's frustrating for his business — which doesn't sell to customers under 21 and focuses on wellness — to be lumped in with more problematic retailers.
McClure told the Senate General Government Committee last month that S.B. 86 would make it illegal for him to carry most of his best-selling products and would put him "and many others who are doing it right out of business."
In an interview with this outlet, McClure specifically noted that he would no longer be able to sell his "bread and butter:" tinctures of full spectrum CBD oil sold in monthslong supply. His two-month, 3,000 milligram oil tinctures, for example, contain 75 milligrams of THC — far above the bounds of what S.B. 86 allows to be sold outside dispensaries.
McClure said CBD, which is non-intoxicating, trumps the THC contents in those tinctures by as much as 50-to-1.
When this outlet talked with Senate leaders on both sides of the aisle, they downplayed McClure's concern about S.B. 86 putting him out of business.
"I still think if they were operating before they'll be able to operate after," said Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon.
"What I will say is that there are legitimate products that they can be selling to make money that will not put our children in jeopardy, and that's where I'll leave that," said Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood.
McClure doubled down on the threat S.B. 86 poses to his business and maintained that shops like his, offering products like his, are an essential part of Ohio's wellness ecosystem and offer a space to educate people on CBD products.
"(If) you put these in the hands of the dispensaries, they're not selling this stuff. There's no way they're going to sell this stuff," McClure told this outlet. "That's not their bread and butter. Their bread and butter is selling marijuana, that's what they do."
------
For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening.
Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts

CNBC

time12 minutes ago

  • CNBC

PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts

The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.

Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'

WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports
Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans press Pentagon chief over Trump's plan to end Russia's war against Ukraine, Politico reports

At a Senate budget hearing on June 11, Republican senators fiercely criticized U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Trump administration's effort to end the Ukraine war through negotiations involving Russia. The session revealed deep divisions within the GOP on U.S. foreign policy, as lawmakers clashed over the administration's strategic direction, Politico reports. Leading the pushback was Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, one of three Republicans who voted against Hegseth's confirmation, who warned, "America's reputation is on the line." McConnell, now chair of the panel overseeing defense funding, issued some of his strongest public criticism yet, questioning whether the United States would continue defending democratic allies against authoritarian threats. He contrasted his stance — rooted in a Reagan-era commitment to global leadership — with Hegseth's "America First" approach favored by many Trump supporters. "We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses," McConnell said. When asked who the aggressor in the three-year-old war is, Hegseth responded, "Russia is the aggressor." But he avoided directly stating which side the U.S. wants to see win, instead emphasizing that President Trump is committed to achieving peace. Hegseth shifted blame to the Biden and Obama administrations, arguing that slow responses during their terms allowed Putin to seize Crimea and invade Ukraine. "Vladimir Putin knows that President Trump is strong," he said, suggesting a negotiated peace would bolster America's global position. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a prominent Trump ally, questioned whether Putin would stop his territorial ambitions if he gained ground in Ukraine. Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine said he did not believe Putin would stop. Hegseth, however, responded, "It remains to be seen." Graham rebuked that answer, saying, "This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen." Democrats also raised concerns. Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware criticized the administration for omitting Ukraine aid in its 2026 budget request and warned against compromising too much for the sake of peace. 'We cannot abandon Ukraine,' he said. Hegseth defended the administration's strategy, calling a negotiated settlement a show of strength. "The alternative of endless war that is largely funded by the United States and fought by Ukrainians… does not make sense strategically," he said. Read also: America's weak strongman We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store