logo
Chilling maps show terrifying apocalyptic power of Britain's new air-launched NUKES joining RAF's doomsday arsenal

Chilling maps show terrifying apocalyptic power of Britain's new air-launched NUKES joining RAF's doomsday arsenal

Scottish Suna day ago

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
CHILLING maps show the apocalyptic power of air launched nuclear weapons returning to Britain's doomsday arsenal.
RAF Top Guns are set to fly with tactical nuclear weapons for the first time in 30 years.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
Trident 2 missiles can carry up to eight nuclear warheads
Credit: PA
3
F-35 bombers will be based in RAF Marham in Norfolk
3
It comes after the government ordered a dozen nuclear bombers that can carry American bombs.
The F-35A bombers – to be based RAF Marham in Norfolk – are certified to carry American B-61 free fall nukes.
The bombs are designed to give governments options in a spiralling state-on-state conflict.
They are less destructive than doomsday weapons carried in the UK's nuclear deterrent submarines.
But even the smallest H-Bomb – known as the B-61 Mod 3 – can engulf a whole city block in a thermo-nuclear fireball.
It's payload is the equivalent of 300 tons of TNT explosives.
If the bomb was dropped on a city, anyone inside an eight block radius would suffer horrific third degree burns as temperatures from the nuclear explosion can reach tens of millions of degrees celsius.
The radioactive fall out would wipe an area the size of 200 football pitches.
And if the bomb was primed to explode in the air – a split second before impact – the total blast area would cover an area of 800 football pitches.
Larger versions of the B-61with have more than 1000 times more explosive power.
Britain to test fire nuke missile in major show-of-force with sub launching 44ft Trident 2 for first time since 2016
But even they are dwarfed by the devastating power of warheads on Britain's Trident 2 missiles.
Each Trident 2 missile can carry up to eight nuclear warheads.
And the destructive power of each warhead ranges from 90 to 475 kilotons – or the equivalent of 475,000 tons of TNT.
The blast radius of an single airburst warhead would flatten homes across an area the size of 12,000 football pitches.
The total blast radius would be even bigger.
But they warheads are designed to scatter as they plummet to earth from the edge of space – which means a single missile could render a capital totally uninhabitable.
A former defence chief told The Sun: 'At the moment Britain has a gap in its arsenal.
'We have Tomahawk cruise missiles and Storm Shadows.
'Both of those can take out a hardened building or a bunker.
'But after that the only thing bigger is Trident.'
Vladimir Putin threatened to drop a tactical nuke in 2022 as a terrifying 'show of force' in Ukraine.
His troops had been forced to retreat on three fronts – in Kyiv, Kharkiv and Kherson – and he was furious at western support for Ukraine.
It triggered a frantic diplomatic effort that saw China and India helping to to convince the tyrant to abort.
We have Tomahawk cruise missiles and Storm Shadows. Both of those can take out a hardened building or a bunker
Former defence chief
The UK scrapped its air-launched nukes in 1998.
Before that the WE-177 bomb – known by pilots as 'the shape' – was carried on Tornado jets.
The new F-35As will be able to carry conventional and nuclear weapons, like the Tornados before them.
Pilots sent on a nuclear raids risk being annihilated the blasts caused by their own weapons.
An RAF source: 'These are gravity bombs, so it is not like a Storm Shadow that you can fire 200km from a target.
'It will depend on the size of the blast.'
Before the Tornado's Britain's air launched nukes were carried on 'V Bombers' including the Avro Vulcan, which served until 1984.
Modern nuclear jets are designed to withstand the deadly electro-magnetic pulse caused by nuclear explosions, which can fry electronics and causing aircraft to crash.
Weapons were less precise in the 80s. So the best way to destroy a bridge would have been with a tactical nuke
A Top Gun who trained to drop WE-177s
During the Cold War the UK's tactical nukes were designed take out Russian infrastructure, including bridges.
A Top Gun who trained to drop WE-177s said: 'This was before smart bombs, and guided bombs.
'Weapons were less precise in the 80s. So the best way to destroy a bridge would have been with a tactical nuke.'
Britain still makes its own nuclear warheads for the Trident 2 missiles on submarines, at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston.
But it is not expected to manufacture sovereign nukes for the fleet of F-35As.
The RAF said the F-35As will be 'available to fly Nato's nuclear mission in a crisis'.
They said it would, 'boost Britain's contribution to 'nuclear burden-sharing and deter those who would do the UK and our allies harm.'
The RAF added: 'It reintroduces a nuclear role for the RAF for the first time since the UK retired its sovereign air-launched nuclear weapons following the end of the Cold War.'
The US already has deals with a number of Nato nations to host and fly its nuclear bombs.
The US Air Force has recently upgraded its nuclear storage bunkers at RAF Lakenheath in Norfolk, where its own F-35As are based.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action
Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action

Leader Live

time2 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action

During a talk at Glastonbury Festival's Speakers Forum with Palestine Action activist Francesca Nadin, Baroness Jenny Jones said people inside the Lords had told her she 'should not be sharing a platform' with the group, but she added she was 'proud' to be with them. It comes after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she would proscribe Palestine Action and would lay an order before Parliament in the coming days to make membership and support for them illegal, after a number of the group's members vandalised two planes at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Following the talk, Baroness Jones told the PA news agency: 'I've worked on policing issues, civil liberties and protests for more than 25 years, and I know very clearly, very well, that what the Government is doing to Palestine Action is not a legal act. 'They are not a terrorist organisation and, to be honest, if the Government proscribes them, there's going to be an outcry. 'Presumably, the legislation will come to the House of Lords, and I will definitely vote against it. 'It is bizarre, because it almost looks as if the Government is frightened of protest. I mean, that's something that I've seen with the Conservative government, but now with the Labour Government, we're seeing it as well. 'They actually don't like opposition of any sort, and that's not democracy, and what they are planning to do is not democratic.' The 75-year-old said the group, along with fellow activist organisation Youth Demand, 'represent an energy and a future that quite honestly is beyond me at the moment', adding she was 'furious' with the Government during the talk. She told PA: 'If some of us in the House of Lords vote against proscribing Palestine Action, will that make us liable for prosecution in some way or another? 'They've got a huge number of supporters, 250,000 at least, and I'm sure this particular action by the Government will give them even more supporters. 'The Government is going to find it very difficult to suppress the protest.' Baroness Jones spoke as Irish rap trio Kneecap, who have seen one of their members charged with a terror offence, prepare to perform on the West Holts Stage at 4pm on Saturday. Before the festival, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said it would not be 'appropriate' for them to perform their slot at Worthy Farm. Rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh was charged for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah at a gig in London in November last year. Last week, the 27-year-old, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was cheered by hundreds of supporters as he arrived with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh at Westminster Magistrates' Court in 'Free Mo Chara' T-shirts. He was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing at the same court on August 20. On Thursday evening, the rap trio posted a film to social media, titled Stop The Genocide, which includes testimonies from a Palestinian activist and plastic surgeon on the war in Gaza.

Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action
Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action

North Wales Chronicle

time2 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Green Party peer says she will vote against proscribing Palestine Action

During a talk at Glastonbury Festival's Speakers Forum with Palestine Action activist Francesca Nadin, Baroness Jenny Jones said people inside the Lords had told her she 'should not be sharing a platform' with the group, but she added she was 'proud' to be with them. It comes after Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she would proscribe Palestine Action and would lay an order before Parliament in the coming days to make membership and support for them illegal, after a number of the group's members vandalised two planes at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. Following the talk, Baroness Jones told the PA news agency: 'I've worked on policing issues, civil liberties and protests for more than 25 years, and I know very clearly, very well, that what the Government is doing to Palestine Action is not a legal act. 'They are not a terrorist organisation and, to be honest, if the Government proscribes them, there's going to be an outcry. 'Presumably, the legislation will come to the House of Lords, and I will definitely vote against it. 'It is bizarre, because it almost looks as if the Government is frightened of protest. I mean, that's something that I've seen with the Conservative government, but now with the Labour Government, we're seeing it as well. 'They actually don't like opposition of any sort, and that's not democracy, and what they are planning to do is not democratic.' The 75-year-old said the group, along with fellow activist organisation Youth Demand, 'represent an energy and a future that quite honestly is beyond me at the moment', adding she was 'furious' with the Government during the talk. She told PA: 'If some of us in the House of Lords vote against proscribing Palestine Action, will that make us liable for prosecution in some way or another? 'They've got a huge number of supporters, 250,000 at least, and I'm sure this particular action by the Government will give them even more supporters. 'The Government is going to find it very difficult to suppress the protest.' Baroness Jones spoke as Irish rap trio Kneecap, who have seen one of their members charged with a terror offence, prepare to perform on the West Holts Stage at 4pm on Saturday. Before the festival, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said it would not be 'appropriate' for them to perform their slot at Worthy Farm. Rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh was charged for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah at a gig in London in November last year. Last week, the 27-year-old, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was cheered by hundreds of supporters as he arrived with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh at Westminster Magistrates' Court in 'Free Mo Chara' T-shirts. He was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing at the same court on August 20. On Thursday evening, the rap trio posted a film to social media, titled Stop The Genocide, which includes testimonies from a Palestinian activist and plastic surgeon on the war in Gaza.

Following NATO summit, Trump and Europe still at odds over Putin's ambitions
Following NATO summit, Trump and Europe still at odds over Putin's ambitions

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Following NATO summit, Trump and Europe still at odds over Putin's ambitions

THE HAGUE, June 26 (Reuters) - For U.S. President Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin is a man looking for an off-ramp to his bloody three-year assault on Ukraine. But according to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the Russian leader may be just getting started. If the alliance does not invest in its defense capabilities, Rutte warned the annual NATO summit on Tuesday, Russia could attack an alliance country within three years. By most measures, this year's NATO summit in The Hague was a success. Member states largely agreed to a U.S. demand to boost defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product. Trump, who once derided the alliance as a "rip-off," said his view had changed, while a budding bromance blossomed between him and Rutte, who compared the U.S. president to a stern "daddy" managing his geopolitical underlings. But the summit, which ended on Wednesday, also highlighted the widening gap between how the U.S. and Europe see the military ambitions of Russia, the bloc's main foil. That is despite some lawmakers in Trump's own Republican Party hardening their rhetoric in recent weeks, arguing that while the president's ambition to negotiate an end to Russia's war in Ukraine is laudable, it is now clear that Putin is not serious about coming to the table. In a Wednesday press conference, Trump conceded that it was "possible" Putin had territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine. But he insisted that the Russian leader - buffeted by manpower and materiel losses - wanted the war to end quickly. "I know one thing: He'd like to settle," Trump said. "He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him." Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed Trump's view in a sideline interview with Politico, saying the U.S. was holding off on expanding its sanctions against Moscow, in part to keep talks going. "If we did what everybody here wants us to do - and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions - we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire," he said. The message from others at the summit was starkly different. A senior NATO official told reporters in a Tuesday briefing that Putin was not in fact interested in a ceasefire - or in engaging in good-faith talks at all. "Regardless of battlefield dynamics, we continue to doubt that Russia has any interest in meaningful negotiations," the official said. Russia's ambitions, the senior official said, go beyond control of "certain territories at their administrative lines," as Rubio put it. Putin is instead bent on imposing his "political will" on neighboring states. Rutte put the Russian threat in existential terms. "If we do not invest now," he said on Tuesday, "we are really at risk that the Russians might try something against NATO territory in three, five or seven years." The U.S. is not the only NATO member with a more optimistic view of Russia. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a longtime Trump ally and critic of European institutions, said Russia was "not strong enough to represent a real threat to NATO." Still, as the alliance's largest contributor and most powerful member, Washington's position is a central preoccupation in most NATO capitals. The White House, asked for comment, referred to Trump's comments at the Wednesday press conference. In response to a request for comment, a separate NATO official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, disputed that there were differing assessments within the alliance, pointing to a NATO declaration on Wednesday which referenced the "long-term threat posed by Russia." The Russian embassy in Washington referred to Thursday comments by Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, who criticized NATO for wasting money on defense. "It seems that only by invoking the fabricated 'Russian threat' will it be possible to explain to ordinary people why their pockets are being emptied once again," she said. The U.S. State Department and the Ukrainian embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. The lack of a common understanding about Putin's goals will complicate future diplomatic plans to wind down the war, said Philippe Dickinson, the deputy director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council and a former British diplomat. "To reach a peace agreement, it's not just something that Trump and Putin can agree themselves," Dickinson said. "There does need to be European involvement. That needs to mean that there is some sort of sharing of views among allies on what Putin is trying to achieve." European leaders likely have not given up on trying to change Trump's views on Russia, Dickinson said. But they were always unlikely bring up thorny conversations at the NATO summit. The alliance's main goal was to simply get through it without major blowups, he said, an aim that was accomplished. Still, peace came at a cost - the lack of substantive discussion around Ukraine and Russia, he argued, was conspicuous. "The lack of a Russia strategy is a real glaring omission from what the summit could have produced," Dickinson said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store