logo
Supreme Court upholds state ban on transgender minors using puberty blockers, hormone therapy

Supreme Court upholds state ban on transgender minors using puberty blockers, hormone therapy

USA Today18-06-2025
Supreme Court upholds state ban on transgender minors using puberty blockers, hormone therapy In her dissent, Justice Sotomayor said the Supreme Court 'abandons transgender children and their families to political whims."
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Families speak out for transgender youth at Supreme Court
Families of transgender youth tells how their lives could change if Supreme Court bans gender-affirming care.
WASHINGTON − An ideologically divided Supreme Court on June 18 upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, a major setback for transgender Americans who have increasingly become targets of conservative states and the Trump administration.
The court's six conservative justices upheld the ban and the three liberals dissented.
The decision − one of the court's biggest this year − came about five years after the court ruled that transgender people, as well as gay and lesbian people, are protected by a landmark civil rights law barring sex discrimination in the workplace.
But in this case, the court said that preventing minors from using puberty blockers and hormone therapy does not violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same.
"Having concluded it does not, we leave questions regarding its policy to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority.
In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the court retreated 'from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most,' and 'abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.'
Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti called the decision a "landmark victory...in defense of America's children."
"A bipartisan supermajority of Tennessee's elected representatives carefully considered the evidence and voted to protect kids from irreversible decisions they cannot yet fully understand," he said in a statement.
Chase Strangio, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union who represented the Tennessee families challenging the law, called the decision is a 'painful setback.'
But Strangio, who was the first openly transgender person to argue before the court, noted the opinion didn't revisit past decisions protecting transgender people from discrimination.
'We are as determined as ever to fight for the dignity and equality of every transgender person,' Strangio said in a statement.
The Biden administration and the Tennessee families that challenged the law argued it discriminated against transgender people because a teenager whose sex assigned at birth is male may be given testosterone to treat delayed puberty. But a teenager assigned female at birth who wants testosterone to treat gender dysphoria may not have it.
Tennessee countered that the treatments have different risks and benefits when used by transgender youth, who need to be protected from life-altering consequences.
The Supreme Court agreed, saying the law is removing one set of diagnoses − gender dysphoria − from the range of treatable conditions, not excluding people from treatment because they're transgender.
After the case was argued in December, the Justice Department under President Donald Trump told the court it was no longer challenging Tennessee's law.
Trump made opposition to transgender rights a central theme of his campaign.
The issue, a major flashpoint in the culture wars, gained prominence with startling speed, despite the tiny – though increasing – fraction of Americans who are transgender.
Since 2022, the number of states taking steps to limit access to gender-affirming care for minors grew from four to about half.
States have also taken steps to restrict the bathrooms transgender students can use, what sports teams they can join. and whether they can change the sex designation on their birth certificates.
When families with transgender children challenged bans on gender-affirming care, district courts largely sided with them and blocked enforcement. But three appeals courts upheld the laws, including the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Tennessee's law was the first to reach the Supreme Court.
More: Transgender lawyer makes history, takes case on puberty blockers and hormone therapy to Supreme Court
During the December oral arguments, several of the conservative justices voiced support for taking a similar approach to what the court did when it overturned Roe v. Wade, finding there's no constitutional barrier to the issue at hand and leaving it up to state and federal legislatures to decide.
'My understanding is the Constitution leaves that question to the people's representatives, rather than to nine people, none of whom is a doctor,' Chief Justice John Roberts said during December's debate.
The court's liberal justices had argued that the court can't ignore constitutional protections, particularly for the vulnerable.
'That's a question for the court,' Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said.
Sotomayor wrote in her dissent that the law 'plainly discriminates on the basis of sex,' tying it to the 2020 decision barring employment discrimination for transgender people.
Roberts responded that the court didn't decide in 2020 whether the reasoning could be applied outside of the civil rights law at issue in that case. And the court didn't need to now, he said, because neither the teen's sex nor transgender status is the reason he can't get puberty blockers under Tennessee's law.
Gender-affirming care for minors is supported by every major medical organization, including the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Psychiatric Association.
But the court's conservative justices focused more on the fact that some European countries have tightened restrictions on the treatments. England's National Health Service, for example, stopped prescribing the drugs outside of clinical trials after a review concluded more data is needed to help doctors and their patients make informed decisions.
Tennessee concluded that there's an ongoing debate among medical experts about the risks and benefits of the treatments, Roberts wrote.
"Recent developments," he said, "only underscore the need for legislative flexibility in this area."
The case is U.S. v. Skrmetti.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Student Loan Update: Some Borrowers Facing Major Change Within Months
Student Loan Update: Some Borrowers Facing Major Change Within Months

Newsweek

time22 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Student Loan Update: Some Borrowers Facing Major Change Within Months

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Some MOHELA student loan borrowers will be transferred to other servicers by the end of the year, according to Forbes. In discussions between Massachusetts' Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, the Department of Education confirmed they would be transferring borrowers from MOHELA, which previously managed the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Newsweek spoke with experts about what this means for borrowers. Why It Matters More than 40 million Americans carry federal student loan debt, and the outstanding nationwide balance exceeds $1.7 trillion. The Department of Education has been experiencing major changes since President Donald Trump took office, with many borrowers seeing higher monthly payments as a result of the updates. A sign marks the location of the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building on June 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. A sign marks the location of the U.S. Department of Education headquarters building on June 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. To Know The Department of Education uses contractors to manage the federal student loan portfolio, with MOHELA, Nelnet, Aidvantage and EdFinancial taking up the bulk of the student loan accounts. The transfer of borrowers under MOHELA could have major disruptions, but the Department of Education confirmed the change last month. "FSA is prioritizing efforts to improve customer service to students and parent borrowers," said Sarah Ursprung, acting assistant secretary for Legislation and Congressional Affairs at the Department of Education, in a letter to Senator Warren last month. "FSA is collaborating with MOHELA to help the servicer manage the multiple strains on its portfolio to help drive overall improvement. As part of these efforts, FSA intends to transfer a portion of MOHELA's PSLF portfolio to other servicers later this year." Newsweek reached out to the Department of Education and MOHELA for comment via email. It is so far unclear how many accounts will be transferred from MOHELA to other student loan servicers or when the transfers will take place. In the past, MOHELA received intense criticism for sending late or incorrect billing statements to borrowers, and the loan servicer also sent out notices to borrowers with misleading information about interest accrual. "It's not just punishment, more like load‑balancing," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of told Newsweek. "MOHELA's average wait times were 7 times longer than the next worst servicer in late 2024. The portfolio is mismatched to their capacity. Once PSLF tracking shifted to there's no reason to keep PSLF heavy borrowers at MOHELA." Many borrowers also complained about long call hold times and difficulties reaching customer service agents. "The 'call deflection' scheme diverts borrowers away from customer service representatives—often to non-operative parts of the MOHELA website—even though many servicing functions can only be performed by a customer service representative," the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) said in a statement last year. Senator Warren has also been vocal in her criticism of MOHELA, expressing concerns over how MOHELA has impacted student loan borrowers on a national scale. "MOHELA has consistently exhibited atrocious customer service, even compared to all other federal student loan servicers," Warren said previously. "For example, in the fourth quarter of 2024, MOHELA took roughly seven times as long to answer phone calls from borrowers compared to the servicer with the second-worst average wait time." What People Are Saying Senator Warren said in a letter to Secretary McMahon: "You also disclosed that ED will be moving some of the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority's (MOHELA's) federal student loan portfolio to other servicers later this year, a process that the Biden Administration set into motion given MOHELA's abysmal performance. You admitted that you were doing so to improve MOHELA's performance, and I appreciate your acknowledgement and action—to my knowledge, the first such admission from the Trump Administration—in response to MOHELA's failures to adequately serve borrowers." A MOHELA spokesperson previously told Forbes in response to the SBPC and AFT report: "Any claims that MOHELA does not act in the best interest of the borrowers we serve as a federal contractor is simply not true. MOHELA's priority has always been on helping the student borrowers that we are here to serve while they navigate the often complex and overwhelming federal repayment process, and that is what we remain proudly committed to doing." Ryan told Newsweek: "People don't like change, transfers create friction. Autopay can break. Due dates can slip. Payment counts for PSLF/IDR can display wrong, even if they're later corrected." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The reasoning behind this move is still unclear, but it's important to understand this isn't solely a bad thing. Given the recent slew of changes to student loans at the federal level, borrowers may take this news with concern. However, there are many borrowers who have had poor experiences with MOHELA, citing poor customer service as the primary reason." What Happens Next Borrowers who may undergo student loan servicing transfers are urged to monitor any changes and make sure their contact details with both their loan servicer and are up to date. "Transfers are rarely smooth. If the records at the current servicer are inaccurate, then the receiving servicer will be working off bad information from the start. The more times loans change hands, the greater the chance of errors," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "That's why it's critical for borrowers to keep their own documentation- PDFs or hard copies- of statements, balances, and interest calculations. If there's a discrepancy down the line, you'll have what you need to push back and ensure your loan data is accurate." Ryan echoed this sentiment. "A better borrower experience is possible, but only if data quality becomes the metric that pays," Ryan said. "Otherwise, they'll just play musical chairs with your loan file."

"He's Out Of His D*mn Mind" — Over 10.2 Million People Are Slamming Trump For His "Outrageous" Truth Social Post Criticizing Museums For Discussing Slavery
"He's Out Of His D*mn Mind" — Over 10.2 Million People Are Slamming Trump For His "Outrageous" Truth Social Post Criticizing Museums For Discussing Slavery

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"He's Out Of His D*mn Mind" — Over 10.2 Million People Are Slamming Trump For His "Outrageous" Truth Social Post Criticizing Museums For Discussing Slavery

It's been 159 years since slavery was legally abolished in the US, and yet, in 2025, discussing the history of slavery has seemingly become too "woke" for the MAGA crowd. During a recent CNN panel discussion, MAGA-supporting celebrity Jillian Michaels shocked her colleagues after she argued that slavery shouldn't be blamed on "just one race," — meaning white Americans. CNN / Twitter: @Acyn Related: Well, President Donald Trump recently took to Truth Social to argue a similar point, criticizing American museums that discuss "how bad slavery was," calling them "woke" and "out of control." He wrote that he's instructed his attorneys to "go through the museums" and make changes to reflect "success" and "brightness." Here's the full post. Related: The now-viral post has been seen by over 10.2 million people and received thousands of comments criticizing Trump for his rhetoric. One person called Trump "out of his damn mind," and advocated for the history of slavery to be taught "again and again." Related: Another person described Trump's post as "pro slavery rhetoric." While this person called the president "fragile" for feeling attacked by teaching slavery. Representative Jim McGovern advised Trump to "spend more time in a museum." Related: And Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of trying to "erase" slavery... And finally, this person asked: "Why do the same people who want to erase the history of slavery insist on preserving the Confederate flag and generals?" What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword

Newsom's office wishes Bed, Bath & Beyond well in ‘efforts to become relevant again'
Newsom's office wishes Bed, Bath & Beyond well in ‘efforts to become relevant again'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Newsom's office wishes Bed, Bath & Beyond well in ‘efforts to become relevant again'

California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) office on Wednesday knocked Bed, Bath & Beyond after the company announced it won't open any new retail stores in the Golden State. 'After their bankruptcy and closure of every store, like most Americans, we thought Bed, Bath & Beyond no longer existed,' the California governor's office posted on social media platform X. 'We wish them well in their efforts to become relevant again as they try to open a 2nd store,' the account added. Bed, Bath & Beyond announced this week it won't open or operate any new stores in California, citing what it called an 'overregulated' and a 'risky environment' for businesses. 'This decision isn't about politics — it's about reality,' Marcus Lemonis, the company's executive chairman, said in a Wednesday statement. He said California's business environment 'makes it harder to employ people, harder to keep doors open, and harder to deliver value to customers.' Lemonis noted the retailer will have stores in 'almost every other state.' Bed, Bath & Beyond closed all of its more than 300 stores across the country and declared bankrupty in 2023. Two years later, the company is attempting to stage a comeback, opening its first brick-and-morter store in Nashville, under the slightly changed name Bed Bath & Beyond Home. In California, while it does not have plans to open any stores, the company says it is offering 24-48 hour delivery services as well as same-day service for some products. In his announcement this week, the company's chairman targeted California's policies, saying, 'Higher taxes, higher fees, higher wages that many businesses simply cannot sustain, and endless regulations that strangle growth.' Retail theft has soared over the past two years, resulting in residents approving Proposition 36 in November to make repeat shoplifters subject to felonies. 'Even when the state announces a budget surplus, it's built on the backs of ordinary citizens who are paying too much and businesses who are squeezed until they break. At Bed Bath & Beyond, our responsibility is to our customers and our shareholders. We will not participate in a system that undermines both,' Lemonis said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store