Celebi subsidiary files 3 lawsuits in Mumbai
Celebi Aviation
's subsidiary on Thursday said that it has filed three lawsuits before the
Bombay High Court
, reported Reuters. The company has filed two lawsuits against the
Mumbai International Airport Ltd
. seeking reversal of the immediate termination of agreements by the Union
Aviation Ministry
. Another
lawsuit
has been filed seeking the suspension and annulment of the administrative decision to cancel Celebi's airport security clearance.
Celebi Aviation Services India Pvt Ltd handles around 58,000 flights and 5.4 lakh tonnes of cargo annually, across nine major airports, including Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore.
Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court is yet to commence the hearing of the Celebi Aviation case scheduled on Thursday, filed after the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) revoked the Turkish-based company's airport security clearance on May 15, along with all its associates. The Centre stated national security and public safety as concerns behind the revocation.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Sindh - South - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
In the previous Delhi HC hearing on May 21, Mukul Rohatgi, representing Celebi stated that Celebi has been running operations across nine airports for over the last 17 years, employing over 10,000 personnel. The Centre granted security clearance to Celebi Aviation in 2022 under Rule 15 for a five-year term.
But, the clearance was abruptly revoked by the Centre on May 15 without any prior notice or hearing. Rohatgi argued that this act violates the principle of procedural fairness. Assumptions are being made that the government's act might be inspired by the Turkish shareholding factor in the firm, as this came in the middle of the Turkey boycott campaign.
Live Events
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Centre manages to meet 4.8 per cent fiscal deficit for FY25
NEW DELHI: The central government managed to meet the fiscal deficit target of 4.8 per cent of the GDP for 2024-25, according to the provisional data released by the Controller General of Accounts on Friday. In the revised estimates (RE) presented to Parliament in February, the government had pegged the fiscal deficit or gap between expenditure and revenue at Rs 15,69,527 crore or 4.8 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP). The CGA data showed that the fiscal deficit in actual terms was Rs 15,77,270 crore, or 100.5 per cent, of the RE. The economic growth in nominal terms for the fiscal 2024-25 is estimated at Rs 3,30,68,145 crore, according to the GDP data released earlier in the day. The government received Rs 30.78 lakh crore or 97.8 per cent of RE 2024-25 of total receipts during 2024-25. This comprised Rs 24.99 lakh crore tax revenue (net to Centre), Rs 5.37 lakh crore of non-tax revenue and Rs 41,818 crore of non-debt capital receipts, the CGA data showed. Non-debt capital receipts consist of recovery of loans (Rs 24,616 crore) and miscellaneous capital receipts (Rs 17,202 crore). According to the CGA data, Rs 12,86,885 crore has been transferred to state governments as devolution of share of taxes by the government up to March 2025, which is Rs 1,57,391 crore higher than the previous year. The total expenditure incurred by the Centre is Rs 46.55 lakh crore (98.7 per cent of corresponding RE 2024-25), out of which Rs 36.03 lakh crore is on revenue account and Rs 10.52 lakh crore is on capital account. Out of the total revenue expenditure, Rs 11.16 lakh crore is on account of interest payments, and Rs 3.88 lakh crore is on account of major subsidies. Commenting on the CGA data, Icra Chief Economist Aditi Nayar said the fiscal deficit marginally exceeded the RE for FY2025, albeit led by a welcome overshooting in capital expenditure amid a less palatable miss on the receipts side being largely offset by considerable savings in revenue expenditure in the fiscal. "The upward revision in the FY2025 nominal GDP number also augurs well for meeting the deficit and debt to GDP targets for FY2026," she said.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will you get a refund for Trump tariffs after federal court's ruling? Check details
What did the US court of International trade say? Live Events What happens now? Tariff refunds and Trump team's response (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump on Thursday received temporary approval to continue collecting tariffs under emergency powers, just a day after a separate court ruled that he had exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping levies on foreign imports. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit allowed the April 2 tariffs to remain in place while the White House appeals the trade court's decision. The New York-based court said the US Constitution gave Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other nations, and that this was not superseded by the president's remit to safeguard the businesses and a group of states had challenged the tariffs that have shaken up the world economic order. Now that two federal courts have ruled that President Trump had overstepped his authority in ordering the tariffs, many have been asking one question: Will they get that money back?On Wednesday, a three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not grant the president authority to impose his sweeping tariffs or bypass Congress' typical control over economic policy and commerce. The 1977 law was cited by Trump as justification for the majority of his tariffs, most notably those unveiled on "Liberation Day" in early April."The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder," the ruling read. The decision, made after multiple lawsuits accusing the president of overstepping authority on trade matters, addresses the paused 'reciprocal' tariffs as well as the 10 percent baseline tariff applied worldwide. Additionally, the ruling stops the 'trafficking' tariffs that were imposed on China, Canada, and Mexico in response to the public health crisis linked to fentanyl and other illegal drugs entering the the ruling does not concern the tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel or aluminum, which were brought under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. It allows the president to limit imports of specific goods if these are considered a threat to national security."This will do tremendous damage to Trump's agenda. His whole second term seemed to be DOGE, deport, and (trade) deals," Todd Tucker, trade expert with the New York-based Roosevelt Institute think tank, posted to BlueSky on Thursday. "On trade, in particular, why would any country waste time negotiating to lower his tariffs if he can't impose them in the first place?"The administration has already appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, describing the CIT's ruling as a 'judicial coup.' Meanwhile, economists have highlighted alternative options for the president to pursue his trade agenda despite the court's the ruling is upheld, the administration may be required to refund billions of dollars in import duties that have already been collected. According to the Kobeissi Letter, approximately $10 billion in tariff revenue has been gathered since April 2, though an analysis by Newsweek using official Treasury Department data suggests the amount could be significantly Reinsch, former under secretary of commerce for export administration under the Clinton administration and president of the National Foreign Trade Council from 2001 to 2016, told Newsweek, 'I believe the court's order should prompt CBP to suspend the liquidation of entries moving forward. This would mean that if the ruling is ultimately upheld, importers could reclaim their payments.'Reinsch told Newsweek that, for goods already processed by customs authorities, importers may also be able to sue the administration."The CIT decision ruling the tariffs illegal and vacating them gives importers good grounds to do that," he said, "but the administration will probably resist."The Trump administration has acknowledged its responsibility to issue refunds for certain tariff charges if those duties are later reduced or rescinded. In late April, following a decision that some tariffs should not be cumulative or 'stacked,' Trump signed an executive order stating that the change would apply retroactively to specific tariffs. Refunds for those who had paid increased import taxes would be issued in accordance with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) procedures and applicable stance was also reflected in the administration's announcements regarding exemptions to the reciprocal tariffs. The CBP has since issued guidance outlining how importers can request refunds for duties paid on products that later became exempt or subject to lower tariffs. While importers—usually U.S. companies, though sometimes foreign exporters contractually responsible for duties—may qualify for refunds, William Reinsch told Newsweek that consumers are unlikely to benefit from the Court of International Trade's (CIT) ruling, even if they paid higher prices on imported goods in recent months.'The importers who paid the tariffs might be reimbursed, but they're not required to pass those savings on to consumers—although some might do so voluntarily,' Reinsch said. He added that he was skeptical any consumer-led lawsuits for damages would be successful.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
South Africa's SPAR plans to sell Swiss and UK retail businesses
HighlightsSouth Africa's SPAR Group is planning to sell its retail businesses in Switzerland and the United Kingdom after a strategic review of its European operations. The group is currently in exclusive talks with an unnamed established UK-based business regarding the sale of its UK operation, Appleby Westward Group. SPAR's Swiss business, which operates 300 stores, contributes approximately 16 billion rand ($899 million) to the group's turnover, while the South West England unit contributes around 6 billion rand. South Africa's SPAR Group plans to sell its retail businesses in Switzerland and in the United Kingdom after completing a strategic review of its European operations , the retail and wholesale group said on Thursday. The group, which owns several SPAR country licences of the Dutch SPAR group, has been trimming its international operations in order to "maximize the return on capital allocated". Last year it sold its loss-making Polish business. The group said it was in exclusive talks with an established UK-based business over the sale of its UK operation Appleby Westward Group . The potential buyer, which SPAR did not name, was "well positioned to develop and grow AWG in South West England," it said. In Switzerland, SPAR has been engaging established parties with extensive business interests in the region and experience in European food retail and distribution , it added. "The group approach has been to engage parties whose interests align with the growth ambitions of the local management teams and retailer partners, and will ensure continuity for employees, suppliers and customers," SPAR said. The Swiss business, with 300 stores, contributes 16 billion rand ($899 million) to group turnover, while the South West England unit contributes 6 billion rand. Internationally, SPAR will be left with Ireland , its biggest overseas business, and a joint venture in Sri Lanka .
