
'Israeli' minister vows to continue Gaza occupation despite international criticism
In a statement reported by Times of Israel, Katz emphasized that Hamas continues to pose a significant security threat to 'Israel'. He reaffirmed the 'Israeli' government's determination to pursue all objectives of the war, following the decision by the small ministerial cabinet to proceed with the Gaza occupation.
'The primary goals of this war include the complete elimination of Hamas, the creation of conditions for the release of detainees, and the establishment of a wide and strong security buffer zone inside Gaza,' Katz said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Roya News
20 minutes ago
- Roya News
Hamas chief nephews killed in 'Israeli' strike on Gaza
Two nephews of Khalil al-Hayya, Hamas' chief in Gaza, were killed in an 'Israeli' airstrike in the Gaza Strip. Hebrew Channel 12 reported that Ayman and Moath, the two sons of Abdelsalam al-Hayya, were killed in an attack on Shuja'iyya neighborhood in Gaza City. Khalil al-Hayya resides in Qatar and leads the Hamas team in the negotiations mediated by Qatar, Egypt to secure a ceasefire and prisoner exchange deal in the Gaza Strip.


Jordan News
21 minutes ago
- Jordan News
The Hidden Goals Behind Netanyahu's Decision to Occupy Gaza - Jordan News
The Hidden Goals Behind Netanyahu's Decision to Occupy Gaza It is hard to believe that a prime minister like Benjamin Netanyahu could decide to wage war and occupy new territories against the recommendations of the army. Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir—credited with the idea of occupying Gaza, who approved its most minute details and presented the plan ready-made to Netanyahu—told him that after reviewing the plan, studying its details, and assessing the risks, he believed it should be replaced with something else. He warned that such an occupation could endanger Israeli hostages held by Hamas and lead to the deaths of many Israeli soldiers. Yet Netanyahu insisted on inserting the word 'occupation' into the plan (at the last moment replacing it with 'control'). اضافة اعلان Of course, there are many distortions, deceptions, and tricks in this decision. The Israeli cabinet gave the army two full months to prepare for the occupation, during which it allowed the army to try the 'siege, fighting, and displacement' plan without occupation. This prompted far-right minister Bezalel Smotrich to say that nothing had changed in the prime minister's policy—that Netanyahu was still maneuvering within the scope of traditional policy, which does not decisively end the battle against Hamas and leaves the door open for negotiations. Some do not rule out that this timetable is itself deceptive. Israel still believes in military deception as the core of its policy, as seen in its management of the war since the beginning—particularly with Hezbollah, Iran, and Syria. It is not inconceivable that Netanyahu is still luring Hamas into traps. At its core, the decision serves Netanyahu's political, partisan, and personal goals. He needs the flames of war to keep his government intact because he knows that ending the war would trigger the 'real' war he fears most: an internal political battle to topple his government. This has been his approach since he first learned about the Gaza occupation plan. Brigadier General Erez Weiner, who drew up the plan when he was head of operations for the army's southern command, revealed that he devised it a year ago, when Herzi Halevi was chief of staff. Netanyahu became enthusiastic about it, saw it as a tool to achieve his goals, and clung to it, demanding its approval and implementation. But Halevi rejected it, seeing it as a trap for the army and a threat to the Israeli hostages held by Hamas. This rejection was one of the main reasons for Halevi's resignation and for appointing Eyal Zamir as his replacement. According to Weiner, Zamir studied the plan thoroughly, intervened in its details, and approved it in coordination with Netanyahu. But he encountered a different reality on the ground. Field officers warned him of its dangers and conveyed the soldiers' frustration with a war that lacked a clear strategic goal and seemed endless. He also heard warnings about the high cost of such an occupation—economically, in human lives, and in public, international, and regional reaction. Zamir then backed down and proposed an alternative plan: impose a siege on Palestinians in three areas, push them southward to encourage displacement, and carry out limited strikes on Hamas forces—gradually eroding their territory without a full-scale occupation. This was when Netanyahu pushed back, insisting on 'occupation'—even if only rhetorically—through combative statements and official decisions, thus projecting the image of a 'strong, decisive leader.' By openly clashing with the army's leadership, he appeals to the far-right, which wants to show that the political leadership is the true authority to which the army must answer. This helps him advance his broader plan to overhaul the system of governance and the judiciary, effectively cornering and restraining the liberal 'deep state.' Moreover, he secures his main aim: staying in power. According to the cabinet's timetable for occupying Gaza (two months of preparation, three months of combat operations, and two years to establish control), he could not only remain in office but also work to delay the elections scheduled for October 2026. These are the hidden goals behind the Gaza occupation decision. But whether they are achieved depends on the reactions from the Israeli public, as well as from the U.S. and the world. If such reactions influence the White House, the equation could change. For now, Netanyahu has received a green light from Washington, as U.S. President Donald Trump—angry at Hamas—told him plainly: 'Do whatever you want to strike them (Hamas), but make sure the Gazans do not starve.' But that green light could turn yellow—or even red—if Israeli, Arab, and international pressure succeeds. It is no coincidence that on Friday, families of the hostages staged their protests in front of the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv. —(Agencies)


Roya News
21 minutes ago
- Roya News
VIDEO: At least six Lebanese soldiers killed in munitions blast in south Lebanon
A powerful explosion occurred in southern Lebanon during an operation to remove rockets from a military facility, killing at least six Lebanese army soldiers and injuring others, Roya correspondent reported. The incident happened as soldiers were dismantling unexploded munitions left from the recent "Israeli" aggression in the area between Majdel Zoun and Wadi Zabqin in the Sour district. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam expressed his deep sorrow in a statement, saying, 'With great pain, Lebanon mourns the brave sons of our army who fell as martyrs while fulfilling their national duty.' He affirmed that the army will remain 'the safety valve, the fortress of sovereignty, and protector of national unity.' President Joseph Aoun called Army Commander General Rudolf Heikal to receive a full briefing on the tragic incident. He expressed his profound grief over the loss, extending condolences to the families and the military institution, and wished a speedy recovery for the wounded. 'The nation today loses some of its finest sons who sacrificed their lives defending Lebanon's land and sovereignty,' Aoun said. 'These pure martyrs wrote with their noble blood the finest meanings of sacrifice and devotion, confirming that the Lebanese army remains the country's protective shield and faithful guardian of its borders.' He added, 'I affirm that their martyrdom is not the end but a beacon of hope to light the way for future generations and remind them that the freedom of the homeland is only preserved through great sacrifices.'