logo
Mental health case worker jobs still in limbo

Mental health case worker jobs still in limbo

Yahoo06-05-2025

BOSTON (SHNS) – State mental health care workers secured some job security in the final House budget but are staring down new uncertainty in the Senate Ways and Means Committee budget.
Ways and Means took no explicit action to maintain the Department of Mental Health case manager workforce, which Gov. Maura Healey proposed slashing in half from 340 to 170 individuals in her fiscal 2026 budget recommendation. Representatives blocked the layoffs within a mega-amendment to their budget last week.
Ways and Means Chair Sen. Michael Rodrigues said his team 'spent a lot of time talking about this,' and deferred to an aide when asked if the committee's budget would maintain the DMH jobs. Rodrigues later said the workforce volume supported by the budget is an 'administrative question' that should be posed to DMH.
'This is the one where there's an active labor conversation going on between the administration and the DMH case workers' union,' SWM budget director Christopher Czepiel said during a briefing. 'So we're proposing that we don't wade into that issue, and let the administration negotiate that. And if it needs to come back for supplemental funding at a later date, we would consider it then.'
Rodrigues said mental health is a 'big priority' for the Senate, and while case manager levels are uncertain in the Ways and Means budget he said the panel wants 'real robust mental health services.'
'What's currently funded provides enough resources to serve the needs of the DMH community,' the Westport Democrat said. 'If, who knows what contracts and negotiations with CBAs, we pass supplemental budgets all the time in order to deal with new collective bargaining agreements. And we'll be prepared to, if need be, we want to ensure that there's real robust mental health services in the commonwealth.'
In response to a follow-up question from a reporter, Rodrigues replied he did not know whether the SWM budget cuts case managers.
Czepiel chimed in, 'We don't explicitly prescribe language to that effect in here. It gives flexibility to the administration to manage those negotiations.'
The House Ways and Means Committee budget also gave no relief to DMH case managers, as Chair Aaron Michlewitz similarly cited a 'collective bargaining conversation.' He told reporters in mid-April that lawmakers will likely need to tackle the issue in a supplemental budget once the Healey administration and union members reach an agreement. The House then adopted a floor amendment stating that 'department case manager staffing levels shall not be reduced below fiscal year 2025 case manager staffing levels.'
The threatened layoffs would save the state $12.4 million, the Executive Office of Health and Human Services has said. DMH Commissioner Brooke Doyle told lawmakers at a budget hearing her department is reshuffling resources to invest in strained inpatient psychiatric care.
SEIU Local 509, whose members recently took a vote of no-confidence in Doyle, is at odds with DMH over a more flexible care model for case managers as the state adapts to a potentially smaller workforce. Union President Dave Foley said the Healey administration's claims about the parties being engaged in 'negotiations' are 'completely inaccurate and misleading.'
'Let me be clear: while we have remained open to doing everything we can to save these services, the administration walked away from a series of conversations with DMH workers and union leadership several weeks ago after refusing to budge on these cuts,' Foley said in a statement to the News Service Tuesday. 'The Governor's continued effort to push a misleading narrative comes across as a delay to finding a real solution and pressuring us into accepting a deal that maintains a dangerous reduction in services. If this administration truly cares about mental health, they should be focused on stopping these cuts, not undermining our efforts to save these vital services.'
Administration spokespeople did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Foley's remarks.
The SWM budget directly saves hospitals and other health care facilities that Healey initially proposed shuttering to save costs. Like the House, SWM would maintain funding for three youth mental health treatment facilities for patients dealing with serious illnesses and safety issues.
State-run public health hospitals would receive $237.7 million under the SWM budget, with $31 million earmarked for operations at Pappas Rehabilitation Hospital for Children in Canton, which treats patients with severe disabilities. Healey, who paused her plan to close Pappas, had recommended $206.7 million for the account.
The House Ways and Means Committee budget proposed $217 million to collectively fund all public health hospitals, with no clear distinction in money between Pappas, Tewksbury Hospital and Lemuel Shattuck Hospital. Representatives adopted an amendment to create a legislative commission to study the future of Pappas while keeping it open, with language also barring the state from cutting services or consolidating care with another hospital until that commission produces a report by the end of 2026.
Pocasset Mental Health Center, a 16-bed psychiatric hospital on Cape Cod that Healey also hit pause on shutting down, would receive $4.8 million under the SWM budget.
The HWM budget directed funding to maintain operations at Pocasset, but the committee did not specify an allocation for the facility within broader funding for DMH. Representatives steered an additional $50,000 to 'improve the mental health rooms' at Pocasset through a budget amendment, though Rep. David Vieira had pushed for a bigger allocation of $200,000.
'We want to ensure that those two very important mental health centers are not closed this fiscal year,' Rodrigues said of Pappas and Pocasset.
Budget amendments are due Friday, and senators are likely to file proposals to install additional protections or funding streams for DMH case managers, Pappas and Pocasset. Budget debate will kick off on May 20.
Local News Headlines
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WWLP.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices
Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

CBS News

time33 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Police cast wide net in probe of defunct North Texas car dealership's business practices

Desire Godfrey said it was time for a vehicle upgrade. The Lancaster mother had her eye on a Lexus. "I had a baby, so I'm looking for something reliable for me and a baby," Godfrey said. She searched online and found what she thought was the right vehicle at The Reserve Auto Group in The Colony. She described the sales process in May 2024 as a positive experience. Warranty and GAP insurance issues But an unexpected oil change six months later changed everything. Godfrey, 33, said a Lexus dealership informed her the vehicle was not under warranty. She also discovered her GAP insurance policy didn't exist. "They (Reserve Auto Group) never paid the warranty company the money they were supposed to pay to activate this warranty and this GAP insurance," she said. Car loan charges continue Godfrey said the costs were included in her car note. She filed a report with The Colony Police Department — and she's not alone. Police said they received their first complaint on Jan. 31. According to a news release, police have been investigating multiple fraud claims connected to the dealership since 2023. The business shut down in December 2024, but complaints continue to come in. Alleged auto fraud pattern Investigators said customers were allegedly instructed to write separate checks for aftermarket warranties or GAP insurance policies. Those payments were supposed to go to third-party providers, but police said the dealership allegedly cashed the checks and never forwarded the money — leaving customers without coverage. Another victim comes forward A second alleged victim, who spoke to CBS News Texas anonymously, said she and her husband also bought a Lexus from the dealership. She provided a non-activation letter from DOWC Administrative Services LLC, a company that offers GAP insurance and warranties. The letter stated: "Please be advised that Reserve Auto has failed to remit payment to Us as the Administrator and Provider for your Contract. Consequently, the Contract was not activated in our system." Investigation still ongoing Police have not made any arrests or publicly identified anyone associated with the allegations. Officers said they are continuing to vet additional alleged victims. CBS News Texas is not naming the person listed as the dealership's owner, as police have indicated he did nothing wrong. He spoke briefly by phone, saying he wanted to schedule an appointment to discuss the claims further because he believed "we did not have all the facts." When asked for clarification, he said he didn't have time to explain. Legal team responds Two emails followed the call, and attorneys from Herrin Law introduced themselves. "We have no comment at this time. Thank you for your interest in our client's side of the story," attorney Benjamin Palatiere said. He requested that all future inquiries be directed to him. Buyer left without coverage Meanwhile, Godfrey said the vehicle itself has not had any issues. But she continues to pay for a warranty and insurance that don't exist. "So nobody wants to refinance the loan. Nobody wants to give me GAP insurance," she said. "It's just more so like I'm going to take it or leave it. If I wreck the car, then I would have to figure out a way to pay that car off." Godfrey said she hopes to recover the money one day.

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel
Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

CBS News

time43 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Supreme Court halts lower court orders requiring DOGE to hand over information about work and personnel

Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Elon Musk on DOGE and his work in and out of government Washington — The Supreme Court on Friday halted lower court orders that required the White House's Department of Government Efficiency to turn over information to a government watchdog group as part of a lawsuit that tests whether President Trump's cost-cutting task force has to comply with federal public records law. The order from the high court clears DOGE for now from having to turn over records related to its work and personnel, and keeps Amy Gleason, identified as its acting administrator, from having to answer questions at a deposition. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. "The portions of the district court's April 15 discovery order that require the government to disclose the content of intra–executive branch USDS recommendations and whether those recommendations were followed are not appropriately tailored," the court said in its order. "Any inquiry into whether an entity is an agency for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act cannot turn on the entity's ability to persuade. Furthermore, separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal executive branch communications." The Supreme Court sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for more proceedings. Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily paused the district court's order last month, which allowed the Supreme Court more time to consider the Trump administration's bid for emergency relief. A district judge had ordered DOGE to turn over documents to the group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, by June 3, and for Gleason's deposition to be completed by June 13. The underlying issue in the case involves whether DOGE is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. CREW argues that the cost-cutting task force wields "substantial independent authority," which makes it a de facto agency that must comply with federal public records law. The Justice Department, however, disagrees and instead claims that DOGE is a presidential advisory body housed within the Executive Office of the President that makes recommendations to the president and federal agencies on matters that are important to Mr. Trump's second-term agenda. DOGE's agency status was not before the Supreme Court, though the high court may be asked to settle that matter in the future. Instead, the Trump administration had asked the justices to temporarily halt a district court's order that allowed CREW to gather certain information from DOGE as part of its effort to determine whether the task force is an advisory panel that is outside FOIA's scope or is an agency that is subject to the records law. The judge overseeing the dispute, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, had ordered DOGE to turn over certain documents to the watchdog group by June 3 and to complete all depositions, including of Gleason, by June 13. Mr. Trump ordered the creation of DOGE on his first day back in the White House as part of his initiative to slash the size of the federal government. Since then, DOGE team members have fanned out to agencies across the executive branch and have been part of efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter entities like the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Institute of Peace. DOGE has also attempted to gain access to sensitive databases kept by the Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and Office of Personnel Management, prompting legal battles. In an effort to learn more about DOGE's structure and operations, CREW submitted an expedited FOIA request to the task force. After it did not respond in a timely manner, CREW filed a lawsuit and sought a preliminary injunction to expedite processing of its records request. The organization argued that DOGE was exercising significant independent authority, which made it an agency subject to FOIA. Cooper granted CREW's request for a preliminary injunction in March and agreed that FOIA likely applies to DOGE because it is "likely exercising substantial independent authority much greater than other [Executive Office of the President] components held to be covered by FOIA." He then allowed CREW to conduct limited information-gathering, which the watchdog group said aimed to determine whether DOGE is exercising substantial authority that would bring it within FOIA's reach. A federal appeals court ultimately declined to pause that order, requiring DOGE to turn over the documents sought by CREW. In seeking the Supreme Court's intervention, Solicitor General D. John Sauer said CREW is conducting a "fishing expedition" into DOGE's activities. He warned that if Cooper's order remains in place, several components of the White House, such as the offices of the chief of staff and national security adviser, would be subject to FOIA. "That untenable result would compromise the provision of candid, confidential advice to the president and disrupt the inner workings of the Executive Branch," Sauer wrote. "Yet, in the decisions below, the court of appeals and district court treated a presidential advisory body as a potential 'agency' based on the persuasive force of its recommendations — threatening opening season for FOIA requests on the president's advisors." But lawyers for CREW told the Supreme Court in a filing that the Justice Department's position "would require courts to blindly yield to the Executive's characterization" of the authority and operations of a component of the Executive Office of the President. They said adopting the Trump administration's approach to DOGE would give the president "free reign" to create new entities within the Executive Office of the President that exercise substantial independent authority but are shielded from transparency laws. "Courts would be forced to blindly accept the government's representations about an EOP unit's realworld operations, unable to test those representations through even limited discovery," CREW's lawyers wrote. "It is that extreme position, not the discovery order, that would 'turn[] FOIA on its head.'"

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store