What If You Had a Plan To Retire Comfortably by Age 60?
For many Americans, retirement can be daunting. Not only do you face a major lifestyle change, but the financial aspect can be hard to manage. In fact, 55% of Americans worry they will not have financial security in retirement, according to a National Institute of Retirement Security survey.
But what if you could put together a plan so that you not only can retire comfortably, but you can even do so a few years at age 60, before most people retire?
Read Next:
Try This:
Studies vary, but one from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College finds men retire on average at age 64.6, while women do so at age 62.6. Social Security also can not be claimed until 62 at the earliest and full retirement benefits don't start until age 67 for those born in 1960 or later.
Consider the below main areas if you want to set yourself up for a slightly early retirement that can enable you to live comfortably.
According to a Chinese proverb, the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago and the second best time is now. The same idea applies if you're planning to retire at age 60, in the sense that starting from a young age is ideally best, but since you can't go back in time, the next best thing is to start planning right away.
'When it comes to planning for the future and retirement the short answer is the sooner, the better. The earlier you begin saving and investing, the more time your money has to grow and the less you need to save to hit your goals. When you have time and compound interest on your side it can be very powerful,' said Amber Schiffert, co-founder of Tara Wealth.
Check Out:
That said, sometimes saving more later in life is more realistic, particularly as you advance in your career and earn more.
Many people's greatest financial achievements don't occur in their 20s and 30s. 'So there is hope if you are in your 40s or even early 50s. Just realize the later you wait you are going to need a higher savings rate and/or look at decreasing your spending,' said Chad Gammon, certified financial planner (CFP) and owner at Custom Fit Financial.
Another key aspect to retiring comfortably at age 60 is figuring out how much you realistically need to cover your monthly spending so that you can save and invest accordingly. It's one thing to start early, but if you're not moving toward a particular goal, then you might not end up where you want to be.
'For example, if you want to retire in San Diego — where I'm located and many of our clients are — and you want to live a comfortable lifestyle you might need $120,000 a year, after taxes or $10,000 per month,' Schiffert said.
From there, you can do some calculations, starting with estimating your Social Security income. If you assume you'll receive $4,000 per month from Social Security, that means you would need a retirement savings balance of $1.8 million to be able to stick to the relatively safe 4% withdrawal rule and take out $6,000 per month, Schiffert explained.
Granted, this does not account for taxes, so you'll likely need more, but will have to calculate that based on factors such as where you live and if you have a Roth or traditional retirement account.
Then, you can calculate what it would take to save $1.8 million (or whatever number applies to your situation) by using a compound interest or similar retirement calculator to determine how much you need to invest per month based on your age and expected average annual return.
For example, if you're 30, you would roughly need to save almost $1,900 per month to reach $1.8 million by age 60 if earning a 6% annual return, but if you're 20, you could save less than $1,000 per month and still hit that mark, as Schiffert pointed out. This shows the power of starting early.
If you're closer to age 60, you might not have the benefit of much time for compounding, so instead you might try to save tens of thousands of dollars per year if you have that luxury. That could mean saving and investing across both retirement and non-retirement accounts, while cutting back in other areas of spending, so you can reach your goal.
'To retire at 60, many of the clients I see have maximized contributions to their retirement accounts and start saving in their brokerage accounts. They also typically know their spending very well and can control costs outside of their fixed costs,' Gammon said.
Lastly, retiring at age 60 means you're retiring before you can claim Social Security and Medicare benefits. So, you'll likely want to figure out ahead of time how you'll navigate the gap.
'The retirees at age 60 are typically not looking to take Social Security at the earliest age of 62. They are waiting at least until their full retirement age and many are delaying to the maximum age of 70' so they can ultimately claim higher benefit amounts, Gammon said. 'The main area they need help around is with health care coverage until they get to age 65.'
That comes back to knowing your numbers. While it's hard to say for sure how much you'll spend on healthcare, you could consider averages, such as Bureau of Labor Statistics data showing the average person ages 55 to 64 spends around $6,700 per year on healthcare. So, factoring that into your spending can help you save enough to retire comfortably at age 60.
More From GOBankingRates
5 Types of Vehicles Retirees Should Stay Away From Buying
How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region
4 Things You Should Do if You Want To Retire Early
12 SUVs With the Most Reliable Engines
Sources
National Institute of Retirement Security, 'Retirement Insecurity 2024: Americans' Views of Retirement'
Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, 'Will the Average Retirement Age Keep Rising?'
Amber Schiffert, Tara Wealth.
Chad Gammon, Custom Fit Financial.
Bureau of Labor Statistics data, 'Consumer Expenditure Surveys.'
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: What If You Had a Plan To Retire Comfortably by Age 60?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Posts falsely claim Namibia has announced ban on US gas and oil exploration
'Namibia cancelled contract with US from Mining their OIL & GAS,' reads an X post published on May 30, 2025. With more than 16,000 likes, the post adds: 'They ended the Oil & Gas contract with the US and told the US Government to immediately stop all Mining Operations in Namibia as Namibia ventures into State-owned mining operations.' The post includes side-by-side photos of Namibia's President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah and US President Donald Trump. Similar posts were shared thousands of times more on X and other platforms, including Facebook, TikTok and blogs. Nandi-Ndaitwah, who was elected in March, placed the country's oil and gas industries under direct presidential control the day after her inauguration. They previously fell under the Ministry of Energy and Mines (archived here). However, the government has not announced the cancellation of any energy contracts with the United States. A keyword search for 'Namibia cancels oil and gas with the US' turned up more posts repeating the false claim, as well as articles debunking it (archived here). The posts began circulating at about the same time as claims debunked by AFP Fact Check alleging that Namibia had announced the deportation of 500 Americans. As reported by AFP in April, Nandi-Ndatiwah explained that the oil and gas sector had the potential to transform Namibia's economy within the next five years by securing energy supplies and creating jobs (archived here). 'Mining contributes 12 percent to our gross domestic product and over 50 percent of our foreign exchange earnings. Regrettably, this figure does not reflect the true potential of mining and our mineral resources,' she was quoted as saying. On May 30, 2025, her presidency responded to the viral posts by labelling them 'fake news' (archived here). Fake news! — Namibian Presidency (@NamPresidency) April 15, 2025 Namibia's presidency reiterated this to AFP Fact Check on June 4, 2025. 'The Namibian government has not at any point cancelled any contracts with investors from the United States in the mining, oil and gas sectors,' said press secretary Alfredo Hengari. He added that 'it is not the policy of the government to cancel contracts that are binding'. A US State Department spokesperson told AFP Fact Check on June 11, 2025: 'The online claims that Namibia has cut off the United States from mining and gas are false.' Contrary to the claim, Namibia has become a global exploration hotspot with several international gas and oil companies actively exploring its coasts in recent years (archived here). At the start of 2025, American firm Chevron announced that it had not found commercially viable gas in Namibia's Orange Basin (archived here). By April, however, the company confirmed it would continue exploration in the Walvis Basin in 2026 or 2027, where firms including TotalEnergies, Shell, and Galp have made discoveries. Similarly, British multinational Shell deemed its Namibia oil discoveries uncommercial due to high gas levels in January. However, France's TotalEnergies believes it can handle these geological challenges, but its investment decision hinges on maintaining production costs below $20 per barrel (archived here). Another American corporation, ExxonMobil, is investigating (here and here) the country's potential in the Namibe Basin (archived here and here). The state itself, through the National Petroleum Corporation of Namibia (NAMCOR), holds a 10 percent stake in its exploration partnership with TotalEnergies (50.5 percent), QatarEnergy (30 percent) and Impact Oil and Gas (9.5 percent) (archived here). As a top uranium producer, Namibia also announced in April 2025 that it will launch talks this year on its first nuclear energy plant, seeking to exploit its rich natural wealth to transform its economy (archived here).
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bentz defends Republican tax and spending bill, despite costs and cuts impacting his district
Oregon Rep. Cliff Bentz, center, voted for a proposal to cut Medicaid funding. The state's lone Republican congresman said the tax bill he and House Republicans put forward will make people "very happy." () Oregon's lone Republican Congressman, Cliff Bentz, represents more than 705,000 Oregonians — about 16% of the state's population — who will feel disproportionately the cuts in the Republican tax and spending bill currently being considered by the U.S. Senate and that passed the U.S. House in May. Bentz's 2nd Congressional District spans two-thirds of the state east of the Willamette Valley and is home to mostly rural communities with higher average rates of poverty, food insecurity, unemployment and Medicaid enrollment than the rest of the state and nation. The bill, which Bentz voted for, would cut spending on Medicaid and on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, funding meant to ensure low-income Americans have food. In a 45-minute phone interview with the Capital Chronicle last Friday, Bentz defended the Republican tax and spending bill, adding that middle and low-income families, small businesses and the timber industry would be particularly pleased. 'I'll just say that there's a lot of really, really, really good things in this bill that I think people are going to be very, very happy for,' he said, pointing to the bill's lowering or ending taxes on certain wages, such as overtime and tips, and costs, such as car loans. He dismissed questions about the possible impacts Medicaid cuts could have on rural medical clinics that cannot turn patients away regardless of insurance, saying 'If I may, this is supposed to be an interview, not an interrogation or an argument.' Instead, Bentz said, the bill reflects fiscal responsibility. 'The most important thing that I was focused on is our economy, and making sure that we don't damage the economy, while at the same time trying to reduce the deficit,' he said. In fact, according to analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the bill if implemented would add trillions to the national deficit and the national debt. That growing debt would be driven not just by spending but by extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed during President Donald Trump's first term that brought the federal corporate income tax rate and income tax rates on the wealthiest Americans to historic lows. A year after the act passed — for the first time in history — America's billionaires paid a lower effective tax rate than the bottom half of American households, according to analysis by economists at the University of California at Berkeley. Bentz said without extending the 2017 tax cuts, the average American family would see their income taxes rise by about $1,700 and up to 7 million jobs could be lost. Those figures come from the Council of Economic Advisers, a three-member, president-appointed agency within the Executive Branch that recommends economic policies. The Capital Chronicle received nearly three dozen questions for Bentz submitted by readers. The bulk of those questions, and the interview, covered provisions of the bill that would impact access to health insurance under Medicaid, cuts to federal jobs and clean energy tax credits, tax cuts for the wealthy and the power President Donald Trump has over the Republican Party. An annotated and full transcript of the interview can be read here. To reduce federal spending, Republicans have focused on adding new work and citizenship requirements to Medicaid eligibility that could result in about 7.6 million people losing coverage over the next decade, or a bit less than 10% of everyone in the country who relies on Medicaid, according to the Congressional Budget Office. It would result in $76 billion to $88 billion a year not being spent on the program, according to Bentz's analysis of Congressional Budget Office data. The group of 7.6 million includes immigrants at risk of deportations and people who might be receiving Medicaid despite higher than reported income. But the bulk of the 7.6 million — more than 60% — are what Bentz calls the 'able-bodied adults choosing not to work.' Analysis of 2024 U.S. Census Bureau surveys finds they are mostly in school, are parents, caretakers or disabled Americans. Bentz, who serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee responsible for the Medicaid cuts proposed in the bill, said that he consulted closely with former Democratic Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, a doctor, for weeks on the bill, and called him 'a genius' in a recent interview on Oregon Public Broadcasting. But Kitzhaber told the Capital Chronicle that there was 'nothing morally defensible in the bill' following a May 22 virtual town hall Bentz hosted the day the Republican tax and spending bill passed the House. 'We advised him on how the program works, and I warned him over and over again that the impact of this was not going to be good, especially for people in his part of the state,' Kitzhaber said. About one in three Oregonians relies on Medicaid for their health insurance. But in the 20 counties in Bentz's district, the numbers are even higher. In Malheur, Klamath and Josephine counties, more than 40% of residents rely on Medicaid, according to the Oregon Health Authority. In Jefferson County, where Bentz is from, half of all residents are covered by Medicaid. Bentz said he couldn't work all of Kitzhaber's recommendations into the bill, including his warnings that it would be overburdensome to rural clinics to take health insurance away from people who will seek medical care they cannot pay for, anyway. Bentz said he understands why Kitzhaber would bemoan it: 'Well, he's a doctor.' 'He is going to be on the side of the patient at all times,' Bentz said. 'Anything that does not provide coverage for everybody, he's going to be concerned about it.' Bentz says he's been worried about the U.S. budget deficit, or the gap between how much revenue the federal government brings in against how much it spends, since before joining Congress in 2021. Bentz has been quoted in the past saying he won't vote for a bill that raises the deficit. The Republican tax bill would raise the national deficit by $3.6 trillion over the next decade and would add $2.4 trillion of debt to the nation's $35 trillion debt, according to analysis by the Congressional Budget Office. It would also raise the debt ceiling — a legal limit to the amount of money the federal government can borrow — by $4 trillion. Asked why Bentz voted for it given his past statements, he said he had to. 'The fact of the matter is, we have to raise the debt ceiling to avoid defaulting on debt incurred way before I got here, and we are not going to default,' he said. Indeed, during Trump's first term from January 2017 to December 2020, the growth in the U.S.'s annual deficit was the third-largest increase, relative to the size of the economy, of any U.S. presidential administration, according to reporting by ProPublica and The Washington Post. Even before the COVID pandemic hit in late 2019, Trump was on track to add close to $10 trillion to the nation's debt by 2025 — $3 trillion more than his predecessor, former President Barack Obama. The version of the Republican tax bill that Bentz voted for before it got to the Senate included a provision that would have transferred and privatized 500,000 acres of public land in Nevada and Utah. Republican U.S. Rep. Ryan Zinke, of Montana's 1st Congressional District, ended up getting the provision killed following pressure from hunting and fishing groups in his state. Bentz said he does not support selling off public land to the private sector, but that he does support trading it for the right purposes. He said most of the 500,000 acres slated for transfer in the bill were going to be made in a trade, not a handover. He said he was surprised Zinke caved and that he believes some of the 'movie stars and whatnot who have moved up there,' to Montana, played a role in getting Zinke to axe the transfer. 'There are really good reasons many times in the West, where there are literally tens and hundreds of millions of acres of public land, to transfer a small portion of it so that we can actually grow and perhaps address, oh I don't know, housing issues? Since everybody knows that we are desperately short of housing,' he said. 'Why in the world would we try to preserve land for hunting when people are living under a tree someplace?' Reporting in the Oregonian found Bentz's district has about $10 billion in committed investment in solar, wind and energy projects spurred by tax incentives and investments in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Among them is Sunstone Solar, which would be Oregon's largest approved solar and storage project on 10,000 acres of farmland in Morrow County. Many of the projects committed so far are incomplete or haven't broken ground. Bentz, who did not vote for the bill in 2022, said he was not worried about losing those projects, and that he thought the clean energy tax credits were bad policy. 'These incentives are all tax-driven incentives, which allow folks to avoid paying taxes in return for investing in a certain type of activity in this case,' he said. Bentz, a career lawyer before becoming a politician, said he is not concerned about Trump or his advisers' defiance and disinterest in judicial review. He said Trump's continued appeals to higher and higher courts when he loses in lawsuits brought against him and his policies are his legal right, and if he 'bumps into a judge that he doesn't appreciate the opinion of, he has every opportunity and right to appeal it.' Bentz said he believes Trump is simply using the full scope of the legal system to his advantage, and that he would not support Trump defying the Supreme Court. 'I would not support anyone ignoring the Supreme Court. That's not how our system works,' Bentz said. As for whether Republicans will fall into line on all of Trump's orders, Bentz said it's not because of pressure, but because they agree with what the president stands for. He said having power in the majority is a new experience for him after 12 years in the Oregon Legislature, led by Democrats. 'I was never one day in the majority, not even one day. And as a result, when I got here and found that I had all Republican control across the scope of the three branches of government, it's been a huge and welcome change,' he said. Bentz said he was unaware of constituent concerns about several topics but will 'look into' issues. On the well-publicized departure of the superintendent of Oregon's only national park because of staffing concerns: 'The person's (former Crater Lake National Park Superintendent Kevin Heatley) concern may be well founded. It may not. Until I know the facts better, I'm not going to take a position on it, but now that you've raised an issue, we'll look into it.' On federal cuts to the National Weather Service office in Pendleton that ended overnight weather forecasts for Central Oregon, as reported by The Bulletin in Bend: 'No one has come to me with that concern, staff or otherwise, but now that you've raised it, we'll look into it.' And in response to a question from a reader who wanted to know whether Bentz would do anything to ensure the display of a plaque made with taxpayer money to commemorate the 140 law enforcement officers who defended the U.S. Capitol and the lawmakers in it from insurrectionists on Jan. 6, 2021: 'I think it's safe to say that you're the first one to raise that issue. We'll check it out.' A May 23 article in The Washington Post found the plaque sitting in a utility room in the Capitol basement three years after Congress approved it because the current House Republicans haven't instructed the Architect of the Capitol to install it. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Recurring Jobless Claims Jump to Highest Since End of 2021
(Bloomberg) -- Recurring applications for US unemployment benefits rose to the highest since the end of 2021, adding to evidence that it is taking unemployed Americans longer to find a new job. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? Continuing claims, a proxy for the number of people receiving benefits, advanced to 1.96 million in the week ended May 31, according to Labor Department data released Thursday. That was above all estimates in a Bloomberg survey. Meanwhile, a measure of new filings that smooths volatility climbed to the highest since August 2023. The spike in recurring claims coincides with a slowdown in hiring, suggesting that out-of-work people are struggling to find employment. However, the report covers periods that included Memorial Day and the start of summer school breaks in some states, which tends to make the data more volatile. Federal Reserve officials are widely expected to hold interest rates steady at their meeting next week, as they wait to see how President Donald Trump's policies affect the economy. Job growth slowed but remained healthy in May, while inflation data released this week showed limited impact from tariffs so far. In a separate report Thursday, US producer price inflation remained muted in May across the board, another sign that higher levies have yet to result in higher prices for consumers and businesses. Treasury yields and the dollar fell after the economic data. What Bloomberg Economics Says... 'Employers are cautious about growth prospects, leading to a relatively weak hiring rate and making it difficult for those who lose jobs to find new ones.' —Eliza Winger To read the full note, see here The claims report shows initial filings were unchanged last week, slightly above forecasts. But the four-week moving average of new applications, a metric that reduces fluctuations, rose to 240,250, the highest since August 2023. Before adjusting for seasonal factors, initial claims also rose last week. California, Minnesota and Pennsylvania saw the largest increases. --With assistance from Nazmul Ahasan. (Adds chart.) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
