Former Moncton teacher gets 14 years in prison for historic sex crimes
Justice Jean-Paul Ouellette called Paul Maillet's actions "a flagrant violation of his authority," as he delivered his decision in French in a Moncton court room Monday.
Maillet, 78, was found guilty in January of 17 sex crimes against nine victims, some of whom were as young as 12 at the time.
The victims in this case cannot be named due to a publication ban.
At a prior proceeding, the Crown had recommended 14 years, and the defence recommended seven.
"Mr. Maillet sexually abused nine innocent children who were vulnerable and at his mercy," Ouellette said in French.
"Mr. Maillet stole the innocence of his victims. He inflicted intergenerational damage."
Ouellette said he considered several aggravating factors in his decision.
The fact that Maillet was in a position of authority in relation to his victims, the young ages and the number of the victims, and the fact that some crimes took place at a school played a role, Ouellette said.
The charges included gross indecency, sexual touching, indecent assault, sexual assault and possession of child pornography, related to incidents between 1967 and 2022.
Maillet previously said in court he did not realize the impact his crimes could have on the victims later in life.
Ouellette referenced that comment Monday, expressing disbelief.
"Hard to imagine that a teacher doesn't know the needs of a child, of his obligations toward them in a situation of confidence and authority," he said in French.
"He was the adult in the room."
When Ouellette finished reading his decision, people in the courtroom, including victims, applauded.
Defence lawyer Gilles Lemieux declined to comment outside the courtroom when reporters asked whether his client planned to appeal the decision.
Maillet has been in custody since the trial began in January. Ouellette said 80 days will be removed from his 14-year sentence for time already served.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
He earned a small town's trust. He owed $95 million in what authorities say was a Ponzi scheme
HAMILTON, N.Y. (AP) — For decades, Miles 'Burt' Marshall was the man you went to see in a stretch of upstate New York if you had some money to invest but wanted to keep it local. Working from an office in the charming village of Hamilton, down the road from Colgate University, Marshall prepared taxes and sold insurance. He also took money for what was sometimes called the '8% Fund,' which guaranteed that much in annual interest no matter what happened with the financial markets. His clients spread the word to family and friends. Have a retirement nest egg? Let Burt handle it. He'll invest it in local rental properties and your money will grow faster than in a bank. Marshall was friendly and folksy. He gave away gift bags with maple syrup, pickles and local honey in jars labeled with cute sayings like, 'Don't be a sap. For proper insurance coverage call Miles B. Marshall.' 'He would tell you about all the other people that invest. Churches invest. Fire companies invest. Doctors invest,' said one client, Christine Corrigan. 'So you'd think, 'Well, they're smart people. They wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't okay to do … Why are you going to be the suspicious one?' Then it all came crashing down. Marshall owed almost 1,000 people and organizations about $95 million in principal and interest when he filed for bankruptcy protection two years ago, according to the trustee's filings. This summer, the 73-year-old businessman was indicted on charges that his investment business was a Ponzi scheme. He could face prison time if convicted. Marshall's lawyers declined to comment. Total losses by Marshall's investors fall short of the multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme masterminded by Bernie Madoff. But they loom large in the small, college town of about 6,400 people and its largely rural surrounding area. Many investors were Colgate professors, laborers, office workers or retirees. Some lost their life's savings of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Corrigan and her husband, who own a restaurant 30 miles (48 kilometers) east, were owed about $1.5 million. Now they're wondering how someone who seemed so reliable, who held annual parties for his clients and even called them on their birthdays could betray their trust. 'You look at life differently after this happens. It's like, 'Who do you trust?'' said Dennis Sullivan, who was owed about $40,000. 'It's sad because of what he's done to the area.' A reliable local businessman Marshall and his wife lived in a brick Victorian, blocks from his office. Aside from insurance and tax preparation, he rented more than 100 properties and ran a self-storage business and a print shop. His parents had run an insurance and realty business in the area and the Marshall name was respected locally. Though he quit college, he was a federally enrolled tax professional. To many in the area, he seemed knowledgeable about money and kept a neat office. 'He had French doors and a beautiful carpet and a big desk and he just looked like he was prosperous and reliable,' Corrigan said. Marshall began taking money from people to buy and maintain rental properties in the 1980s. People got back promissory notes — slips of paper with the dollar amount written in. Withdrawals could be made with 30 days' notice. People could choose to receive regular interest payments. Participants saw the transactions as investments. Marshall has called them loans. For many years, Marshall made good on his promises to pay interest and process withdrawals. More people took part as word spread. Sullivan recalls how his parents gave Marshall money, then he did, then his fiancee, then his fiancee's daughter, then his son, and even his snowmobile club. 'Everybody gets snowballed into it,' Sullivan said. A number of investors lived in other states, but had connections to the area. The promise of 8% returns was unremarkable in the '80s, a time of higher interest rates. But it stood out later as rates dropped. Marshall told a bankruptcy proceeding that he assumed appreciation on his real estate would more than cover the debts. 'That's obviously false now,' he said, according to filings, 'but that's what I always thought.' Reckoning with more than $90 million in debt The money stopped flowing by 2023. Marshall filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection that April, declaring more than $90 million in liabilities and $21.5 million in assets, most of it in real estate. He explained in a filing that he had been been hospitalized for a 'serious heart condition' that required two surgeries, costing him $600,000. As news of his illness spread, there was a run on note holders asking for their money back. The bankruptcy trustee, Fred Stevens, blamed Marshall's insolvency on incompetent business practices and borrowing from people at above-market rates. The trustee contended that by 2011, Marshall was using new investment money to pay off previous investors, the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme. Prosecutors claim Marshall falsely represented the profitability of his real estate business and had his staff generate 'transaction summaries' with bogus information about account balances and earned interest. Money was funneled into his other businesses and he spent hundreds of thousands of investors' dollars on personal expenses, including airline travel, meals out, groceries and yoga studios, according to prosecutors. Marshall's clients feel betrayed. 'We left it there so that it would accumulate. Well, it accumulated in his pocket,' Barbara Baltusnik said of her investment. The ripple effects of multimillion-dollar losses Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Marshall pleaded not guilty in June to charges of grand larceny and securities fraud. He's accused of stealing more than $50 million. Marshall's home and properties were sold as part of bankruptcy proceedings, which continue. People who gave Marshall their money stand to recoup around 5.4 cents on the dollar from the asset sales. Potential claims against financial institutions are being pursued, according to the trustee. Baltusnik said she and her husband were owed hundreds of thousands of dollars and now she wonders how she will pay doctors' bills. Sullivan's mother moved in with him after losing her investment. In Epworth, Georgia, retiree Carolyn Call will never see money she hoped would help augment her Social Security payments. She found out about Marshall though an uncle who lived in upstate New York. 'I'm just able to pay my bills and keep going,' she said. 'Nothing extravagant. No trips. Can't do anything hardly for the grandkids.'
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
‘Needle attacks' reported at music festival in Montreal, police investigating
Montreal police (SPVM) say they have launched an investigation following reports that several people at îLESONIQ music festival may have possibly been unknowingly drugged with an unknown substance after reportedly being stabbed with a needle. According to authorities, at least six individuals reported feeling a sudden, sharp prick on their backs while standing in the crowds during the festival held Aug. 9 – 10 at Parc Jean-Drapeau. Some of those affected said they later experienced symptoms such as dizziness. Pour plus d'informations, consultez le communiqué de presse du For more information, please see the SPVM press release. — îLESONIQ (@ilesoniq) August 15, 2025 Story continues below advertisement Police have not confirmed whether the incidents are connected and say it's too early to release additional details. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In a statement, Montreal police used the alleged incidents to remind festivalgoers and the public to stay alert in crowded settings. Investigators are working in collaboration with festival organizers and security personnel from Evenko, the event's promoter, as the investigation continues. This comes after French police arrested 12 suspects back in June after 145 people reported being stabbed with syringes during France's' Fête de la Musique in Paris leading to the hospitalization of more than a dozen young women. The SPVM says victims and witnesses are encouraged to contact 911 or their local police station if they haven't already done so. To report information anonymously, authorities advise people to get in touch via Info-Crime Montréal at 514-393-1133 or via the reporting form available on the website Rewards of up to $3,000 may be offered by Info-Crime Montréal for information leading to the arrest of a suspect. –with files from The Canadian Press
CTV News
a day ago
- CTV News
Elliot Lake woman admits drugs, gambling led her to steal from her employer
A woman from Elliot Lake, Ont., admits that her drug and gambling addictions led her to steal at least $60,000 from her employer, but denies claims from the Crown that her theft was closer to $800,000. (File) A woman from Elliot Lake, Ont., admits that her drug and gambling addictions led her to steal at least $60,000 from her employer, but denies claims from the Crown that her theft was closer to $800,000. Her lawyer wants to call witnesses to back her claims, but the Crown argued that such testimony could stray into areas that affect solicitor-client confidentiality, since her former employer is a lawyer. In a decision released last month, the judge in the case ruled the questions could proceed, provided the defence was careful in the way she crafted her questions. The case itself dates back several years. Stephenie Chevis worked for a law firm in Elliot Lake, with duties that included bookkeeping. She was hired in 2007 and was fired in 2017 when her theft was discovered. Transaction details Her defence lawyer wants to raise details of transactions handled by the firm in an effort to prove that some of the thefts were, in fact, legitimate transactions, while others were the responsibility of someone else. Chevis pleaded guilty in December 2024 to one count of fraud over $5,000. The court heard that she often worked at night, explaining that she said she 'found it easier to do her accounting software work at night when no other employees were using the computer.' By 2016, the lawyer she worked for started getting suspicious. 'Despite working full-time, he found he was unable to draw personal funds from the business, as the firm's general account was dipping into the negative,' the court decision said. So he installed security cameras and told Chevis to stop working at night. 'In April and May 2017, Ms. Chevis was surveilled entering the office after midnight and she was terminated from employment in June 2017,' the decision said. Traced back to her An investigation uncovered a number of irregularities that were traced back to her. When her lawyer contacted her, she quickly confessed. 'Ms. Chevis broke down and told him she had stolen some money the previous year, in the amount of $60,000 to $70,000,' the court said. 'Ms. Chevis was arrested on Sept. 7, 2022. During a video interview with the North Bay OPP, she explained that her conduct was the result of drug and gambling addictions. She admitted to taking $60,000. That remains the extent of Ms. Chevis's admission and the basis for her plea of guilt.' She admitted to issuing checks to her benefit or that of her former spouse. She used some of the money to pay her personal bills, while other cheques were deposited into her accounts at various financial institutions. During a video interview with the North Bay OPP, she explained that her conduct was the result of drug and gambling addictions. She admitted to taking $60,000. — Superior court decision The lawyer she worked for was left in dire straits and was forced to remortgage his home, use his line of credit and cash in more than $300,000 in RRSPs. During a hearing Dec. 10, 2024, Chevis's lawyer was cross-examining a former employee from the law firm when she paused to raise an issue. She wanted to ask questions about three transactions, but was concerned about whether the answers would raise 'potential issues of solicitor-client privilege,' the court decision said. 'It is important to note that Ms. Chevis explicitly waived any solicitor-client privilege she may have had in respect of any of these transactions … The privilege concerns were with respect to (the law firm's) other clients as potential privilege-holders.' The 'Lottery Winner' Specifically, the defence wanted to raise the case of a client of the firm dubbed 'the Lottery Winner,' who won a large amount of money and left it in a trust with the firm. Other cases involved private mortgages given to Chevis using other unnamed clients' funds. 'Ms. Chevis proclaims to have knowledge of these transactions already,' the decision said. 'She is not seeking production. She is simply seeking to elicit the evidence.' The Crown argued that these cases involve solicitor-client privilege, something that can only be breached in specific cases, such as when it's the only way to prove someone's innocence. 'To engage the exception, the Crown submits, an accused must show that she is otherwise unable to raise a reasonable doubt as to her guilt and that there is a risk of wrongful conviction,' the decision said. 'The Crown emphasizes that a finding of guilt has already been made in this case and the proceedings before the court involve sentencing.' Public documents However, Justice Graham Jenner ruled that once something like a mortgage or a will has been executed, it becomes a public document. 'I have difficulty … with the notion that a legal instrument such as a will, a power of attorney, or a private mortgage, could possibly remain covered by solicitor-client privilege once the instrument is acted on, and enters the public sphere,' Jenner said. 'Indeed, when this question was put to the parties, they agreed that it would seem illogical to protect the existence of such public-facing instruments within the scope of the privilege.' As long as the questions were limited in scope to cases no longer covered by privilege, the judge ruled that questions would be allowed to be put to witnesses. I 'instruct counsel to apply that vigilance in the formation of their questions to be put to witnesses,' Jenner wrote in his decision. 'Care must be taken not to pose questions that could tend to elicit evidence that remains covered by the privilege.' Read the full decision here.
