Entire country could become RPZ under new plan
The entire country could be made a Rent Pressure Zone before the Dáil rises for its summer break in mid-July.
It's understood the Minister for Housing, James Browne, is advancing legislative plans to that effect and hopes the measure can become law swiftly.
It is anticipated that Opposition parties will their give their support to fast-track the process, even though they vociferously oppose other parts of the Government's rental reforms which were passed by the Cabinet on Tuesday.
The change would mean that all tenancy increases would be limited to an annual cap of 2%, or the rate of inflation - whichever is lower.
As it stands, roughly a fifth of tenancies are outside of RPZs and therefore are not subject to the 2% cap.
A swift introduction of legislation would limit the ability of landlords outside of RPZ's to increase rents beyond the cap limit before the law is changed.
After Tuesday's Cabinet decision, Minister Browne indicated that the designation of the entire country as an RPZ would be taken swiftly.
Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said in the Dáil that the measure should be introduced this week, adding that her party would back the Oireachtas sitting for as long as is necessary to get the job done.
The party's housing spokesperson Eoin Ó Broin said the Government is "scrambling around" under pressure from the Opposition.
"The department told journalists on Tuesday that the RPZ extension would take place in March 2026. After Opposition highlighted that this would put renters outside RPZs at risk of huge rent hikes, in anticipation of the application of the caps the Government changed the plan and are proposing to deal with this issue more quickly," he said.
"We welcome this but continue to insist that the Government scrap the rest of their proposed changes to RPZs as these will lead to a hollowing out of the existing protections and significant rent increases for tens of thousands of renters."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
New rent rules a sign Government is prepared to take tough decisions to tackle housing crisis
The level of political outrage generated by the proposed changes to the rent control system is a welcome development. It shows that the Government has actually made some serious decisions about a thorny issue for which there are no obvious right or wrong answers. The most worrying feature of the Coalition's first six months in office has been the impression of drift. There appeared to be a reluctance to take decisions that had the capacity to stir up opposition or lead to negative publicity of any kind. Regardless of the rights or wrongs of the package of rent control measures , it is at least a sign that the Government is prepared to start grasping some of the nettles that stand in the way of serious progress. Many more will have to be grasped if real progress is to be made on housing and infrastructure. It is a political truism that governments need to take tough decisions during their first year in office to have any chance of getting results before their term is up. The rental sector is just one aspect of the housing problem, but the willingness of Minister for Housing James Browne to move on the issue hopefully signals more serious initiatives in the coming months. READ MORE The big issue for Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael is whether they can create the conditions for a significant increase in housing supply to enable young people to buy their own homes. That will require a range of decisions to streamline the cumbersome planning system that stops houses being built and slows the development of the vital infrastructure required for development to take place. Ireland is far from alone in facing such problems. They are a feature of most successful western economies where many of the regulations originally designed for the public good have been expanded to such an extent that they are now major obstacles to necessary developments. A serious debate is currently taking place among Democrats in the United States about whether the complex planning rules promoted by the party over the past half century are the very reason they have been unable to meet the needs of a growing population in the states they control. There has recently been a spate of serious books focusing on the policy reforms needed to make it easier to build housing and infrastructure, while enabling government bureaucracy to work more effectively. At the core of this agenda is a radical critique not just of government, but of the array of activist organisations that dominate progressive politics and have significant influence over the Democratic Party. They address the question of why large public projects of the past such as the Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge, which were completed ahead of schedule and under budget, cannot happen today. The problem is particularly acute in states and cities controlled by the Democrats. The scale of the problem was highlighted by the fate of Joe Biden's trillion-dollar infrastructure Bill. He managed to get the measure passed through Congress in his first year and hailed it as proof that democracy can still deliver for the people. The problem was that in the years that followed only a fraction of the funds that Biden had authorised were actually spent, so the Bill had no impact on the lives of ordinary Americans by the time he started his re-election campaign. The writer Joe Klein, a Democratic Party supporter, summed up the situation: 'A regulatory quicksand has been created that it is almost impossible to crawl out of. It has been a bipartisan project – environmental activists and not-in-my-backyard (nimby) obstructionists and antivax loonies walk hand in hand. It has been a movement led by lawyers and judges.' This debate has a direct relevance to Ireland. It has been widely asked why a project like the Ardnacrusha hydro electric scheme on the Shannon conceived by the Cumann na nGaedheal government in the 1920s, or the large public housing projects undertaken by Fianna Fáil in the 1930s and 1940s, would not be feasible today. [ Could we build Ardnacrusha now? Not a chance Opens in new window ] Even when there is a political will to get something done, the legal and regulatory obstacles prove too daunting. For instance, the commitment to renewable energy was central to the political life of former Green Party leader Eamon Ryan . Yet during his time as minister for energy his ambitious plans to develop a large offshore wind industry stalled. The long list of objections which have been raised to building a more modest wind farm off the coast of south Dublin illustrate the difficulties Ryan faced in trying to develop a serious renewable energy infrastructure in this country. Similar problems with cumbersome planning regulation and public objections have haunted the Government's ambitions to develop our electricity and water infrastructure. To break the logjam it will have to take whatever action is required, and ignore the inevitable squeals of protest. Despite all its problems, the Labour government in the UK is showing courage in tackling the obstacles to building houses where they are needed and investing in nuclear energy to meet its climate change targets. Similar courage is required on this side of the Irish Sea.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Concern that buildings developed as creches are being sold as residential homes
Planning guidelines will have to be updated to stop the 'very serious issue' of buildings intended as new childcare facilities being sold off by developers as residential homes. Minister for Children Norma Foley said she is working with Minister for Housing James Browne to try to update planning regulations that are 'not working the way they should be working'. Under the current rules, each development of 75 new homes needs to include a childcare facility with places for at least 20 children. But anecdotal evidence and a spate of 'change of use' planning applications from developers reveal that in some cases buildings ostensibly developed as 'creches' are being designed and built with the true intention of selling them as residential homes. This means that buildings intended to provide much-needed childcare facilities are either sitting empty for years or being sold as expensive new builds after the developer successfully applies for a change of use to housing. READ MORE It is understood Ms Foley has already been meeting officials in local authorities to discuss the issue. There is a belief within the Department of Children that different local authorities are applying planning rules in different ways. At the first meeting of the Oireachtas committee on Children and Equality on Thursday, Ms Foley said she was now working with the Department of Housing to 'update' planning laws to increase supply of childcare places. 'I believe that there are significant challenges around the planning guidelines,' Ms Foley said. 'I know myself of instances where there are facilities that were built, that were never used for the purpose for which they were built in terms of [a] childcare facility, and then eventually some of them became a change of use, and something else went in there that's not acceptable.' Ms Foley also suggested that planning guidelines could help ease the issues with national supply of childcare places. 'I think that's a very serious issue around the planning guidelines. I think they're not working the way they should be working,' she said. 'And I think we would be surprised what that might bring on stream when we manage with the Minister for Housing to revisit all of that, because it is a shame that we do have those facilities and they are not being used for [childcare].' According to Emer Currie , Fine Gael TD for Dublin West and party spokeswoman on childcare, said there were a number of examples in her constituency alone of much-needed childcare facilities either lying empty or being sold as homes. Ms Currie highlighted one estate where two three-storey homes intended to be childcare facilities when they were built in 2014 'lay idle for years'. The developer applied four times between 2017 and 2023 for a change of use to housing. Ms Currie explained that the units, which were advertised for sale as a creche, 'were built in the same style as houses'. 'Both have now been sold as housing,' she said. In the Barnwell Park estate in Dublin 15, the developer applied to change two units intended to be childcare facilities into housing but this was refused by Fingal County Council in 2023 because it would 'set an inappropriate precedent'. Ms Currie said these buildings are 'still lying empty.' 'As parents we realise that finding childcare is a challenge. You have parents that believe that they've found a childcare solution that's going to be in their estate, or close to them, and then it never materialises. You can imagine the disappointment that follows,' Ms Currie said. She said she was calling on the Department of Finance to make childcare a 'priority' in the ongoing review of the National Development Plan . 'This is our moment to be able to say that childcare is essential infrastructure,' Ms Currie said.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
The numbers say we need private rental investment to address housing crisis
Some of our most challenging social and economic problems arise from the success of the economy . For example, if the recovery from the 2008 financial crisis had been much slower, there would have been fewer jobs to attract back emigrants, or skilled employees from round the world. The huge rise in employment since 2013, and the related rise in the population – up 8 per cent between 2016 and 2022 – has filled the government's tax coffers and raised living standards for all. However, it has put severe pressure on the housing market . We have yet to find a solution that will deliver the major increase in housing stock needed for a successful economy. Almost a decade ago, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) highlighted a need, at the time, to build 30,000 houses a year. We have averaged just two-thirds of that over the intervening period. READ MORE However, the ESRI also pointed to a funding gap. Unlike the madness of the 2000s, households are now constrained to borrow in a prudential fashion, limiting how many people could become homeowners. That has meant a substantial financial gap – one that, if 30,000 houses were to be built, could only be met by Government investment or by private investment in rental property. Last March's ESRI Quarterly Economic Commentary returned to the theme. Now, with the continuing success of the economy, there is a need to build at least 50,000 houses a year but it's likely that those who can afford to buy their own home will account for just a little more than half of these. The Government has also to fund a major increase in water and transport infrastructure to allow the expansion of the housing stock. [ Housebuilding in Dublin to stall within three years if wastewater plant not delivered Opens in new window ] Thus, without a massive increase in taxation, a prudent government can only finance, directly or indirectly, a minority of the required new builds. As a result, the private rental sector will be essential to fund a large chunk of the required new homes. Without willing institutional investors, we will have no prospect of solving the housing crisis. As noted yesterday by the Central Bank governor, this is not happening. The introduction of rent controls a decade ago has made it increasingly difficult to attract commercial investment. Potential returns on investment in Ireland have been lowered by rent caps, by uncertainty around planning, by building costs, and by politicised rent controls. Those who could fund the extra homes can choose to invest in other countries instead. The experience worldwide with rent controls is that they are good for existing tenants but that, over time, the supply of new apartments dries up as they cannot be financed, given the impact of rent controls on investor returns. The impact is exacerbated when population, and thus demand, is growing strongly. More than a century ago, as a wartime measure, Ireland introduced rent controls on unfurnished accommodation. My wife grew up in a rent-controlled house that her parents had moved into in 1941. However, over time, new supply of unfurnished rental accommodation vanished, and only furnished tenancies – outside the rent control system – became available. [ Explainer on rent changes: How will tenants be impacted by the plans for Ireland's rental market? Opens in new window ] Particularly as inflation took off in the 1970s, real rents in the controlled sector plummeted. This rent control was found unconstitutional in 1981. The latest proposals from the Government don't deal effectively with the challenge of encouraging private investment in homes to rent. Without private capital, there will continue to be a funding gap relative to the need, and ambition, for new homes. That means the housing crisis, caused by the gap between high demand and low supply, will continue. If we want to build 50,000 or more homes a year, rent for new lets should be unrestricted. For those currently protected, it would be traumatic to revert immediately to market rents so that a continuation of some restrictions on rents for existing protected tenants is warranted. Initially, if rent controls were ended for new builds, there would be little effect on protected tenants. However, rents on new builds could rise more rapidly than consumer prices. What would put a lid on ever-increasing rents would be the resulting supply response. If investors were convinced that by building lots of apartments they would get their money back, supply would, over time, increase to meet the needs of the economy, choking off any surge in rents. From the 1930s to the 1950s, in much more difficult economic circumstances, Ireland built tens of thousands of social homes, and ended the tenement scourge. Today's housing challenges are different, but we should have the know-how and the imagination to tackle this most urgent of social problems.
