
Concern that buildings developed as creches are being sold as residential homes
Planning guidelines will have to be updated to stop the 'very serious issue' of buildings intended as new
childcare
facilities being sold off by developers as residential homes.
Minister for Children
Norma Foley
said she is working with Minister for Housing
James Browne
to try to update planning regulations that are 'not working the way they should be working'.
Under the current rules, each development of 75 new homes needs to include a childcare facility with places for at least 20 children. But anecdotal evidence and a spate of 'change of use' planning applications from developers reveal that in some cases buildings ostensibly developed as 'creches' are being designed and built with the true intention of selling them as residential homes.
This means that buildings intended to provide much-needed childcare facilities are either sitting empty for years or being sold as expensive new builds after the developer successfully applies for a change of use to housing.
READ MORE
It is understood Ms Foley has already been meeting officials in local authorities to discuss the issue. There is a belief within the
Department of Children
that different local authorities are applying planning rules in different ways.
At the first meeting of the Oireachtas committee on Children and Equality on Thursday, Ms Foley said she was now working with the
Department of Housing
to 'update' planning laws to increase supply of childcare places.
'I believe that there are significant challenges around the planning guidelines,' Ms Foley said.
'I know myself of instances where there are facilities that were built, that were never used for the purpose for which they were built in terms of [a] childcare facility, and then eventually some of them became a change of use, and something else went in there that's not acceptable.'
Ms Foley also suggested that planning guidelines could help ease the issues with national supply of childcare places.
'I think that's a very serious issue around the planning guidelines. I think they're not working the way they should be working,' she said. 'And I think we would be surprised what that might bring on stream when we manage with the Minister for Housing to revisit all of that, because it is a shame that we do have those facilities and they are not being used for [childcare].'
According to
Emer Currie
,
Fine Gael
TD for Dublin West and party spokeswoman on childcare, said there were a number of examples in her constituency alone of much-needed childcare facilities either lying empty or being sold as homes.
Ms Currie highlighted one estate where two three-storey homes intended to be childcare facilities when they were built in 2014 'lay idle for years'. The developer applied four times between 2017 and 2023 for a change of use to housing. Ms Currie explained that the units, which were advertised for sale as a creche, 'were built in the same style as houses'. 'Both have now been sold as housing,' she said.
In the Barnwell Park estate in Dublin 15, the developer applied to change two units intended to be childcare facilities into housing but this was refused by
Fingal County Council
in 2023 because it would 'set an inappropriate precedent'. Ms Currie said these buildings are 'still lying empty.'
'As parents we realise that finding childcare is a challenge. You have parents that believe that they've found a childcare solution that's going to be in their estate, or close to them, and then it never materialises. You can imagine the disappointment that follows,' Ms Currie said.
She said she was calling on the
Department of Finance
to make childcare a 'priority' in the ongoing review of the
National Development Plan
. 'This is our moment to be able to say that childcare is essential infrastructure,' Ms Currie said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
BBC will not appeal against Gerry Adams's defamation case victory
The BBC will not appeal over Gerry Adams's defamation victory against the organisation. Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Féin , said there needs to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, that he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. READ MORE The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision.' 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences,' the spokesperson said. In a statement issued through the Sinn Féin press office on Friday, Mr Adams said the decision not to appeal by the 'British Broadcasting Corporation' has to be followed by a 'substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland'. He said the broadcaster must become 'more accountable to the public'. 'The Dublin court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest,' he said. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said, the damages will be donated to good causes,' he said. —Press Association


Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on proliferating drones: don't look up
This week the Dáil was warned of a dystopian future of Irish skies filled with commercial drones. People Before Profit TD Ruth Coppinger played footage of drones hovering noisily over Blanchardstown rooftops, while Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon called for a temporary restriction zone over Glasnevin. Despite the hyperbole, concerns over noise, privacy and safety are valid. At the heart of the growing unease is a company now operating high-frequency drone food deliveries in west Dublin, and reportedly planning to expand to the northern and southern suburbs before rolling out nationwide. With weekly flight volumes already in the thousands, the shift from pilot project to daily reality is well underway. Ireland finds itself at the leading edge of drone delivery in Europe, praised by operators for a regulatory environment that fosters innovation. Drones are being used not just for burgers and burritos, but for medicines and time-sensitive consumer goods. Yet what industry advocates view as forward-thinking policy, critics see as dangerously lax. They argue that existing laws are outpaced by the speed of technological development and ill-equipped to manage the risks. This is acknowledged in the Programme for Government, which commits to integrating drone oversight into the air navigation division of the Irish Aviation Authority. The Taoiseach has conceded new regulations are needed to deal with drones 'flying left, right, centre', suggesting an Oireachtas committee should investigate the matter further. READ MORE While the Government reflects, the drone economy is scaling up fast. Communities in Tallaght, Glasnevin and beyond will soon hear the distinctive buzz overhead if planning applications are successful. The concerns which have been expressed over noise and privacy are legitimate. But others border on the moralistic. The question is not whether drone deliveries will be part of modern life – they already are – but how they are regulated to ensure that innovation serves the public good, rather than intrudes upon it.


Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Kneecap name high-profile legal team to defend terrorism charge against Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh
Irish-language rap group Kneecap have named high-profile legal representation to aid the defence against a terrorism charge levied at one of their members. Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged under the UK's Terrorism Act last month for allegedly waving a flag that expressed support for Hizbullah. The British government classified Hizbullah a terrorist organisation in 2019, and expressing support for them is illegal. Mr Ó hAnnaidh denies this charge and called it 'political policing' which is a 'carnival of distraction' from Israel committing genocide in Gaza. He is due to appear in Westminster Magistrates' Court next Wednesday. READ MORE Kneecap on Friday published details of the legal team, whose past work has focused on freedom of expression, international human rights law, and high-profile cases against the British state. Mayo-born barrister Blinne Ní Grálaigh KC specialises in protest law Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC represented South Africa last year at the International Court of Justice in its case alleging genocide by Israel in Gaza. Ms Ní Ghrálaigh, a Mayo-born barrister, specialises in protest law. In 2022, she represented a member of the 'Colston Four', who were cleared of a criminal damage charge after they toppled a statue of a 17th-century British slave-owner in Bristol during the Black Lives Matter protests. Solicitor Darragh Mackin represented families of victims of the Stardust fire. Photograph: Stephen Collins/Collins Darragh Mackin represented the families of victims of the 1981 Stardust fire at an inquest which ultimately concluded they had been 'unlawfully killed'. The families received a State apology last year. Mr Mackin has also worked on reforming Northern Ireland's abortion laws. [ Glastonbury full lineup for 2025: eyes on Kneecap's Saturday slot after gig cancellations Opens in new window ] Gareth Peirce, whose name is synonymous with representing the wrongly convicted Birmingham Six and Guildford Four, counts WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange among her recent clients. Gareth Peirce represented the Birmingham Six and Guildford Four and, more recently, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Photograph: David Sleator Barrister Rosalind Comyn practices criminal and media law, having recently acted on behalf of climate justice activists charged with vandalising Vincent Van Gogh's Sunflowers painting. Other legal representatives include Jude Bunting KC and Brenda Campbell KC, who are concerned with freedom of expression and terrorism and protest law, respectively. Kneecap wrote in a statement posted on X that 'the British establishment is conducting a campaign against' them. 'We are ready for this fight,' they said. 'We are proud to have such a strong legal team with us.'