Fraud charges against tow companies a ‘black eye' for industry: towing association
The back of a tow truck can be seen in this photo from May 22, 2025. (Miriam Valdes-Carletti)
The director for the Towing and Recovery Association of Alberta said he is not surprised to see the owners of 10 towing companies facing fraud charges.
Fraud charges against the 11 owners of the companies were announced on Thursday and stem from a 10-month investigation by Edmonton police, which alleges operators were inflating bills, arriving at crash sites and demanding drivers use their services and charging insurance companies for services that weren't provided.
According to police, the cost of the fraudulent billing from the companies totalled more than $120,000.
Don Getschel, also the owner and operator of Oil Country Towing, said the association has started seeing more predatory towing practices starting a year-and-a-half ago.
'When Ontario regulated their industry, we started to see an influx of new towing companies popping up, and some of the ones that we had here starting to change the practices,' he said. 'We started to see the bills start to get higher and higher and higher.'
Getschel said he was seeing inflated charges of upwards of $5,500 for a service he would charge $500 for. Police said they saw the same.
The practice is a major concern for the association and members, he added, because it hurts the industry as a whole.
'It gives us a black eye … It just makes us all look like a bunch of criminals when 99 per cent of the towers that work in Alberta are hard-working, law-abiding citizens.'
Edmonton Police Service Det. Bryan Niehaus said the tactics being used by these companies are relatively new to Alberta and have been increasing over the past two years.
He said the current investigation began with a man trying to get his vehicle back from a towing company.
'His insurance company wasn't going to cover the cost just due to some technicalities, and (the company) wanted him to pay $5,000 to get it out of their holding lot,' Niehaus said. 'He came to the police and it kind of just went from there.'
Niehaus and Getschel explained that predatory companies take advantage of people who are in a vulnerable position after a crash.
Drivers can protect themselves by knowing their rights and standing up for themselves should a tow truck arrive unsolicited.
'If a tow truck company is just stopping by the collision and soliciting them for business, that actually is a bylaw offence, and that there's probably something behind it in regards to why they want to get that tow so bad,' Niehaus said.
'You have the right to pick your tow provider. You have a right to ask for a quote up front. Any reputable toll company will do that,' Getschel said. 'It's your right to have your vehicle taken wherever you want.'
More information on predatory towing can be found on the Alberta Motor Association website, including that you have the right to refuse towing services, the right to access your vehicle during a storage facility's business hours and the right to an itemized invoice before paying.
If a company shows up and won't leave when asked, Niehaus said to call the police.
'Say, 'I'm involved in a collision. There's tow trucks here, they won't leave me alone.' You will get a police response for that.'
CTV News Edmonton reached out to four of the companies named by police. One declined an interview and the three others weren't available.
Police said on Thursday that reports of fraud from additional towing companies are under investigation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Parents concerned after Toronto man arrested for allegedly filming, grabbing kids
Watch CP24 crime analyst Steve Ryan says parents find the incident 'extremely concerning,' describing the behaviour as 'predatory.'
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Charter challenge to B.C.'s Mental Health Act being heard in court
A Charter challenge to B.C.'s Mental Health Act, over a provision that groups say denies patients the ability to consent to treatment, is now being heard in B.C. Supreme Court nearly a decade after it was first filed. The challenge, filed by the Council of Canadians with Disabilities and other plaintiffs, was first made in 2016 over the act's "deemed consent" provision, which states that anyone with involuntary status under the law is presumed to have agreed to psychiatric treatment. The first hearing day was Thursday, and those involved say it's likely to continue for several weeks. Supporters of the challenge say that deemed consent removes safeguards that ensure a patient is being treated humanely, and violates the Charter's rights to life, liberty and security for everyone. They argue that B.C. having a deemed consent provision makes it unique among Canadian provinces and jurisdictions worldwide, and that it deprives patients of the right to control what is done to their own bodies — including, potentially, electroconvulsive treatment or the provision of medication. "It's time to modernize, and ensure that the legislation is brought into compliance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which I think all of us living in Canada now greatly respect and feel as a part of our Canadian culture," said Yvonne Peters, co-chair of the Council of Canadians with Disabilities' disability justice litigation initiative. A spokesperson for Health Minister Josie Osborne declined to comment on the case as it is before the courts. Loved ones should be involved: supporters The Charter challenge has drawn support from numerous groups, including the Canadian Mental Health Association's B.C. division (CMHA-BC). Jonny Morris, CEO of CMHA-BC, says removing the deemed consent provision would provide people with dignity and more control over their care. "We hope that there's a world in which the Mental Health Act is modernized so that deemed consent is replaced with evidence-based safeguards," he told CBC News. "So if the person wants their family members to be part of the decision making, if they can't make a decision, that those family members are included ... and that people have a say in their treatment if they have the capacity to be making decisions," he added. Morris said that, in addition to family members, he would like to see a patient's trusted neighbours, friends or other colleagues be incorporated into decision-making as part of the act's reform. Victoria resident Celeste Macevicius was committed to care under the Mental Health Act as a teenager, and has acted as a carer for people who have dealt with the mental health system. She says the legislation acts as a brick wall as soon as a decision is made to certify a patient to treatment, and family members aren't even informed when their loved one is discharged from care. "The degree to which people all of a sudden lose dignity and agency and autonomy and sense of self when they're put under the Mental Health Act is devastating," she said. "Even if somebody is a risk to themselves or a risk to somebody else, that shouldn't mean that then they'll be forced to comply with whatever a psychiatrist — who's known them for four hours — thinks they should comply with." Province reviewing act In the wake of a tragedy last month, in which a man on "extended leave" from his mental health team allegedly drove a car into attendees of the Lapu-Lapu Day festival in Vancouver, killing 11, B.C. Premier David Eby announced a review of the Mental Health Act. Eby said Osborne and her team will initiate a review of the act. Dr. Daniel Vigo, B.C.'s chief scientific adviser for psychiatry, toxic drugs and concurrent disorders, will be part of the review, the premier said. He did not provide a timeline for the review. Claire Rattée, the B.C. Conservative critic for mental health and addictions, said that the deemed consent provision in the Mental Health Act was not consistent with best practices, and that a collaborative approach to care was a better approach. She's arguing that, while the Mental Health Act is a good piece of legislation, the province is failing to support people with mental health and addictions challenges, including people with brain injuries from repeated drug overdoses. "I'm more concerned about the lack of services that are out there to support people with mental health and addiction struggles," she said. "And that's really where we're seeing these large failings, these large cracks that people are are falling through." WATCH | What two lawyers want to see in Mental Health Act review: What changes to B.C.'s mental health legislation could look like 23 days ago Duration 15:05 Premier David Eby has announced a review of the province's mental health legislation in light of the Lapu-Lapu Day festival tragedy. Two lawyers with extensive professional experience, Laura Johnston of Health Justice and Kevin Love with the Community Legal Assistance Society, joined us to share their experiences with the Mental Health Act and what changes they do and do not want to see.
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Incarcerated former mortgage broker agrees to pay B.C. regulator $35K over misconduct
A real estate sign is posted outside a home in Pointe-Claire, a city in Montreal's West Island, Tuesday, May 7, 2024. (Christinne Muschi / The Canadian Press) A former B.C. mortgage broker has agreed to pay a $35,000 administrative penalty for failing to report a misleading mortgage application submitted in his name by his ex-wife. Siavash Ahmadi was registered as a submortgage broker from May 2019 until October 2022, according to a consent order he signed with the BC Financial Services Authority earlier this month. The document details the misconduct that led to the fine, the principal instance of which began in March 2020. According to the consent order, Ahmadi met with the prospective buyer of a Vancouver condo around that time, but determined that the buyer would not qualify for a mortgage, and declined to file an application for them. Ahmadi then travelled to Iran for two months. While he was away, his then-wife Ksenia Ivanova submitted a mortgage application for the client, using Ahmadi's Filogix account. Filogix is a software platform that connects mortgage brokers and lenders, according to the BCFSA. 'After returning from Iran, S. Ahmadi discovered (the client's) application had been submitted and been approved,' consent order reads. 'He also discovered at that time that the documents submitted in support of the application differed from the documents he had reviewed earlier and were inaccurate.' The consent order indicates Ivanova filed the application without Ahmadi's knowledge or approval. Ivanova was also a registered submortgage broker from 2015 to 2020. In a separate consent order signed last year, she, too, was fined $35,000 for using Ahmadi's account to submit misleading applications. Ivanova was also one of 23 people penalized for working with fake mortgage broker Jay Kanth Chaudhary. She is banned from reapplying for registration as a mortgage broker for 10 years. When Ahmadi got back from Iran, there were still a few days left before the transaction Ivanova had submitted was due to be completed, according to the consent order. Despite this, however, Ahmadi 'made no attempts to cancel the application or inform the lender, despite knowing the documents that supported the application were not accurate,' the consent order reads. It also notes that Ahmadi 'accepted financial documentation for his clients from third parties' without meeting with the clients directly on 'at least some of' eight other mortgage applications filed through his Filogix account from January 2020 through January 2021. The documents he received on behalf of each of the eight borrowers 'were not genuine and showed an income that was higher than the borrower's true reported earnings,' according to the consent order. All of this amounted to conducting mortgage business 'in a manner prejudicial to the public interest,' Ahmadi admitted in the document. In addition to the $35,000 administrative penalty, Ahmadi also agreed to pay $3,500 in 'investigation costs' to the BCFSA. 'BCFSA is committed to ensuring integrity in the mortgage services industry and will not hesitate to take action against those who compromise the public interest,' said Jon Vandall, the agency's senior vice-president of compliance and enforcement, in a news release about the case. 'The substantial administrative penalty of $35,000 reflects the severity of Ahmadi's actions and serves as a clear message that such misconduct will not be tolerated.' According to the consent order, Ahmadi 'is currently incarcerated for a significant period of time' as a result of convictions unrelated to his financial misconduct as a mortgage broker. While the document does not specify the crimes for which Ahmadi was convicted, a man by that name was sentenced earlier this year for offences stemming from a June 2023 standoff with police on a highway off-ramp in West Vancouver. He received a global sentence of four years – minus credit for time already served – for reckless discharge of a firearm and possession of a loaded or restricted firearm, as well as a $1,000 fine and a two-year driving ban for impaired driving.
