logo
Mayor's race pushes ahead following Mackinac conference

Mayor's race pushes ahead following Mackinac conference

Axios05-06-2025
Coming off a high-profile conference packed with business leaders and potential donors, Detroit's mayoral hopefuls are sprinting to the end of this month with big events and rounds of door-knocking.
Why it matters: The late May Mackinac Policy Conference offered a venue to showcase leadership and policy plans but didn't reach a wide swath of Detroit voters — and candidates need to do just that ahead of June 26, when absentee ballots become available.
Nine candidates are certified to run for mayor in the Aug. 5 primary.
Catch up quick: After last week's Mackinac debate, candidates are seeking funding and endorsements.
That could potentially include the PAC run by the Detroit Regional Chamber, which hosted the conference.
Mayoral candidate and City Council President Mary Sheffield, for example, nabbed another union endorsement after the debate.
Yes, but: Candidates should "brush off" Mackinac and hit the ground running, Mario Morrow, a political consultant and the president of a local communications firm, tells Axios.
Connections made with Detroiters at their doors, on the street, on the bus and in neighborhood meetings are what will make someone stand out, he said.
Caveat: While Sheffield is seen as the frontrunner, and Triumph Church pastor Solomon Kinloch Jr. is often noted as her top challenger, many voters are undecided and there's time for dynamics to shift.
The mayoral hopefuls are fanning out across the city to drum up street-level support.
What they're saying: Kinloch is preparing for a rally with UAW president Shawn Fain and hundreds of UAW members at 10am Saturday in Detroit, according to the union, which endorsed Kinloch.
"There's no campaign with the ground force of the Kinloch campaign and it is getting fully activated," Kinloch spokesperson Dan Lijana tells Axios.
For Sheffield's campaign, the strategy hasn't changed post-Mackinac, even as the campaign kicks into high gear.
"We are at the point where we're about to hit a sprint, before we hit the 'Get out the vote' efforts in July," campaign manager Chris Scott tells Axios.
Candidate and former City Council president Saunteel Jenkins
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minneapolis mayor makes high-stakes pitch for budget trims, tax hike
Minneapolis mayor makes high-stakes pitch for budget trims, tax hike

Axios

time4 hours ago

  • Axios

Minneapolis mayor makes high-stakes pitch for budget trims, tax hike

Mayor Jacob Frey is asking Minneapolis to tighten its belt. Why it matters: The mayor proposed Wednesday to increase the city's property tax levy by 7.8% next year — Minneapolis' largest levy hike since 2010, if enacted — though the increase could've been higher without $23 million in cuts the mayor has suggested. He contends the budget proposal shields taxpayers from a flood of rising costs without employee layoffs or deep cuts to core services like road repairs or police. What they're saying:"This was not an easy budget year. But it's also not a crisis budget. This is a disciplined budget," Frey is expected to say in his budget address Wednesday morning, according to draft text shared with Axios. Zoom in: If Minneapolis made no major budget changes, city officials would've needed a much larger levy increase next year — as much as 13% — to keep up with rising costs, mostly for salaries, benefits and construction expenses. By eliminating two dozen vacant positions and making other money-saving accounting moves, city officials were able to reduce next year's levy increase. Minneapolis would also save $3.6 million by eliminating "double-time" overtime pay for police officers. (The department has spent record amounts on OT amid a staffing shortage, per the Star Tribune.) The big picture: The mayor now has to sell the $2 billion budget proposal to the City Council — which is controlled by Frey critics — during an election year, as even some of the mayor's council allies are pleading for limits to the levy increase. Friction points: The mayor's budget saves money by ending or reorganizing programs that the council funded, but were deemed "untested or unsustainable." For example, instead of four Open Streets festivals, the mayor proposes to fund only three — and Frey has already faced criticism for stifling the event. The city would also continue a sidewalk-shoveling partnership with neighborhood groups, but abandon other efforts to explore city-run sidewalk clearing programs that have intrigued council members. What we're watching: How the council — which makes most final budget decisions — responds. Last year, Frey's council critics banded together to reshape the budget, and ultimately overrode the mayor's veto of their rewritten spending plan. What's next: The city's Board of Estimate and Taxation will set the maximum levy amounts later this fall, though the council can always approve smaller tax increases.

'Q2T3' is the 'freakish' new growth benchmark for AI startups
'Q2T3' is the 'freakish' new growth benchmark for AI startups

Business Insider

time4 hours ago

  • Business Insider

'Q2T3' is the 'freakish' new growth benchmark for AI startups

A new growth metric is doing the rounds in Silicon Valley that shows how exuberant investors have become about generative AI. In a new State of AI 2025 report, Bessemer Venture Partners introduced a growth benchmark that sets a high bar for today's AI startup ecosystem. Called Q2T3 — short for quadruple, quadruple, triple, triple, triple — this metric signals a dramatic departure from the SaaS era's more measured growth expectations, typified by the "T2D3"—triple, triple, double, double, double— playbook. "We share these admittedly freakish new benchmarks to showcase the reality of standout AI startups of the moment," Bessemer wrote. Bessemer didn't name any specific startups. However, the firm said that it came up with this new metric by studying 20 high-growth, durable AI startups across its portfolio and beyond, including Abridge and Cursor. Escalating Expectations Bessemer usually releases a "State of the Cloud" report each year. This year, the VC firm changed it to the "State of AI," a sign of how much generative AI is changing the tech industry, upending cloud computing, and pressuring established software business models. T2D3 became the north star for SaaS startups during the last decade. This metric required startups to triple their annualized recurring revenue in the first year, then do it again in their second year. Then, they had to double ARR in the third year, and repeat that feat in years four and five. In theory, this would get ARR from $1 million or $2 million to more than $100 million in about five or six years — enough to earn a potential valuation of $1 billion. Bessemer thinks T2D3 is now being rapidly eclipsed by AI-native companies, which are demonstrating unprecedented velocity thanks to generative AI's unique dynamics: rapid product cycles, explosive user demand, and new distribution channels. Enter Q2T3, a far more aggressive trajectory. The new benchmark reflects a faster path where AI startups quadruple revenue in years one and two, and triple ARR in each of the next three years, according to Bessemer. This implies growing ARR from $3 million to more than $100 million in just four years, and then more after that — a feat that redefines what hypergrowth means in a post-ChatGPT world. "Shooting Stars" vs "Supernovas" Bessemer's Q2T3 model is based on a new archetype it calls "Shooting Stars." These are AI startups that grow meaningfully faster than SaaS counterparts, while maintaining capital efficiency, solid gross margins (~60%), and strong product-market fit. According to Bessemer, these startups achieve roughly $3 million ARR in their first year of monetization and about $164,000 in ARR per employee. Some AI startups are growing even faster, hitting $100 million in ARR in about 1.5 years. Bessemer calls these "Supernova" startups. "These are at once the most exciting and the most terrifying startups we see," the venture capital firm wrote in its report. These numbers often come from situations where revenue may be fragile, driven by rapid adoption that may not reflect lasting value. Low switching costs, highly competitive markets, and thinly differentiated products can push profit margins toward zero or below, Bessemer warned. In contrast, Shooting Stars find product-market fit quickly, retain and expand customer relationships, and maintain strong gross margins—slightly lower than SaaS peers due to faster growth and modest model-related costs. They grow faster on average than their SaaS predecessors, but at rates that still feel anchored to traditional bottlenecks of scaling an organization. "These businesses might not yet dominate headlines, but they're beloved by their customers and are on the trajectory to making software history," Bessemer wrote. "Freakish" but achievable While Q2T3 seems "freakish," the firm said it's not impossible for AI startups to attain. Generative AI has drastically compressed time-to-market, with faster development, deployment, and go-to-market cycles, and Bessemer argues that dozens of startups are already proving this curve is within reach. Still, Q2T3 isn't for the faint-hearted. Is it a new way to redefine startup success, or a sign of AI frothiness? Only time will tell.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store