The Beats Solo Buds Are Now Over 3× Cheaper Than AirPods Pro Just in Time for Back-to-School
The custom acoustic architecture at play with the Beats Solo Buds is able to achieve that big Beats sound with full range and clarity. It utilizes dual-layer drivers which help to minimize distortion to produce high-fidelity sound.
See at Amazon
Beats has improved on the design of its earbuds with each new model, and with these you're looking at their smallest case yet. That means they're even more portable the ever before, easily sliding into any pocket in your jeans or bag.
These Beats Solo Buds are designed to fit any ear regardless of shape or size. Each set comes with four different sizes of pad to go on the tip of your buds. They're each ergonomically engineered to match the natural shape of the ear canal. This prevents leakage of sound and keeps the buds fitting nice and snug in your ear. They ain't going anywhere.
One of the most important metrics of any set of wireless ear buds is how long they can last on a single charge. Well, the Beats Solo Buds have a battery life of up to 18 hours so you can listen practically all day. If they do end up dying on you while you're out and about, you can get yourself an extra hour of listening time with just a 5-minute charge. You can actually even plug the earbuds case into your phone or other USB-C device and charge off its power, so you'll always be able to get yourself just a little bit more playtime when you need it.
For the time being, Amazon has the Beats Solo Buds on sale for a 26% discount. Choose between three color options—matte black, storm gray, and transparent red. Each are down from their original price of $80 to just $59, saving you a whole $21.
See at Amazon
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
1 Brilliant Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock That Will Be Worth More Than Apple by 2030
Key Points AWS and advertising drive Amazon's growth. Apple hasn't released an innovative product or feature in some time. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Apple is the world's third-largest company by a wide margin, with a $1 trillion gap between it and fourth-place Alphabet . However, I think several companies are slated to pass Apple in market share over the next five years, including fifth-place Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), which is valued at around $2.4 trillion compared to Apple's $3.5 trillion. That's a wide gap to make up in five years, but looking at Amazon's growth tailwinds versus Apple's makes it fairly clear that Amazon is the much better stock pick. Amazon has two business units driving profit growth Apple's business is fairly straightforward; it's the leading consumer tech brand and generates significant revenue selling iPhones and other products in the Apple ecosystem. Amazon is a bit more complex, as it has the online store that most investors are familiar with, but that's not the best reason to invest in it. Although its online stores division posted the best quarter in a long time (revenue rose 11% year over year), the real stars of the show are Amazon Web Services (AWS) and its advertising services division. AWS is Amazon's cloud computing platform, and it is seeing strong demand fueled by the migration of traditional workloads to the cloud, as well as by new artificial intelligence (AI) workloads. AWS grew revenue by 17% year over year in Q2, which is strong growth considering it generated nearly $31 billion in revenue during the quarter. However, AWS's primary competitors (Microsoft's Azure and Google Cloud) posted stronger growth rates in their corresponding quarters, so investors are worried about AWS's long-term ability to perform in this sector despite its being the market-share leader. AWS will likely continue to underperform its peers due to its size, but 17% growth is nothing to sneer at. AWS is also a large part of Amazon's profit picture. In Q2, it accounted for 53% of Amazon's operating profits despite accounting for only 18% of revenue. Analysts still expect cloud computing to grow rapidly over the next few years, and if Amazon surpasses Apple in market cap, this will be a primary reason why. Advertising services is Amazon's fastest-growing segment, with revenue rising 23% year over year, an acceleration over previous quarters' growth rate. Amazon has one of the most lucrative places to advertise on the internet, as consumers are already coming to their platform to make purchases. Paying to place a product at the top of an Amazon search almost guarantees increased sales. This is worth a lot to its advertising clients and will be a key part of Amazon's investment thesis over the next few years. Amazon's margins are rising Amazon isn't a revenue growth story; it's a profit growth story. The rise of high-margin businesses like AWS and advertising services has helped Amazon boost its profit margins over the past few years. AMZN Profit Margin data by YCharts With its two high-margin business segments growing faster than other parts of its business, Amazon will naturally have elevated profit growth rates. In Q2, Amazon's operating income rose 31% year over year. Contrast that with Apple, whose Q3 FY 2025 (ending June 28) operating income increased by 11%. Amazon's profit growth rate is much faster. Over five years, a 30% growth rate will increase its operating income by 271% while an 11% growth rate increases operating income by only 69%. That would be enough to drive Amazon's profits higher than Apple's, propelling it to surpass it in size along the way. Amazon is an excellent stock pick for the next five years and a no-brainer buy at today's prices. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,070% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Keithen Drury has positions in Alphabet and Amazon. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Brilliant Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock That Will Be Worth More Than Apple by 2030 was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
The Ninja Swirl by Creami has landed in Oz — here's where to get the viral soft serve maker
Ninja Kitchen is back at it again with a welcome upgrade to an already beloved and viral gadget. The internet went wild when the Ninja Swirl launched in the U.S. in January and the U.K. in July, as eagle-eyed fans waited with bated breath for Ninja's follow-up to the Creami. The soft-serve ice cream maker sold out in seconds, with thousands of customers waiting for restocks. Following the highly anticipated Ninja Slushi launch in February, it was only a matter of time before we secured the machine Down Under — and now, it's finally here. Stocked at retailers like Ninja, Amazon, The Good Guys and JB Hi-Fi, the Swirl has officially debuted today (August 18), nationwide. You'll need to act fast to nab one, though, as we expect these fun dessert makers will fly off shelves. Destined to sell out fast, the Ninja Creami Swirl is now available directly from the maker. It features 13 one-touch presets and a soft-serve handle, designed to dispense up to 4 small cones from one container. Also available for purchase at: • JB Hi-Fi for AU$549• The Good Guys for AU$549.99• Amazon for AU$599.99 Adding a whole new soft-serve feature to the mix, the Swirl incorporates the features of its predecessor but unlocks a new spin on the older machine. Once your ice cream has been processed on the Creami side of the machine, you can attach the tub and lid to the front of the machine. When attached, you can lower the lever on the side to dispense your creamy and delicious soft-serve. The Swirl also has six different soft-serve settings, so there's sure to be some trial and error involved, but who doesn't love experimenting with ice cream? Thanks to enhanced Creamify technology, the Ninja Swirl has been dubbed a "one-spin solution", whipping mixes faster than the Creami and Creami Deluxe. As a Creami owner, the only pain I've ever experienced is waiting hours minutes for my ice cream to process after the dreaded 24-hour freeze time, and then having to hit the re-spin button because the mix isn't quite right. But thankfully, the new tech should have any ice cream fiend — myself included — chowing down on their favourite frozen treats in no time. The Swirl doesn't skimp out on new features either, adding a new setting to the existing lineup. With Creamifit, the machine will magically blend and process protein-based ice cream mixes just like regular, sugary ones and deliver better consistency. The health-conscious nut in me is looking forward to trying my favourite protein-rich mixes in a soft serve capacity. Aside from the existing Creami features, the Swirl does take up more countertop space to allow the soft-serve side to shine, so do keep that in mind. And if you're keen to try some mix-ins in your soft serve, you may want to think again, as you will risk clogging up the machine. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. So do get in quick — or else the Swirl will sashay away. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Digital Trends
3 hours ago
- Digital Trends
Blink's subscription model is affordable, but is it worth it?
Blink is the younger, more-affordable cousin of Ring. Both brands fall under the Amazon umbrella, and both work well (although I find that Ring is slightly faster in terms of loading times). Both brands have something else in common, too: to access the best features, you'll need a subscription. Blink offers three different tiers. With no subscription, you'll receive notifications whenever something moves within range of the camera and see an extended live view of up to five minutes. While the official site doesn't list the number of devices that includes, all of your connected Blink cameras and other devices will send motion alerts. Recommended Videos The next level is the Basic plan. That's $3 per month for a single device and includes cloud storage for up to 60 days, motion detection, person and vehicle detection, and an extended live view of up to 90 minutes. It also includes motion event recording, live view recording, instant video access, photo capture, and an auto-update thumbnail. The highest tier is called Plus. It's $10 per month for an unlimited number of devices and the best value by far. It includes everything the other plans have, with the addition of custom snooze notifications, a 10% discount off future Blink devices, extended warranty coverage, and the Blink Moments feature that stitches together multiple events into a seamless video. With those features in mind, you have to ask: is a Blink subscription really worth it? I'll be honest: I hate subscription services. If I buy a device, I want to be able to use all of its features without paying an arbitrary monthly sum. However, given the affordability of Blink devices in relation to other products on the market and just how many features the subscription opens up, the smart devices aren't worth their cost unless you pay for the subscription. I subscribe to the Plus tier. With a video doorbell and multiple cameras around the exterior of my home, it's a more economical choice than paying per device. And $10 per month (closer to $8 with the annual sub) is on-par with what other brands offer, although Blink does lack feature parity with more advanced options like Ring. Is $100 per year worth the cost? I paid next to nothing for my Blink devices. For full transparency, several devices were sent my way for review, but I have expanded the system with additional purchases. The kicker? I bought most of them during Prime Day or Black Friday sales. Blink has a tendency to drop its prices to an almost absurd degree. While I do have a few Ring products, I can usually get two or three Blink cameras for the price of a single Ring. The subscription cost feels like a small amount to pay given how well the system has worked. It lets me keep an eye on the house when I'm traveling, and it also lets my wife and me check in on our pets. The ability to view up to 90 minutes of footage at a time is a win, particularly when I suspect multiple events might be connected. For example, I had silenced my phone, only to check it later and see more than 30 motion alerts. That meant that either my neighbors were having a party and the camera was being set off by motion at the fringes of the yard, or our garden gnomes had decided to rise up and form an army. Thankfully, it was the former (although the garden gnome army would be fun to explain). Some kids were playing in the cul-de-sac and chased a ball into the yard, and that explained the alerts. That's another perk of the Plus tier: it allows you to snooze notifications for a set amount of time. When my lawn service comes to cut the grass, I tend to shut off notifications; otherwise, my phone will practically vibrate itself off the desk as the mower moves back and forth in its field of view. The downside: no professional monitoring Blink is strictly a DIY system. You can keep an eye on your property no matter where you are, but no one will intervene to alert the authorities if necessary. Ring offers that service, but it costs an extra $10 per month on top of their mid-tier plan, which means you're paying at least $20 (and more than likely $25) for professional protection. That's the trade-off. While $10 per month gives you access to a host of different features, it doesn't provide you with what is arguably the most useful one of all. I always suggest professional monitoring whenever possible, if only for the peace of mind — but if you don't have access to a device that offers that, then a monthly fee of $10 is a small price to pay, especially as it makes it significantly easier for you to keep an eye on what's happening around your home on your own. Pairing that subscription with some of Blink's optional accessories, like the solar panel or the floodlight attachment, gives you a home security system for a fraction of the cost of other names in the business.
