Kerala MLA booked for threatening forest officers and forcibly releasing person from custody
Kottayam: Police booked Konni MLA K U Jenish Kumar of CPM for threatening and forcibly releasing a person from forest department's custody on Thursday. Naduvathumoozhy forest range officer, Padom deputy range officer and staff gave statements against the MLA to Koodal police.
A high-level forest department team recorded the statement in the Konni forest range office as well.
The MLA was booked under IPC Section 132 (for preventing the forest officers from discharging their duties) and 351 (2) (for threatening). The forest officers' association also filed a complaint against Jenish.
The MLA forcibly released Tamil Nadu native Raju from the forest station earlier this week. He was taken into custody in connection with the electrocution of a jumbo at Kulathumannu near Konni in Pathanamthitta.
The MLA was heard shouting at the forest officers that Naxalites would return and set fire to the forest station. Konni DSP T Rajapa Ravuther was also present at the station.
Jenish claimed he intervened as the forest officers were charging cases against innocent people in connection with the jumbo's death. A person was taken into custody without following any legal procedures, he stated.
Meanwhile, the forest department said the jumbo died as excessive current was passed through the solar fencing.
Meanwhile, Coexistence Collective-Kerala, a group of environmental activists and concerned citizens, demanded immediate action over the incident. They sought an independent high-level inquiry, registration of an FIR and initiation of criminal proceedings under relevant sections of the IPC and Wildlife (Protection) Act. They also called for protection for forest officials, ensuring they are not subjected to political victimisation, and a crackdown on illegal encroachments.
Additionally, they requested a formal censure motion or disciplinary proceedings in the assembly against Jenish for gross misconduct. They urged a public statement reaffirming the govt's commitment to upholding the rule of law, protecting forest staff and ensuring justice for wildlife lost due to illegal activities.
Kerala Council of Churches came out against the forest officers, citing past incidents and asking them to realise that they are not masters but servants of the public. Its general secretary, Prakash P Thomas, said the forest department was taking innocent people into custody in the name of
Wildlife Protection Act
.
Even the MLA of the ruling front is forced to take a stand against the forest officials, he said.
Kottayam: Police booked Konni MLA K U Jenish Kumar of CPM for threatening and forcibly releasing a person from forest department's custody on Thursday. Naduvathumoozhy forest range officer, Padom deputy range officer and staff gave statements against the MLA to Koodal police. A high-level forest department team recorded the statement in the Konni forest range office as well.
The MLA was booked under IPC Section 132 (for preventing the forest officers from discharging their duties) and 351 (2) (for threatening). The forest officers' association also filed a complaint against Jenish.
The MLA forcibly released Tamil Nadu native Raju from the forest station earlier this week. He was taken into custody in connection with the electrocution of a jumbo at Kulathumannu near Konni in Pathanamthitta.
The MLA was heard shouting at the forest officers that Naxalites would return and set fire to the forest station. Konni DSP T Rajapa Ravuther was also present at the station.
Jenish claimed he intervened as the forest officers were charging cases against innocent people in connection with the jumbo's death. A person was taken into custody without following any legal procedures, he stated.
Meanwhile, the forest department said the jumbo died as excessive current was passed through the solar fencing.
Meanwhile, Coexistence Collective-Kerala, a group of environmental activists and concerned citizens, demanded immediate action over the incident. They sought an independent high-level inquiry, registration of an FIR and initiation of criminal proceedings under relevant sections of the IPC and Wildlife (Protection) Act. They also called for protection for forest officials, ensuring they are not subjected to political victimisation, and a crackdown on illegal encroachments.
Additionally, they requested a formal censure motion or disciplinary proceedings in the assembly against Jenish for gross misconduct. They urged a public statement reaffirming the govt's commitment to upholding the rule of law, protecting forest staff and ensuring justice for wildlife lost due to illegal activities.
Kerala Council of Churches came out against the forest officers, citing past incidents and asking them to realise that they are not masters but servants of the public. Its general secretary, Prakash P Thomas, said the forest department was taking innocent people into custody in the name of Wildlife Protection Act. Even the MLA of the ruling front is forced to take a stand against the forest officials, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
FIR after sick mare found tied up without food, water
1 2 Kolkata: An FIR was registered after Peta India rescued a horse from Maidan with assistance from cops last Monday. The mare, blind in one eye and whose physical condition indicated prolonged neglect by her former owner, was found tied up with no access to food or water. Veterinarians said she was emaciated and suffering from painful chronic osteoarthritis. The mare was later transferred to a sanctuary. The FIR was registered on June 2 under sections on negligent conduct regarding the animal, which poses a probable danger to human life or any potential threat of grievous harm, and for causing grievous hurt by maiming the animal. This case also invokes multiple sections of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (PCA) Act, 1960, including neglecting the duty of care, for unreasonably tethering the animal, and for failing to provide adequate food, water, and shelter. Moreover, Section 3(5) of the BNS was invoked for committing crimes in furtherance of common intention. "This rescue is not an isolated case; it's a reflection of the ongoing cruelty that horses face daily on Kolkata's roads, hauling tourist carriages and when abandoned in the Maidan area. We urge CM Mamata Banerjee to take decisive action to retire all horses used to pull carriages, and introduce heritage-style electric carriages," said Peta India advocacy associate Chumki Dutta. In recent months, Peta India has filed two FIRs — at Bhowanipore and Maidan — following two incidents of cruelty to horses. The first one was registered after a video surfaced on social media showing one of two horses hitched to a carriage collapsing on the road. The second concerned the death of a mare found abandoned and recumbent. In 2024, at least eight horses were reported dead in Kolkata due to similar abuse and neglect, according to data gathered by Peta India and the CAPE Foundation. Investigations reveal that many horses used in the city are anaemic, malnourished, overworked, and suffer from painful conditions caused by constant use of hard road surfaces. The Calcutta HC had directed the state to develop a proposal for rehabilitating horse owners and providing them with an alternative livelihood. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Quashing FIR in minor's rape risks safety, dignity of survivor: Delhi HC
The Delhi high court has refused to quash a rape case involving a minor despite the victim's voluntary request, warning that permitting such withdrawals under the pretext of social pressures would set a dangerous precedent and embolden perpetrators to exploit victims' vulnerabilities to escape accountability. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, in a strongly worded ruling, said that courts must not be seen as endorsing the idea that victims should withdraw genuine complaints to maintain social acceptability or preserve personal relationships, such as marriage prospects. 'To quash the present FIR, given the facts, the nature of allegations, and the ground on which quashing is sought, would gravely compromise the protected interests of society and pose a serious risk to the dignity and safety of sexual assault survivors,' the court said in its May 26 ruling, which was released later. Such a decision, the judge underscored, would send a harmful message that perpetrators of heinous crimes can coerce victims into silence by preying on their social circumstances and thereby evade the legal consequences of their actions. The FIR in question, registered under sections of the Indian Penal Code, including rape, kidnapping, intimidation, and insulting a woman's modesty, and under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, accused the man of repeatedly raping a minor girl, burning her genitalia, filming obscene videos and threatening her with acid attacks. The accused had approached the court seeking to quash the FIR, claiming that the complainant had voluntarily agreed to settle the matter and that both families had mutually resolved to not pursue any further legal action. The victim, who appeared in court, told the judge that she wished to withdraw the complaint as its pendency was jeopardising her plans to marry another person. But the court made it clear that such settlements in serious criminal cases, particularly those involving minors, cannot form the basis for extinguishing legal proceedings. The judgment said the reasons cited by the complainant reflected not free will but a 'more complex reason hidden in the background of societal pressure.' Justice Sharma noted that the FIR was not impulsively filed but was a product of 'due deliberation,' and quashing it would amount to legitimising the manipulation of victims' rights through coercion or pressure. 'One judgment, particularly in a sensitive case such as this, can set a precedent that reverberates across society. If courts were seen as supporting the view that a victim must first withdraw her complaint to be deemed 'eligible' to marry or resettle, it would perpetuate the deeply entrenched imbalance of gendered power dynamics,' it held. The court further stressed the need for a justice system that upholds survivors' dignity rather than placing the burden on them to choose between justice and social acceptance. Delhi Police, represented by additional public prosecutor Naresh Kumar Chahar, had also opposed the petition, arguing that the case involved grave allegations of sexual and physical violence and that compromise between the parties could not override the seriousness of the offence. The ruling comes just days after another coordinate bench of the high court had allowed quashing of an FIR involving online harassment of a minor girl, where the complainant had cited similar concerns. The court had directed the accused to perform community service, while also flagging the broader issue of digital abuse and the misuse of social media to exert control over victims. In contrast, justice Sharma's ruling firmly shuts the door on quashing in cases involving allegations of extreme physical and sexual violence against a minor, reinforcing the judiciary's role as a safeguard against coercive settlements that mask deeper societal pressures.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi: ACB quizzes Jain; may be summoned again
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Delhi minister Satyendar Jain was on Friday interrogated for nearly six hours by the Delhi government's Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) in connection with alleged irregularities in the construction of classrooms during the previous government's tenure. Jain, who earlier held key portfolios of Public Works Department (PWD) and health, appeared 'evasive' during the questioning and is likely to be summoned again to join the investigation, according to three ACB officials familiar with the proceedings. 'We asked him 28 key questions about procedural lapses, cost escalations, and possible financial misconduct in the classroom construction drive. He gave valid responses to barely six,' said one senior officer, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'Initially, he blamed the education department. When countered, he then appeared to shift responsibility to the cabinet. His responses weren't cooperative from an investigative standpoint,' the officer added. ACB is investigating alleged violations in a project involving the construction of 12,748 semi-permanent classrooms in schools run by the then AAP government. Initially valued at ₹860 crore, the project cost ballooned to over ₹2,800 crore, allegedly without new tenders or adherence to standard procurement protocols. 'When questioned about the awarding of contracts at inflated rates and violations in procurement processes—reportedly to benefit contractors with AAP links—Jain largely deflected, repeatedly citing cabinet decisions,' said a second ACB official. Investigators pointed out that while the classrooms were meant to be semi-permanent structures (SPS), with a lifespan of about 30 years, the cost per unit averaged ₹24.86 lakh—nearly five times the estimated market cost of ₹5 lakh per classroom. 'When we asked him to explain the inflated costs, Jain claimed the pricing was determined by the education department. He argued that SPS classrooms were constructed to near-RCC standards based on cabinet decisions,' the official said. A further point of contention was the alleged suppression of a report by the Chief Technical Examiner (CTE) of the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), which flagged serious procurement violations. The report was not disclosed between 2017 and 2020. When questioned about it, Jain claimed ignorance. 'He did admit to some form of favouritism in selecting contractors and architects, but again deflected blame—saying it was a collective decision by the cabinet and the education department,' said the third investigator cited above. ACB has also summoned former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia, who was education minister during the period under scrutiny. Sisodia is expected to appear before the agency on Monday. An FIR was registered on April 30, naming both Sisodia and Jain. The charges include Section 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy). The FIR was filed after receiving clearance under Section 17-A of the POC Act. The summons served to Jain and Sisodia cite their roles in key policy decisions, and request written responses along with supporting documents. Both leaders have previously denied any wrongdoing in the matter. Jain refused comment on the matter when approached by HT.
