Swathe of harassment and fraud in EU laid bare
The internal report, obtained by The Telegraph, highlights almost 100 investigations into European Commission officials for a wide range of misdemeanours, many of which were punished with a mere slap on the wrist.
There were probes into a money-laundering scheme, an official stealing cash from colleagues and dozens of cases of sexual and psychological harassment.
The report, which is usually hidden from the public by Eurocrats, was only released as part of a Freedom of Information request.
Frank Furedi, of the MCC Brussels think tank, which helped unearth the documents, said: 'The numerous cases of disciplinary proceedings serve as testimony to the poor standard of behaviour inside the institutions of the EU.
'Yet we know from anecdotal evidence that far too many examples of inappropriate behaviour do not become targets of disciplinary proceedings.'
He added: 'The real problem is the lack of decisive and ethical leadership from those in charge of EU units.'
The Investigatory and Disciplinary Office of the Commission (Idoc) investigated 88 new cases last year, resulting in only one dismissal.
Allegations of either sexual or psychological harassment featured in 21 of the investigations.
In one case, an official was penalised with a €2,000-a-month deduction from their overall pay package for 18 months after they were found to have 'adopted seriously inappropriate behaviour and sexual harassment'.
The unusually high penalty was justified because 'the misconduct was recurrent and that it seriously disrupted the working environment'.
The official in question had attempted to justify their behaviour as a result of a 'medical condition', but this excuse was thrown out by investigators.
Another anonymous official working at an overseas EU delegation was given a mere warning after being accused of 'inappropriate behaviour towards colleagues, including investigating about colleagues' lives and whereabouts, threatening them to obtain private information about them, questioning their religious choices and commenting on their looks'.
The perpetrator was let off without any serious punishment because they owned up to their actions, apologised and improved behaviour at work, the report said.
In another case highlighted by Idoc's report, a senior member of staff was reprimanded for having 'intimate relationships' with two juniors under his command.
The head of unit – a middle manager role in the Commission – failed to report the relationships as a 'conflict of interest' even after he was alerted to the misdemeanours.
The report reveals how officials stole from both their colleagues and the EU taxpayers who fund the Commission.
One official was demoted a grade – which could result in the docking of thousands of euros in wages – for 'having stolen cash from colleagues'.
A contractor was reprimanded for transporting their family in a EU-owned 'service vehicle', broke public parking rules and 'enabled, through this negligent behaviour, the theft of the said vehicle'.
A retired official had their pension reduced to the minimum amount for a period of 10 years because they were found guilty of being involved in 'a money-laundering scheme involving mainly a company which benefited from EU funds and its owners'.
As well as the more serious offences, there were slaps on the wrists handed out for more petty behaviour.
One official, who had 20 years service, got away with a warning after they 'deliberately deleted … a folder that was necessary to organise the daily work of the unit' from a shared drive.
Five officials were ticked off for leaking 'non-public information', 12 'breaches of loyalty' and two cases of inappropriate use of social media.
In one case, an official was demoted by one grade for being found guilty of a crime by a court in an EU member state. They had also published 'articles' in an online newspaper relating to Brussels without prior 'authorisation'.
As part of Idoc's work last year, it launched an outreach campaign titled 'Say no to temptations, they might have disciplinary consequences!'.
It featured seven training sessions available to EU officials, which featured 'case studies based on anonymised Idoc cases … given to raise awareness on what is appropriate or forbidden to pursue as EU staff members'.
HR personnel also gave 'tailor-made presentations' to officials being handed high-ranking jobs, such as head of units or heads of overseas delegations.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Big Tech looks for some global wins
With help from Aaron Mak Big Tech might have lost its bid to freeze state AI rules, but on the global front, it's finding new opportunities to push back on regulation it doesn't like. Nearly six months after President Donald Trump took office promising to go after 'unfair' overseas digital regulation, the American tech industry has already notched one victory and is pushing for more. Canada folded first: Last week, after Trump threatened to stop trade with Ottawa, Canada agreed to shelve a digital services tax that would have collected billions of dollars from U.S. tech companies. Now, looking to press its case in Europe, half a dozen U.S. tech trade groups signed onto a letter last week urging the White House to take a stand against 'the EU's discriminatory digital regulatory policy.' Europe's Digital Services Act, which aims to curb harmful content online, has already come up as a topic of conversation between American and European negotiators, POLITICO's Ari Hawkins reported. European officials pushed back on reports that the Digital Markets Act, which regulates competition, is on the table, too. No trade deal is set yet, and Trump on Monday announced the tariffs that had been set to snap back this week will once again be postponed as he negotiates deals with U.S. trading partners including Europe. But the environment is giving American tech advocates the sense that the wind is at their backs. 'It's hard for me to see the Europeans just giving it up entirely, but they're going to have to make changes' to their digital rules, said Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the Consumer Technology Association, which counts Amazon, Meta and Apple as members. His group signed last week's letter to the White House, which named the DSA, DMA, digital services taxes, EU AI Act and the General Data Protection Regulation among 'discriminatory, unreasonable and burdensome regulations and taxes in the EU.' American companies say they're unfairly targeted by European policies. In the latest example, Apple, which faces fines of €500 million, and Meta, which was fined €200 million, are challenging their penalties for breaching the EU's Digital Markets Act. The trade war that Trump opened seems to have created new avenues to push their case, and now the tech industry has other digital measures in its sights. 'Canada walking back the DST was an example of how everything is on the table in these trade negotiations,' said Daniel Castro, vice president at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a nonprofit whose supporters include the CTA, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft and Meta. To some extent, European tech groups are joining the push to defang the digital rules coming out of Brussels. More than 40 leaders of Europe's biggest corporations, including French AI powerhouse Mistral and the Dutch chipmaking equipment manufacturer ASML, urged Brussels in a letter last week to pause the EU AI Act for two years. They pointed to the challenges pointed out by Mario Draghi, the former European Central Bank chief, whose seminal report last September found Europe lagging in productivity. He blamed Europe's financial markets, costly energy, fragmented R&D and polarized politics. The push against the AI Act, from both sides of the Atlantic, seemed to land with a receptive audience. European Commission tech chief Henna Virkkunen told Politico last month she would not rule out postponing some of the AI Act. Nick Moës, executive director of The Future Society that favors tech regulation, said the push was 'emblematic of significant lobbying going on to try to water down or delete obligations and requirements imposed upon industry players developing AI.' But other tech regulations may be harder to crack. In late June, The Wall Street Journal reported the U.S. Trade Representative's office had compiled a draft trade agreement with the EU that included a list of tentative deals with Brussels, including a dialogue on the Digital Markets Act. According to the report, American companies would be exempt from DMA enforcement while talks went on. A senior member of the European Parliament told POLITICO's Jacob Parry the WSJ report 'is bullshit' and that 'DMA is not up for discussion.' Brzytwa, of the CTA, said he could see policymakers in Brussels struggling to outright repeal tech regulation that had been carefully crafted over years – but the enforcement might be lightened. 'What we're hopeful for is it becomes less burdensome on companies with respect to fines,' he said. Brzytwa said he saw the White House taking an expansive view of what might be possible on the global front. In Trump's first term, he ordered investigations into individual policies that burdened American companies. Now, however, Trump was targeting a wide range of digital policies. 'His aperture in terms of the issue set has broadened,' Brzytwa said. 'We haven't seen anything in writing but all the tea leaves seem to indicate…the issues we're citing are on the table.' Communications systems blamed for flood disaster As deadly floods devastate Texas, alleged failures in emergency communications infrastructure may have been a driving force of the destruction. Over the weekend, flash floods coursed through central Texas, resulting in the deaths of at least 80 people. Dozens of people are also missing. Some local officials have accused the National Weather Service (NWS) of making faulty forecasts, which the agency has disputed. Yet, emergency preparedness experts say that gaps in the technical measures to disseminate warnings are really to blame. 'The crux of this disaster is a failure of the last mile of communication,' Tom Fahy, legislative director for the NWS employee union, told POLITICO. Such alerts were transmitted wirelessly to handheld devices, and to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Weather Radio. However, the messages can't reach people who don't have access to a cellphone or reliable service, or who've disabled such notifications on their devices. A summer camp where 11 people are missing notably had a policy against touchscreen devices that could've received weather alerts. In addition, people may miss radio communications if they don't happen to be listening at the right moment. Other counties in Central Texas have tried to solve this problem by installing outdoor weather sirens. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Are tariff rates going up? What to know about Trump's July 9 deadline
President Donald Trump's administration says higher rates will now go into effect Aug. 1. Here's where trade negotiations stand. U.S. consumers might have a few more weeks before feeling the full force of President Donald Trump's tariffs, even as a July 9 deadline looms. Trump in April announced a baseline 10% tariff, as well as targeted tariffs on dozens of countries. After stocks tanked and the bond market rebelled, Trump reversed course and said he would pause the sweeping tariffs for 90 days, giving countries until July 9 to negotiate rates. The flat 10% rate remained in effect. But that goalpost seems to have been pushed back. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters on July 6 that Trump is 'setting the rates and the deals right now," with new tariff rates set to kick in on Aug. 1. "I think we'll have most countries done by July 9. Either a letter or a deal," Trump said on July 6. By July 7, Trump posted letters to the leaders of various countries, like Japan and South Korea, announcing tariffs and warning of further increases if they raise tariffs on the United States. Here's where the country's trade deals stand so far. Where do tariffs stand today? After announcing a 90-day pause on the April 2 tariffs, the Trump administration said it would use that time to launch dozens of deals with trade partners. "We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days. It's possible," White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said in April. So far, the Trump administration has announced two trade deals: The U.S. and China in May also agreed to lower tariff rates during a 90-day pause. The administration has hinted at more deals on the horizon amid ongoing discussions. The EU's top trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, recently met with officials in Washington, and the Japanese government said its tariff negotiator held 'in-depth exchanges' with Lutnick over the phone in early July, according to Reuters. Talks with South Korea are also set to continue the week of July 7, according to Reuters, with President Lee Jae Myung's national security adviser visiting Washington. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on July 7 told CNBC that the administration would make 'several' more trade announcements within the next 48 hours. 'I think what President Trump is concerned about is the quality of the deals, not the quantity,' he said. Trump threatens countries aligned with BRICS On July 6, Trump said countries that align with BRICS policies could face an additional 10% tariff. The group of nations includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Ethiopia, Egypt, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates. Trump's threat comes shortly after the countries issued a joint statement warning that tariffs could hurt global trade. The countries also condemned military strikes on Iran. What does this mean for Americans? Because importing U.S. businesses will be paying Trump's tariffs, economists have warned that U.S. consumers will likely see higher prices as companies pass along those higher rates to customers. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell last month said he expects to see more price hikes this summer after tariffs have more time to work through the distribution chain. "The cost of the tariff has to be paid, and some of it will fall on the end consumer," he said. "That's what businesses say. ... So we know that's coming." Trade war escalates again: Trump says 25% tariffs coming for Japan and South Korea Trump sends tariff letters to countries During a July 6 appearance on CNN's 'State of the Union,' Bessent said the U.S. would send letters threatening to hike tariffs if trading partners fail to reach an agreement, with roughly 100 letters sent to smaller countries that don't trade much with the U.S. The letters are "saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug. 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level," Bessent said. Here are where the April 2 tariffs stood for some of the country's largest trading partners: Letters started going out on July 7. That afternoon, Trump shared letters threatening 25% tariffs on goods from Japan and South Korea starting Aug. 1 if the countries do not agree to a trade deal. According to the Commerce Department, 4.9% of the U.S.'s machinery and mechanical appliance imports originated from South Korea as of 2022, as well as 8.3% of its transportation equipment and 4.9% of its base metals, iron, steel and tools. U.S. imports from South Korea totaled $115.4 billion, up 21.3% from the previous year. As for Japan, the country accounted for 6.2% of the U.S.'s machinery and mechanical imports in 2022. Nearly 4% of total U.S. exports were sent to Japan that year, while 4.6% of total U.S. imports were from Japan. Trump revealed new tariff rates on goods from an additional five countries later in the day, including: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said there will be dozens of additional letters sent in the coming days.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
EU avoids US tariff letter, eyes concessions, EU sources say
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The European Union will not receive a letter from the United States setting out higher tariffs, EU sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday, and is eyeing possible exemptions from the U.S. baseline levy of 10%. U.S. President Donald Trump began informing, in a wave of letters, a range of trading partners from Japan to Myanmar of sharply higher tariffs on goods they sell into the United States starting August 1. Some EU sources said the bloc was close to an agreement with the Trump administration. This could involve limited concessions to U.S. baseline tariffs of 10% for aircraft and parts, some medical equipment and spirits in an eventual deal with the Trump administration, three sources familiar with the situation said on Monday. Two sources also said that the EU was looking into an arrangement that would allow EU automakers that produce and export cars from the United States to import more EU vehicles at tariff rates below the current 25%. Such an arrangement would benefit German carmakers that have large U.S. plants. The European Commission, which had aimed for a balanced and broader trade agreement with the United States, briefed EU envoys late on Monday that EU countries faced a choice between accepting an unbalanced deal or facing more uncertainty. The Commission also said that there were no guarantees that the Trump administration would not impose further tariffs or demand further concessions. The EU currently faces 50% U.S. tariffs on its steel and aluminium exports, 25% on cars and car parts and 10% on most other products. The U.S. is also looking into further tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
