Senedd will get final say on assisted dying law in Wales
Health secretary Jeremy Miles said the Welsh Government maintained a neutral position as he drew a distinction between enacting the UK end of life bill and its implementation.
He explained enactment is reserved to Westminster but providing voluntary assisted dying services in Wales is a discretionary power in the hands of the Welsh Government.
Giving evidence on July 16, Mr Miles suggested options for services outside of the NHS would be available in the private sector in Wales and England as in other parts of the world.
Pressed on whether ministers could refuse to implement elements, Wales' health secretary said: 'In devolved competence, yes, and even if the [Welsh] Government wanted to and the Senedd didn't want to approve it – the Senedd would have that ability as well.'
Mr Fox asked: 'On regulations – if they are not made by the Welsh Government and consequently approved by this Senedd, the NHS in Wales will not be able to provide assisted dying services – is that the case?'
'That is correct,' Mr Miles replied, later suggesting a decision on whether to provide services in the health service would be made after the next Senedd election in May 2026.
The Welsh Parliament rejected the principle of assisted dying in a historic vote last year, with Senedd members voting 26-19 against with nine abstaining.
The Senedd rejected a similar motion a decade earlier in December 2014.
But, this side of the election, politicians will get a vote on a legislative consent motion (LCM), the means by which the Senedd signifies consent for proposed UK laws in devolved areas.
While the Sewel convention states the UK Parliament would 'not normally' legislate on devolved matters without consent, it is not legally binding.
But Mr Miles suggested the vote would influence Welsh ministers' decision-making.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Most expensive bird's nest in history! Ospreys leave Welsh Labour with useless £4m farm that can't hold festival spin-off amid fears for wildlife
The Welsh government has been accused of spending over £4m on 'the most expensive birds' nest in history' after buying land for a music festival – which cannot be used due to ospreys. The Labour-run administration paid out £4.25m for a farm to host a spin-off event from the annual Green Man music and cultural festival held each August. The land, at Gilestone Farm, near Brecon, Powys, has even lost £500,000 in value since it was purchased in 2022 – and not a single note of music has been played there. Now a Welsh Parliament committee has raised 'serious concerns' over the purchase and demanded a full review. The Senedd's public accounts and administration committee said the decision to buy the farm was taken with a 'lack of thorough due diligence'. The report said plans were 'not sufficiently robust and had not been communicated effectively to the community'. The proposed festival spin-off, which would have been held alongside events at its current base at Crickhowell, near Abergavenny, caused opposition from conservationists. And when the pair of ospreys – a protected bird of prey – landed in 2023 and built a nest in an oak tree, it scuppered the plans. Labour Ministers had faced questions over their friendships with festival chief Fiona Stewart, amid claims a business plan for the festival had not even been submitted. James Evans, Conservative Welsh assembly member for Brecon and Radnorshire, said: 'The next time the Labour government reaches for the cheque book, they should listen to local concerns and act with far greater transparency. 'In the meantime, Gilestone Farm remains the most expensive publicly owned 'bird nest' in history.' Plaid Cymru's Adam Price, who sits on the public accounts and administration committee, said: 'This whole saga, that has unravelled under the chaos of three Labour first ministers, serves as proof of the extent of this Labour Welsh government's mismanagement of the public purse.' The committee said there was a lack of adequate record of meetings between ministers and Green Man officials which meant politicians were 'unable to fully scrutinise and evaluate decisions taken by the Welsh government'. It said the 'haste' in completing the purchase may have inhibited the ability to identify risks - including the presence of wildlife 'that would affect its proposals for the site, and potentially, its value'. The report added: 'This is particularly notable as the site has now been valued at £3.75m, meaning that the Welsh government's asset has lost half a million pounds in value'. Committee chairman Mark Isherwood said: 'The arrival of the ospreys on the site was unexpected and it's acknowledged that the Welsh government has responded positively to this development to preserve their habitat, albeit there was evidence of other protected species being present at the site at the time of purchase. 'However, the future of the site now appears to be very uncertain, with the most recent valuation showing that the asset has decreased in value by £0.5m compared to the purchase price. This is highly regrettable.' The land is currently leased commercially. An earlier report by auditors for the Welsh government found the 'most significant factor' for the farm purchase was using up unspent money by the end of the financial year. A Welsh government spokesman said: 'Gilestone remains one of the Welsh government's property assets and is being managed on our behalf as a working farm. 'We continue to explore potential opportunities for its future use, in keeping with our commitment to seek a sustainable outcome that helps local communities thrive. 'We will read the committee's report with interest and respond in due course.'
South Wales Argus
14 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Funding golf tournament was not attempt to ‘butter up' Trump, says Swinney
The Government announced on Saturday, just days before the First Minister met Mr Trump, that £180,000 of public money would be spent to bring the Nexo Championship to Scotland next month. Mr Swinney said he had 'courteous' talks with Mr Trump on Tuesday morning, ahead of the official opening of a second course in Aberdeenshire. Gifts were also exchanged ahead of the meeting, with Mr Swinney giving the US president framed historic documents showing his family connections to Scotland, and a map of the Isle of Lewis. In return Mr Trump gave the First Minister an American bald eagle figurine. The leaders discussed the situation in Gaza and tariffs on Scotch whisky, which Mr Swinney said the president appeared to be willing to move on. Speaking to the PA news agency, the First Minister said the tournament funding was not to curry favour with the president. Asked if it was an effort to 'butter up' Mr Trump, he said: 'No, I think what I was trying to do is to make sure that a tournament that was coming to Scotland could be properly promoted. 'It's coming here, we've essentially intervened to secure a tournament quite late in the day.' Mr Swinney added that the Government provides cash to the Royal and Ancient Golf Club (R&A) in St Andrews. 'If the principle is good enough for the R&A, it's good enough for Trump International,' he said. Asked about his relationship with Mr Trump following his first face-to-face meetings with the leader, Mr Swinney said there had been 'very good and courteous' conversations between the two. 'I think we talked well about the issues that matter to the people of Scotland,' he said. Donald Trump was joined by his sons Donald Jnr, left, and Eric for the official opening of the course at Menie, Aberdeenshire (Jane Barlow/PA) 'He has a deep affinity with Scotland, so he's got a warmth and an empathy towards Scotland and he was interested in all the issues that I was raising about Scotland. 'So I think we had a very welcome opportunity to engage in dialogue and to build a relationship.' Asked if he believes that positive relationship will continue into the future, the First Minister said he does, adding the president ended the meeting by urging him to contact the US administration should he wish to raise any issues. 'I intend to take him up on that issue, because my job as First Minister of Scotland is to promote and protect the interests of the country and I can engage constructively with the president of the United States to do that,' Mr Swinney added. As well as a meeting early on Tuesday, the First Minister was also invited to a dinner on Monday evening at the Aberdeenshire club alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Over a meal of langoustines and beef, the First Minister had his first face-to-face meeting with the US president – having spoken over the phone after his election win last November.
Sky News
20 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump ally Representative Jim Jordan to criticise Online Safety Act in meeting with Technology Secretary Peter Kyle
An ally of Donald Trump and critic of the Online Safety Act is to raise his concerns about the UK legislation with Technology Secretary Peter Kyle on Wednesday, Sky News understands. It comes after Mr Kyle was criticised on Tuesday morning for claiming Reform UK leader Nigel Farage was "on the side" of predators, including the disgraced television host Jimmy Savile, for opposing the act. Representative Jim Jordan is chair of the powerful House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, and is currently part of a bipartisan group meeting governments in Europe on the topic of digital regulation. In a thread on social media recently, Mr Jordan called the Online Safety Act the "UK's online censorship law". He added: "It allows the British government to dictate how social media companies must censor so-called 'disinformation' 'misinformation', and hate speech." Mr Jordan also heavily criticised regulator Ofcom - which is the watchdog for the law - for "targeting" and "harassing" American companies. He is set to meet them on Wednesday too. Sky News understands he will make his views known to Mr Kyle on Wednesday. 6:45 The law was passed in 2023 under the Conservative government, but only came into force last Friday. It puts a duty on technology companies to protect children from harmful content, including pornography, terrorism, and violent content, with businesses facing sanctions if they fail to comply. But Mr Jordan - a Republican - champions an American perspective that laws from other countries should not apply to US businesses, even if they operate overseas. He said on social media that "in many cases", British laws "run counter to fundamental American free speech principles". While the UK managed to get a favourable trade deal with the US, attempts to punish US technology companies could be taken with a dim view in the White House during further talks. Speaking next to Donald Trump on Monday, Sir Keir Starmer defended the law. He said: "We're not censoring anyone. We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites." The prime minister added: "I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection." Mr Trump joked his own social media platform, Truth Social, would not get banned, saying: "I only say good things about him and this country." A Judiciary Committee spokesperson declined to comment. Sky News understands that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology wants to discuss a range of topics in the meeting.
