
House committee demands Brown University hand over memos on student behind DOGE-style email
"We are concerned that Brown's decision to file disciplinary charges against Mr. Shieh and hold a misconduct hearing may serve to suppress free speech and discourage others from coming forward and asking questions related to Brown's rising costs," the Thursday letter from the House Judiciary Committee to Brown University President Christina Paxson said.
Alex Shieh, a rising junior who was cleared of wrongdoing by the university on May 14, had previously angered school officials by sending a DOGE-like email to non-faculty employees identifying himself as a journalist for The Brown Spectator and asking them what they do all day to try to determine why the school's tuition has gotten so expensive.
The letter, signed by House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wisc., chairman of the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust and Rep. Troy Nehls, R-Texas, seeks to understand Brown's "rationale for attempting to silence a student raising questions about how student and taxpayer dollars are being used."
The Brown Spectator, which has a board of three people, including Shieh, was revived this year after it ceased publication in 2014.
The board members faced a disciplinary hearing on May 7 over allegations that they violated Brown University's name, licensing and trademark policies.
Shieh previously told Fox News Digital that other campus publications also use the school's name, including "The Brown Daily Herald," another student-run nonprofit newspaper.
Shieh and the Spectator faced scrutiny from the university after Shieh, during free weekends in March, began investigating positions he deemed redundant after reviewing 3,805 non-faculty employees who worked at Brown and emailing them to ask, "What do you do all day?"
Shieh used AI to try to determine what Brown employees did and why the school, which costs nearly $96,000 a year, was so expensive.
When creating his database, he formatted it to identify three particular jobs: "DEI jobs, redundant jobs, and bulls--t jobs."
He said that he wanted to investigate DEI because of President Donald Trump's executive orders addressing DEI policies, and his administration threatening to withhold federal funds to universities who employ them. The goal was to get as much data as possible to improve his research.
Only 20 of the 3,805 people emailed responded, with many of the responses being profane and hostile, and Shieh's Social Security number was subsequently leaked.
On June 4, Shieh testified before the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust for a hearing entitled, "The Elite Universities Cartel: A History of Anticompetitive Collusion Inflating the Cost of Higher Education."
The House Judiciary Committee is asking that Paxson, Brown's president, provide all documents and communications between Brown's employees pertaining to Shieh's "investigative inquiry, Brown University's subsequent investigation of Mr. Shieh, Brown University's decision to file disciplinary charges against Mr. Shieh, or Brown University's adjudication of Mr. Shieh's charges."
The committee is also asking for all information related to what they call the "unauthorized disclosure of Mr. Shieh's personally identifiable information."
"Brown University's decision to file disciplinary charges against students like Alex Shieh, simply for looking into the school's bloated bureaucracy and rising tuition costs, is a clear act of retaliation," Fitzgerald, who signed the letter, told Fox News Digital in a statement. "The Committee shares serious concerns about this troubling response and remains committed to conducting rigorous oversight into whether Brown University and other Ivy League institutions are engaging in anticompetitive pricing practices."
In a statement, Brian Clark, vice president for News and Strategic Campus Communications told Fox News Digital that the university "has been cooperating with extensive requests for information from the U.S. House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary since the initial inquiry arrived in April, demonstrating that we have and continue to make decisions on tuition and financial aid independently as part of our commitment to making sure that no student's family socioeconomic circumstances prevent them from accessing the benefits of a Brown education."
Clark added, "We'll continue to provide any responses to follow-up requests directly to the committees."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California Democrats, Gov. Gavin Newsom hit back after Texas passes Trump redistricting map
California Democrats were set Thursday to pass a redistricting map to add up to five blue congressional seats after Texas Republicans rubber-stamped President Donald Trump's mid-decade gerrymander plan that would give the GOP a similar edge in the Lone Star State. Gov. Gavin Newsom is championing the aggressive high-stakes Democratic effort to strike back at Trump's Texas power grab as the two parties jostle for a political advantage in next year's midterms and beyond. The likely Democratic 2028 White House contender tweeted 'Triggered?' at Trump after the president accused him of 'destroying the great state of California' in a post on his social media site. California Democrats were poised to use their legislative supermajority to approve the new congressional map, which Newsom could then sign ahead of a Friday deadline. Then would then schedule a special election in November to ask voters to approve the map, which is aimed at flipping five GOP-held seats. With angry Democrats itching to fight back against Trump's second-term agenda, polls show broad early support for the effort, even though blue states have traditionally championed independent non-partisan redistricting efforts as a fair way to divvy up seats in the House of Representatives. Trump hailed the Texas House for finally approving what he calls a 'big beautiful map' on Wednesday. It chops up three Democratic held House seats in blue-leaning Texas metropolitan areas and makes two more seats in the Rio Grande Valley much tougher for Democratic incumbents. He quickly took aim at other red states like Indiana, Florida and Missouri, urging them to take similar action to bolster already outsized Republican edges in their House delegations. 'We're going to win the midterms … bigger and better than ever before,' Trump proclaimed Thursday. Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, who is in line to become Speaker of the House if Democrats retake the House in the midterms, vowed to fight the Texas plan, which he says is unconstitutional and violates the Voting Rights Act. 'This corrupt power grab by desperate Republican hacks will be fought in the legislature and in federal court,' Jeffries tweeted. The escalating redistricting arms race is unfolding as Trump aims to hold onto control of both the House and the Senate in the midterms so he can keep pushing his right-wing policy agenda past 2026. Democrats hope to retake the House so they keep Trump in check. Propr to Texas' redistricting, history says Democrats would have had a great chance of flipping the handful of House seats needed to win the House in the midterms, especially with polls showing widespread public disapproval of Trump's policies. That's why Trump wants to change the script by pulling off the unprecedented effort to redraw the congressional maps in the middle of the decade. Newsom, on the other hand, appears to prove his mettle to the Democratic base, perhaps ahead of a 2028 presidential bid that many pundits believe he is certain to pursue. He's using his press office to troll Trump by imitating his social media style with cheeky all-caps messages that insult Trump and some of his loyal Republican acolytes. The tactic has won wide attention, even though some liberal pundits dismiss it as juvenile. 'MAGA HAVE NEWSOM DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!!! THEY SHOULD CRY HARDER! SAD!!!' Newsom tweeted.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump finally responds to Gavin Newsom's mocking – and busts out an old nickname to do it
President Donald Trump has hit back at California Gov. Gavin Newsom for brutally mimicking his social media style, dusting off a familiar nickname to deride his West Coast imitator in the process. 'Gavin Newscum is way down in the polls,' Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Wednesday night. 'He is viewed as the man who is destroying the once Great State of California. I will save California!!!' The president repeatedly clashed with Trump in recent months, notably in January when devastating wildfires hit Southern California and again in June when Trump sent in the National Guard to suppress anti-ICE demonstrations in downtown L.A. This month, the governor has begun savagely parodying the commander-in-chief's idiosyncratic posting style through his GovPressOffice X account, blustering about his greatness in all-caps and inventing infantile slurs with which to attack hostile media personalities, just as Trump has done for years. Newsom's team took just nine minutes to respond to the president's 'Newscum' message, replying with three snowflake emojis. They have since reposted another highly characteristic Trump post, in which the president accuses MSNBC of experiencing poor ratings, with the outraged comment: 'TRUMP IS IMITATING ME! – GCN.' Newsom's new approach has seen Kid Rock and several Fox News presenters react angrily, with Dana Perino, Tomi Lahren, Raymond Arroyo, and Trace Gallagher, all taking the bait and engaging with the governor's arch-trolling. Perino hit out at the governor on Fox's The Five by urging him to stop for the sake of his assumed presidential ambitions and asking why his wife had not stepped in to prevent him from pursuing the pranks. 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' came the inevitable reply. 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA – WHILE TRUMP CAN'T EVEN CONQUER THE 'BIG' STAIRS ON AIR FORCE ONE ANYMORE!!! TRUMP HAS 'LOST HIS STEP' AND FOX IS LOSING IT BECAUSE WHEN I TYPE, AMERICA NOW WINS!!! THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' Lahren, meanwhile, berated Newsom and his 'team of losers' after they jokingly claimed to have confused MAGA activist Scott Presler with South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace, notorious for her anti-trans agenda. The broadcaster was accused of being 'woke' when she complained about the offense caused. Gallagher was also dispatched in ruthlessly faux-Trumpian style: 'BIRD-BRAIN TREY GALLAGHER (A SO-CALLED FOX 'NEWS' HOST THAT NOBODY HAS EVER HEARD OF) SAYS MY POSTS ARE 'CHILDISH' AND 'UNBECOMING' OF A LEADER – CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? MANY ARE SAYING FOX ('EDIT THE TAPES') NEWS SHOULD CANCEL HIS PATHETIC LITTLE 'BEDTIME SHOW' IMMEDIATELY. 'THEY ARE CALLING IT THE MOST BORING PROGRAM IN CABLE HISTORY. TOTAL SNOOZE FEST! SAD!!!' Mediaite's Colby Hall has said that Newsom is 'shooting fish in a barrel,' describing his feed as 'an X-ray of Trumpian excess' and praising him by saying he has not merely entered 'the arena of schoolyard retorts' but 'grabbed the microphone, turned it upside down, and made the absurd impossible to ignore.' Speaking for himself last week, the governor said: 'I'm just following [Trump's] example. If you have issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns with what he's putting out as president.'
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule
In Annapolis, voters may soon get a bigger say in city elections. Members of the Annapolis City Council are considering adopting ranked-choice voting. It may sound new and complicated but it's actually quite simple and has been around since the 1850s, first originating in Denmark. Under ranked choice, voters have the chance to not only pick their top pick for office but to essentially rank their runners-up. How does this make a difference? Imagine a crowded primary race for mayor, for example, where no candidate is likely to win an outright majority of votes. Under the current system, that doesn't matter. The candidate who garners a plurality of votes still wins. But under ranked-choice voting, voters list their second, third, fourth and so on choices, too. And if there's no majority winner, these rankings are factored in — by eliminating the lowest polling candidate and redistributing that individual's second-choice votes and so on. That continues with bottom-listers dropping out until a candidate racks up a clear majority. What's the impact? Potentially profound. Suddenly, there's much less incentive to bad-mouth opponents or to follow party orthodoxy. Getting a shoutout from an opponent is actually helpful. Maryland doesn't have much experience with the system. Currently, Takoma Park is the only municipality where it's in use. But the state sure has a lot of experience with the downside of single voting: electing candidates with as little as 36.2% of the vote (the share Sarah K. Elfreth won in a crowded 22-person primary for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives vacated by U.S. Rep. John Sarbanes last year). Party loyalists aren't wild about ranked choice. They complain it's involved, it only helps the opposing party (whichever one that is) and can even leave the winner of a plurality in the dust if he or she doesn't fare well as a second or third choice in a crowded field. But given ranked choice is in use for statewide races in red-state Alaska as well as Takoma Park (AKA the 'People's Republic of Takoma Park' for its left-leaning politics), you have to wonder if fears of partisan disadvantage are overblown. The New York City mayor's race had ranked choice. It helped New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani win the primary, but he also had a plurality (43.5%), so it didn't change the outcome. What it did cause, observers say, was for Mamdani to 'cross-endorse' fellow progressive candidates. Such teamwork is uncommon but hardly undemocratic. New York didn't choose a socialist-leaning Democrat because of ranked-choice, but did it impact Mamdani's election strategy? Probably. Polls show it engaged his base and broadened participation. And that's somehow a bad thing? Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@ Solve the daily Crossword