logo
Momentum sagging at UN plastic pollution treaty talks

Momentum sagging at UN plastic pollution treaty talks

Korea Herald2 days ago
GENEVA (AFP) -- Talks on forging a landmark treaty to combat the scourge of plastic pollution were stumbling Saturday, with progress slow and countries wildly at odds on how far the proposed agreement should go.
The negotiations, which opened on Tuesday, have four working days left to strike a legally-binding instrument that would tackle the growing problem choking the environment.
In a blunt mid-way assessment, talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso warned the 184 countries negotiating at the UN that they had to get shifting to get a deal.
"Progress made has not been sufficient," Vayas told delegates.
"A real push to achieve our common goal is needed," the Ecuadoran diplomat said, adding that Thursday was not a just deadline but "a date by which we must deliver.
"Some articles still have unresolved issues and show little progress towards reaching a common understanding," Vayas lamented.
The key fracture is between countries that want to focus on waste management and others who want a more ambitious treaty that also cuts production and eliminates use of the most toxic chemicals.
And with the talks relying on finding consensus, it has become a game of brinkmanship.
A diplomatic source told reporters that many informal meetings had been scrambled together for Sunday's day off to try and break the deadlock.
"If nothing changes, we won't get there," the source added.
Countries have reconvened in Geneva after the failure of the supposedly fifth and final round of negotiations in Busan in 2024.
After four days of talks, the draft text has ballooned from 22 to 35 pages -- with the number of brackets in the text going up near five-fold to almost 1,500 as countries insert a blizzard of conflicting wishes and ideas.
The talks are mandated to look at the full life cycle of plastic, from production to pollution, but some countries are unhappy with such a wide scope.
Kuwait spoke up for the so-called Like-Minded Group -- a nebulous cluster of mostly oil-producing nations which rejects production limits and wants to focus on treating waste.
"Let us agree on what we can agree. Consensus must be the basis of all our decisions," Kuwait insisted.
Nudging in the same direction, Saudi Arabia, speaking for the Arab Group, said the responsible way ahead was to start considering what bits of the text "may not make it to the final outcome due to irreconcilable divergence."
But given how little is truly agreed on, Uruguay warned that consensus "cannot be used as a justification to not achieve our objectives."
Eirik Lindebjerg, global plastics adviser for the World Wide Fund for Nature, told Agence France-Presse that the Like-Minded Group's proposal was "another attempt to make it a waste management agreement," and to stifle talks on reducing the amount of plastic in circulation.
The UN Environment Program is hosting the talks and swiftly called a press conference after the stock-take session.
UNEP executive director Inger Andersen said a deal was "really within our grasp, even though today it might not look so."
"Despite the fog of negotiations I'm really encouraged," she told reporters, insisting, "There is a pathway to success." Vayas added, "We need to accelerate. We need a better rhythm in this and we need to also work in such a way that it will be clear that we will deliver by the end."
Afterward, Bjorn Beeler, executive director at IPEN, a global network aimed at limiting toxic chemicals, told AFP, "This whole process has not been able to take decisions and is still collecting ideas. We're sleepwalking towards a cliff and if we don't wake up, we're falling off."
Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items.
Plastic production is set to triple by 2060.
Panama's negotiator Juan Monterrey Gomez took the floor to slam those countries wanting to stop the treaty from encompassing the entire life cycle of plastic.
He said microplastics "are in our blood, in our lungs and in the first cry of a new-born child. Our bodies are living proof of a system that profits from poisoning us." "We cannot recycle our way out of this crisis."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

1930s document shows women jailed for warning others about Japanese sex slavery
1930s document shows women jailed for warning others about Japanese sex slavery

Korea Herald

time14 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

1930s document shows women jailed for warning others about Japanese sex slavery

Four individuals convicted for spreading word about "comfort women" sent to Japanese military in China Spreading word about Japanese military's mobilization of Korean women into sexual slavery resulted in suspended prison terms, newly revealed documents showed Monday. According to the 1930s court documents released by the government of Yeongam-gun, South Jeolla Province, Koreans who informed others about women being mobilized were tried and found guilty of spreading falsehoods. In a ruling from 1938, Gwangju District Court under the Japanese rule found four Yeongam residents guilty of what they claimed to be false rumors. The documents were provided by the National Archives. The ruling dated Oct. 7 of 1938 showed that a mother by the name of Song Myeong-sim on Aug. 8 had heard news from another person named Yeong Mak-dong that many young women are hurrying into marriage. This was because the authorities were mobilizing unmarried women between the ages of 12 and 40 to send to Manchuria, China, to "comfort" the military. A week later, Song found that the town chief was creating census on female residents, including her 15-year-old daughter. She filed a complaint and inquiry about what she had heard, which led to her being convicted of violating the military law, along with Yeong who first told her the news. An Oct. 27 ruling in the same year showed that a person named Lee Wun-seon and another person named Han Man-ok had been convicted of the same charge, for also spreading the word about the comfort women. Han told Lee that women were being sent to China as comfort women, after which Lee told neighbors to "send your daughters away to marriage as quickly as you can." The UN and the international community have acknowledged the human rights violation committed by the Japanese military through the comfort women system. This is the first time a legal document has shown that Japan punished residents who tried to tell others about comfort women conscriptions, Yeongam officials said. "(Yeongam officials) will look for the descendants of those who had been unjustly punished, and see if there are ways that they can receive honors," Yeongam-gun chief Woo Seung-hee said.

Deputy head of IAEA to visit Teheran
Deputy head of IAEA to visit Teheran

Korea Herald

time15 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Deputy head of IAEA to visit Teheran

TEHRAN, Iran (AFP) -- Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday the deputy head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog will be visiting Tehran early within the week. The visit will be the first by a senior official from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) since Iran suspended cooperation with the body last month in the wake of the 12-day war with Israel. "Our talks with the Agency tomorrow will focus on a new cooperation framework. ... Until we reach an agreement on a new framework, cooperation will not begin," Araghchi told reporters. He said there were "no inspections or visits" of nuclear sites planned for the official. In mid-June, Israel launched an unprecedented attack targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites, but also hitting residential areas over the course of the war. US forces joined with attacks on nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. Last month, Iran officially suspended its cooperation with the IAEA citing the agency's failure to condemn Israeli and US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's attack derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States which had begun in April. The talks had been the highest-level contact between Tehran and Washington since the United States abandoned in 2018 a landmark agreement on Iran's nuclear activities. Since the 12-day war, Iran has demanded guarantees against military action before resuming any negotiations with the US. Araghchi recently said Iran has "received messages" from the US side on the resumption of talks, and on Sunday, he said that "nothing has been finalized" on that matter. On July 25, Iranian diplomats met with counterparts from Germany, Britain, and France who have threatened to trigger sanctions against Tehran by the end of August if it fails to reach a deal on its nuclear program. The so-called "snapback mechanism" would reinstate UN sanctions under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers. The option expires in October and Tehran has warned of consequences should it be activated. "Our contact with the Europeans is ongoing," said Araghchi on Sunday, adding that a date for the next round of talks has yet to be set.

[Lee Kyong-hee] Alliance for NE Asia nuclear-weapon-free zone
[Lee Kyong-hee] Alliance for NE Asia nuclear-weapon-free zone

Korea Herald

time21 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Lee Kyong-hee] Alliance for NE Asia nuclear-weapon-free zone

Eighty years since a nuclear Armageddon leveled two Japanese cities, ending the bloodiest armed conflict in history, nuclear anxiety is rising in this region. At the crux of this paradoxical security dilemma is the Korean Peninsula, with no end in sight to its division, imposed by the Allies upon their victory. North Korea continues to expand its nuclear stockpile as a de facto nuclear power, and big-power rivalries intensify to reshape the geopolitical landscape. North Korea's nuclear and missile capability poses a major security threat in the region and beyond, with cross-border dialogue frozen for years, deepening security concerns. Successive administrations in Seoul and Washington have tried to curb Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions over the past three decades, but to no avail. Negotiations for denuclearization fell apart, with the three stakeholders aiming for different goals. The Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, signed by both Koreas in 1992, says they 'shall not test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess, store, deploy or use nuclear weapons, and shall use nuclear energy solely for peaceful purposes.' A perfect description of denuclearization at that time, the document has a critical shortfall: It regards denuclearization as business between the two Koreas, whereas the United States would be the real party in any strategic conversation with the North. In February 2019, US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un met in Hanoi amid fanfare. Hampering their second summit were incompatible notions of what 'complete denuclearization' meant, and what sanctions would be lifted as a reward. The historic summit was cut short with 'no deal.' As the dialogue for denuclearization at the government level faltered, oftentimes due to the conflicting policies of South Korean and US administrations, the civil society movements toward establishing a 'Northeast Asia nuclear-weapon-free zone,' or NWFZ, have also failed to gain traction. Still, the momentum of such movements survives among the civic and academic communities, especially those advocating for peace on the peninsula and in the region. Unlike a bilateral agreement, the treaty for an NWFZ constitutes a legally binding multilateral mechanism. It prohibits the acquisition, possession, placement, testing and use of nuclear weapons. Under the treaty, signatories already armed with nuclear weapons would promise not to use or threaten to use them against any other state in the zone. Within the Northeast Asia framework, it would involve six countries — the two Koreas, Japan, the US, China and Russia — in a shared approach to global nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. The UN Disarmament Commission provides a set of principles and guidelines for the establishment of an NWFZ. The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in Article VII, says, 'Nothing in this Treaty affects the right of any group of States to conclude regional treaties in order to assure the total absence of nuclear weapons in their respective territories.' Currently, 115 countries belong to six NWFZs, covering most of the Global South. They include Latin America and the Caribbean, the South Pacific, Southeast Asia, Africa, Central Asia and Mongolia. While the existing NWFZs can be guidance for creating and operating a new zone in Northeast Asia, the unique circumstances surrounding the Korean Peninsula will present unprecedented challenges. A peace regime on the peninsula will be a prerequisite, which will only be attainable when North Korea is given security assurances that pacify its fear of US deterrence. It appears to be the right time, with the Lee Jae Myung administration pursuing dialogue and reconciliation with the North. In his summit with Trump, reportedly scheduled for later this month, Lee may put all necessary matters on the table to redraw the security map around the peninsula for a permanent peace regime. What is noteworthy about the movements for a 'Northeast Asia free from fears of nuclear war' is that they are based on alliances between South Korean and Japanese civic groups. It appeals as a strength this particular year, marking the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on Aug. 6 and 9, 1945, respectively, which led to Japan's surrender and Korea's liberation from Japanese rule. Northeast Asia is the sole region of the world to have suffered the atrocity of nuclear warfare, and Koreans, alongside the Japanese, experienced its cataclysmic destruction. In Hiroshima and Nagasaki, some 210,000 people are known to have died by the year's end. According to separate statistics announced by an association of Korean victims, some 40,000 Koreans died, most of them mobilized for wartime forced labor. Numbers don't tell everything, though. 'Real war is hell. And the atomic bomb — what poetry could capture that? What painting, what song, what novel? Nothing,' wrote Takashi Nagai, a radiologist at Nagasaki Medical University and survivor of the bombing, in his 1949 book, 'The Bells of Nagasaki,' which is recognized as one of the most powerful testaments to nuclear horror. Nagai goes on, 'It was a silent, apocalyptic force, flattening everything like a roller over an anthill. There's no beauty. No honor. Just death. Oh mankind, plan no more wars. With the atomic bomb, war is suicide.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store