Centre announces gallantry awards for 36 air warriors of Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor, which was launched on May 7, was in direct response to the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. Indian forces targeted nine terrorist facilities deep within Pakistani territory, resulting in over 100 terrorist casualties. This retaliatory action demonstrated India's military resolve and strategic capability.The announcement also marks the first-ever conferment of the 'Sarvottam Yudh Seva Medal' to Air Force officers. This prestigious accolade, along with other high military decorations, underscores the exceptional contributions of officers across the Army, Navy, and Air Force in the operation.The operation saw a significant military exchange, with Pakistan launching drone strikes in retaliation. However, Indian air defence systems effectively countered these threats, leading to further strikes on 11 key military and radar sites in Pakistan by Indian forces on 10 May. This escalation eventually led Pakistan to seek a ceasefire agreement.Air Force Chief Air Marshal A P Singh revealed that during the operation, Indian forces downed six Pakistani jets and inflicted damage on several F-16 aircraft. This achievement not only highlights the tactical precision of Indian pilots but also underscores their readiness in a volatile conflict scenario.Overall, the gallantry awards serve as a testament to the courage and skill of the Indian Air Force personnel, whose dedication and bravery were instrumental in the successful execution of Operation Sindoor. The recognition comes as India prepares to celebrate Independence Day, marking a moment of national pride.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
PM Modi wishes nation on Independence Day, calls for efforts towards ‘Viksit Bharat'
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday extended Independence Day greetings to the people of India, urging them to 'work harder' to build a 'Viksit Bharat'. Prime Minister Narendra Mod(DD Grab) Posting on X, he wrote, 'Wishing everyone a very happy Independence Day. May this day inspire us to keep working even harder to realise the dreams of our freedom fighters and build a Viksit Bharat. Jai Hind!' Later in the day, he will hoist the national flag at the Red Fort in the capital and deliver his 12th consecutive address to the nation from the historic monument's ramparts. Across the country, the tricolour is already on display in shops, streets, and markets, with saffron, white, and green dominating everything from clothing to everyday items. This year's celebrations are themed Naya Bharat, reflecting the government's vision of achieving Viksit Bharat by 2047.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home
A month ago, I carried five tiny kittens home from the street. They were stranded in a house about to be demolished, shivering, hungry, and still too young to eat on their own. Today, they are healthy, curious, and very sure they own my home. It is astonishing how quickly an animal can change when it is given care. This week's Supreme Court order that every street dog in Delhi be relocated to a shelter within eight weeks is, at its heart, about care — or rather, the lack of it. Yes, the threat of rabies is real. Yes, we need solutions to incidents of aggression and population growth. But there is a difference between solving a problem and sweeping it out of sight. Even if the order were legally sound, the reality on the ground makes it impossible to execute. To begin with, we don't know exactly how many dogs there are in Delhi. There hasn't been a count in 10 years. The 'estimate' offered by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is around 8 lakh. Against those numbers, Delhi has just 20 temporary shelters, none of them government-run. Building and running enough facilities to house every dog would cost crores. We struggle to build bridges for decades, yet we are expected to build and staff thousands of shelters in two months. Ironically, the same MCD that has already failed to meet sterilisation targets and hasn't supplied anti-rabies vaccines in the numbers needed is now being tasked with the creation of humane shelters. Not once has the Court asked the civic body for accountability. But the most important reason to doubt the effectiveness of this order is neither legal nor logistical, it's logical. Mass removal simply doesn't work. We know this from Turkey, where a similar programme descended into mass culling, only for the stray population to rebound. The sterilise-vaccinate-return approach, enshrined in Indian law, exists because it works. Remove the dogs who already have a place, and you create space for new ones who don't. If the intent is to curb rabies cases in Delhi, then this order does more harm than good. To start with, panic fanned by WhatsApp messages declares that 2,000 people die of rabies every day in the national capital. Yet, the government's own figures — given in a reply to a question in the Lok Sabha just months ago — tell a very different story. According to official data, in 2024, there were 54 'suspected human rabies deaths' in the entire country — none from Delhi. The root cause of death by rabies is the shortage of rabies vaccines at government hospitals. Sending every single stray to a shelter cannot be a one-stop solution to India's rabies crisis. Look at Romania, where, after shelters were filled and streets emptied, unsterilised and unvaccinated dogs moved into the emptied territories. Beyond the failures of policy and denial of science, though, there is something more troubling: The absence of care. Article 51A(g) of our Constitution, which asks us to show compassion to all living creatures, is meant to shape how we live and the principles we live by. The persistent caricature of those who oppose this verdict is the elite South Delhi aunty, feeding pedigreed dogs in her gated colony. In truth, most community dogs live in less privileged neighbourhoods, sustained by families who cannot keep them inside their small homes but still take responsibility for them. I think of a friend who found a dog abandoned outside his home. He took the dog in, not into his house but into his life. Neighbours feed him. Someone else covers the cost of vaccinations. In winter, children in the lane make sure he has a blanket. This is what a community of care looks like: Fragile, improvised, but deeply human. The real cause of Delhi's stray population is abandonment. What happens when the dog bought for a child's birthday is dumped a year later? When he mates with another discarded pet, producing a litter born into homelessness? The owners face no penalty. But the puppies will be rounded up, sent to overcrowded shelters, where they will disappear. Even if Delhi somehow found the space and money overnight, removing sterilised, vaccinated dogs from their territories will undo years of rabies control and leave the streets more unsafe. The alternative is not a mystery. It is in our laws already: Large-scale sterilisation and vaccination, strict enforcement against illegal breeding and abandonment, public education on responsible pet ownership, and support for communities that care for animals where they are. The Supreme Court may have, in all its wisdom, passed the order that it has. Yet, the Chief Minister still has the chance to step in and stop an unworkable, unlawful order from taking effect — and to choose care over cruelty disguised as efficiency. Inhumanity is easy. It is also a sign of our times. But care — for each other, for the animals who live alongside us — is what makes a city worth calling home. The writer is national spokesperson, NCP (SP)
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does
Between December 2022 and July 2025, China accounted for about 47 per cent of all crude oil and 44 per cent of the coal exported by Russia, as against India's corresponding purchase shares of 38 per cent and 20 per cent. Despite that, US President Donald Trump has slapped India with a 25 per cent 'penalty' for buying Russian energy. This rate, to be effective from August 27, would take the total tariff on Indian goods imported into the US to 50 per cent. China has not only escaped such punishment, but has actually seen a lowering of the duty on its goods from 145 to 30 per cent since May 12. On Monday, Trump extended his trade truce with China for a further 90-day period till November 10. At the same time, his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has threatened additional 'secondary tariffs' on India if the outcome of Trump's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin isn't favourable. This blatantly divergent treatment, further eroding the credibility of the current Western sanctions regime, has significantly to do with relative economic leverage — China is seen to possess much more of it. The most visible demonstration of that was when, in early April, it imposed export restrictions on rare earth elements and magnets that are indispensable, whether for auto, aerospace, defence, semiconductor, renewable energy or consumer electronics manufacturing. China could use its virtual global monopoly over the mining and processing of these critical minerals to bring Trump to the negotiating table. Rare earths apart, China also played the trump card of being a massive buyer of US agricultural produce — from soyabean, cotton and coarse grains to beef, pork and poultry meat — sharply reducing the imports of these to signal its capacity for retaliation in any unilateral trade war. On the face of it, India does not have that sort of economic leverage. Barring, say, pharmaceutical products, much of what it exports to the US — readymade garments, gems and jewellery, frozen shrimps, basmati rice or even steel and aluminium — aren't items for which there are no alternative suppliers. Nor are Indian imports of California almonds comparable to the humongous quantities of Midwest US soyabean and corn that China was, until recently, sourcing to feed its swine and poultry birds. Given how much it stands to lose in any prolonged trade war — the worst-affected industries are also the most employment-intensive — the best approach for India to adopt is strategic patience. What the Indian foreign policy establishment and its trade negotiators should emphasise is the country's importance to global economic and regional stability, which aligns with the US's own long-term interests.
