On this Earth Day, stand up for our environment by saying ‘yes'
Fifty-five years ago, 20 million Americans came together on the first Earth Day to say 'no' to pollution: no more oil spills off the Santa Barbara coast, no more toxic rivers catching fire like the Cuyahoga, no more pesticides like DDT that harm our health. Fed up with unchecked pollution, environmental leaders of the 1970s organized, educated, and advocated, ultimately ushering in landmark federal regulations, such as the Clean Air Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act, that fought contaminants in our air, water and land.
The environmental movement has excelled at standing up and saying 'no,' with huge results. We can credit the rejection of pollution with helping to restore ecosystems and save countless lives. Today, while some things remain the same — and we're still justified in fighting polluters to protect environmental and human health — some factors have changed, warranting new approaches. Climate change is no longer some far-off problem. It's here, and it's wreaking havoc. Last year was the warmest year on record; in fact, the hottest 10 years on record were all of the last 10 years. Floods, extreme storms, and disappearing winters are hurting Wisconsin's communities and economy. And we need to do something about it. On this Earth Day, as we watch our federal government turn its back on the science of climate change, we have an opportunity to keep moving forward in Wisconsin by saying 'yes' to wind and solar projects lining up for approval in our state.
While the president may be pushing expensive, 'beautiful' coal and opening up protected lands for oil and gas drilling, we know that homegrown wind and solar are not only the cheapest ways to produce energy in Wisconsin, but they also bring enormous economic benefits to communities that host these projects. Farmers who sign leases to host solar panels or wind turbines receive high, stable income for 30 or more years. Communities hosting projects receive annual utility aid payments to the tune of $5,000 per megawatt. Local leaders can then direct this boost to municipal budgets where the community needs it most, like repairing roads and lowering taxes.
But let's face it, in Wisconsin, large wind and solar projects remain controversial. Our state is rock bottom in the Midwest when it comes to the amount of wind energy we produce. Solar produces 100 times more energy per acre than ethanol, yet we devote more than a million acres of land to ethanol production and just a fraction of that to solar farms. The reality is that to protect the places we love and that sustain us, we need to build new, better infrastructure, because what we have now is harming us. We desperately need an alternative. We need more Wisconsinites to speak up in support of these solutions. The environmental movement cut its teeth by saying 'no' to the problem of pollution. The time has come to build on this legacy and say 'yes' to solutions: 'yes' to clean energy, 'yes' to thriving Wisconsin communities, and 'yes' to a brighter future.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump administration sanctions ICC officials for efforts to arrest Americans, Israelis
President Trump's administration announced on Wednesday that it is imposing sanctions on four members of the International Criminal Court (ICC), saying they are engaged in efforts to 'investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute' Americans and Israelis without the consent of either country. The sanctions were slapped on two judges and two prosecutors at the ICC: France's Nicolas Yann Guillou, Fiji's Nazhat Shameem Khan, Senegal's Mame Mandiaye Niang and Canada's Kimberly Prost. 'The United States has been clear and steadfast in our opposition to the ICC's politicization, abuse of power, disregard for our national sovereignty, and illegitimate judicial overreach. The Court is a national security threat that has been an instrument for lawfare against the United States and our close ally Israel,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement on Wednesday. Last November, ICC judges released arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, ex-Israeli defense head Yoav Gallant and former Hamas commander Ibrahim al-Masri, alleging war crimes and crimes against humanity in light of Israel's war with the Palestinian militant group. The State Department hit Prost for a ruling greenlighting the ICC's probe into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan. Guillou, the French judge, was sanctioned for a ruling to issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. Niang and Khan are the ICC's deputy prosecutors. Both were sanctioned for 'continuing to support illegitimate ICC actions against' Israel, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant. Israel asked judges in May to strike the ICC's arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister and former defense minister. The Trump administration imposed sanctions on four ICC judges over what the U.S. government has deemed as 'illegitimate and baseless actions' against Washington and Jerusalem. In early July, the administration levied sanctions against United Nations special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, Francesca Albanese, over her political 'warfare' against Israel. 'It remains the policy of the United States Government to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions,' Rubio said on Wednesday.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump set to bar college graduates from debt relief program if employers undermine ‘American values'
Donald Trump's administration is considering introducing a new rule that would block college graduates with outstanding loans from having their debt forgiven if their employers are found to be 'undermining national security and American values through illegal means.' The proposal, announced this week by the Linda McMahon-led Department for Education, would bar people from being considered for the federal Public Student Loan Forgiveness program if the businesses they work for engage in 'activities with a substantial illegal purpose.' The examples given by the DOE of what offenses might qualify include 'supporting terrorism, aiding or abetting discrimination or violations of immigration laws, or child abuse.' Announcing the draft rule change proposal, Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said: 'President Trump has given the department a historic mandate to restore the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program to its original purpose – supporting public servants who strengthen their communities and serve the public good, not benefiting businesses engaged in illegal activity that harm Americans. 'The federal government has a vital interest in deterring unlawful conduct, and we're moving quickly to ensure employers don't benefit while breaking the law.' The PSLF was first introduced in 2007 under George W Bush with the intention of rewarding graduates who enter public service professions like teaching or law enforcement by relieving them of the burden of student debt at the outset of their careers. The DOE insists the rule change it is pitching is necessary to preserve the original spirit of the taxpayer-funded program while penalizing companies found to be operating outside of the law. It is now soliciting public comments on its proposal until September 17. According to CBS News, critics of the revision have already warned that it would open the door to DOE officials moving to 'improperly exclude' public servants from the scheme on ideological grounds. In advance of the draft proposal being published, the Student Borrower Protection Center campaign group slammed it last month as 'harmful, horrific, and illegal,' warning it could empower the Trump administration to persecute agencies and firms whose work or ethos conflicts with its own goals. 'To be clear, if implemented this proposal would allow the secretary to disqualify from PSLF any employees of school systems that accurately teach the U.S.'s history of slavery, of healthcare providers who offer gender-affirming care and of legal aid organizations that represent individuals against unlawful deportations,' said the SBPC's legal director Winston Berkman-Breen in late June. The Independent has reached out to the DOE for further comment. Earlier this month, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem offered student loan forgiveness as an incentive to encourage graduates to apply to join ICE as part of a massive recruitment drive to boost the administration's crackdown on undocumented migrants.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill
Millions of Americans could soon see their food assistance slashed. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' introduced large cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that will affect families across the country. Check Out: Learn More: According to the Urban Institute, over 22 million families are expected to lose some or all of their SNAP benefits, with over 5 million affected households losing an average of $146 per month. The bill also introduces a new requirement: States must begin covering 5% to 25% of SNAP costs starting in 2028, depending on their payment error rates. This cost-sharing model means that states with higher administrative errors will face deeper cuts. A Commonwealth Fund analysis projects that by 2029, some states will see significantly reduced federal SNAP funding, noting that the bill was designed to cut funding disproportionately in certain states. Based on this analysis, these are the 10 states that are facing the deepest SNAP cuts. Also see states where people are most likely to benefit from the SALT changes in Trump's bill. New Mexico Funding loss: $479 million Relative reduction: -43.9% Also See: Explore More: West Virginia Funding loss: $262 million Relative reduction: -43.6% See More: Georgia Funding loss: $1.49 billion Relative reduction: -43% Delaware Funding loss: $112 million Relative reduction: -41.6% New Jersey Funding loss: $846 million Relative reduction: -41.4% Mississippi Funding loss: $367 million Relative reduction: -41.1% Take Our Poll: Indiana Funding loss: $603 million Relative reduction: -39.6% Michigan Funding loss: $1.29 billion Relative reduction: -39.6% Oklahoma Funding loss: $628 million Relative reduction: -39.3% Missouri Funding loss: $630 million Relative reduction: -39.3% Editor's note: Data was sourced from The Commonwealth Fund. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 25 Places To Buy a Home If You Want It To Gain Value This article originally appeared on 10 States That Face the Harshest SNAP Cuts Under Trump's New Bill Solve the daily Crossword