Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal: Will President's face get added to monument? See if it is a possibility or not
Interior Department Response to Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal
Live Events
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Technical and Cultural Challenges
Can Mount Rushmore Have More Faces?
Mount Rushmore Rock's Poor Quality
Trump Mount Rushmore Proposal Political Support and Resistance
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
has hogged the limelight again as a renewed political push has emerged to add a fifth face to Mount Rushmore, this time that of President Donald Trump. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) has formally requested that Interior Secretary Doug Burgum study the feasibility of the addition. However, experts and park officials continue to emphasize the structural and philosophical barriers.Rep. Ogles wrote a letter to Secretary Burgum urging the Department of the Interior to consider expanding the Mount Rushmore National Memorial. He pointed to Trump's domestic policy bill, which passed Congress on Thursday, and the administration's ongoing border security efforts.Ogles also posted his proposal on social media, writing that the monument should evolve to include recent moments in US history.The Department of the Interior did not directly comment on the expansion proposal. A spokesperson said the agency reviews all correspondence from Congress seriously and thoroughly. The National Park Service, which manages Mount Rushmore, did not issue a fresh statement in response.In the past, NPS officials have stressed that the rock surrounding the current sculpture is unsuitable for new carvings.Ogles acknowledged the difficulties involved in modifying Mount Rushmore. He suggested a feasibility study involving the public and experts to address technical, legal, and cultural concerns. Mount Rushmore sits on sacred Lakota Sioux land, a source of ongoing dispute with Indigenous groups.Ogles argued that recognizing Trump's accomplishments would increase the site's importance and visitor numbers, benefitting South Dakota and local communities.Park officials and geologists have repeatedly warned that the monument cannot safely accommodate another face. Maureen McGee-Ballinger of the NPS stated in 2020 that no suitable rock remains near the sculpted area.A long-standing engineering partner, RESPEC, supports this view, saying any new carving could destabilize the existing structure.Geomechanical engineer Paul Nelson said removing more material could harm the support of the monument, possibly risking structural damage.Mount Rushmore's original sculptor, Gutzon Borglum, made several changes to his design due to the rock's poor quality. Jefferson's first face had to be blasted away and moved. Roosevelt's face was carved in a narrow space near a crack, and Lincoln's face is held by friction.In the 1990s, scientists mapped over 140 fractures across the site, showing it is already fragile. Park rangers even angled Jefferson's gaze to avoid a fracture.Alongside Ogles, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) has introduced legislation to begin carving Trump's face on the mountain. The bill has not yet received a hearing.In past interviews, Trump expressed interest in being added to the monument. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem once said Trump told her it was his dream.However, sculptor Borglum's granddaughter said the monument was not intended to celebrate individuals but ideals. Past suggestions to include other presidents were never acted on.Experts say the rock is unstable. Carving more faces risks damage to the existing sculpture and could make the entire structure unsafe.Yes, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill in January to carve Trump's face, but it has not advanced in Congress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Alberta secretly settles billion-dollar lawsuits as coal giants cash out over government betrayal
Two coal firms, Evolve Power and Atrum Coal, settled with Alberta over mining policy changes. They sued after the province reversed course on coal mining restrictions. Other companies like Cabin Ridge, Black Eagle, and Northback Holdings are still in court. Northback is trying to revive the Grassy Mountain project. The settlements raise questions about trust and coal's future in Alberta. Evolve Power and Atrum Coal are among companies that sued Alberta after investing millions in coal exploration before a sudden government policy reversal Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A crisis born of policy whiplash Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Two major coal companies that sued the Alberta government for billions after a sudden shift in mining policy have quietly reached confidential settlements, bringing a dramatic legal saga closer to an end, but raising fresh questions about trust and the future of coal in Canada's energy-rich province. Evolve Power Ltd. and Atrum Coal Ltd. announced this week they had struck separate deals with Alberta after accusing the province of effectively expropriating their assets. The companies were part of a broader group seeking up to $16 billion in damages for lost investments tied to canceled coal leases and halted exploration exact settlement amounts remain under wraps, Alberta's latest financial report shows government expenses shot $356 million over budget, mostly due to litigation settlements and oil-related the center of the dispute is Alberta's 2020 decision to lift a 44-year-old land protection policy that had restricted coal mining in the ecologically sensitive Rocky Mountain foothills. That move sparked public outrage, including from ranchers, Indigenous groups, and environmentalists, who feared for the future of Alberta's clean water and backlash, the government reversed course in 2021, reinstated protections, and later imposed an indefinite moratorium on coal exploration. The flip-flop left mining companies blindsided, especially those who had already poured millions into planning, equipment, and consultation.'They don't know what they're doing. There's no leadership,' said Evolve CEO Peter Doyle in a interview late last year. 'It's a terrible place to invest.' Doyle added that some of his firm's major investors in Australia had pulled out of Alberta settlements are expected to be finalized and publicly updated later this year. Meanwhile, three other coal companies, Cabin Ridge, Black Eagle, and Northback Holdings, remain locked in litigation. Northback, which is trying to revive the controversial Grassy Mountain coal project, alleges that the regulatory process was 'flawed' and marred by bad-faith conduct from provincial energy regulator approved new exploration permits for Northback's reworked mine plans, igniting further full financial fallout may take months to emerge. But for many watching from small towns, investment offices, and ranches, the damage to public trust is already done.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
US-Iran deal on cards? Donald Trump meets Saudi defence minister; Tehran sets terms for dialogue
Saudi defence minister Prince Khalid bin Salman (left) (Image: X) and US President Donald Trump (right) (Image: AP) US President Donald Trump met Saudi defence minister Prince Khalid bin Salman at the White House on Thursday to discuss de-escalation efforts with Iran, according to Fox News. Prince Khalid, who is the younger brother of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman , also held talks with White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth . The meeting took place ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's Monday meeting with Trump at the White House. Focus on de-escalation and peace: The meeting is crucial for Saudi Arabia as it wants to ease tensions in the region after the recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Talks also reportedly covered broader issues of ending the war in Gaza, negotiating the release of remaining hostages and working toward Middle East peace. The Trump administration wants to push for a historic peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Israel in the coming months. Fox news quoting their sources suggested that the meeting was not only about normalizing ties of Saudi Arabia with Israel but also about necessary steps required to reach it. The meeting comes just days after Trump said other countries have expressed interest in joining the Abraham Accords. The recent Middle East conflict dubbed the '12-Day War' saw Israel and the US target Iran's nuclear sites. Strengthening the Abraham Accords: The Abraham Accords, signed at the White House in September 2020 during Trump's first term are a set of agreements that aimed to normalize relations between United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff said on June 25 that expanding the accords is one of the president's 'key objectives' and predicted 'big announcements' about new countries joining soon. Last week, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt named Syria as one of the nations Trump is eager to bring into the accords, noting their historic meeting in Saudi Arabia earlier this year during the US President's visit to the Middle East. Saudi-Iran dialogue: The Saudi defence minister spoke on the phone with Iran's Chief of the General Staff, Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi on June 29. 'We discussed developments in the region and the efforts being made to maintain security and stability,' Bin Salman wrote on X. . Witkoff is also planning to meet Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi in Oslo next week to restart nuclear talks, according to Axios. The Iranian foreign ministry said Araghchi spoke on the phone Thursday with Norwegian foreign minister Espen Eide to discuss efforts to ease regional tensions. Trump on Iran talks: Speaking to local media on Thursday, Trump said Iran wants to initiate talks with the US and 'it is time that they do.' He added that the US does not want to hurt Iran. 'I know they want to meet and if it is necessary I will do it,' Trump said. Iran's conditions for talks: In an email interview with ANI, Iran's Ambassador to India, Iraj Elahi, said any negotiations with the US are meaningless unless Washington offers a 'credible guarantee' to prevent future acts of aggression by Israel and the US. 'As for negotiations with the United States, considering their betrayal of diplomacy and complicity with the Zionist regime in launching illegal attacks on Iran, while a diplomatic process was still ongoing, there will be no meaning or value in any talks unless a credible guarantee is provided to prevent the recurrence of such acts of aggression,' he said. Elahi was referring to two major military operations last month. On June 13, Israel launched 'Operation Rising Lion,' carrying out widespread airstrikes on Iranian soil that targeted nuclear sites at Natanz and Fordow and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) command bases. Several senior IRGC commanders and nuclear scientists were reportedly killed. This was followed by US strikes on June 21–22 under 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' which also targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure. Iran has strongly condemned both operations as blatant violations of international law and the UN Charter.
The Hindu
31 minutes ago
- The Hindu
As Kharge reaches Hyderabad, posters accusing Congress of violating Constitution put up in Hyderabad
On Friday (July 4, 2025) when All India Congress Committee (AICC) president Mallikarjun Kharge arrived in Hyderabad, posters and flexi banners were put up at several junctions and bus stops targeting the Congress government accusing it of governing with an iron hand violating the Constitution. The banners without any names of the publishers claimed that the Congress government unleashed violence and atrocities against the people. It was further charged that people were arrested and implicated in false cases for demanding the implementation of [2023 Assembly] poll promises.. Mocking the Congress party's slogan of 'Save the Constitution,' the posters claimed that the government was 'Destroying the Constitution' and harassed people in Telangana. The slogans filled with sarcasm included 'Jai Bapu, violence is our weapon,' 'Jai Bhim, SCs/STs are our goal,' and 'Jai Samvidhan, Constitution is of no importance to us.' Pictures of police arresting people were also included in the posters. The posters appeared overnight, and there was no mention of any political party or the organisations that prepared the posters. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) was asked to remove the posters put up at public places without any permission. Congress party, however, accused the Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) of resorting to cheap politics and said such posters have become a norm whenever a national level Congress leader tours Hyderabad. The BRS's desperation to paint the Congress government in a bad light has reached the lowest levels, but there are no takers for its claims as people have not forgotten how it suppressed democratic protests, Congress Media Committee Chairman Sama Ram Mohan Reddy said. The BRS - which closed even the Dharna Chowk - talking about suppression is laughable, he said.
