logo
Exclusive: DHS secretary seeks military arrests in Los Angeles in leaked letter

Exclusive: DHS secretary seeks military arrests in Los Angeles in leaked letter

One day before the Trump administration deployed U.S. Marines to confront protesters in Los Angeles, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct the military to detain or arrest 'lawbreakers,' a move one expert called 'a grave escalation.'
A letter sent Sunday from Noem to Hegseth, obtained by the Chronicle, requested that the Pentagon give 'Direction to DoD forces to either detain, just as they would at any federal facility guarded by military, lawbreakers under Title 18 until they can be arrested and processed by federal law enforcement, or arrest them.'
The military is generally barred under federal laws from taking part in domestic law enforcement. Noem's request may be a step toward the administration sidestepping those laws by invoking the Insurrection Act, two legal experts said in interviews.
Noem also asked Hegseth for 'drone surveillance support' as well as weapons and logistics assistance in Los Angeles. By Monday, the Defense Department had deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles, where they were to join more than 2,000 federalized California National Guard troops in quelling raucous immigration protests.
The Pentagon and Homeland Security did not immediately return requests for comment Monday, as California sued over the deployment of troops to Los Angeles and as immigration protests spread to other cities including San Francisco.
In the letter, Noem referred to an 'emergent Request for Assistance (RFA) to aid in resolving the situation in Los Angeles,' and used strong language to describe what she said was the threat posed by people protesting a series of raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
'We need … support to our law enforcement officers and agents across Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and Federal Protective Services (FPS),' Noem wrote, 'as they defend against invasive, violent, insurrectionist mobs that seek to protect invaders and military aged males belonging to identified foreign terrorist organizations, and who seek to prevent the deportation of criminal aliens.'
It's not clear what Noem meant by her reference to terrorist organizations. In the past, the Trump Administration has used the term terrorist organizations to refer to gangs.
'This is a grave escalation,' said William Banks, a Syracuse University law professor and leading expert on national security law and the domestic role of the military. 'It may presage the invocation of the Insurrection Act.'
Stephen Dycus, an expert in national security law and the Insurrection Act, called the requests in the memo extraordinary given that local authorities appeared to be in control of the protests. In the rare cases that such military force has been used in the past, the Vermont Law and Graduate School professor emeritus said, local law enforcement had either lost control or was refusing to act.
'Viewed all together, and more importantly in the current context, these requests can be seen as using the military, or at a minimum using that threat, to instill fear in the American people and discourage the kinds of protests that are going on in Los Angeles,' Dycus said. 'So this could be viewed as a preparation for invoking the Insurrection Act, or it could be viewed as part of a larger effort to frighten people who otherwise would exercise their first amendment guarantee of free speech and protest.'
The Insurrection Act of 1792 was last used during the 1992 riots following the Rodney King police beating and trial in Los Angeles, when California's then-governor, Pete Wilson, requested military aid from President George H.W. Bush.
Banks said the act should be used rarely and only in dire emergencies. 'Our society is founded on the idea that laws are enforced by civilians, first of all,' he said. 'And second, that problems going on in the states, other than the most grave situations, should be handled by the states.'
Kyndra Rotunda, professor of military and international law at Chapman University, said the military's role will ultimately be decided by more than just the executive branch.
'The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the military from engaging in domestic law enforcement without authorization from Congress,' Rotunda said. 'In light of this provision, presumably Congress or the courts will eventually weigh in as this situation continues to develop.'
State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, called Noem's request an ominous step.
'This isn't what happens in a democracy, this is what happens in a dictatorship,' Wiener said. 'We have a time-honored tradition in the United States that the military does not enforce civilian law.'
Military use of drones for domestic purposes carries a number of restrictions, and is largely limited to training and disaster response. Under Defense Department policy, the military can use drones within its borders in support of a request from federal or state officials, but only with approval from the secretary. Federal agencies used military drones to monitor protests following George Floyd's murder and Black Lives Matter protests.
Noem asked Hegseth in her letter for 'logistical support and the transportation of munitions' from Fort Benning and Wyoming. The letter did not specify what weapons were needed nor why they were requested from those two locations.
State Sen. Tom Umberg, a retired Army colonel and Judge Advocate General officer, said he found the letter's requests alarming.
'It looks like a preparation for a military assault,' said Umberg, a Democrat from Santa Ana. 'This looks like a subterfuge to create some sort of rationale for some sort of invocation of the Insurrection Act.'
Umberg said he was also concerned that the letter did not explicitly say people should only be arrested or detained based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause. It would be false imprisonment to detain someone unless those conditions are met, which is a crime, he said.
'As a former federal prosecutor and former JAG officer, I find it to be outrageous that two cabinet secretaries are basically attempting to provoke a situation where both law enforcement as well as other individuals could be hurt,' Umberg said.
Noem also asked for graduates 'of an advanced intermediate level school, like the Marines' School of Advanced Warfighting, to aid in developing SOPs (standard operating procedures) and TTPs (tactics, techniques and procedures) going forward for when DHS and DoD have to setup a joint operation center and work in conjunction with each other in these situations.'
'At the President's direction,' Noem wrote, 'DHS is seeking to put an end to the migrant invasion and these lawless riots.'
Noem wrote that she would send a formal request 'in the coming days.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump warns that LA military deployment could be first 'of many'
Trump warns that LA military deployment could be first 'of many'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump warns that LA military deployment could be first 'of many'

President Donald Trump and his administration officials warned that the use of the military in response to protests against his immigration crackdown may not be limited to just Los Angeles, saying it could be the first "of many" -- and that protesters could be met with "equal or greater force." Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday that his administration was going to enforce its deportation policy strictly and that it would not tolerate violent protests against ICE officers. "This is the first, perhaps, of many," Trump said of the deployment of 4,000 National Guardsmen and 700 Marines to Los Angeles as demonstrators clash with law enforcement amid the protests. MORE: Trump warns 'any' protesters at military parade will be 'met with heavy force' Demonstrators have clashed with law enforcement sporadically for days, and Trump called in the National Guard, against Gov. Gavin Newsom's wishes, in an attempt to quell the violence and allow immigration enforcement to continue. "You know, if we didn't attack this one very strongly, you'd have them all over the country, but I can inform the rest of the country, that when they do it, if they do it, they're going to be met with equal or greater force," Trump continued. The president's threats come as California's leaders and 22 Democratic governors decry Trump's show of force as a breach of the state's sovereignty and a provocative escalation. Trump's words were echoed in testimony given by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a congressional hearing on Capitol Hill earlier in the day. "So in Los Angeles, we believe that ICE, which is a federal law enforcement agency, has the right to safely conduct operations in any state, in any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth said. "ICE agents should be allowed to be safe and doing their operations, and we have deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them in the execution of their duties, because we ought to be able to enforce ... immigration law in this country." The president suggested he is open to invoking the Insurrection Act in response to the protests. The act authorizes the president to deploy military forces inside the United States to suppress rebellion or violence. The National Guard and Marines, under Trump's current authorization, are not allowed to act in a law enforcement capacity because of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. "There were areas of Los Angeles last night where you could call it an insurrection," Trump said. MORE: Hegseth asserts Trump can send troops anywhere to protect ICE agents conducting raids Trump repeated claims, without evidence, that the protesters are "paid insurrectionists." He decried some protesters who were damaging streets and targeting members of the National Guard. Despite claims from Trump that there were fires and "bad scenes" on Monday night, there wasn't anything all that violent. ABC News observed police moved protesters using skirmish lines and less lethal rounds around the city for a few hours, but there was no widespread violence compared to the weekend. And although Trump claimed that Los Angeles was "under siege," the incidents had been confined on Sunday and Monday to a relatively small area of downtown Los Angeles -- about a 10-block area. So far, the National Guard's presence and role in handling the protests appears to have been minimal. ABC News observed National Guard troops standing outside of a federal building and the Los Angeles Police Department and other local agencies clearing the streets and interacting with protesters. The administration has not immediately provided details about the guardsman's actions from Monday. Congressional Republicans -- including House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune -- backed the president's use of the military in the situation. "Clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task of getting the job done there," Thune told reporters Tuesday. Although Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said "violence in the riots is outrageous," he called Trump's order to send in troops "provocative" and "dangerous." "It really threatens the bedrock of our democracy," the New York Democrat said. MORE: LA protest live updates Trump said the National Guard will be in the Los Angeles area "until there's no danger," declining to put a timetable on ending the deployment. "It's easy. Look, it's common sense. … When there's no danger, they'll leave," he said. ABC News' Alex Stone, Lalee Ibssa, Isabella Murray and Kelsey Walsh and contributed to this report.

Defense Secretary Hegseth defends LA deployments at Capitol Hill hearing
Defense Secretary Hegseth defends LA deployments at Capitol Hill hearing

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Defense Secretary Hegseth defends LA deployments at Capitol Hill hearing

June 10 (UPI) -- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sparred with Democrats on Capitol Hill on Tuesday over the decision to send 5,000 Marines and National Guard troops into Los Angeles as some protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids turned violent. Hegseth, a former National Guardsman, testified before the House Appropriations subcommittee, where he defended the decision to deploy troops and the role of ICE. "We ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country," Hegseth testified. "I think we're entering another phase, especially under President Trump with his focus on the homeland, where the National Guard and Reserves become a critical component of how we secure that homeland." "In Los Angeles, we believed ICE had the right to safely conduct operations," Hegseth added. "We deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them." Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., asked Hegseth why he was sending "war fighters to cities to interact with civilians?" "ICE agents need to be able to do their job," Hegseth responded. "They are being attacked for doing their job, which is deporting illegal criminals. The governor of California has failed to protect his people, along with the mayor of Los Angeles. And so President Trump has said he will protect our agents and our Guard and Marines." Aguilar fired back against Hegseth's answer and said, "The law also says Mr. Secretary that the orders for these purposes shall be issued through governors of the states." Democratic Rep. Betty McCollum of Minnesota also sparred with Hegseth about the cost of deploying the National Guard and Marines, and whether their absence would impact trainings in other parts of the country. The two talked over each other repeatedly as Hegseth referenced the George Floyd murder protests and accused Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz of "abandoning a police precinct" in 2020. "We're both from Minnesota. I was in the Twin Cities during the riots that followed the murder of George Floyd. Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets for days," said McCollum. "At no point did we need Marines to be deployed. This is a deeply unfair position to put our Marines in. Their service should be honored. It should not be exploited." "You are right," Hegseth testified. "We are both originally from Minnesota. Which is why I recall 2020 quite well, when Gov. Walz abandoned a police precinct and allowed it to be burned to the ground -- and also allowed five days of chaos to occur inside the streets of Minneapolis." "We believe that ICE has the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth continued. "Especially after 21 million illegals have crossed our border under the previous administration. ICE should be able to do their job." "Chairman, I have limited time," McCollum declared. "I asked a budget question." After repeated questioning about the budget by several committee members, Hegseth finally gave an answer. "We have a 13% increase in our defense budget and we will have the capability to cover contingencies, which is something the National Guard and the Marines plan for. So we have the funding to cover contingencies, especially ones as important as maintaining law and order in a major American city," Hegseth testified. During the hearing, Hegseth was also questioned about spending cuts to foreign aid programs, including USAID, and staffing cuts at the Defense Department, to which he argued the administration is reducing any program considered "wasteful and duplicitous."

148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents
148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents

The majority of House Democrats voted in favor of allowing non-citizens to participate in Washington, D.C. elections on Tuesday. The House of Representatives passed a bill led by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, to prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in elections in the nation's capital. It passed 266 to 148, with 56 Democrats joining Republicans in passing the measure. One Democrat voted "present," while 148 voted against the bill. "I believe strongly in not having federal overreach, but we have jurisdiction, Congress has jurisdiction over Washington, District of Columbia…and we don't like to utilize our jurisdiction and our authority, but in this case, they've gone too far," Pfluger told Fox News Digital in an interview before the vote. D.C.'s progressive city council passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting non-U.S. citizens the ability to vote in local elections if they've lived in the district for at least 30 days. Scoop: House Gop Memo Highlights Republican Wins In Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Read On The Fox News App Noncitizens can also hold local elected office in the D.C. government. The local measure has been a frequent target of GOP attacks, with Republican national security hawks raising alarms about the possibility of hostile foreign agents participating in D.C. elections. But progressive Democrats like Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., who spoke out against the bill on Tuesday afternoon, have dismissed that as an implausible scenario. "Republicans claim that Congress has a constitutional duty to legislate on local D.C. matters, but this is historically and legally incorrect. Republicans legislate on local D.C. matters only when they think they can score political points, such as by demonizing immigrants," Frost said during debate on the House floor. "They only bring it up to the floor when they think they can score political points, taking away the democratic rights of people here in D.C. and home rule." Frost also argued that it was "highly unlikely" foreign officials would vote in those elections, claiming they would have to "renounce their right to vote in their home country" and because "D.C. has no authority in federal matters." But Pfluger, who spoke with Fox News Digital before the vote, was optimistic that it would get at least some Democratic support. He noted that 52 Democrats voted for the bill when it passed the House in the previous Congress. It was never taken up in the formerly Democrat-controlled Senate, however. "It's hard to go back to your district as a Democrat and say, yeah, I want foreign agents to be able to vote in our elections – 'Oh yeah, it's not federal elections,' some may say. But it has an impact on the way the city is run," Pfluger said. Meet The Trump-picked Lawmakers Giving Speaker Johnson A Full House Gop Conference "This could be Russian embassy personnel, they could be Chinese embassy personnel – a number of folks. It's just wrong. It goes against the fabric of our society," he added. Another bill receiving a vote on Tuesday is legislation that would grant D.C. police the ability to negotiate punishments via collective bargaining, and would help shield the capital's police force from at least some liability by installing a statute of limitations against the Metropolitan Police Department. That legislation was introduced by New York Republican Rep. Andrew article source: 148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store