logo
148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents

148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents

Yahoo11-06-2025
The majority of House Democrats voted in favor of allowing non-citizens to participate in Washington, D.C. elections on Tuesday.
The House of Representatives passed a bill led by Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, to prohibit non-U.S. citizens from voting in elections in the nation's capital.
It passed 266 to 148, with 56 Democrats joining Republicans in passing the measure. One Democrat voted "present," while 148 voted against the bill.
"I believe strongly in not having federal overreach, but we have jurisdiction, Congress has jurisdiction over Washington, District of Columbia…and we don't like to utilize our jurisdiction and our authority, but in this case, they've gone too far," Pfluger told Fox News Digital in an interview before the vote.
D.C.'s progressive city council passed the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act in 2022, granting non-U.S. citizens the ability to vote in local elections if they've lived in the district for at least 30 days.
Scoop: House Gop Memo Highlights Republican Wins In Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Read On The Fox News App
Noncitizens can also hold local elected office in the D.C. government.
The local measure has been a frequent target of GOP attacks, with Republican national security hawks raising alarms about the possibility of hostile foreign agents participating in D.C. elections.
But progressive Democrats like Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., who spoke out against the bill on Tuesday afternoon, have dismissed that as an implausible scenario.
"Republicans claim that Congress has a constitutional duty to legislate on local D.C. matters, but this is historically and legally incorrect. Republicans legislate on local D.C. matters only when they think they can score political points, such as by demonizing immigrants," Frost said during debate on the House floor.
"They only bring it up to the floor when they think they can score political points, taking away the democratic rights of people here in D.C. and home rule."
Frost also argued that it was "highly unlikely" foreign officials would vote in those elections, claiming they would have to "renounce their right to vote in their home country" and because "D.C. has no authority in federal matters."
But Pfluger, who spoke with Fox News Digital before the vote, was optimistic that it would get at least some Democratic support.
He noted that 52 Democrats voted for the bill when it passed the House in the previous Congress. It was never taken up in the formerly Democrat-controlled Senate, however.
"It's hard to go back to your district as a Democrat and say, yeah, I want foreign agents to be able to vote in our elections – 'Oh yeah, it's not federal elections,' some may say. But it has an impact on the way the city is run," Pfluger said.
Meet The Trump-picked Lawmakers Giving Speaker Johnson A Full House Gop Conference
"This could be Russian embassy personnel, they could be Chinese embassy personnel – a number of folks. It's just wrong. It goes against the fabric of our society," he added.
Another bill receiving a vote on Tuesday is legislation that would grant D.C. police the ability to negotiate punishments via collective bargaining, and would help shield the capital's police force from at least some liability by installing a statute of limitations against the Metropolitan Police Department.
That legislation was introduced by New York Republican Rep. Andrew Garbarino.Original article source: 148 Democrats back noncitizen voting in DC as GOP raises alarm about foreign agents
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Long Island town's GOP majority shuts down Dem's motion to kill controversial ICE contract
Long Island town's GOP majority shuts down Dem's motion to kill controversial ICE contract

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Long Island town's GOP majority shuts down Dem's motion to kill controversial ICE contract

The Town of Islip has doubled-down on its partnership with Immigration and Customs Enforcement — shutting down a motion by the lone Democratic board member to end the town's contract with the feds. Jorge Guadrón, the only Democrat on the Town's five-person board, proposed a motion to terminate the deal that allows ICE agents to use Islip's taxpayer-funded gun range as a training grounds — but no other board member seconded the motion, which killed the proposal before even getting to a vote. 'In the interest of safeguarding the mental integrity and well-being of the constituents of the town, the town board wishes to suspend the access to the rifle range for ICE,' Guadrón said in his motion. 3 The Town of Islip has shut down an effort by the town board's lone Democrat to end the partnership allowing ICE to train at a taxpayer-funded shooting range. Google/Stephen Wicelinski 3 Board member Jorge Guadrón proposed the motion to terminate the partnership with ICE — but no other members seconded it. islipny But when Town Supervisor Angie Carpenter asked if any other legislators supported the proposal — it was crickets — shutting down Guadrón's ask in the face of dozens of community members and activists who spoke for over two hours, mainly in support of the contract's termination. With the motion dead, ICE will get to keep training at the range until at least next June, when the contract is set to expire. After the long silence, chaos erupted and shouting broke out from many in the crowd, ending with activist Joshua Chan having to be dragged out by two cops after an emotional outburst to the motion failing. 'Angie, you're disgusting,' Chan screamed at the supervisor as he was being pulled away. Other crowd members started chanting 'shame,' while some approached the legislators and spoke their minds up close as they exited the Town Hall. But the GOP majority walked out of the meeting seemingly unfazed by the screams and insults being thrown at them. 3 ICE agents detain a person in Southhold, Long Island. WABC None of the members of the majority commented after the meeting, but later issued a joint statement. 'Those attempting to politicize this matter are unnecessarily causing more distrust of our law enforcement agencies, especially in communities that are already vulnerable and underreporting crimes,' Town of Islip officials wrote. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The safety and protection of all of our residents, despite race, religion or Country of origin — remains our utmost concern.' Guadrón defended his constituents' reaction and told reporters that the 'audience was beyond upset' with the 'the lack of human empathy' shown by the board. He added that he will continue speaking with fellow council members in hopes of ending the contract before next June and bringing the proposal back for a future vote.

Texas Democrats signal they are poised to end redistricting walkout
Texas Democrats signal they are poised to end redistricting walkout

Politico

time12 minutes ago

  • Politico

Texas Democrats signal they are poised to end redistricting walkout

'We're prepared to bring this battle back to Texas under the right conditions and to take this fight to the courts,' Texas House Democratic Caucus chair Gene Wu said in a statement. Democratic Texas state Rep. Gene Wu speaks during a press conference in Elmhurst, Ill., Friday, Aug. 8, 2025. | Paul Beaty/AP Photo By Andrew Howard 08/14/2025 03:01 PM EDT Texas Democrats gave their clearest signal yet on Thursday that they will soon return to the Lone Star state, after decamping to stop the passage of a redrawn congressional map that adds five new GOP-leaning seats. A statement from the state House Democratic Caucus said that the lawmakers will return on two conditions, both of which are expected this week. First, that the Texas Legislature ends its first special session on Friday, and second that California lawmakers introduce their expected proposal that could offset the GOP gains in Texas. 'Now, as Democrats across the nation join our fight to cause these maps to fail their political purpose, we're prepared to bring this battle back to Texas under the right conditions and to take this fight to the courts,' Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu said in a statement.

California Democrats announce redistricting effort to counter Texas GOP
California Democrats announce redistricting effort to counter Texas GOP

CBS News

time12 minutes ago

  • CBS News

California Democrats announce redistricting effort to counter Texas GOP

California Democrats are preparing to counter Republicans' attempt to reshape a series of Texas congressional districts for political advantage in a back and forth that could define next year's midterm elections and with it, the final two years of President Trump's second term. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is set to make an announcement Thursday as national tensions rage over changing congressional lines mid-decade. Districts are usually redrawn after the decennial census. Newsom has vowed his state would respond after Texas Republicans released plans earlier this summer to redraw five seats held by Democrats and make them more favorable to the GOP. "California won't stand by and watch Trump burn it all down — we are calling a special election to redraw our Congressional maps and defend fair representation," Newsom said Thursday in a post on X ahead of his expected remarks. Newsom's team participated in a series of conversations with the state's Democratic congressional delegation and the California Legislature as drafts of possible maps were discussed. According to U.S. Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the conversations were initially centered on the question, "Is this even conceptually possible?" California Democrats concluded that it was possible to gain five Democratic seats to counter Texas' gains, according to Lofgren. "I'm confident that if we need to move forward, we will do that successfully. There's tremendous unity on the Democratic side." Republicans currently control both chambers of Congress and hold the White House. At the moment, if Democrats were to win back as few as three seats in next year's midterms, they could flip control of the House. That path would be threatened however if Republicans and Mr. Trump succeed in convincing GOP-led states like Texas, Indiana and Missouri to take some of their Democratic-held districts and alter them to favor Republicans instead. The potential developments in California Thursday come as Texas Republicans struggle to pass the maps that have become a national issue. Breakaway state House Democrats fled Texas earlier this month, denying the chamber the quorum it needed to take action on the new maps during a special legislative session. Since then, national Democrats have sought to call attention to what Republicans are trying to do in Texas, even as it's opened the left up to accusations of hypocrisy. During the standoff, some Texas Democrats have spoken out from Illinois, a blue state that was criticized for drawing its congressional maps after the 2020 Census to give Democrats the advantage. For both sides, the issue of congressional districts has become even more starkly partisan this summer. Various attempts have also been made in court to bring state House Democrats back to Texas, or to create a path that will help Republicans get their way. During a floor speech — before the maps passed the Texas Senate earlier this week in what amounted to a moot effort, given the House's obstacles — Republican Phil King bluntly said an objective of his "was to support a plan that, simply put, elects more Republicans to the U.S. Congress." With the special session in Texas set to end in just a few days, Republicans have been adamant about eventually passing the maps, even if it takes more time and special sessions. With Democratic power limited in the state, there is a sense that Republicans will eventually be able to get their way. But the situation has left an opening for Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, to create a new front in the political fight, given that Democrats may have a path to redrawing Republican-held congressional districts in the blue state of California. But California's effort will likely prove to be far more difficult and time intensive than the Republican-led push in Texas. In California, only nine of the state's 52 U.S. House districts are held by Republicans. Earlier this century, voters in the state signed off on putting in the state's constitution an independent citizens redistricting commission to decide new boundaries following the once a decade census process. The state-level differences between Democrat-led California and Republican-led-Texas essentially makes it harder for California Democrats to redraw districts in their state than it currently is for Texas Republicans. In Texas, GOP leaders and Mr. Trump allies just need to go through the normal legislative process to change districts. Because of California's constitution, changing the redistricting process in the state ahead of the 2026 midterms would likely require a new amendment. To take effect, it would need to be passed by a two-thirds vote in both the Assembly and Senate, and then be approved by California voters in an election. That election could prove costly, with major implications for the country on the line. California lawmakers are scheduled to return to Sacramento on Aug. 18 amid the redistricting talk. The Legislature will have five days to conduct public hearings and formalize the process.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store