
As the ADA turns 35, groups fighting for disability rights could see their federal dollars slashed
But the flow of funding under the Trump administration is now in question, disability rights groups nationwide say, dampening their mood as Saturday marks the 35th anniversary of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act. Federal dollars pay for much of their work, including helping people who seek government-funded services and lawsuits now pushing Iowa and Texas toward better community services.
Documents outlining President Donald Trump's budget proposals show they would zero out funds earmarked for three grants to disability rights centers and slash funding for a fourth. Congress' first discussion of them, by the Senate Appropriations Committee, is set for Thursday, but the centers fear losing more than 60% of their federal dollars.
The threat of cuts comes as the groups expect more demand for help after Republicans'
tax and budget law
complicated Medicaid health coverage with a new work-reporting requirement.
There's also the sting of the timing: this year is the 50th anniversary of another federal law that created the network of state groups to protect people with disabilities, and Trump's proposals represent the largest potential cuts in that half-century, advocates said. The groups are authorized to make unannounced visits to group homes and interview residents alone.
'You're going to have lots of people with disabilities lost,' said Jensen, now president of Colorado's advisory council for federal funding of efforts to protect people with mental illnesses. She worries people with disabilities will have 'no backstop' for fighting housing discrimination or seeking services at school or accommodations at work.
The potential budget savings are a shaving of copper from each federal tax penny. The groups receive not quite $180 million a year — versus $1.8 trillion in discretionary spending.
Trump's administration touts flexibility for sta
tes
The president's Office of Management and Budget didn't respond to an email seeking a response to the disability rights groups' criticism. But in budget documents, the administration argued its proposals would give states needed flexibility.
The U.S. Department of Education said earmarking funds for disability rights centers created an unnecessary administrative burden for states. Trump's top budget adviser, Russell Vought, told senators in a letter that a review of 2025 spending showed too much went to 'niche' groups outside government.
'We also considered, for each program, whether the governmental service provided could be provided better by State or local governments (if provided at all),' Vought wrote.
Disability rights advocates doubt that state protection and advocacy groups — known as P&As — would see any dollar not specifically earmarked for them.
They sue states, so the advocates don't want states deciding whether their work gets funded. The 1975 federal law setting up P&As declared them independent of the states, and newer laws reinforced that.
'We do need an independent system that can hold them and other wrongdoers accountable,' said Rocky Nichols, the Kansas center's executive director.
Helping people with disabilities navigate Medicaid
Nichols' center has helped Matthew Hull for years with getting the state to cover services, and Hull hopes to find a job. He uses a wheelchair; a Medicaid-provided nurse helps him run errands.
'I need to be able to do that so I can keep my strength up,' he said, adding that activity preserves his health.
Medicaid applicants often had a difficult time working through its rules even before the tax and budget law's recent changes, said Sean Jackson, Disability Rights Texas' executive director.
With fewer dollars, he said, 'As cases are coming into us, we're going to have to take less cases.'
The Texas group receives money from a legal aid foundation and other sources, but federal funds still are 68% of its dollars. The Kansas center and Disability Rights Iowa rely entirely on federal funds.
'For the majority it would probably be 85% or higher,' said Marlene Sallo, executive director of the National Disability Rights Network, which represents P&As.
The Trump administration's proposals suggest it wants to shut down P&As, said Steven Schwartz, who founded the Center for Public Representation, a Massachusetts-based organization that works with them on lawsuits.
Investigating allegations of abuse and pushing states
Federal funding meant a call in 2009 to Disability Rights Iowa launched an immediate investigation of a program employing men with developmental disabilities in a
turkey processing plant.
Authorities said they lived in a dangerous, bug-infested bunkhouse and were financially exploited.
Without the dollars, executive director Catherine Johnson said, 'That's maybe not something we could have done.'
The Kansas center's private interview in 2004 with one of Jensen's fellow residents eventually led to long federal prison sentences for the couple operating
the Kaufman House,
a home for people with mental illnesses about 25 miles (40 kilometers) north of Wichita.
And it wasn't until Disability Rights Iowa filed a federal lawsuit in 2023 that the state
agreed to draft a plan
to provide community services for children with severe mental and behavioral needs.
For 15 years, Schwartz's group and Disability Rights Texas have pursued a federal lawsuit alleging Texas warehouses several thousand people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in nursing homes without adequate services. Texas put at least three men in homes after they'd worked in the Iowa turkey plant.
Last month, a federal judge ordered work to start on a plan to end the 'severe and ongoing' problems. Schwartz said Disability Rights Texas did interviews and gathered documents crucial to the case.
'There are no better eyes or ears,' he said.
___
Hunter reported from Atlanta.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump closes key trade loophole, impacting Shein, Temu orders
President Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday, July 30, ending the de minimis trade loophole that allows for low-value goods to be shipped to the U.S. duty-free. Packages valued at $800 or less sent to the U.S. outside of the international postal network will now face "all applicable duties," the White House said. The order takes effect August 29. Shein and Temu are two popular fast fashion brands that have attracted American shoppers looking to place large orders at heavily discounted costs and often with free shipping. With the trade loophole ending, U.S. consumers are bracing to see rising prices, including in their once-cheap fast fashion orders. Here's what shoppers need to know about the trade loophole ending: What is de minimis and why will it impact Shein and Temu? Shein and Temu sell a range of products, including clothing, furniture and more that arrive quickly and cheaply. Over half of all packages with de minimis exemptions come from China, and more than 30% of all daily packages shipped under de minimis are from Temu and Shein, Reuters reported in February. A provision in the Tariff Act of 1930 allows for de minimis exemptions, which has become the primary route for e-commerce imports from China to enter the U.S. According to a congressional report from February, between 2018 and 2023, Chinese exports of low-value, single packages increased dramatically from $5.3 billion to $66 billion. Eliminating the loophole for China would have "far-reaching negative effects for Americans, particularly poorer consumers," according to libertarian think tank the Cato Institute. Republican U.S. Senator Jim Banks of Indiana hailed the executive order, saying "for too long, countries like China have flooded our markets with duty-free, cheap imports." Reuters contributed to the reporting of this article


USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
What whistleblowers said about just-confirmed Trump appeals court judge Emil Bove
Emil Bove, President Donald Trump's Senate-confirmed pick to a prestigious judicial role, overcame accusations of misconduct at the Justice Department. Here's what whistleblowers and Bove said. The U.S. Senate narrowly confirmed Emil Bove, President Donald Trump's controversial pick for a prestigious judicial role, in a 50-49 vote late July 29, dismissing multiple whistleblower complaints about Bove's conduct as a top Justice Department official. The vote unfolded almost entirely along party lines. Two Republicans, Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, joined all of the Senate's Democrats in opposition. Bove is now set to be sworn in to his new role on the Philadelphia-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which handles federal appeals for Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware. Bove, a former personal criminal defense lawyer for Trump, overcame multiple accusations from whistleblowers that he had suggested the Trump administration defy court orders if necessary and misled Congress while serving as a top official within Trump's Justice Department. Bove will now shift from that prosecutorial role to the appeals court. Bove defended his integrity at his Senate confirmation hearing, saying he has honored his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and has a "deep respect for the rule of law." Here's what whistleblowers said ahead of Bove's confirmation: Whistleblower accusation #1: Ignoring court orders? Shortly before the Senate Judiciary Committee considered Bove's nomination June 25, a whistleblower – former Justice Department prosecutor Erez Reuveni – alleged that Bove advocated at a March 14 meeting for the department to ignore court orders if necessary to make sure deportation flights took off. "Bove stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f--- you' and ignore any such court order," according to Reuveni's June 24 whistleblower disclosure. At his confirmation hearing, Bove said he "did not suggest that there would be any need to consider ignoring court orders," adding that there were no court orders in place at the time of the meeting. Bove said he couldn't remember if he instructed his subordinates to say "f--- you" to courts in some manner, but that he has "certainly said things encouraging litigators at the department to fight hard for valid positions." Reuveni was fired in April, after he raised concerns to his chain of command "for nearly three weeks regarding the government's compliance with court orders and candor to the courts," according to the disclosure. While Democrats sounded the alarm, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, said June 25 that Reuveni's allegations weren't a cause for concern. "Even if we accept most of the claims as true, there's no scandal here," Grassley said. "Government lawyers aggressively litigating and interpreting court orders isn't misconduct. It's what lawyers do all the time." Another whistleblower later came forward to corroborate claims from Reuveni. The person, whose identity has remained shielded, provided internal Justice Department documents supporting Reuveni's allegations, according to Whistleblower Aid, a nonprofit that represents the whistleblower. Whistleblower accusation #2: Misleading Congress on Eric Adams case? Another whistleblower, whose identity hasn't been publicly disclosed, came forward to allege Bove misled Congress during his Senate confirmation, according to reports from the Washington Post and CNN. The testimony concerned the circumstances behind the Justice Department dropping its criminal bribery case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. Bove directed prosecutors to drop the case after Trump took office, saying the prosecution was restricting Adams' ability to focus on illegal immigration and violent crime. At his confirmation hearing, Bove denied allegations that he negotiated a "quid pro quo" – meaning an exchange of favors – with Adams' lawyers, under which the Justice Department would drop the charges. Bove also denied instructing a lawyer to stop taking notes when Adams' lawyers allegedly urged a quid-pro-quo deal, although Bove said at some point he did remark on a lawyer taking extensive notes. Several Justice Department prosecutors resigned rather than follow Bove's orders to drop the Adams case, which has nonetheless been dismissed. The Justice Department didn't immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment about whether Bove misled Congress. Gates McGavick, a department spokesperson, responded in the Washington Post's July 28 story that Bove has done "incredible work at the Department of Justice" and was going to be "an excellent judge." Justice Connection, an organization composed of Justice Department alumni concerned that their former colleagues are under attack in the Trump administration, put out a statement that was short on specifics, but said the whistleblower "has strong evidence that Emil Bove was not truthful" during his confirmation hearing. The whistleblower tried to share the information with Republican senators for weeks, according to the statement. Contributing: Erin Mansfield and Bart Jansen – USA TODAY; Reuters


New York Post
19 minutes ago
- New York Post
Senate Majority Leader John Thune readying Russia sanctions as deadline for Ukraine cease-fire shortens to 10 days
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) is ready to move on a bill sanctioning Russia if a cease-fire with Ukraine isn't reached by the end of next week — if President Trump gives him 'the green light.' Thune told The Post in an exclusive interview Wednesday that he's 'hopeful' the legislation — introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and sponsored by more than 80 senators — would give Trump more leverage to wind down the 41-month-old war. Thune, 64, admitted that the commander-in-chief may decide to take 'unilateral action' to impose those sanctions, but the House and Senate were 'ready to move' if asked to apply harsher penalties. Advertisement 4 Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) stands ready to move on a bill sanctioning Russia if a cease-fire with Ukraine isn't reached in the next week — and if President Trump gives him 'the green light.' Mattie Neretin – CNP for NY Post 'He's somebody who is animated largely by trying to get to a peaceful solution,' the Republican leader said of Trump. 'I think the president genuinely believes in that. We want to be a good partner in that and so like I said, we've been, I made it clear we're available to move on that whenever they're ready to have us do it.' On Tuesday, Trump shortened a 50-day window before slapping sanctions on Vladimir Putin down to just 10 days, as the Russian strongman shows no signs of letting up on nightly bombings against Ukraine and merciless drone strikes on civilians. Advertisement 'I'm disappointed in him, I must be honest with you,' the president told Post columnist Miranda Devine of Putin on the newest episode of 'Pod Force One.' 4 'I'm disappointed in him, I must be honest with you,' the president told Post columnist Miranda Devine of Putin on the newest episode of 'Pod Force One.' AP 'We've had great conversations, but it hasn't been followed up with, you know, just some very bad things have happened. Very, very bad things have happened after we've had conversations. And I'd leave and I'd say, 'Well, I really thought we had it settled' three or four times.' Trump said Monday he hadn't determined whether to impose additional sanctions on Russia or slap secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian energy, while repeating that the US hasn't seen 'any progress being made' toward ending Europe's bloodiest conflict since World War II. Advertisement At least three summits have been held between Ukraine and Russia in Turkey in recent months with a cease-fire no closer, though there have been some prisoner swaps. 4 The Russian strongman shows no signs of letting up on nightly bombings against Ukraine and merciless drone strikes on civilians. REUTERS 'I'm not so interested in talking anymore,' Trump told reporters during a Monday press conference at his Turnberry club in Scotland while meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'Trump is going to impose tariffs on people that buy Russian oil. China, India and Brazil, those three countries buy about 80% of cheap Russian oil,' Graham said of the move over the weekend. 'That's what keeps Putin's war machine going.' Advertisement 4 'I'm hopeful at least that at some point he'll give us the green light,' Thune said. 'It gives him added credibility and added weight to his side of the negotiations if in fact he's got the entire United States Congress behind him.' UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE/AFP via Getty Images The South Carolina Republican's bill would place a much higher 500% tariff on Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. 'I'm hopeful at least that at some point he'll give us the green light,' Thune said. 'It gives him added credibility and added weight to his side of the negotiations if in fact he's got the entire United States Congress behind him. 'At least right now, they've been happy to have these discussions and negotiations independently without the threat of you know, a sanctions bill coming out of the Congress, but I think it strengthens their hand.'