logo
Football: No. Xavi Hernandez, Pep Guardiola didn't apply for India coaching job. It was a hoax, says AIFF

Football: No. Xavi Hernandez, Pep Guardiola didn't apply for India coaching job. It was a hoax, says AIFF

Deccan Herald4 days ago
The All India Football Federation (AIFF) confirmed on Saturday that a job application attributed to former Barcelona manager and Spain midfielder Xavi Hernandez for the India head coaching role was a hoax.The AIFF's national team director told The Times of India on Thursday that Xavi's name was on the list of applicants. The report also quoted an AIFF technical committee member saying the his candidacy was deemed too expensive to pursue..Indian men's football team drops six places to 133rd in FIFA rankings, worst in nine years."The AIFF received an email furnishing the applications from Spanish coaches Pep Guardiola and Xavi Hernandez. The authenticity of their applications could not be confirmed, and it has since emerged that the email applications were not genuine," the AIFF said in a statement..The great Xavi Hernandez's application surprises AIFF, but coaching job set to go to an Indian.It had not been previously reported that the AIFF had also received an application purporting to be from Manchester City manager Guardiola.The AIFF Technical Committee said it had reviewed 170 applications for the Indian men's head coach role, narrowing the list to 10 before short-listing three candidates.The AIFF sacked former India manger Igor Stimac in June last year before appointing Spaniard Manolo Marquez, who left the job this month and returned to his role as coach of Indian Super League team FC Goa.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India To Face Pakistan In WCL Semifinal After Big Win Over West Indies
India To Face Pakistan In WCL Semifinal After Big Win Over West Indies

News18

time40 minutes ago

  • News18

India To Face Pakistan In WCL Semifinal After Big Win Over West Indies

India Champions have stormed back into title contention after being on the brink of elimination in the ongoing World Championship of Legends 2025 in England. The Yuvraj Singh-led defending champions needed to record a big win in their final league match of the tournament after poor show resulted in back-to-back defeats. Facing West Indies Champions on Tuesday, the Indian team overhauled the target of 145 in just 13.2 overs for a five-wicket win and improve their net run-rate that pushed them ahead in the points table to open the door for a semifinal spot.

A Jharkhand worker is killed in Niger terror attack, his family is now squeezed between company and contractor
A Jharkhand worker is killed in Niger terror attack, his family is now squeezed between company and contractor

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

A Jharkhand worker is killed in Niger terror attack, his family is now squeezed between company and contractor

Around 15 days after the terror attack at a project site in Niger that left two Indian workers dead, the body of Ganesh Karmali, a resident of Jharkhand's Bokaro district, reached his village on Sunday evening. The family, however, has now raised concerns over an alleged disparity in compensation from his employer. Ganesh Karmali, 35, who was a resident of Karipani village, and Krishna Gupta from Uttar Pradesh were killed in the July 9 attack at a World Bank-funded site managed by Transrail Lighting Ltd, an India-based company undertaking power transmission projects abroad. Another man from Jammu and Kashmir, who served as the company's safety manager, was abducted. Ganesh's daughter, Sapna Kumari, said that while Krishna's body was repatriated earlier and his family reportedly received Rs 27 lakh in compensation, her family was promised only Rs 10 lakh. Ganesh's wife, Yashoda Devi, told The Indian Express, 'If both were killed in the same attack and worked at the same site, why are we being treated differently? My husband had told me that the company owed him Rs 40 lakh.' A company representative, Mannar Ansar, said it did not directly employ Ganesh and that he was employed by a subcontractor. Ganesh was not on the company's payroll or on a visa sponsored by it, the representative claimed. 'We helped repatriate his body purely on humanitarian grounds after a request from the Indian embassy,' Ansar said, adding, 'He was not our employee. Krishna was, and he has been compensated under company policy with all applicable benefits, including insurance and gratuity.' Ansar said the Rs 10 lakh given to Ganesh's family came from the subcontractor working under them, not from the parent company managing the Niger project. The subcontractor under whom Ganesh was employed, LK Swamy, claimed that Transrail officials verbally urged him not to escalate the issue. 'They told me not to file any complaints, or it would create problems. But I'm just a small-time labour contractor,' he said, adding that he is ready to cooperate if approached by government officials or family representatives with documents. Swamy said that so far, he had paid the family around Rs 3 lakh from his own pocket, including Rs 50,000 for the daughter's wedding and Rs 17,000 for funeral related expenses. He said he had committed to providing a total compensation of Rs 12 lakh over time. 'I'm not a big contractor. I've only worked under their registration for two months. The company is now pressuring me to take full responsibility, but I didn't even issue the visa or ticket, all of that was arranged by Transrail Lighting Ltd,' he claimed. He also said that all of Ganesh's documents, including his visa, flight tickets, and landing permit, mentioned Transrail's name and address. 'Why did they pay Rs 27 lakh in Krishna Kumar's case from UP and refuse to take responsibility in this one?' he asked. Shikha Lakra, the officer in charge of the Jharkhand's Migrant Workers Control Room, operating under the state Labour Department, confirmed that Ganesh worked for Transrail Lighting Ltd. She acknowledged that the compensation in such cases is often minimal and insufficient. 'Under the state government's policy, Rs 5 lakh is to be provided to the family, which will be done,' she said. Yashoda Devi, however, remains unconvinced. 'We don't understand these technicalities. We just want justice and dignity for my husband,' she said. Shubham Tigga hails from Chhattisgarh and studied journalism at the Asian College of Journalism. He previously reported in Chhattisgarh on Indigenous issues and is deeply interested in covering socio-political, human rights, and environmental issues in mainland and NE India. Presently based in Pune, he reports on civil aviation, other transport sectors, urban mobility, the gig economy, commercial matters, and workers' unions. You can reach out to him on LinkedIn ... Read More

Gautam Gambhir had an ugly conversation with the Oval Pitch curator due to...
Gautam Gambhir had an ugly conversation with the Oval Pitch curator due to...

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

Gautam Gambhir had an ugly conversation with the Oval Pitch curator due to...

Gautam Gambhir had an ugly conversation with the Oval Pitch curator due to... New Delhi: India's head coach Gautam Gambhir and Oval chief curator Lee Fortis got into a heated exchange two days ahead of the final Test of the series. Gambhir and Fortis had a verbal spat during India's first practice session on Tuesday, which saw batting coach Sitanshu Kotak intervene to pacify the situation. Why did Fortis express his displeasure? According to a PTI report, Fortis said, 'It's a big match and he (Gambir) is a bit sensitive.' However, when Indian journalists asked him to confirm on camera, he said, 'I don't want to say anything.' He further said, 'I don't have to feel anything about it. I don't even know him.' What was the real reason for the argument? The incident took place during a practice session and a video has also surfaced on social media. It was reported that the argument was over the condition of the pitch or its use. Fortis told Gambhir, 'I have to report it,' to which Gambhir replied, 'You can report it to whoever you want.' Gambhir also said, 'You can't tell us what to do. You are just a groundsman, nothing more than that.' How did the coaching staff handle the matter? When the matter escalated, batting coach Sitanshu Kotak calmed the matter down and assured Fortis, 'We will not harm anything.' Bowling coach Morne Morkel and assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate were also present during this time. Both the parties later separated and no official statement came. Sitanshu Kotak told the whole story In the press conference after the match, Kotak said, 'When we were looking at the pitch, we were asked to stay 2.5 meters away. We were wearing joggers, it was a bit strange. We know the curators are a bit overprotective.' He further said, 'When you talk to such talented people, you should be polite. This is a cricket pitch, not a 200-year-old historical object that will break if touched.' Fifth Test and rising tension This heated debate between Gambhir and Fortis has further heated up the atmosphere before the fifth and decisive Test. England is leading 2-1 and India has made a comeback by winning the Manchester Test. In such a situation, this controversy has become a topic of discussion before the decisive match.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store