
Big high street retail chain to close ANOTHER shop after already shutting 35 sites following rescue deal
A POPULAR high street fashion brand is shutting another store just months after collapsing into liquidation — and locals are gutted.
Select, which has already closed 35 stores across the UK, is now preparing to pull the shutters down on its Grantham branch for good on May 10.
2
2
Posting the heartbreaking news on Facebook, the store said: 'It is with a heavy heart that we tell all our lovely customers that our store will be closing.
"As far as we are aware our last trading day is 10th May. I just want to take a minute to say thank you for all your support over the years.'
Shoppers in the Lincolnshire town were quick to share their dismay, with one writing: 'We will soon have no clothing stores left in Grantham.'
Another said: 'Are you kidding me.'
A third added: 'Nooo! This is awful news!'
And a fourth chimed in: 'Oh wow we literally have nothing in this town – such bloody shame x.'
The store wasn't included in the initial list of 35 closures in March — but it highlights the growing struggles faced by the troubled fashion chain.
The retailer — once a staple of budget-friendly fashion on the high street — entered Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) in April, first reported by The Sun, after struggling with mounting financial pressures.
Advisers from insolvency firm Moorfields have been appointed to wind up the business, with 40 stores shut immediately and staff left without redundancy pay or wages.
An email sent to employees, seen by The Sun, confirmed that weekly wages would not be paid, and that workers would need to apply for support through the government's Redundancy Payment Service (RPS).
Why are shops closing stores?
Staff at the 48 Select branches still trading were told their pay would be 'delayed', with a promise that wages would be processed the following week. However, many say they've since been met with radio silence.
Some were even told to expect a small advance payment to tide them over — but that never came through. It's understood that during the liquidation meeting, Select's bank accounts were frozen, leaving both stores and staff in limbo.
The future of the remaining stores remains uncertain, with workers and shoppers alike left wondering what's next for the struggling fashion retailer.
Elsewhere, Smiggle, known for its colourful, quirky pens, lunchboxes and school bags, revealed that it is shutting up shop at the Darwin Centre in Shrewsbury later this month.
Whilst, B.D Price, a beloved toy and bike store announced its closure after 160 years in business.
The 84-year-old owner revealed that the cost of living crisis has led to a reduction in sales and to the costs of running the business skyrocketing.
The news comes as both independent and industry giants have been struggling with rising costs and reduced footfall over the past few years.
Dozens of shops are set to close across the country before the end of the month in the latest blow to UK high streets.
Just a few months into 2025 and it's already proving to be another tough year for many major brands.
Rising living costs - which mean shoppers have less cash to burn - and an increase in online shopping has battered retail in recent years.
In some cases, landlords are either unwilling or unable to invest in keeping shops open, further speeding up the closures.
Smiggle isn't the only stationary shop shutting its doors, more WHSmiths stores are set to close this month.
Whilst, Red Menswear in Chatham in Medway, Kent, shut for the final time on Saturday, March 29, after selling men's clothing since 1999.
A couple months ago, Essential Vintage told followers on social that it would be closing down after they had been "priced out" because of bigger players in the market such as Vinted.
Jewellery brand Beaverbrooks is also shutting three shops early this month.
New Look bosses made the decision to axe nearly 100 branches as they battle challenges linked to Autumn Budget tax changes.
Approximately a quarter of the retailer's 364 stores are at risk when their leases expire.
It's understood the latest drive to accelerate closures is driven by the upcoming increase in National Insurance contributions for employers.
The move, announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in October, is hitting retailers hard - and the British Retail Consortium has predicted these changes will create a £2.3billion bill for the sector.
RETAIL PAIN IN 2025
The British Retail Consortium has predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs will cost the retail sector £2.3billion.
Research by the British Chambers of Commerce shows that more than half of companies plan to raise prices by early April.
A survey of more than 4,800 firms found that 55% expect prices to increase in the next three months, up from 39% in a similar poll conducted in the latter half of 2024.
Three-quarters of companies cited the cost of employing people as their primary financial pressure.
The Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year.
It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year.
Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025."
Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector.
"By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves faces crisis as cabinet conflicts threaten to block spending plans
Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a crisis as cabinet conflicts threaten to block her spending plans, with disagreements over proposed cuts to housing and police force budgets. Yvette Cooper and Angela Rayner are pushing back against budget cuts, leading to a stalemate with the Treasury just 48 hours before Reeves is due to unveil the spending review. Cabinet minister Peter Kyle refused to rule out real-terms spending cuts to the police force and housing budget, while the Ministry of Housing is reportedly resisting such cuts. The social housing sector is warning of a potential crisis if funding cuts proceed, with concerns about a "cliff edge" in building more homes and councils already running deficits on housing budgets. Senior police chiefs have cautioned that Keir Starmer's pledge to cut crime will be unattainable without significant investment, citing new online threats and pressures from prison overcrowding.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Lidl is selling the ultimate £15 camping & festival buy – it can be used all summer & makes a great Father's Day gift
LIDL is offering a sizzling summer deal – the Grillmeister Foldable Barbecue is now just £14.99 with the Lidl Plus app, down from its regular price of £19.99. The budget-friendly grill is available nationwide from 12 to 18 June and is ideal for those looking to fire up the barbecue without spending a fortune. 4 The compact and clever design makes it perfect for park picnics, beach days, or small garden gatherings. It's ready to use in seconds, thanks to a tool-free folding mechanism, and the funnel-shaped charcoal tray with air vents helps charcoal ignite quickly. Made from chrome-plated steel, the barbecue grate is easy to clean, and the robust, heat-resistant case includes a handy carrying handle. When assembled, it measures 39.5cm wide, 25cm high and 28cm deep, and it folds down to a slimline 8.5cm for easy storage and travel. It weighs just 2kg, so it won't weigh you down. Lidl said: 'Get £5 off the regular price with the Lidl Plus app 12.06 – 18.06.' This portable BBQ joins a wave of wallet-friendly summer deals as retailers gear up for barbecue season. Recently, shoppers were seen racing to B&Q to snap up a "bargain" gas BBQ – slashed from £120 to just £60. The two-burner gas barbecue is perfect for feeding up to six people and is small enough to fit even in modest outdoor spaces. B&Q has also launched a huge summer sale, with up to 50 per cent off garden and homeware essentials, making it easy to prep your space for sunny weekends and al fresco dining. I'm a chef and you've been using the barbecue wrong - there's a secret step Aldi has also joined the summer savings rush, with its Gardenline Dual Fuel BBQ back in stock for £199.99 – a popular hybrid model that uses both charcoal and gas for flexible grilling. It's been described by fans as 'the best of both worlds' and usually sells out fast. Meanwhile, Argos is offering a 3-in-1 smoker, grill and BBQ for just £75, down from £100 – ideal for those who like to slow-cook ribs or experiment with flavours. Wilko recently relaunched its summer range too, including a compact kettle-style charcoal barbecue for just £25, plus budget garden furniture and accessories to complete your outdoor setup. Other barbecue essentials: Also hitting the shelves are essential items to get you barbecue-ready this summer. Grillmeister Fire Pit- £24.99 Grillmeister Foldable Barbecue- £14.99 Grillmeister Charcoal Chimney Starter- £5.99 Grillmeister Round Pizza Stone- £7.99 Grillmeister Rectangular Pizza Stone- £7.99 Grillmeister Burger Kit- 3 Piece Set Grillmeister Pulled Pork Kit- 4 Piece set- £6.99 Grillmeister Gas Pizza Oven- £79.99 Grilmeister Barbecue Chicken Roaster £3.99 Grillmeister Ceramic Barbecue-£79.99 4


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves must do more than hope for the best when it comes to paying for Labour's spending
R achel Reeves has an unenviable task as she puts the final touches to the government -wide spending review she will unveil on Wednesday. It will be a defining moment for the Labour government as she sets out departmental spending limits up to the next general election. The headlines garnered in the run-up to the chancellor 's big day are misleading. We have been promised £15.6bn for local transport projects, mainly in the North and Midlands; £4.5bn a year for schools; £22.5bn a year for science and tech, and £187m to bring digital skills and AI learning into classrooms and communities. While all are worthy, the government is playing a rather cynical game. Some of its pre-announcements stem from the extra £113bn of capital spending for which Ms Reeves created room last October by sensibly changing her fiscal rules so investment projects do not count towards her target to balance revenue and spending by 2029-30. However, her determination to stick to her fiscal rules to prevent a wobble on the financial markets means that Wednesday's statement will impose a squeeze on day-to-day budgets. Although overall spending will rise by an average of 1.2 per cent a year on top of inflation, big increases for health and defence will mean real-terms cuts for other budgets, possibly including the Home Office (which funds the police), housing and local government. So there has been a bruising round of negotiations between the Treasury and ministers such as Angela Rayner, who is responsible for housing and councils, and Yvette Cooper, the home secretary. During a media round on Sunday, Peter Kyle, the science secretary, did not rule out real-terms cuts to the police and housing. While the squeeze will technically be less severe than the austerity over which George Osborne presided from 2010, the danger for Labour is that it will feel like austerity 2.0 for many voters. Labour backbenchers are well aware of this and, after the party's poor results in last month's local elections in England, have pushed ministers into a U-turn on Ms Reeves's disastrous decision to means-test the pensioners' winter fuel allowance and extracted a promise from Sir Keir Starmer of more measures to combat child poverty, possibly by easing the two-child limit on benefits. There could also be a tweak to the £5bn of cuts to disability and sickness benefits hurriedly announced in March. The government must prioritise the fight against child poverty; without intervention by ministers, it would rise significantly over the five-year parliament, which would be an indictment of Labour. Ms Reeves must find a way to make good her promise in her article for The Independent last week to ensure ' every young person can fulfil their potential '. Admittedly, that will not be easy, given all the conflicting pressures on her to spend more. Although Wednesday's statement will not be a Budget, Ms Reeves should do more than rattle off a list of spending commitments without making clear where the money will come from. There is already a risk of doing so on defence. The strategic defence review unveiled last week is based on the government's ambition to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP in the next parliament but it has not yet allocated the funds to go beyond a rise from 2.3 per cent to 2.5 per cent by 2027. The UK will come under pressure to commit to 3.5 per cent at a Nato summit later this month. Ms Reeves should also provide clarity on which pensioners will receive winter fuel payments in the coming winter. The about-turn has been slow and messy, to the consternation of Labour MPs. In responding to such pressures, the chancellor and prime minister have cited the economy's 0.7 per cent growth in the first quarter of this year but there is no guarantee that will be maintained. They should not lose sight of the need to balance higher spending with genuine public sector reform. There will be a limit to how much can be achieved through 'efficiency savings'. The suspicion is that, in spending more on defence, winter fuel payments and child poverty, Sir Keir and Ms Reeves are willing the ends without providing the means. They should level with the public about how their sums will add up. For now, they may be tempted to adopt a Micawberish approach in the hope that the fiscal picture improves by Ms Reeves's second Budget in the autumn. Again, that is far from certain: more holes might be blown in her headroom against her rules by an uncertain global economic outlook in the age of Trump 2.0 and the Office for Budget Responsibility downgrading its optimistic forecasts for productivity growth. Unless she changed her rules to allow more borrowing, the chancellor would then have to implement tax rises or spending cuts or a combination of both. When things might get even worse, the chancellor needs more than a strategy of hoping for the best.