
Can we put in an offer on a house if it is sold subject to contract?
We fell in love with one we viewed a couple of weeks ago, but didn't make an offer as we didn't know the area it was in very well.
We now regret not doing so, but have spotted that the house is now sold subject to contract.
What does this mean and can we still make an offer?
Jane Denton, of the Daily Mail, replies: If you see a house you like in a popular area, it is important to act quickly.
I appreciate you weren't 100 per cent sure of the location of the property, but the market moves fast in many areas.
The house you fell in love with was obviously appealing to other people, as it is now sold subject to contract.
This means that the seller has accepted an offer from a prospective buyer for the house.
However, at this point, in England and Wales at least, the sale is yet be legally binding as contracts have not been exchanged and the conveyancing process has not been completed. In Scotland, the deal would be legally binding at this point.
What you are considering doing is gazumping the person who has had their offer accepted on the house you now want. This means, if your pockets are deep enough, you'll be submitting an offer higher than the seller has already accepted.
In England and Wales, there is nothing from a legal perspective stopping you from getting in touch with the estate agency selling the house and putting in your own offer.
Unsurprisingly, the lack of regulation or laws in this area is the subject of significant debate and controversy.
The seller of the house you like can accept your offer if they choose to.
If you are in a much better position than the current buyer, by for example being a cash buyer or chain-free, your offer may be more likely to be accepted.
However, don't expect this to all go your own way.
Not all sellers will be happy to accept other offers and may well view the concept of gazumping with disdain.
I have asked two experts for their thoughts on your question.
Liam Gretton, owner of Liam Gretton Bespoke Estate Agent, on Wirral Peninsula, says: At some point in their career every estate agent would have received this question, and it's completely understandable, especially when you find a property you fall head over heels for.
When a property is marked as under offer, sale agreed or sold subject to contract, it means the seller has accepted an offer, and both parties are working toward completing the sale through the legal conveyancing process.
However, it is important to note that until contracts are exchanged, the sale is not legally binding in England and Wales.
This means the seller is still legally entitled to consider other offers, although doing so can understandably be a sensitive matter.
While it is legally permissible to submit an offer at this stage, it is important to consider the moral implications of gazumping.
The original buyer may have already invested significant time and money into the transaction, often spending thousands on surveys, legal fees, and mortgage arrangements.
Gazumping can result in real financial and emotional loss for those buyers.
For that reason, many sellers choose to honour their original agreement unless there are serious concerns or delays.
Now, can you still make an offer? Yes, you can.
Legally, estate agents are obligated to pass on all offers to the seller up until the point of exchange of contracts, unless the seller has provided written instructions to the contrary.
If you have revisited your decision and would now like to proceed, the best course of action is to contact the selling agent by phone and email and submit a clear, formal offer with details of your position, including whether you are a cash buyer, if you are chain-free and whether you have a mortgage in principle.
A clear and well-positioned offer can still be of interest to the seller, especially if there are delays or concerns with the current buyer.
Sellers may still consider a new offer, however most will weigh this carefully against the progress already made.
The agent won't be able to tell you the amount of the existing offer, unless the seller has given them permission.
If you are thinking of making an offer, do so with respect and transparency. It is not about disrupting a sale, but about offering a serious alternative if things aren't moving forward.
Amy Reynolds, head of sales at Richmond estate agency Antony Roberts, says: The short answer is, yes, you can still make an offer.
When a property is marked as sold subject to contract, it means an offer has been accepted, but contracts haven't yet been exchanged.
Until that exchange takes place – often several weeks later – the sale isn't legally binding, and the seller is still allowed to consider other offers.
If you've done your homework and feel confident this is the right house, you can submit an offer.
This practice is known as gazumping – where a seller accepts a higher offer after already agreeing to sell to someone else.
Gazumping is legal in England and Wales, although many see it as ethically questionable.
Some sellers won't entertain other offers once they've agreed terms, especially if they've built a rapport with the buyer or are committed to a chain.
Others might welcome a higher offer or use it as leverage to push the existing buyer to increase theirs.
The key thing to understand is that making a late offer doesn't guarantee success.
The seller might decide to stay loyal to their original buyer. Or they may ask both parties to submit their best-and-final bids.
Some buyers respond to being gazumped by pulling out entirely – so there's always a risk the seller could lose both deals and a good agent should explain this to the vendor.
If you do want to proceed, contact the estate agent handling the sale and explain that you would like to submit a serious offer.
Make it clear you are in a strong position if that is the case – the more attractive your circumstances, the more compelling your offer will be.
Be aware, though, that gazumping can make things uncomfortable for everyone involved.
And if you're in a similar position later on – under offer, waiting to exchange –it's worth remembering how it feels to be gazumped.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Could Sheikh feel the heat over solar panels at his 63,000-acre Highland estate?
The billionaire ruler of Dubai added solar panels to a property on his vast Highland estate without obtaining the key planning permission required in advance. Representatives of Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum - one of the world's richest men with an estimated £11billion fortune - have now filed relevant paperwork with Highland Council to get the green light for the installation at the 63,000-acre Inverinate estate in Wester Ross. The environmentally friendly technology was put in place at Lochview house to the west of the main estate house in a bid to 'enhance the building's sustainability performance' while having 'minimal' visual impact. Retrospective planning permission is also being sought for additional installations at Lochview such as a new staff room, and a ring road connection to improve site circulation and access for service vehicles. A design statement submitted to Highland Council states: 'Solar photovoltaic (PV) panels have been installed on the roof to enhance the building's sustainability performance in line with national and local renewable energy goals. Their location ensures minimal visual impact.' The document from Colin Armstrong Architects also states: 'The PV panels demonstrate a clear commitment to environmental responsibility and align with Highland Council's carbon reduction targets.' The solar panels progress the Sheikh's support of this renewable source of energy, and he is behind the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Solar Park in Dubai. The facility is billed as the largest single-site solar park in the world, and supports the city's aim to produce all of its energy from clean sources by 2050. However, the plans at Inverinate come amid longstanding questions from locals after years of building works at the site, which is located on the banks of Loch Duich, a haven for wildlife such as red deer, Eurasian otters, pipistrelles, west European hedgehogs, and harbour seals. Some people living in the area have previously accused the Sheikh of building a 'mini Dubai' at the estate that he visits only once or twice a year. The 74-year-old bought the property more than two decades ago, and his representatives say major expansion implemented in recent years is to make more room for guests and staff. The Sheikh is one of the UK's biggest landowners with a portfolio spanning more than 100,000 acres, while he developed a friendship with the late Queen through their mutual love of horses, often appearing as her guest at Ascot. Inverinate, whose considerable facilities include several helipads, a hunting lodge and a pool, was recently given the go-ahead to build a tenth on-site property with 15 bedrooms, a large living room and dining room area, and a conservatory. That came after the Sheikh in 2020 won a long battle to create the six-bedroom Ptarmigan Lodge on the estate, despite more than 30 local objections. The application was granted on condition of a £30,000 payment towards local affordable housing. A statement from his representatives submitted to Highland Council regarding the latest plans said: 'This retrospective application reflects necessary and beneficial modifications made during the construction and operational planning phases. The proposed changes are minor in scale relative to the approved development and are fully justified in terms of functional necessity, sustainability, and design integrity. We respectfully request that The Highland Council support this application.'


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Rail & Sail ferry service to Belfast ‘set up to fail'
The number of passengers using a flagship rail and ferry service between Scotland and Northern Ireland has tumbled to 12 a day. Freedom of Information figures obtained by The Times reveal the 'Rail & Sail' service carried 4,400 passengers in the year to 2025, compared with 15,000 passengers five years previously. A drastic cut in service levels has been blamed for the 71 per cent drop in annual passenger numbers since 2019. Services were curtailed during the Covid-19 lockdowns, with tickets valid only on a single train, coach and ferry combination each day. This system remains in place. Before the pandemic, several options were available daily. Colin Smyth, Labour's MSP for South Scotland, accused SNP ministers of allowing the service to be 'set up to fail' and called for a direct rail link to Cairnryan port, which replaced Stranraer as Scotland's ferry gateway to Belfast. Currently, passengers must take a coach from Ayr to the port, a transfer that a rail expert says is the root of the problem. 'The rot set in when Stena Line moved operations from Stranraer, where the port directly adjoined the railway station, to the remote Cairnryan,' said Mark Smith, who founded the travel website The Man in Seat 61. He said the service 'appears to have reneged on the promise to provide a bus connection, reducing service to one per day'. Colin Smyth said the once-popular 'boat train' was no longer viable for most travellers owing to its inflexibility. 'By cutting the connection back to a single daily coach, the journey has been made so awkward and inflexible that it's no longer a viable option for most travellers,' he said. He believes the service is being intentionally run down so it can be written off due to 'lack of demand', a move that he says goes against the Scottish government's commitment to promote public transport and reduce transport emissions. Despite the low usage, some travellers have complained that the service was often sold out when they try to book online, with some opting for direct coach transfers from Glasgow instead. The low numbers have also led to instances of the bus leaving Cairnryan with a single passenger onboard. Transport Scotland said that a rail link to the port had been considered in 2022 as part of a strategic transport review but the idea was rejected because it 'was not expected to provide value for money'. Campaigners argue that the current situation goes against Scotland's national transport strategy, which prioritises public transport over cars. Ellie Harrison, a transport campaigner, said this strategy needs to be 'reflected in the cost of the different transport modes, so that the lower-carbon journeys are always cheaper.' She added that with ScotRail now in public ownership, it should be a priority for the government to promote the service and help reduce short-haul flights. In response, ScotRail's commercial director, Claire Dickie, said the company was 'committed to supporting the Rail & Sail route and encouraging sustainable travel options'. She said that ScotRail was working with Stena Line to make the service more 'appealing and reliable for customers' and that ticket sales to Belfast via Cairnryan were 'up 35 per cent so far in 2025'. Stena Line echoed this sentiment, calling the Rail & Sail service 'a key part of the Stena Line travel offer' and stating that the company 'would welcome improvements in rail services and products'. A Transport Scotland spokesman said any commercial decisions related to ticket initiatives would be for Stena Line to decide, in liaison with other operators such as ScotRail.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Villagers whose country idyll was 'destroyed' by traveller site overnight furious after family submits retrospective permission to make site permanent and some are even considering moving
A luxurious property has gone on the market just weeks after an illegal travellers' site appeared on its doorstep. The stunning four-bedroom detached bungalow – priced at offers around £950,000 – is less than 150 yards from the caravan park, which is built on green belt land and without planning permission. Set in 3.5 acres of rural land, the high-specification property includes stables and a hot tub area, perfect for entertaining friends. Estate agents Stapleton Derby described the home as: 'Set within a peaceful rural location and offering superb access to all major motorway connections. 'This absolutely stunning, newly built four-bedroom detached bungalow presents a rare opportunity to acquire a luxurious home with its own equestrian facilities and expansive land. 'Designed with elegance and practicality in mind, the property is a true sanctuary, combining high-end finishes with thoughtful architectural detail. 'Externally, the front of the property welcomes you with a charming courtyard and ample parking for multiple vehicles. 'To the rear, a private oasis awaits, featuring patios, a hot tub, decking with seating areas, an Astro turf lawn, and a large pergola with its own bar and social space —perfect for entertaining or unwinding in style.' The current owners made the decision to sell as villagers fear the caravan camp, which sprung up in May – will knock hundreds of thousands of pounds off property prices. Rex Bennett, 78, said: 'Judging from past experiences of travellers' sites appearing close by, house prices will definitely fall. 'I've lived here nearly 40 years, and it's happened before when travellers' site spring up. 'The value of people's houses will fall and the owners lose money. 'Whether the reasons are justified or not, no one would choose to live near a caravan site.' He added: 'I haven't heard of anyone having trouble with the travellers but that doesn't make what they have done right. 'They have been very clever about how they have gone about building it. 'Turning up on a Bank Holiday weekend, knowing full well they wouldn't be stopped. 'It was very well thought out.' Stephen Holgate, 55, said: 'I don't have a problem with the site but then again, I don't have to live next to it. 'I'm not sure how I'd feel if they were my neighbours.' The travellers tore up the protected six-acre greenbelt plot, in Burtonwood, Cheshire, in just 72 hours – covering it in hardstanding and erecting a 10ft perimeter fence. The site located between Tan House Lane and Farmer's Lane was lit up like 'Blackpool Illuminations' at night according to one neighbour. Warrington Borough Council said it was aware of the 'potential breach of planning control' and vowed to 'take strong enforcement action within the legal framework.' A retrospective application has been submitted seeking full planning permission for a change of use of land associated with Tan House Farm. The documents state the change of use is for a gypsy and traveller residential site, with four pitches and associated landscaping, and the installation of a farm gate to a footpath on the corner of Tan House Lane and Farmers Lane. Applicant John Varey said the pitches can accommodate a mix of 16 caravans and mobile homes, occupied by Romani gypsies. The report added: 'All of the proposed occupants grew up in nomadic families and have continued to follow that way of life. The families travel in caravans for work and to attend fairs. 'The site is in the greenbelt, however, the land represents 'grey belt', and on that basis, the development is not necessarily inappropriate within the green belt.' Planning documents continued: 'The proposed site provides four gypsy and traveller pitches which are safe, well-designed, and ensure that the site will be private and provide a favourable living environment. 'The proposals include substantial planting and screening, which will result in an on-site biodiversity net gain 'The site will be well screened and capable of integrating with the area, which is characterised by farmland and some other pockets of residential development. 'The site is already connected to water, and connection to the electricity grid is proposed and achievable. 'The package treatment plant and welfare units facilitate the effective management of foul waste. 'The entire site remains permeable, ensuring that surface water will soak away, and the site is well drained with a ditch along the northern boundary. 'Given the families' lack of alternative accommodation, their living standards have been greatly improved since moving onto the application site.' Villagers have already expressed concerns that a metal gate has been installed on a public right-of-way. The planning document read: 'The metal gate is 3.6m, and a 1.2m gap is left to the right-hand side for pedestrians which enables continued access to the public right of way. 'The road is owned by the applicant and the gate is locked with a padlock. For reasons relating to fly-tipping and security, we would argue that the gate should be approved as part of the planning application.' The council has been inundated with objections by villagers. One objector wrote: 'The land has been destroyed without any planning permission, our greenbelt completely vandalised with absolutely no regard to the rules or residents. 'It is absolutely disgusting that this has been allowed to happen.' Another said: 'The site has damaged the natural beauty of the area and transformed once green belt land into a caravan park. 'Not only this, but a footpath has been obstructed with little to no consideration for anyone who plans to use this regularly used route. 'Failure to reject this planning application will only lead to further exploitation of the system in similar ways around the area, which will seriously damage an area of considerable natural beauty and wildlife.' But one letter of support read: 'I have spoken with some of the people on the caravan park at the village café. 'They were polite, friendly, and explained the situation of Warrington having no caravan sites for them to live on. I am happy with them being there. It is better than them on our parks.' The council is expected to reach a decision on the retrospective planning application later in the year.