
Earth's rotation will mysteriously speed up TOMORROW as scientists contemplate unprecedented move
The change, driven by the moon's gravitational pull, will cause the planet to spin slightly faster at its poles, shaving 1.25 milliseconds off the usual 24-hour day.
While the shift is too small for humans to notice, experts said the long-term implications could be catastrophic.
However, scientists said that unchecked acceleration would eventually lead to disastrous consequences.
If Earth's rotation continues to accelerate unchecked, scientists warn it could trigger disastrous consequences across the globe.
As the planet spins faster, centrifugal force would begin pushing ocean water away from the poles and toward the equator.
Even a modest increase of just one mile per hour could raise sea levels by several inches in equatorial regions, enough to swamp low-lying coastal cities already on the brink.
In more extreme scenarios, where Earth spins 100 miles per hour faster, vast areas around the equator could disappear under rising water as polar seas surge southward.
For those who survive the flooding, scientists warn that daily life would grow increasingly hostile as the planet's balance shifts, making this seemingly minor change far more ominous than it appears.
A faster spin would not just shorten the day, it could throw human biology into chaos.
If Earth's rotation continues to accelerate, the solar day could shrink to just 22 hours, disrupting circadian rhythms and effectively shifting everyone's internal clock two hours earlier each day without time to adjust.
Such disruption wouldn't be minor. Studies have shown that even small changes, like daylight saving time, are linked to spikes in heart attacks, strokes, and traffic accidents. A permanent shift would be even more dangerous.
NASA astronomer Dr Sten Odenwald also warned that weather patterns would become more extreme. As the planet spins faster, the Coriolis effect, which causes storms to rotate, intensifies.
'Hurricanes will spin faster and carry more energy,' Dr Odenwald explained.
These minute deviations in Earth's rotation are tracked using atomic clocks, which measure time by counting the oscillations of atoms in a vacuum chamber.
This forms the basis of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the global timekeeping standard.
In recent years, Earth has seen a growing number of 'short days.' On July 19, 2020, the day was 1.47 milliseconds shorter than average. June 30, 2022, came in 1.59 milliseconds short.
But the current record was set just last year, on July 5, 2024, when Earth completed a full rotation 1.66 milliseconds faster than usual, the shortest day recorded since atomic clocks were introduced in 1949.
Graham Jones, an astrophysicist at the University of London, discovered the change earlier this year, noting that Earth's rotation could speed up noticeably on July 9, July 22 and August 5.
Earth normally takes 24 hours, or exactly 86,400 seconds, to complete one full rotation, which is called a solar day.
Earth's rotation is not always perfect, as it can shift by a tiny amount over time, a few milliseconds.
That is likely due to the Earth's spin being influenced by natural forces, like earthquakes and ocean currents.
Melting glaciers, movement in Earth's molten core, and large weather patterns like El Niño can also slightly speed up or slow down the planet's rotation.
These changes are measured using atomic clocks, which track time more accurately than regular watches. The recent spin-up has surprised researchers.
The fastest day recorded so far was on July 5, 2024, when Earth spun 1.66 milliseconds faster than the standard 24 hours.
Although Jones does not know the exact reason for the acceleration, he is studying what's happening inside the Earth.
That includes shifting molten layers in the core, ocean currents, and high-altitude winds as they affect the Earth's spin.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
a few seconds ago
- The Independent
Not all fierce-looking dinosaurs like T rex packed strong bites, study reveals
A comprehensive new analysis of the bite forces of 18 species of dinosaurs has revealed that, despite their size, several of the giant prehistoric predators packed much weaker bites than previously thought. Researchers, including from the University of Bristol, found that while dinosaurs like the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex were optimised for quick, strong bites, much like a crocodile, many others that walked on two legs, such as the spinosaurus and allosaurs, had much weaker bite forces and instead specialised in slashing and ripping flesh. The research, published in the journal Current Biology, revealed that meat-eating dinosaurs followed different evolutionary paths in terms of skull design and feeding style despite their similarly gigantic sizes. 'Tyrannosaurs evolved skulls built for strength and crushing bites while other lineages had comparatively weaker but more specialized skulls, suggesting a diversity of feeding strategies even at massive sizes,' Andrew Rowe, one author of the study from the University of Bristol, said. 'In other words, there wasn't one 'best' skull design for being a predatory giant; several designs functioned perfectly well.' In the study, scientists probed how walking on two legs influenced skull mechanics and feeding techniques in dinosaurs. Previous research showed that despite reaching similar sizes, predatory dinosaurs evolved in very different parts of the world at various times and conditions and had different skull shapes. This raised doubts on whether the skulls of these dinosaurs were functionally similar under the surface or if there were notable differences in their predatory lifestyles. 'Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in terms of feeding biomechanics and possible behaviors,' Dr Rowe said. To understand the relationship between body size and skull biomechanics, researchers used 3D X-ray scanning technology to analyse the skull mechanics and quantify the feeding performance and the bite strength across 18 species of two-legged carnivorous dinosaurs ranging from small ones to giants. Researchers were surprised to find clear divergence among the species. For instance, skull stress didn't show a pattern of increase with size. Some smaller dinosaurs even experienced greater stress than the larger species due to increased muscle volume and bite force. 'Tyrannosaurids like T rex had skulls that were optimised for high bite forces at the cost of higher skull stress,' Dr Rowe noted. 'But in some other giants like Giganotosaurus, we calculated stress patterns suggesting a relatively lighter bite. It drove home how evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped.' Overall, being a predatory two-legged dinosaur did not always equate to being a bone-crushing giant like T rex. Unlike T rex, some dinosaurs like spinosaurus and allosaurs became giants while maintaining weaker bites more suited to slashing at prey and stripping flesh. 'Large tyrannosaur skulls were instead optimised like modern crocodiles with high bite forces that crushed prey,' Dr Rowe explained. 'I tend to compare Allosaurus to a modern Komodo dragon in terms of feeding style.' 'This biomechanical diversity suggests that dinosaur ecosystems supported a wider range of giant carnivore ecologies than we often assume,' he added.


The Guardian
a minute ago
- The Guardian
Great Barrier Reef coral bleaching event in 2024 most widespread and severe on record
The Great Barrier Reef has seen the sharpest annual drop in the amount of live coral recorded by scientists in its northern and southern sections since monitoring started four decades ago, according to a report from the Australian Institute of Marine Science. The report is the first to comprehensively document the devastating impacts of the early 2024 mass coral bleaching event – the most widespread and severe event on record.


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Can countries solve the plastic pollution problem?
Plastic production has exploded in the last century - to some it has been a miracle product while to others it is a pollution nightmare. Scientists have estimated that there are nearly 200 trillion pieces floating in the world's oceans, and this could triple if no action is taken. In 2022, countries agreed to develop a legally binding global treaty to cut the waste and the harmful chemicals some plastics contain - but after two years no agreement has been Tuesday, the world's nations meet again at a UN conference in Geneva - could they finally agree how to curb the plastic excesses? Why is plastic such a valuable product? Human societies have used plastics that occur naturally in the environment for hundreds of years, in the form of rubber, horn and the 20th Century brought the explosion of synthetic plastics, made from processing fossil material's versatility, strength and heat-resistant properties has lent itself to thousands of uses, from sewage pipes to life-saving medical equipment, to clothing. It has become ubiquitous in a short time without understanding its full impact, explains Dr Alice Horton, research scientist at the National Oceanography Centre. "Proportional to life on earth, plastics have been around for no time at all, there are people alive that weren't using plastics as children. I think that's what makes this quite a concerning material," said Dr Horton. "It has exploded in such a way that we are using it in every application in our lives and yet we are suddenly realising there may be problems with it." How are plastics impacting our planet? Levels of plastic production have grown exponentially over the last few decades. In 1950 two million tonnes was produced, by 2022 that had risen to 475 million plastic can be reused, the cost and availability of recycling infrastructure means very little is. About 60% of all plastics are single use and just 10% are estimated to be recycled, according to analysis in Nature. Plastic has been shown to accumulate in the marine environment where it poses particular problems for wildlife who can ingest it. "They can confuse it as food, which then harms their internal organs and also can lead to fatalities, because of digestion difficulties," said Zaynab Sadan, global plastics policy lead at WWF. She said they could also become entangled in discarded fishing gear or plastic packaging that has entered the ocean from sewage systems. When it enters the environment, most plastic breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces - known as microplastics. They have been found across all geographical ranges, from the deep sea to mountain tops, and across all living systems ever is continuing to understand the full impact, with different species faring better than others. But Dr Horton from the National Oceanography Centre warns there is a threshold where animals will start to be harmed."When we [get] accumulation of plastic in tissues we start seeing inflammation, cell damage, hormonal changes. Things that are not outright going to kill an organism but likely to have this accumulative, long-term effect whereby they get weaker and weaker, and sicker and sicker, and either become diseased or die," she explained. Are plastics harmful for us? Plastics are a "grave, growing and under-recognised danger" for human health, according to a new expert report. The Lancet Countdown estimated that health-related disease and death from the "plastic crisis" is responsible for at least $1.5tn (£1.1tn) a year in health-related damages. These impacts can range from air pollution from the production of plastic, through to elevated risk of cancer, respiratory illnesses and miscarriages from plastic contamination in our contain more than 16,000 chemicals such as dyes and flame retardants, some of which are toxic and cancer-causing. Despite the growing body of evidence of the hazards of plastic, the Lancet report highlights that there is a lack of transparency as to what is in most products. Just a quarter of plastic chemicals have data on their impact, but of those tested 75% were found to be "highly hazardous". What are countries trying to agree? In 2022, countries agreed a global treaty was needed in two years to tackle the deadline passed in December 2024, after five rounds of negotiations, with no treaty having been signed. On Tuesday, more than 170 nations will meet again to try to get a deal over the main issues they are trying to get agreement on include:Targets on cutting the production levels of single-use plasticsBans on some of the most harmful chemicals in plasticUniversal guidance on the design of plastic products Financing of this effortProducts that have to meet consistent design standards can help to improve recycling, save costs and reduce the demand for virgin plastics, Rob Opsomer, executive lead of plastics and finance at the Ellen McArthur Foundation, which co-convenes the Business Coalition for a Global Plastics Treaty, told the BBC."So, to give you one example, a drinks bottle, if it is coloured, the value of what you can get from it if you sell the recycled material is half the value of a clear, uncoloured bottle," he 100 countries, including the UK, are calling for an "ambitious" treaty which would include a commitment to limit production levels. But there has been strong opposition from a group of oil-producing nations including Russia and Saudi Arabia who want the talks to focus not on producing less, but recycling more. Demand for oil in global energy and transport systems is expected to peak in the next few years as countries move to greener technologies. This could leave plastic as one of the few growth markets for the oil industry. Any efforts to limit production could pose short term economic damage to the for those users of plastics not having clear, global regulations is costing them."It is a fundamental risk. Businesses don't want packaging with their brand name on it to be littering the streets and our oceans," said Mr Opsomer. He said there was also the cost for businesses of having to comply with hundreds of new standards globally every year on Business Coalition, which includes some of the biggest global users of plastic such as Nestle and Unilever, is calling for governments to introduce coordinated taxes on their businesses to help pay for the cost of recycling and cleaning up plastic waste. What can you do to reduce plastic waste? Single-use plastic is the biggest contributor to plastic waste in the environment, and most of our daily consumption of this comes from food packaging. You can take a reusable container or cup if you are getting a takeaway, and when food shopping consider taking a reusable sealed bag to weigh your fruit and is estimated that more than a quarter of microplastics in the environment come from car tyres. For those that are able, walking and cycling to the local shops or sharing car journeys with friends or neighbours can help. And avoid plastics that break down to microplastics more easily - such as chewing gum and glitter. There are many non-plastic alternatives still available which means you can keep having fun at festivals. Sign up for our Future Earth newsletter to keep up with the latest climate and environment stories with the BBC's Justin Rowlatt. Outside the UK? Sign up to our international newsletter here.