logo
Terror grips the Red Sea: Fears grow that Houthi terrorists are more powerful than ever and could grind international shipping to a halt after sinking two ships in a week - despite Trump's vow he'd dealt with them

Terror grips the Red Sea: Fears grow that Houthi terrorists are more powerful than ever and could grind international shipping to a halt after sinking two ships in a week - despite Trump's vow he'd dealt with them

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Yemen's Houthi rebels have launched a new and yet more violent campaign of attacks targeting cargo ships in the Red Sea, sinking two vessels, killing some of their crew and allegedly taking others hostage.
The terror attacks represent the latest chapter of the rebels' explosive campaign over the Israel-Hamas war that threatens to plunge international shipping into chaos.
Between November 2023 and December 2024, the Houthi rebel group officially known as Ansar Allah targeted more than 100 vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two and killing four sailors, in what they said was retaliation for Israel 's offensive in Gaza.
Their campaign has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the Red Sea corridor, which typically sees $1 trillion of goods move through it annually and the latest attacks have seen insurance costs skyrocket.
In May, Donald Trump announced he had struck a deal with the rebel group in which the White House agreed to stop bombing Houthi targets in return for an end to shipping attacks.
The Trump administration had presented its 52-day bombing campaign on Yemen as being successful in restoring freedom of navigation in the Red Sea.
But Yemeni Houthi militia leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi on Thursday embarrassed the US President, declaring that no company could be permitted to transport goods related to Israel as his group launched another round of murderous assaults.
Now, two more ships - the Magic Seas and Eternity C - lie at the bottom of the Red Sea, days after they were hit with drone attacks and with rocket-propelled grenades.
The crew of the Magic Seas were rescued, but at least four crewmembers of the Eternity C are believed dead, according to maritime sources who spoke to Reuters.
Ten more narrowly escaped the same fate after they were plucked from the Red Sea by rescue boats having abandoned ship and spent more than 24 hours floating adrift in the water.
But 10 others remain unaccounted for and are feared to have been taken hostage after the Houthis claimed they had seized some members of the fleeing crew.
Many shipping companies have suspended voyages in the Red Sea due to the fear of attack, and the insurance cost of shipping goods there has more than doubled in the past week.
Rates for a typical seven-day voyage period, which are set by individual underwriters, have been quoted this week at up to 1%, matching the peak level in 2024 when there were daily attacks.
Such a small percentage may not sound like much, but this adds hundreds of thousands of dollars in further costs for every single shipment.
Some underwriters have pausing cover altogether for some voyages.
'What we have seen in the last week appears to be a return to mid-2024 targeting criteria, which essentially involves any vessel with even a remote Israeli connection,' said Munro Anderson, head of operations at marine war risk insurance specialist Vessel Protect.
The attacks represent a new level of violence being employed by the Houthis.
Experts have referred to the assaults as being complex in nature, involving armed rebels first racing out to the vessels in the Red Sea, firing small arms and rocket-propelled grenades.
They then have used anti-ship missiles and both aerial and sea drones loaded with explosives to attack the ships.
Analysts also pointed out the fresh aggression symbolises a failure on the part of Israel and America, whose bombing raids have clearly not stripped the rebels of their ability to launch attacks.
The US said it dropped more than 2,000 munitions on more than 1,000 targets in the course of its months-long campaign against Houthi stronghold in Yemen as Trump vowed the group would be 'completely annihilated' unless it stopped targeting Red Sea shipping.
His bluster has seemingly failed to deter the Houthis, who have apparently been able to reconstitute their forces to pull off complex maritime military operations.
For the Houthis, attacking commercial ships remains far easier than targeting warships as those vessels don't have air defence systems.
Instead, some carry a few armed guards able to shoot at attackers or approaching drones. Downing a drone remains difficult and shooting down a missile is impossible with their weaponry.
Armed guards also typically are more trained for dealing with piracy and will spray fire hoses at approaching small boats or ring a bridge with cyclone wire to stop attackers from climbing aboard.
The Houthis, however, have experience doing helicopter-borne assaults and likely could overwhelm a private security detail, which often is just a three-member team aboard a commercial vessel.
The new attack campaign 'represents a qualitative shift in the course of the open battle in support of Gaza', the Houthis' SABA news agency said this week.
It added that Israel commits 'daily massacres against civilians in Gaza and relies on sea lanes to finance its aggression and maintain its siege'.
'This stance, which is not content with condemnation or statements, is also advancing with direct military action, in a clear effort to support the Palestinians on various fronts,' the rebels said.
The Houthis are members of Islam's minority Shiite Zaydi sect, which ruled Yemen for 1,000 years until 1962.
They battled Yemen's central government for years before sweeping down from their northern stronghold in Yemen and seizing the capital, Sanaa, in 2014. That launched a grinding war still technically being waged in the country today.
A Saudi-led coalition intervened in 2015 to try to restore Yemen's exiled, internationally recognised government to power.
But years of bloody, inconclusive fighting against the Saudi-led coalition settled into a stalemated proxy war between Saudi Arabia and Iran, causing widespread hunger and misery in Yemen, the Arab world's poorest country.
The war has killed more than 150,000 people, including fighters and civilians, and created one of the world's worst humanitarian disasters, killing tens of thousands more.
A ceasefire that technically ended in October 2022 is still largely being honoured.
Saudi Arabia and the rebels have done some prisoner swaps, and a Houthi delegation was invited to high-level peace talks in Riyadh in September 2023 as part of a wider détente the kingdom has reached with Iran.
But there is still no permanent peace.
The Houthis are counted among Iran's so-called 'Axis of Resistance' in the Middle East that the Islamic Republic uses to project power and political will.
Tehran routinely denies arming the rebels, despite physical evidence, numerous seizures and experts tying the weapons back to Iran.
Until recently, the Houthis were considered far less capable than their partners Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.
But these once-feared militant groups have been decimated by Israel after the October 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas that sparked Israel's war in the Gaza Strip.
Hamas has been systematically broken down by Israel's brutal campaign of bombings and ground operations that has razed much of the embattled Palestinian enclave to the ground.
Hezbollah meanwhile has been gutted by the Israeli Mossad intelligence agency's cunning pager attacks and bombing campaigns which eliminated its leadership and destroyed much of its military capabilities.
Iran too has been left reeling after Israel launched a 12-day war against the country in June, which culminated in US airstrikes on key nuclear sites.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Syria's massive wildfires brought under control after days of intense battles
Syria's massive wildfires brought under control after days of intense battles

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Syria's massive wildfires brought under control after days of intense battles

Some of Syria's worst wildfires in years have been brought under control as of Sunday, according to the Civil Defense and the Ministry of Emergency and Disaster Management, following days of grueling firefighting in the forested countryside of the coastal Latakia province. The blazes, which started 10 days ago and swept through the heavily wooded area of several mountain ranges, were fanned by strong winds, scorching summer heat and unexploded ordnance left behind from the country's 13-year civil war. Firefighters faced hazardous conditions with support from aerial teams and engineering units working to open firebreaks in the dense terrain. In a statement, the Civil Defense said the spread of the fire was halted on Sunday morning, following 'extensive efforts by firefighting teams and both helicopter and glider aircraft.' Crews remain on the ground conducting cooling operations and monitoring the area to prevent new flare-ups, it added. More than 15,000 hectares of forest were burned, according to Abed al-Kafi Kayal, a civil defense team leader. 'There are no injuries among residents,' he told The Associated Press. 'Some firefighters were hurt, mostly from slipping, road conditions or the intensity of the flames.' Firefighting helicopters swept low over ridgelines on Saturday, dumping water onto hotspots as ground crews worked below to contain flare-ups. Among the pilots were defectors who had left the Syrian Air Force in 2012 during the uprising against President Bashar Assad. Now, some have rejoined under the new government and are contributing to the emergency effort. Col. Ameen al-Ameen, who returned to service after 14 years, said his team has been flying 'day and night' for 10 consecutive days. 'We are extinguishing fires and doing our duty toward our country and people, who need us after this long period,' he said. By Saturday evening, teams had successfully contained hotspots on all fronts. The civil defense statement praised the 'tremendous efforts' of Syrian firefighters along with Turkish and Arab support teams, and noted that roads and fire lines were being cut through the forest to help prevent future spread. Minister of Emergency and Disaster Management Raed al-Saleh said the firefighting efforts had reached a 'promising stage' by Saturday night. 'The scene is changing, the smoke is clearing and teams continue working intensively to extinguish remaining hotspots,' he said. The United Nations also stepped in to support the emergency response. U.N. Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in Syria, Adam Abdelmoula, announced on Thursday the allocation of $625,000 from the Syria Humanitarian Fund to assist those affected. Initial U.N. assessments suggest thousands have been displaced, with significant damage to farmland, infrastructure, and livelihoods in the coastal region. U.N. agencies said they are coordinating closely with local authorities and stand ready to mobilize further aid if needed. 'The wildfires have had catastrophic consequences on the local communities and require our immediate attention,' said Abdelmoula. He called on international donors to step up, warning that 'timely and flexible funding is critical to saving lives and protecting communities in moments of crisis.' Al-Saleh praised the assistance of firefighting teams from Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq, and Qatar. 'We promise our people that we will not leave until the last spark has been extinguished,' he said. Summer fires are common in the eastern Mediterranean region, where experts warn that climate change is intensifying conditions that lead to blazes. Also, below-average rainfall over the winter left Syrians struggling with water shortages this summer, as the springs and rivers that normally supply much of the population with drinking water have gone dry.

'Putin tells Iran to accept US nuclear deal supporting zero enrichment'
'Putin tells Iran to accept US nuclear deal supporting zero enrichment'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

'Putin tells Iran to accept US nuclear deal supporting zero enrichment'

Vladimir Putin has allegedly told Iran to accept a US nuclear deal in which they would be unable to enrich uranium. The Russian President is said to have told both Donald Trump and Iranian officials that he supports the deal, despite Russia being one of the Middle Eastern country's key allies. American news site, Axios, claim three European officials and one Israeli official, who have knowledge of the discussions, have said that Moscow has encouraged the stance and that Putin also informed French President Emmanuel Macron. A European official reportedly told the site: 'Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favorable. The Iranians said they won't consider it.' And an Israeli official allegedly added: 'We know this is what Putin told the Iranians.' However, Iran's semi-official news agency, Tasnim, denied the report, quoting an 'informed source' as saying Putin had not sent any message to Iran in this regard. The US have been trying to broker a deal with Iran after Trump said they 'cannot have a nuclear weapon' and launched strikes on three of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities. However, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said last month that the country not having the ability to enrich uranium - used to fuel nuclear power plants and atomic warheads - was '100 per cent' against their best interests. Axios claim their sources close to the negotiations have said that Russia would supply Iran with 3.67 per cent of its uranium, which it would remove, for nuclear power, if a deal is brokered. It is also alleged that they would provide Iran with 'small quantities' of 20 per cent enriched uranium for their Tehran research reactor and the 'production of nuclear isotopes'. They additionally reported that US envoy Steve Witkoff has been in discussions about resuming nuclear negotiations in the coming days, after plans to meet Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in the Norwegian capital of Oslo were scrapped. The reports about Putin's new stance come just weeks after the Russian President vowed to back Iran and condemned 'groundless' aggression against its ally after the US joined Israel in striking nuclear facilities last month. 'This is an absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran,' Putin told Araghchi, who travelled to Moscow seeking support in mediation. Putin called the strikes 'unjustified' and added that Russia was ' making efforts to provide assistance to the Iranian people.' The Russian President did not single out the US attacks, talking instead broadly of 'strikes' against Iran, though the Kremlin had earlier said it condemned and regretted the US strikes. 'There has been a new escalation of tensions in the region, and, of course, we condemn this and express our deep regret in this regard,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, shortly before Putin met Araghchi in the Kremlin. Araghchi thanked Putin for condemning the US strikes on Iran, telling him Russia stood on 'the right side of history'. The crisis violently escalated last month when the United States sent a fleet of stealth bombers to attack nuclear facilities across Iran. Israel initiated the conflict with unilateral strikes against Iran, citing concerns the regime was trying to build a nuclear bomb, which Iran has consistently denied.

Why any ceasefire in Gaza will not hold
Why any ceasefire in Gaza will not hold

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Why any ceasefire in Gaza will not hold

Could there be a temporary Gaza ceasefire and partial hostage deal in the next days or weeks? Yes. Would it lead to the end of the war and a ' postwar Gaza ' structure? No. Why? For a multitude of of reasons, but the one overarching and overriding reason is that prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu does not want to end the war. He is infatuated with his 'wartime leader' status, convinced that he is drastically remodelling the Middle East geopolitical landscape in Gaza, Iran and elsewhere. And for his political interests and expediency, he needs to perpetuate a war and emergency atmosphere. The New York Times Magazine just published a comprehensive and detailed account of how Netanyahu has been prolonging the war since early 2024. By all indications, this policy trajectory continues and applies to both Gaza and to a future, second strike against Iran, as Netanyahu himself attested during his visit to Washington during the past week. How does this affect the chances of a ceasefire? The endless talk and abundant speculation of an imminent Gaza ceasefire has become tragically tedious and predictable, with each day bringing a combination of reasons why a deal is just around the corner and the caveat that it won't last. There's an explanation for that: the deal that is being negotiated at varying pace – which includes a 60-day ceasefire, a partial exchange of 10 live Israeli hostages and 18 deceased hostages, in exchange for an undisclosed (but large) number of Palestinian prisoners, some convicted of terrorism and murder – is partial. It is supposed to lead to a bigger agreement, and thus its principles, tenets and stages are derived from that 'postwar Gaza' framework. On that framework the sides are not even close. In fact, it is safe to assume that even if a ceasefire deal is struck in the next days or weeks, its durability is highly questionable. It is almost inevitably doomed to be violated just like the almost identical truce agreement that was in place in January, lasted for 58 days and was then breached by Israel in mid-March. The reasons for this realistic but patently pessimistic outlook are both substantive and political and are manifest in glaring inner contradictions between the two phases. There is a series of unanswered questions underlining the current negotiations, with a short answer to each: will Hamas stay in power? De facto yes, according to the current deal. No, according to the postwar plans that Israel, the US and some Arab countries are considering. Will Israel redeploy and gradually withdraw from the Gaza Strip? Yes, according to the agreement. No, according to Israel, which insists on large and wide buffer zones and total control over Rafah, in the southern part of the Gaza Strip. Are these reconcilable? Of course not. Then comes the question of what guarantees exactly did the US provide Hamas that Israel will not resume the war after 60 days? Unclear. How are those assurances consistent with a postwar plan that disposes of Hamas? They are not. Who is in charge of humanitarian aid and the supply of food and medicine to Gaza? Not clear. What is included in the so-called 'postwar Gaza' political plan and power structure? The US is favorably considering a primarily Emirati plan, which others, but not Israel, have contributed to. The plan has five main principles, all based on the successful implementation of the 60-day cessation of hostilities: A gradual transition to governance by 'non-Hamas Palestinians״ backed by five Arab countries: Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. A security force will be drawn from some of those countries, backed by US private contractors and possibly a US Command and Control center, situated outside Gaza. The plan will be launched after the Palestinian Authority invited those countries to execute the plan. That way, the Palestinian Authority is involved, but Israel could credibly claim that it is not a part of the governing structure. The Arab partners will vet, recruit and train a new security force and raise the necessary funds (estimated in excess of $60bn) for Gaza rebuilding. This plan will impel the Palestinian Authority to reform and become a reliable interlocutor. Does Israel agree to such a plan? No. Does it have an alternative plan? Not really. And that brings us to the second paradox that dooms a long-term agreement: the so-called ' humanitarian city '. The term is morally depraved Orwellian 'Newspeak' likely borrowed from some third-rate dystopian sci-fi movie and the would-be place has been described as a location for ethnic cleansing and forcible displacement. Clearly, in order to advance this patently unviable objective (which the Israeli military opposes vehemently) Israel needs to maintain vast military presence in Gaza. So yes, a temporary ceasefire agreement is possible and should be welcomed given the alternative. But no, this does not portend any permanent agreement as long as Mr Netanyahu believes the war must continue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store