‘President Trump, it's not too late": Hear Austin Tice's mother plea to Trump 13 years after his disappearance
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Environmental Groups Sue Over D.O.E. Report Downplaying Climate Change
A new lawsuit in federal court alleges that the Trump administration violated the law by secretly recruiting a group of people who reject the scientific consensus on climate change to write a report downplaying global warming. The Environmental Defense Fund and the Union of Concerned Scientists, both environmental groups, accused the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency of 'flagrant violations' of a law that governs advisory committees. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on Tuesday. It alleges that in March Chris Wright, the energy secretary, 'quietly arranged for five handpicked skeptics of the effects of climate change' to form a committee called the Climate Working Group that then wrote a report downplaying the threat of rising greenhouse gas emissions. Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, cited the report to justify a plan to repeal the legal foundation for regulating climate pollution. But the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 does not allow federal agencies to recruit or rely on secret groups when engaging in policymaking, according to the lawsuit. The law requires that any groups developed to advise federal policy must be disclosed and that meetings, emails and other records be made public. 'This is one of the most brazen violations of federal law on one of the single most consequential issues to the lives of millions of Americans,' said Vickie Patton, general counsel for the Environmental Defense Fund. The lawsuit alleges that the agencies 'have sought to manufacture a basis to reject' widespread scientific agreement that the burning of fossil fuels is the primary contributor to global warming, and that swift action is needed to avoid the worst consequences. On Thursday the environmental groups filed a separate motion asking the court to block the E.P.A. from moving forward with a plan to repeal a scientific determination made by the government in 2009 that climate pollution harms public health and welfare. That assessment, known as the endangerment finding, is the basis for regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. Officials with the Department of Energy did not respond to a request for comment. An E.P.A. official said the agency does not comment on current or pending litigation. The authors of the Department of Energy report were Steven E. Koonin, a physicist and author of a best-selling book that calls climate science 'unsettled'; Judith Curry, a climatologist who has cautioned of alarmism about warming; John Christy, an atmospheric scientist who doubts the extent to which human activity has caused global warming; Roy Spencer, a meteorologist at the University of Alabama, Huntsville; and Ross McKitrick, an economics professor at the University of Guelph in Canada. Dr. Koonin said in an email that he is not an attorney and not qualified to offer an opinion on the lawsuit. Dr. Curry said in an email that the Climate Working Group 'provided technical information to the DOE, not policy advice.' Dr. Christy declined to comment, and Dr. Spencer and Mr. McKitrick did not respond to requests for comment. Documents obtained by the Environmental Defense Fund under public records laws show that Dr. Koonin began contacting Trump administration officials within weeks of President Trump's inauguration. In one email exchange, Dr. Koonin reached out in February to Mr. Zeldin's chief of staff, Eric Amidon. 'I was told (through a mutual friend of mine and the Administrator's) that I should contact you to set up a meeting with Mr. Zeldin,' Dr. Koonin wrote. 'The subject is to offer technical assistance from me and colleagues in the review of the Endangerment Finding.' Mr. Amidon replied that the agency was 'moving right along on this topic' and said he would set up a call for Dr. Koonin with E.P.A. officials. On Friday Dr. Koonin said the call never occurred, writing in an email, 'A search of my records shows no further contact with the EPA (whether by phone, video, or in person)' after the Feb. 16 email exchange. Dr. Koonin did send Mr. Amidon a memo of what he called 'inconvenient truths' on climate change, including a claim widely rejected by mainstream scientists that 'there is no basis to conclude that human emissions enhance natural 'greenhouse' warming in any amount.'
New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
Appeals Court Paves Way for Mass Layoffs at C.F.P.B.
A federal appeals court paved the way for the Trump administration to move ahead with plans to decimate the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, ruling 2 to 1 to throw out a lower court's effort to block mass layoffs. In the 49-page ruling, Judge Gregory G. Katsas of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, a Trump appointee, wrote that Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the Federal District Court in Washington had no jurisdiction to block the Trump administration's efforts to lay off about 1,500 of the C.F.P.B.'s 1,700 workers. Civil servants' employment-related complaints are subject under law to a specialized review process, he wrote, and the plaintiffs' other grievances did not pertain to reviewable, final agency actions or unconstitutional acts. 'Accordingly, we vacate the preliminary injunctions,' Judge Katsas wrote in the majority decision, in which he was joined by Judge Neomi Rao, also a Trump appointee. But the effect of the ruling is not expected for at least seven days, leaving the plaintiffs time to appeal. This spring, the Trump administration attempted to reduce the C.F.P.B.'s work force by nearly 90 percent, a move blocked by Judge Jackson. Over the next several weeks, a frenetic back-and-forth ensued, as the three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned Judge Jackson's initial injunction before allowing a revised version to stand until they could fully address the matter. The C.F.P.B., an Obama-era creation that was the brainchild of Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, has long been a target of President Trump, and was a focal point for his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, a federal cost-cutting operation led by the tech billionaire Elon Musk. Less than three weeks into Mr. Trump's second term, Russell T. Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget who was also named acting director of the C.F.P.B., ordered the agency's employees to cease 'all supervision and examination activity,' effectively freezing their operations. The layoff notices came almost immediately after. Congress created the C.F.P.B. in 2010, as part of a wider financial regulatory overhaul, and the plaintiffs argued that the Trump administration's efforts to diminish it were an unlawful power grab from the legislative branch. The appeals court's ruling disputed their argument that the administration's moves to drastically reduce the agency's staff were a final decision about the fate of the agency. In a dissent published Friday, Judge Cornelia T.L. Pillard, an Obama appointee, rejected her colleagues' view, stating that only Congress could dissolve the agency. 'It is emphatically not within the discretion of the president or his appointees to decide that the country would benefit most if there were no bureau at all,' she wrote in a 60-page dissent.
Washington Post
2 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Clash over D.C. immigration policies heightens community's fear
Immigrants and advocacy groups were already on high alert this week after D.C. police moved to allow increased collaboration between District officers and federal immigration enforcement agencies, the latest development in the Trump administration's campaign against crime in the nation's capital.
