
Shoreham Airshow disaster pilot blamed for the death of 11 people STILL won't apologise 10 years after fatal crash
Ex-RAF airman Andy Hill, 60, has spent the last decade trying to regain his pilot licence after the Civil Aviation Authority revoked it.
And despite a coroner blaming his flying for the crash that saw his jet explode in a fireball on the A27 in West Sussex in August 2015, Mr Hill has declined to say sorry.
A spokesperson for him told The Mirror: 'Mr Hill does not want to make any public statement about the tragic events of Shoreham.'
The former British Airways captain was cleared of manslaughter by gross negligence following a trial at the Old Bailey in 2019.
But at an inquest in 2022, senior coroner Penelope Schofield said Mr Hill's plane crashed as 'a result of the manner in which it was flown'.
Anthony Mallinson, whose father James Graham Mallinson, 72, was killed in the disaster, called for the pilot to 'acknowledge' the grieving families.
He said: 'Hill hasn't let anything drop and so there hasn't really been that sort of time frame where you could say we've had three months grace where we have had time to grieve properly.
'I think I think in the ten years since, it's been all about him. It would be very nice for him to acknowledge us properly.'
Earlier this year, Mr Hill's final attempt to regain his pilot licence through a legal challenge was refused at the High Court.
He had lodged a Judicial Review just months after he lost an appeal following a two-day hearing in London in October last year.
The decision to challenge the ruling was heavily criticised by families who lost loved ones in the Shoreham Airshow disaster.
Caroline Schilt, 64, whose 23-year-old son Jacob died, said: 'Whether he is aware that his late challenges cause the families the ultimate pain as he prolongs the legal process cannot be proved.
'However, it certainly feels like a personal vendetta. Hill has never accepted any form of responsibility for killing 11 men as a result of his diabolical flying.
'He has never shown any remorse and we don't believe he ever will.'
Jacob had been on his way to play an away football match when Hill's 1950s aircraft smashed into the A27 while he performed in the Shoreham airshow.
He was sitting next to his Matt Grimstone, who was also killed, as they drove themselves to play for Worthing Utd.
Mr Hill's lawyers previously argued the Civil Aviation Authority took the decision to stop him flying based on public reaction to the 2015 tragedy.
The former British Airways captain suffered serious injuries in the crash and nearly died at the side of the road.
The CAA previously said: 'Following a public hearing on a challenge by Andrew Hill to a UK Civil Aviation Authority proposal to revoke his pilot and flight radio telephony licences, the Civil Aviation Authority's decision panel has confirmed that proposal and Andrew Hill's licences will now formally be revoked.
'Following the crash at the Shoreham Airshow in 2015 in which 11 people died, Andrew Hill's licences were suspended, and he has been unable to fly in the UK since then.
'The thoughts of everyone at the UK Civil Aviation Authority remain with those affected by the tragic crash.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
42 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Police make six arrests at asylum hotel protest in London
Police made six arrests at a protest outside a hotel in London that has been used to house asylum seekers. Protesters gathered outside the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf on Sunday afternoon, with some setting off pink flares and waving England flags. Advertisement Some demonstrators carried a banner that said: 'We're not far right but we're not far wrong. Don't gamble with our lives. Stop the boats.' The Metropolitan Police said six arrests were made for breaching Section 14 Public Order conditions, possession of Class B drugs, and assaulting an emergency worker. In a post on X, the Metropolitan Police said: 'We have imposed conditions using Section 14 of the Public Order Act to prevent serious disruption at the protests in Canary Wharf. 'The group protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers have been instructed to remain on the pavement opposite the Britannia Hotel.' Advertisement The hotel has been the site of numerous anti-migrant protests in recent weeks.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Rank unfairness of UK today means Starmer's Two Tier Kier nickname has stuck – but here's how he can shed it
FOR those enraged at growing evidence of 'two-tier' Britain, the acquittal of Ricky Jones last week was just the latest depressing example. Here was a Labour councillor being cleared of encouraging violent disorder despite calling for far-right protesters to have their throats slit. 3 3 Reform and the Tories seized on the case as yet another blinding display of courtroom double standards. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp wasted no time laying the travesty squarely at the feet of Sir Keir Starmer. In a tweet viewed more than two million times, he said 'as far as I can see, this Labour Government seems to be quite happy with two-tier justice'. Cue howls of anger from online liberals, who breathlessly crowed that not only was he disrespecting the decision of a jury, he was unfairly meting out blame to ministers. 'You ought to know this has nothing to do with them', retorted the arch-Conservative wet Dominic Grieve. 'That is the hallmark of a rabble rouser.' Rank unfairness But people are roused. In fact, they are bloody furious about what they perceive to be rampant 'two-tierism'. The refrain thundered into the political lexicon like a bullet train in the tinderbox aftermath of last year's Southport riots. In that sticky, angry summer, there was a feeling the clunking fist of the British state was being disproportionately brought down upon a certain kind of protester. For a public that routinely watches paedophiles walk free, the case of Lucy Connolly — slung in the slammer for a disgraceful but quite clearly stupid tweet — became a lightning rod. Even now, her 31-month jail sentence is the yardstick held up against some of the more mind-boggling outcomes from our judiciary. 'Two-tier' justice savaged by Kemi Badenoch who blasts 'extraordinary' decision to spare Huw Edwards You can argue the toss over how much blame ministers should shoulder for policing and court decisions. We have an independent judiciary but it is of course Parliament that makes our laws and ministers who make the political weather. Rightly or wrongly, Starmer is the man at the sharp end of the criticism. And much more dangerously for him, allegations of two-tier standards have now stretched well beyond the orbit of crime and seeped into every cranny of public life. It has become a byword for the rank unfairness voters see in modern day Britain. Charges of two-tierism are so common I'd eat my notebook if it is not the 2025 Oxford word of the year. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look Of all the unfortunate nicknames bestowed upon our Prime Minister, none has stuck quite so solidly as Two Tier Keir. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look. Ordinary British families struggling to pay the rent watch in fury as undocumented illegal migrants waltz into hotels for free bed and board. Law-abiding citizens paying full whack for council services and leisure activities read revelations in The Sun about small-boat migrants getting discounts. Millions of workers setting their alarm clocks for crack of dawn see an ever-growing number of their countrymen and women signing on for welfare with zero requirements to look for work. Taxpayers squeezed more than ever wonder where the improvement in public services is to show for it. Passengers paying hefty Tube fares rattle with rage as guards turn a blind eye to entitled oiks bumping the barriers. And just last week, we saw Birmingham council tear down St George flags from lamp-posts while turning a blind eye to Palestinian ones. Two-tierism is more than just a buzzword — it captures the mood of a nation fed up with a system they increasingly feel is not on their side. The PM's political enemies are alive to just how damaging the Two Tier Keir narrative has become. Consider how just last year those who brandished allegations of two-tierism were dismissed as cranks and nutjobs, whereas now these are mainstream complaints. Even when Starmer was shoving Netflix show Adolescence down our throats, but neglected to watch a documentary about grooming gangs, he was accused of 'two-tier telly'. How does Sir Keir neutralise these attacks and restore the faith of a nation that loves rules and loathes unfairness? Winning the trust of voters always starts by showing them you get it. Starmer will never himself use the T-word — a refrain adopted mainly by the political Right. And it is unlikely this former lawyer will start openly criticising his old profession, although it is a good first step that he has pledged new legislation to stop dinghy-chasing lawyers weaponising European human-rights laws. Kick up backside Expect him to start wrapping himself up in the language of 'fairness' over the next few months, though, as he tries to show he does in fact get it. He tweeted yesterday: 'I will do what it takes to uphold the law and ensure fairness for the British people. 'If someone doesn't have the right to be in this country, we won't allow them to stay.' Which is all well and good, but the rhetoric has to be matched by results. Whitehall departments have been given a kick up the backside to deliver positive stories about this Government to sell. At a recent summer bash, No10 chiefs told Cabinet aides that the Health, Treasury and Environment departments had churned out the most 'top of the grid' stories — a pointed reminder to slackers to up their game. Stopping the boats, closing hotels, driving living standards, going after genuine criminals and getting more people into work — voters don't ask the world of their politicians, they just want the basics done right so they can get on in life. Sir Keir needs to restore that uniquely British sense of fairness — or it could all end in tiers. NEVER wrestle with a pig – you both get dirty but the pig likes it. I fear Sir Keir Starmer's latest mud-slinging campaign against Nigel Farage could see him end up on the wrong end of that old political slogan. 3 New Labour attack ads claim the Reform leader 'wants to make it easier to share revenge porn online' and would 'put women and girls at risk'. Another one attempts to portray him as best mates with social media misogynist Andrew Tate. It all comes shortly after ministers lampooned Farage, right, as 'on the side' of modern day Jimmy Saviles. Politics can be a dirty business and sometimes it pays dividends to go below the belt. But if the gloves are off, the PM should not be surprised if he now gets hit back twice as hard. And Reform are hardly the sort who will pull their punches. I suspect the real reason Labour has ratcheted up the criticism is that nothing else is sticking to Teflon Nige, or knocking him off his perch atop the polls. A No10 insider recently told me their attempts to undermine the costs of Farage's policies were futile. They said: 'We are so far out from a general election that nobody cares about whether the sums add up. It's all vibes.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Only serious punishment will deter shoplifters
Most acquisitive crimes such as burglaries and muggings are committed by a small number of offenders. The same is true of shoplifting. The great majority of people are law-abiding and would never dream of stealing. They are angered by the way in which the lawless minority can get away with their behaviour without any apparent penalty. If they are able to do so they will carry on stealing, targeting more shops. The obvious remedy is to ensure that prolific shoplifters are caught and punished, both to take them out of circulation and to demonstrate the consequences of their actions. It is called deterrence and our criminal justice system is supposedly founded on its nostrums. But that can no longer be said. Ministry of Justice (MoJ) figures show that nearly six in 10 thieves with at least 15 previous offences avoided prison last year, the highest proportion since records began more than a decade ago. One offender with 315 previous convictions caught stealing a £495 designer handbag from Fenwicks store in Newcastle was given a 'last chance' by a court, despite breaching a suspended jail sentence and community order. People will be astonished to discover just how many crimes need to be carried out before a jail term is handed down. It has become even less likely that these crooks will be sent to prison given the backlog in court hearings and the overflowing prisons. The police are often blamed for refusing to investigate shoplifting or even burglaries. But they have a point if the criminals they apprehend are simply sent packing with a rap on the knuckles. Katy Bourne, Sussex's police and crime commissioner, said last week that the current system is madness. Most people would agree with her.