
Within a few years, The Brutalist will be consigned to oblivion, where it belongs
Much has been written about Brady Corbet's epic, Oscar-winning film The Brutalist, whose 215 minutes (including an interval, as in the old days) I experienced recently. Some say high art is for the few, and Corbet clearly intended his film to be high art. I happened to be in Australia and saw the film in Sydney, where, only three weeks after its release, I struggled to find a screening. When I did, it was in a tiny auditorium, in the company of no more than 20 others.
These days, perhaps box-office takings matter less than later home-entertainment revenue from Blu-rays and streaming. The Brutalist is released on disc here next month. It already has a review on Amazon (the film, not the Blu-ray package) that calls it 'Possibly the dullest film ever made. Nothing to like anywhere' and gives it one grudging star, perhaps because one can't give it zero. Doubtless, Corbet would feel it confirms the view that high art is not for the masses.
His film is self-indulgent and far too long: I found myself wondering what a master editor such as David Lean would have done with it. The story itself, though not bad, is implausible: the idea that a Bauhaus-trained, prize-winning architect would, on surviving the Nazi death camps, arrive in the United States and end up shovelling coal is hard to believe, given the construction boom in post-war America.
That also brings me to a nagging doubt about the originality of the conception. Almost from the moment it started, I was reminded of Ayn Rand's vast (and almost unreadable) 1943 novel The Fountainhead, and the preposterous but enjoyable King Vidor film of it made in 1949, starring Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal. The Brutalist is effectively The Fountainhead with an added backstory of the persecution of the Jews and their displacement into an ever-wider diaspora.
In both films, the main character is an architect (in Corbet's, László Tóth, played by Adrien Brody; in Vidor's, Howard Roark, played by Cooper) who is not allowed to execute his particular vision, is wronged and ends up doing manual labour (Roark goes to work in a quarry, but both the book and the film suggest an element of psychosexual masochism behind that decision; Tóth does so solely because he'd otherwise starve).
Both men acquire a wealthy patron, and their relationship goes awry. Yet in both cases, the architect triumphs in the end – Roark after a court case in which he justifies blowing up a block of flats for which his ultramodern design has been unilaterally altered; Tóth after many years of brutalist constructions. Both films end with a speech of justification: Roark delivers his; a wheelchair-bound Tóth has his delivered by his niece as he prepares to be honoured at the Venice Biennale.
Roark's speech is philosophical, about the importance of the integrity of art, and the importance of it conforming to the artist's conception. Tóth's niece discloses that his original radical work in America, the Van Buren Institute, was designed to include spaces reminiscent of Buchenwald, where he had been incarcerated, and Dachau, where his wife and niece had languished. But the stories of the two films are fundamentally the same: architects (whom we are invited in both cases to take as symbols of the artistic firmament) must be allowed to create without interference from others, if their work is to have its most profound meaning: all else is worthless.
Unlike The Fountainhead, The Brutalist is not overacted or absurd. Adrien Brody probably deserved his Best Actor Oscar, though his performance is not so profound as it was in 2002's The Pianist, which was a far better film. Felicity Jones as Erzsébet, his wife, is superior, and Guy Pearce deserves high praise for playing the repulsive Van Buren, Tóth's patron.
Although ridiculed and slated by critics in 1949, The Fountainhead has become a cult film, perhaps for the wrong reasons – certainly for reasons Rand herself would find offensive, as they revolve around its unintentional humour. Whether in three-quarters of a century The Brutalist will have attained quite such status is, I think, doubtful.
As Corbet embarks on his next project, he might profit from being less of the auteur, with all the pretentiousness that goes with that, and a bit more of the good old-fashioned film director.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I'm sick of mums forking out £70 for birthday cakes so DIY-ed one for my son with Asda buys for a fraction of the cost
Plus, a full list of where your kids can eat free this summer holiday THAT'S SWEET I'm sick of mums forking out £70 for birthday cakes so DIY-ed one for my son with Asda buys for a fraction of the cost WITH the cost of living continuing to squeeze household budgets, many parents are looking for ways to save money, especially when it comes to celebrations like birthdays. A birthday cake is often a centrepiece, but with many shop-bought cakes costing a small fortune, it doesn't have to break the bank. 2 Crystal managed to make her own birthday themed cake for her son Credit: tiktok/@ One mum has shown that you can create a fun, personalised cake for your child without spending a lot – and it can still be a big hit. Crystal, a mum who shared a video on her TikTok page @ revealed how she made her son's ninth birthday cake using budget-friendly items from Asda. Admitting she often leaves things until the last minute. She added: "But hey, we moved and he's gonna have a birthday cake no matter what.' Determined to make her son's day special, Crystal dashed to Asda before school pick-up and grabbed two of the budget Just Essentials by ASDA chocolate cakes, which costs £4.53 each. She also bought chocolate icing, Kinder treats, Happy Hippos, and other sweets. She explained: 'I can bake cakes but they come out shit half of the time, so I wasn't getting a chance at it today.' Stacking the two cakes on top of each other, Crystal got creative with her decorations, layering the cake with the icing. She then decorated the top of the cake herself, by adding her chocolate bars around the cake, as well as the Happy Hippos and Kinder egg surprises on top of the cake. She admitted she didn't bother decorating the back of the cake, as she asked: "Who's going to see the back of the cake?" before adding: "Well in all honesty I never bought enough of them straw thingies (Chocolate straws) to even decorate the back of the cake.' I DIY-ed a 'professional' level kids' birthday cake for less than £25 using Amazon & eBay buys - I didn't bake a thing Despite her self-deprecating humour, Crystal's efforts paid off. Once she put the cake into a box and revealed the finished product, she said: 'For some, you may look at it and think what a load of s**t. "But do you know what? When he's here, he was over the moon.' Within two days of her video being shared, Crystal went viral gaining one million views, and 1,681 comments as many people rushed to share their thoughts. One wrote: "Let's normalise this kind of cake over the £70 baked cake for birthdays!" 2 She bought two chocolate cakes from ASDA Just Essential section Credit: tiktok/@ A second added: "I'm gonna do this for my daughters graduation cake as I can't afford to get one done. "Going to get two plane cakes. Lob em together and add some decorations from Amazon. Bish bash bosh well done us mums." Whilst a third said: "The child will remember his cake, not how much it was. "You've saved money on cake for other things. Top mum."


NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Jury in Harvey Weinstein sex assault retrial have reached a partial verdict
Jurors in the trial against disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said Wednesday they unanimously found him guilty of sexually assaulting one woman and not guilty of assaulting another more than a decade ago. But jurors at Weinstein's retrial told the judge they were unable to reach a verdict on allegations he assaulted a third woman and Judge Curtis Farber asked the jurors to continue deliberating Thursday before sending them home for the day. Weinstein, 73, had denied all the charges and his lawyers insisted the sexual encounters with his three accusers were 'transactional' and 'consensual.' The jury weighing the evidence against disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein in his New York retrial reached a partial verdict after five days of deliberation. Weinstein, 73, who has denied all the allegations, was charged with sexually assaulting three women more than a decade ago. Weinstein found himself on trial again after the New York state Court of Appeals last year overturned his landmark 2020 conviction for sexually abusing young women, a trial that defined the #MeToo movement and helped turn the Oscar-winning producer into a pariah. The appeals court found that the judge in that trial had improperly allowed testimony against the former Miramax chief based on allegations that were not part of the case. During the six-week retrial, jurors heard testimony from a former 'Project Runway' production assistant, Miriam Haley, and actress Jessica Mann, both of whom testified in the 2020 trial. New to the retrial was testimony from a third accuser, Kaja Sokola, a former runway model from Poland. Weinstein's lawyers have argued that the sexual encounters with his three accusers were all 'transactional' and 'consensual.' 'If this person wasn't Harvey Weinstein, would we even be here?' Weinstein defense attorney Arthur Aidala asked during his closing argument in accusing the women of being grifters. Prosecutors, however, said Weinstein preyed on young women trying to make it in Hollywood, sometimes repeatedly, and threatened to wreck their careers if they talked. 'He never had any interest in their careers,' Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg told the jury. 'He had an interest in their bodies. And he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they had wanted him to or not." Just as in 2020, Weinstein did not testify at his retrial. But before the jurors announced they had reached a verdict, he told a FOX5 New York reporter that he acted "immorally" and regretted hurting his wife and family, but never did anything "illegal." "I put so many friends through this and hurt people … that were close to me, by the way, by actions that were stupid," he said. "But never illegal, never criminal, never anything." Much of the evidence that resulted in Weinstein being convicted five years ago of the third-degree rape of one woman and a first-degree criminal sex act against another woman was reintroduced at his retrial. Just as before, Weinstein pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree criminal sexual act and third-degree rape based on complaints by Haley and Mann. But this time, Weinstein also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of first-degree criminal sexual act in the alleged sexual assault of Sokola. Sokola told the court that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006 at a Manhattan hotel when she was 19 years old. But the alleged abuse began in 2002, when she was 16 and Weinstein forced her to masturbate him, she said. 'Her first sexual experience was the defendant forcing himself on her,' Blumberg said. During his three-hour closing, Aidala tried to poke holes in the testimony of the three accusers. He suggested they were coached by prosecutors to describe the sexual encounters, which he likened at one point to 'naked twister,' in a sinister light. 'They did it all to get the original sinner, the poster boy of the MeToo movement,' Aidala said. The #MeToo hashtag took off in 2017 following reports in The New York Times and The New Yorker that detailed allegations of sexual misconduct against Weinstein that went back decades. It helped inspire a reckoning in Hollywood and beyond around sexual harassment. Weinstein, Aidala added, made for an easy target. 'He's a fat dude — sorry, Harvey,' he said while the former producer looked on. Aidala insisted the encounters were all 'transactional' and that all three women believed Weinstein could help their careers. 'It's not really a casting couch I thought it was,' Aidala said. 'It's different now. I know it sounds crazy, but he's the one being used.' Blumberg painted a far different picture during the prosecution's closing remarks. 'I want to remind you why we are here,' she said. 'Because he raped three people.' Sokola and Haley both claimed that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on them in separate incidents in 2006. Mann told the court the producer raped her in 2013. Weinstein, Blumberg said, 'had tremendous control over Hollywood. He spoke, people listened. He decided who was in and who was out.' While Blumberg spoke, Weinstein, seated in a wheelchair, appeared to be listening intently. 'Remember, it's not the person sitting here today in a wheelchair but this man, in Hollywood, who had the power and was in control,' Blumberg said. Regardless of the verdict, Weinstein will most likely be returned to California where he has to serve a 16-year sentence for a 2022 rape conviction. His lawyers filed an appeal for that conviction in 2024 that is still in process. During his latest trial, Weinstein was allowed to stay at Bellevue Hospital where he was being treated for a host of serious health issues. Back in October, two sources told NBC News that Weinstein had been diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia, an uncommon form of bone marrow cancer. Weinstein was a Hollywood titan in the 1990s and 2000s when he and his brother Bob ran Miramax, the distributor of critically acclaimed independent movies like 'Sex, Lies, and Videotape,' 'The Crying Game,' 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Clerks,' and box office successes like 'Chicago' and 'Bridget Jones's Diary.' In 1999, Weinstein won a best picture Oscar as one of the producers of 'Shakespeare in Love.' And in the early 2010s, his second distribution label, The Weinstein Company, won back-to-back best picture Oscars for 'The King's Speech' and 'The Artist.' But as Weinstein collected accolades, he was dogged by rumors that he preyed on his leading ladies and other women in the industry. By the time he was arrested, more than 80 women had accused him of sexual assault or harassment going back decades. Just as he did at his trials, Weinstein doggedly denied the claims and insisted the encounters were consensual.


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Molly-Mae Hague gets her FOURTH parking ticket of the year as she leaves £200k G Wagon outside her Cheshire office while filming her Amazon series
Molly-Mae Hague has been slapped with her fourth parking ticket of the year as she stepped out of her £200,000 G Wagon in Cheshire on Wednesday. The Love Island star, 26, was greeted with the fine on her luxurious car after leaving her offices where she was filming the second series of her Amazon show Behind It All. For the outing, the star wore a stylish brown sueded jacket which she wore with a pair of wide leg black jeans and accessorised with a pricey Chanel bag. She added Prada shades to her look and swept her blonde tresses back into her usual sleek bun. Looking unphased, Molly ripped off the parking ticket from her windshield as she racketed up another fine after getting others in March, February and January of this year. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the Daily Mail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. A representative for Molly-Mae has been contacted by MailOnline for comment. Her outing comes after it was claimed that a feud is brewing between Molly-Mae and Tommy Fury 's families over their decision to give their relationship another go. The former Love Island star and the boxer, both 26, shocked their fans last summer when they announced that they had split, with Tommy later revealing it was down to his drinking. But this year they have slowly reconciled and enjoyed several family trips with their daughter Bambi, two. But a report from The Sun this week suggested that Molly-Mae's sister Zoe is concerned about them getting back together. In the latest episodes of Molly-Mae's Amazon Prime documentary Behind It All, Zoe expressed her doubts over Tommy openly. And this in turn has reportedly angered Tommy's family including his brother Tyson and his wife Paris. A source told the publication: 'The Fury family aren't impressed that Zoe has been so outspoken about Tommy. 'They're a fiercely loyal bunch and seeing Zoe's comments broadcast to millions of people via Amazon absolutely got their hackles up. 'To them Tommy is a stand up guy, a good, hard working father. His drinking issues shouldn't be used as a stick to beat him.' The insider added that Paris is confused as to why Zoe would try to hinder the family getting back together. Tyson, Tommy and Molly-Mae Hague have been contacted by MailOnline for comment. Zoe said of Tommy on the documentary: 'I do worry for her and my relationship with her if they did get back together. 'I think she potentially needs to look into the future and think about what's best for her and Bambi. She's got a long, rocky road ahead, unfortunately.' It comes after last week Molly-Mae and Tommy looked every inch the happy family as they enjoyed a very lavish 'surprise trip' to the Cotswolds. After months of rumours that the couple had rekindled their romance following their split in August, the pair finally went Instagram official last month with a loved-up family snap. And Tommy has clearly been making the effort since their shock split as he whisked his family off to a 'surprise trip' to the Cotswolds. Sharing an array of snaps to her Instagram Stories, Molly shared some sweet moments from the mini break as she took a dip in the pool with Bambi. Elsewhere she shared a snippet of her very lavish accommodation which featured huge L-shaped couches and large emperor beds. And Bambi appeared to settle in straight away as she was pushing her toy pram around the luxury property. Alongside a mirror selfie, Molly penned: 'Back from St Tropez and straight to the Cotswolds for a surprise staycation. 'This look is giving mum who's had approx 3 seconds to get ready'. Molly and Tommy fell for each other in front of the nation during series five of Love Island, going on to welcome Bambi and then get engaged in 2023. But fans were shocked when Molly announced on Instagram last August that she and Tommy had split up after five years, with many suspecting he had been unfaithful. In a statement posted to her 8.5million Instagram followers, she confirmed the breakup, saying: 'I never imagined our story would end, especially not this way.' Tommy denied continued speculation about him cheating during a magazine interview, insisting any reports about him being with other women were 'complete and utter b*****ks.' The boxer, who's the half-brother of heavyweight champion Tyson, said the reason he and Molly ended their romance was down to his excessive drinking. Also on Wednesday she took to Instagram to promote her latest range with brand Maebe She looked summer chic in a stylish black co-ord in the snaps He said: 'People go through different things in life. I'm 25 years old. I went through a lot and my breakup was in front of the whole world... 'Cheating was never a thing. You can ask Molly this yourself. It was the drink, and the drink is not a good thing.' The pair's split was branded a 'publicity stunt' by fans after they were filmed packing on the PDA at Manchester United footballer Luke Shaw 's Hogmanay party in Cheshire.