logo
‘I'm really not safe': A Venezuelan poet's fight to stay and write in the U.S.

‘I'm really not safe': A Venezuelan poet's fight to stay and write in the U.S.

Yahoo05-06-2025
When Oriette D'Angelo, in the fifth year of her doctorate program at the University of Iowa, found out that President Donald Trump had plans to revoke her temporary protected status, she told her friends she would mail them her notebooks of poems if she had to go back to Venezuela.
They asked her why.
'It would be almost impossible to start over,' she said.
She'd put years into her degree in Spanish and Portuguese, only to have it threatened by Trump's immigration agenda.
D'Angelo, 34, came to Chicago on a student visa over a decade ago, seeking professional opportunities and escape from a crumbling infrastructure and violence in her home country. In recent months, however, a string of executive orders and court decisions on the legality of these orders has left her in an uncomfortable state of limbo, grasping for loopholes that might let her continue her academic research and writing.
As a student who researches and writes poems about themes of dictatorship, she is heartened by the separation of powers in the United States, but said the federal government's often contradictory language in this moment feels dangerous.
'Venezuelans are being categorized as bad,' she said. 'But I want to stay here professionally. I want to finish my dissertation. I want to follow the right path.'
D'Angelo's legal status changed several times over the course of a decade as she navigated the processes of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
She grew up in Lechería, Venezuela, a beach city with white buildings and red thatched roofs, which she said was peaceful in the 1990s and early 2000s. Throughout her young adulthood, she watched Venezuela slowly decline under the leadership of the country's far-left leaders, Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro.
She had a student visa upon her entry to the U.S. in 2015, as her purpose for coming to Chicago was academic and professional.
When her Venezuelan passport expired in 2020, she applied for temporary protected status, or TPS, a form of relief that allows individuals from certain countries experiencing ongoing conflict or disaster to live and work in the U.S. for a specified period. But due to Venezuela's broken diplomatic relations with the U.S., all the consulates were closed. She had to travel to Colombia to renew it.
And when D'Angelo came back through O'Hare International Airport in late November 2024, she was processed under TPS, not her student visa. She lost her international student status, despite her main purpose for moving to the U.S. being to study.
Then, in late January, Trump revoked her temporary protected status. In a few months, it could expire, she said, and she would have no legal documents.
D'Angelo is set to complete her doctorate in May 2026. She said everything she had worked for — her professional future and career aspirations — was put in jeopardy.
Photos: Local officials, protesters clash with ICE outside
Local officials, protesters clash with ICE outside office over detentions in growing escalation over Trump's immigration tactics
Advocates demand release of Milwaukee father still facing deportation after being falsely accused of threatening Trump
Chicago's new FBI boss touts new squad focused on fentanyl and says immigration enforcement is a 'sustained effort'
Kristi Noem said an immigrant threatened to kill President Donald Trump. The story quickly fell apart
'The (Venezuelan) government is persecuting and detaining people who speak freely against them, so I couldn't imagine doing research like mine in my own country,' she said. 'It wouldn't be possible.'
Following the news of her status being revoked in January, she immediately began preparing statements and documents for an international student status application. The processing and legal fees would add up, so she made a GoFundMe page to raise over $10,000.
At a time of intense fear, D'Angelo and her girlfriend decided to get married in mid-March. They didn't make the decision for immigration purposes, D'Angelo said, but for concern about federal attacks on LGBTQ rights.
'With the current administration, we don't know if same-sex marriage will still be legal in the next few years,' she said. 'We want to be together.'
As Trump ramped up the pressure on international students over the spring, D'Angelo took down her GoFundMe and kept a low profile. Every day in March, pulling up the news was a new type of anxiety.
'It was the longest month of my life,' she said.
Her stress was so out of control that it started to affect her memory, D'Angelo said. She couldn't remember what had happened a day before.
With the help of online donations, D'Angelo submitted an international student status application in March, which was approved by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in mid-April. Receiving her status while watching more federal changes and mandates come in every day was surreal, she said. And, it all still feels fragile.
About a month after she received her status, the U.S. State Department temporarily halted interviews abroad with foreign citizens applying for student visas and expanded scrutiny of applicants' social media.
'Survival mode is not over,' she said. 'Even though I have my student status back, I'm really not safe.'
D'Angelo is concerned that funding for her program might be cut. She is cautious about what she shares on the social media platform X, as the Trump administration has said that it doesn't want to let in international students who are critical of the country. After spending years studying the patterns of dictatorships, she said that she can sense when politics becomes personal.
'It's getting very real,' she said.
Recent data shows that almost 8 million Venezuelans have left the country in an exodus, a quarter of the population, in the largest Latin American displacement in recent history.
Poetry was a way for her to escape the violence in Caracas, where she lived and studied in her early 20s, and where at least three times she was walking back to her home and passed dead bodies on the street, she said.
'It's impossible to fully describe what it was like,' she said. 'But that's also something that motivates me. It's part of everything I do.'
In her poems, D'Angelo writes about gender-based harm, using threads from personal experience in a close relationship she had at age 21 with one of her professors, whom she said turned abusive.
She compares unemployment, hunger and violence to a chronic illness that corrodes everything. Her work reflects the belief that human beings, inherently political, will do whatever it takes to survive, like humans traversing mountains and crossing borders in pursuit of a better future.
At a recent book fair at the University of Chicago, D'Angelo sat on a panel with other writers from Latin America and talked about her childhood in Lechería. Her home was paradise, she said, except she loved to read and there were no bookstores. The only one was converted into a clothing store a few months after it opened.
Hungry for a literary community, she began writing online, she said. She read authors like Octavio Paz and Mexican poet Leticia Cortéz and imitated their vivid style, using rich metaphors to explore big themes.
Light shone through the window in a perfect square in front of them.
'Bruises on the skin know nothing of forgiveness / Dried-out wounds only tell one story,' she read.
In an interview with the Tribune afterward, D'Angelo said that most Venezuelans come to Chicago because they are forced out of their homes, seeking physical safety or economic security that they don't have.
'It seems so unfair that the people who ran away from that … are now forced to go back, when they came here looking for safety,' she said.
D'Angelo's second book will come out this month. Her goal is to teach at a university upon graduation, which she is allowed to do under her student status.
As a professor, she said she wants to help her students understand that their dreams are valid, no matter where they come from.
D'Angelo's arm is covered with tattoos: a hummingbird, her mother's handwriting, and designs like air and flowers.
The Trump administration has used tattoos in combination with other justifications on a checklist to deport migrants, but hers remind her of beauty and home. They give her strength.
'Vale la pena,' reads one in cursive lettering on her left forearm, in English, 'It's worth it.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection
U.S. trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection

NBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • NBC News

U.S. trans woman challenges Dutch asylum rejection

AMSTERDAM — A 28-year-old transgender woman from the U.S. began a legal challenge on Wednesday to the rejection of her asylum application in the Netherlands where she had sought political asylum saying she no longer felt safe in the United States. Veronica Clifford-Carlos, a visual artist from California, came to the Netherlands — the first country to legalize same-sex marriage and known for its strong protections of LGBTQ rights — because the Trump administration's policies towards transgender people made her feel unsafe, her lawyer's office said. The case, the first of its kind in the Netherlands, will be heard in a court in Amsterdam starting Wednesday, with a ruling expected in four to six weeks. Since taking office in January, President Donald Trump has issued executive orders limiting transgender rights, banned transgender people from serving in the armed forces, and rescinded anti-discrimination policies for LGBTQ people. Dutch advocacy group LGBT Asylum Support, which backs the lawsuit, is currently assisting around 20 U.S. trans individuals with pending asylum claims. According to data from the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (IND), 29 Americans applied for asylum in the Netherlands during the first half of this year. In previous years there were between nine and 18 applicants per year, an IND spokesperson said. 'The IND generally states that discrimination by authorities and fellow citizens can be considered an act of persecution if it is so severe that victims can no longer function socially and societally,' LGBT Asylum Support said in a statement. 'But the IND maintains that there are no grounds for exceptional treatment of transgender and queer refugees from the U.S.'

Almost 6 in 10 say UN members should recognize Palestinian state: Survey
Almost 6 in 10 say UN members should recognize Palestinian state: Survey

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Almost 6 in 10 say UN members should recognize Palestinian state: Survey

Nearly 6 in 10 Americans said that the United Nations (U.N.) countries should recognize the Palestinian state, according to a new survey that was published on Wednesday morning. The new Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 58 percent of U.S. adults think that every country in the U.N. should recognize Palestine as a nation. About a third of respondents, 33 percent, disagreed, while another 9 percent didn't answer when asked. The survey comes as the United Kingdom, France and Canada — all close U.S. allies — have recently expressed their intentions to recognize the Palestinian state. In late July, when asked about UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's intention, President Trump said he had 'no view on that.' The president said French President Emmanuel Macron's decision was not 'going to change anything.' The decisions from all three nations come as Israel is facing international pressure over the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, with starvation spreading and some aid organizations warning that Palestinians are on the brink of famine. Israel has denied the accusation of facilitating the growing hunger in the war-torn enclave, stating that the Palestinian militant group Hamas is stealing humanitarian aid. Hamas, designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S., has denied the accusation by Israel. The majority of Americans in the survey, 65 percent, said that the Trump administration should spring into action to aid Palestinians when it comes to food delivery. About 28 percent disagreed, including 41 percent of Trump-aligned GOP voters. Nearly 6 in 10 Americans, 59 percent, argued that the Israeli military's actions in Gaza, which kicked off following Hamas's Oct. 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel, have been excessive. About a third, 33 percent, disagreed, according to the poll. In February last year, 53 percent of Americans said Israeli military response in the enclave was excessive, while 42 percent said otherwise. The survey was conducted from Aug. 13-18 among 4,446 U.S. adults. The margin of error was around 2 percentage points.

The news media has lost control
The news media has lost control

The Hill

time14 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The news media has lost control

It has been said that journalists provide the conversation of democracy. That old adage is losing steam in this era, however, as the news agenda for the nation's rhetorical sphere is increasingly being framed by many and varied new voices. For decades, the journalism establishment exercised great power in deciding the topics and issues that Americans reflected over at the kitchen table or water cooler, and eventually at the voting booth. 'The news' was what primary gatekeepers such as The Associated Press, The New York Times and CBS said was news. Americans assumed that journalists brought particular and professional expertise to the agenda-setting function. Citizens also believed these reporters were representative of the nation's population, and therefore committed to creating a sensible, fair and wide-ranging news marketplace. News consumers respected journalists and trusted that the news industry was trying to serve a greater societal purpose. Long-time and legendary CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite was once widely considered the most trusted person in the nation. But the media establishment has largely squandered this lofty role and lost the confidence of news consumers. The news agenda has become infected with activism, hyperpartisanship and, at times, superficiality. The AllSides Media Bias Chart tracks the ideological leanings of a wide range of news outlets. Precious few achieve a centrist rating. Some receive a 'leans right' label, but most establishment news outlets receive a 'leans left.' Credibility ratings for the journalism industry have suffered as a result, and news consumers are looking elsewhere for information. Perhaps even worse, some citizens are just becoming news bystanders who no longer care about being informed. This void is being increasingly filled by all kinds of other voices, including podcasters, bloggers, social media provocateurs and even fringe, bombastic miscreants. On one level, this could actually be considered a good development. It is certainly the American way that everybody gets to have their say. The constitutional framers, indeed, intended that free press and free speech rights applied broadly to the wise and even the less than wise. The marketplace of news content need not be left any more to the machinations of a handful of elite, detached editors and producers in corporate media towers. The warping of the news agenda by supposedly professional journalists no doubt opened the door for the other players to emerge. And the old-time media have not yet figured out that squeezing the agenda won't work in the wide-open marketplace of the internet. The major broadcast networks provided minimal coverage last month of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's press briefing about a possible role of the Obama administration in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. CNN dumped out of its coverage with a correspondent questioning whether the story deserved any time at all. Gabbard's comments deserved to be scrutinized, of course, but a DNI's pointed remarks are news. However, there are risks associated with having the nation's news agenda set by the rough and tumble atmosphere of social media, podcasters, influencers and zany characters. These actors are often more interested in buzz and vibe than deliberation and rational thinking. And now, in turn, traditional media cruise the internet looking for 'news,' trying to capitalize on the buzz of alternative agenda setters. There is little other way to explain the Coldplay concert couple or Sydney Sweeney's advertisement. And who would have figured a time when a key factor in a presidential election was which candidate did or did not go on Joe Rogan's podcast? Establishment journalism being influenced by the grassroots surely indicates a surrender by the news industry of its long-established responsibility to set an agenda of substance. Perhaps G.K. Chesterton had it right a hundred years ago when he mused, 'I am a journalist and so am vastly ignorant of many things, but because I am a journalist, I write and talk about them all.' But there should still be a key role for professional agenda-setters even in today's cluttered public sphere. Democracy and rational decision-making need an agenda based on deliberate and measured judgement, rather than chasing buzz and vibe. Professional editors and producers owe the nation a national dialogue based on relevance, high impact and perspective. A nation distracted by a shrill and superficial news agenda is unable to effectively address the serious challenges the nation faces.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store