FBI Confirms $10 Million Chinese Hacker Bounty
getty
The U.S. is no stranger to hack attacks that have a Chinese affiliation, from the U.S. Treasury breach, an attack that led the FBI to remotely delete malware from thousands of computers belonging to American citizens, and most recently the nation state sponsored Ghost ransomware attacks leading to yet another FBI security warning as American hospitals and factories were targeted. Now, the FBI has upped the ante as it confirmed a $10 million bounty on the heads of members of the notorious Chinese Salt Typhoon hacking group.
The Chinese Salt Typhoon cyber-espionage group has risen to the top of the state-sponsored hacking pile courtesy of a number of high-profile attacks over the last six months or so. From the hacking of presidential candidate campaign iPhones, the exposure of critical vulnerabilities within the U.S. telecommunications infrastructure, and more.
Salt Typhoon is known to be an advanced persistent hacking group, affiliated with the Ministry of State Security in China, conducting cyber espionage campaigns against U.S. targets. Salt Typhoon also operates under a number of other guises, including FamousSparrow, Ghost Emperor and UNC2286
Now the Federal Bureau of Investigation has confirmed it is offering a $10 million bounty for 'information about foreign government-linked individuals participating in certain malicious cyber activities against U.S. critical infrastructure in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.' The FBI bounty is mentioned in a new security advisory that asks members of the public to report any information that they have about Salt Typhoon activity, but 'especially information about specific individuals behind the campaign.' For more information about how to qualify for the $10 million bounty, readers are advised to refer to the U.S. Department of State's national security rewards program, Rewards for Justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Tulsi Gabbard is setting Trump's base up for the next Epstein disappointment
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is sowing the seeds for MAGAs next Jeffrey Epstein moment and perpetuating a dangerous retaliatory cycle. She has accused former senior government officials of directing a treasonous conspiracy to undermine President Trump's 2016 campaign. Nothing Gabbard has released proves that assertion, including the 2017 House Intelligence Committee report questioning the intelligence community assessment that Russia wanted Trump to win the 2016 election. That 2017 conclusion is at odds with the unanimous and bipartisan findings of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that found Russia did in fact try to influence the campaign in Trump's favor but those efforts did not affect the outcome. Gabbard's claims reinforce a long-standing narrative prevalent among MAGA supporters that Democrats sought to destroy Trump's candidacy, and then undermine his presidency, by manipulating information about Russian interference in the 2016 election. Gabbard's unsubstantiated conclusions will come back to bite the Trump administration the same way Attorney General Pam Bondi's inability to release the Epstein client list has upset the president's supporters. Unless the Trump administration is prepared to fabricate evidence, it's unlikely enough new information will ever be discovered to prove a conspiracy of the magnitude suggested by Gabbard. MAGA supporters will be waiting for the mass arrest and imprisonment of Obama administration officials that never comes. Gabbard, and ultimately Trump, will be left to weakly explain why the conspirators aren't coming to justice. Gabbard's powerful assertions came at a delicate moment for a Trump administration already caught in the middle of a similar storm of their own making about Epstein. From the start, the investigations and public communications about Russian interference in the 2016 election were mishandled. It's important to acknowledge that fact upfront. President Obama didn't have to release the government's conclusions about Russian interference a month before the 2016 election, conclusions that lent an air of legitimacy to accusations against Trump being discussed publicly by supporters of Hillary Clinton. The FBI's probe into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia was itself predicated on flimsy information. Even if Gabbard's wild assertions aren't true, and there's no evidence so far to suggest they are, the judgement exercised by parts of the government during and after the 2016 campaign still left a lot to be desired. The Trump campaign had been the primary victim of the government's poor judgement, but former FBI Director James Comey evened the score a bit when he announced the opening of an FBI probe into Clinton's use of an unclassified email server days before the 2016 election. Democrats botched the messaging around Russia's interference with the 2016 election, either accidentally or intentionally inflating its role and falsely insinuating the Trump campaign had been involved. But Gabbard is now recreating their mistakes with her reckless accusations. Now that both sides have weaponized intelligence for political purposes, what matters is to restore trust in the intelligence community. Gabbard would say she's doing that by leveling her accusations in the name of transparency, but her aggressive assertions go beyond where the facts are leading and perpetuate an overblown narrative of government conspiracy. Already, Democrats aren't inclined to believe what she's saying, just as most Republicans never bought into the Steele dossier or the assertions about Trump's collusion with Russia. Beyond the trust gap with Democrats, Gabbard is setting the conditions for a major falling out with the MAGA faithful. After Epstein, this will be the second time that Trump administration officials allege a massive conspiracy but aren't able to produce evidence to support their claims. Trump's core supporters believe these conspiracies are real because their leaders, officials like Bondi and Gabbard, keep telling them that proof exists. They'll demand action over Gabbard's accusations, the way they are with Epstein, then be left with no choice but to assume the Trump administration is complicit in the coverup when no action comes. This is a distraction Trump doesn't need. He would do well to direct Gabbard to tone down her assertions rather than egg her on. Going forward, the intelligence community, elected officials, the Justice Department and the government in general should take a lesson from former President Gerald Ford. Ford understood that prosecuting President Richard Nixon would divide the country and create more problems than it solved. He made the hard decision to allow what was probably criminal conduct to go unpunished to allow the nation to heal. Except in cases of the most egregious crimes supported by the strongest evidence, the U.S. government should take a break from seeking to prosecute former government officials. Democrats spent years rooting for Trump to go to jail or actively trying to put Trump in jail for perceived crimes. Gabbard seems intent on doing the same in reverse. This is a bad place for the country to be, with the intelligence community being used against former officials and sensitive information being declassified when it suits a political purpose. This type of behavior will have a chilling effect on everything the intelligence community does and further divide our country. The Trump administration should be the grown-up in the room and break this dangerous cycle now.
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
America Needs Colbert
The role of a late-night talk show host has always occupied a uniquely liminal space in American life, traversing the uncertain territory between comedian, social commentator, political pundit and moral compass. Among these roles, the first quality is always the most important: audiences tune in to be entertained. But the lines between satire and political commentary have always blurred on the late-night format, and America has benefited greatly from the overlap. So when Paramount Global's CBS announced the cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, it was clear that the move would be a disservice to the public.
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Protests expected as Trump arrives in Scotland for five-day visit
Donald Trump UKFacebookTweetLink Follow Protesters in Scotland say they will mount a wave of resistance as US President Donald Trump prepares to travel to the country on Friday for a five-day private visit. Trump is traveling to his golf resort in the small village of Turnberry, on the west coast, where he will meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday, before going to his other resort near Aberdeen, on the other side of Scotland, and open an 18-hole course dedicated to his Scottish-born mother Mary. Several protest groups, ranging from trade unions and climate justice campaigners to sections of the American diaspora and Palestinian and Ukrainian advocacy groups, are planning to demonstrate against the US president under the umbrella of the 'Stop Trump Coalition.' Protests are scheduled for Saturday in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dumfries. Police Scotland are expected to deploy thousands of officers during Trump's visit, according to PA Media. Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond told CNN in a statement that the visit 'will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other UK police forces.' Trump himself is expected to stay at his golf resorts, away from the public. Scotland, ruled for decades by a left-of-center devolved government, has a long history of protesting against Trump. When he visited his Scottish golf courses during his first presidential term, police estimated that 5,000 people marched through Edinburgh in protest. On Tuesday, Scottish pro-independence newspaper The National printed a front page with the headline 'Convicted US felon to arrive in Scotland.' 'I don't think many Scottish people would feel he's welcome,' one Scottish resident Anna Acquroff told Reuters in Glasgow. 'I think it's an embarrassment that he is coming here at all. Personally.' Not everyone is so opposed to the Trump visit, however. Another Glaswegian, Keith Bean, told Reuters he thought Trump was 'welcome to come' because 'talking is always good. To divide and keep people separate from one another without discussing, it tends to create more problems than conversation.' While in Scotland, Trump will also meet its First Minister John Swinney, who said he will 'raise global and humanitarian issues of significant importance, including the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza, and ensure Scotland's voice is heard at the highest levels of government across the world,' according to PA. This visit to Scotland marks a distraction from Trump's current domestic political troubles over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein – an accused sex trafficker and disgraced financier who died by suicide in 2019. Already, however, that ongoing turmoil has seeped into Trump's visit. The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the trip's press pool after the publication ran a story which described a collection of letters gifted to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003, including a note bearing Trump's name and an outline of a naked woman. Trump filed a lawsuit the next day claiming defamation 'because no authentic letter or drawing exists.' Trump will return to the UK in September for an 'unprecedented' second state visit at the invitation of King Charles, which is unlikely to have any public-facing events. Typically, second-term US presidents are not invited for a second state visit. In keeping with tradition, former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush were offered lunch or tea with the monarch during their second administrations.
