Privatization of N.L. school system not on the table, says Education Accord co-chair
Response comes after advisory board member quits due to privatization concerns
One of the leaders of the team tasked with modernizing Newfoundland and Labrador's education system says she never would have joined if she thought privatization was on the table.
Education Accord advisory board co-chair Karen Goodnough is disputing accusations from CUPE N.L. president Sherry Hillier, who announced earlier this week she would no longer sit on the advisory board over worries the government is dismantling the province's public education system.
"No, I would not be here and I can assure you that my co-chair, Dr. Anne Burke, would not be part of this process if that was the intent," Goodnough recently told CBC.
There were no references to privatization in the group's interim report, she added, though she said she can understand Hillier's concerns about privatization and job losses.
"But that's not part of our job, or our mandate, as providing strategic direction for the accord — that's not what we do," said Goodnough.
"I think, from my perspective, they must be misunderstanding the purpose of the accord and confusing [it] with government and operations."
Hillier's decision to step down came after Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty Association president Josh Lepawsky's announcement in January that he was leaving the advisory board.
Late in the game
The provincial government launched the Education Accord in January of last year. Goodnough said the board has been talking with individuals, families and community groups on ways to improve the education system.
"We're almost into our 14th month and we're very close to releasing our final report, which will have a set of calls to action with suggestions for pathways, targets," she said.
She added Hillier decided to withdraw from the advisory board at a very late stage. While she is disappointed with Hillier's decision to walk away, she also thanked Hillier for her involvement.
"The more people we can have involved, more individuals and groups, the more robust our report, our final report, will be," said Goodnough.
The advisory board's interim report was released in January.
"The intent of the interim report was not to provide specific calls to action or calls to transformation at this point. It was to outline the process in which we were involved based on the accord," she said.
The results of the interim report was what Hillier said prompted her to make her decision to leave the board.
Goodnough said the interim report also brought up themes that might show up in the final report.
"So saying that, you know, there's no direction in the interim report is incorrect and the final report will have those calls to action," she said.
Goodnough said the final report will have specific and broader recommendations for the government, adding it will be up to the government to determine its next steps.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
3 hours ago
Canada calling for de-escalation between Israel and Iran, says foreign affairs minister
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand says Canada is calling for de-escalation after Israel targeted Iran's nuclear sites and killed Iranian military leaders with a barrage of airstrikes early Friday. We as a country always prefer negotiated solutions, and we encourage parties to get the table, Anand said in an interview with CBC's The House that airs Saturday. The concerns relating to potential escalation are real, and the key is going to be to de-escalate and reach a negotiated solution, she told host Catherine Cullen. Anand added that of course Israel has the right to defend itself and Canada is concerned about the threat posed by Iran's nuclear ballistic missile program. She also said the federal government is monitoring developments. Multiple locations in Iran's capital, Tehran, were hit in the attack, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said targeted nuclear and military sites. Israel's military said about 200 aircraft were involved in the initial attack on about 100 targets. WATCH l The latest on the strikes, their aftermath and what may lie ahead: Israeli air strikes kill top Iranian military leaders, hit nuclear sites 7 hours agoDuration15:07Israel attacked Iran's capital early Friday in strikes targeting the country's nuclear program and killed at least two top military officers. Iranian state TV confirmed that the leader of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard and the chief of staff of Iranian armed forces were killed. The leader of Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, Gen. Hossein Salami, was killed, Iranian state television reported, in a major body blow to Tehran's governing theocracy and an immediate escalation of its long-simmering conflict with Israel. U.S. President Donald Trump urged Iran on social media to reach a deal with Washington on its nuclear program, warning that Israel's attacks will only get worse. Anand said Canada believes the best path to sustainable peace and security in the region are the talks between the United States and Iran and the federal government would like to see those talks continue. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said in a social media post on Friday morning that Israel has the right to defend itself — including by disarming Tehran's genocidal nuclear program. It cannot wait until the regime has capabilities for a nuclear strike. All levels of government must take extra steps to protect Canada's Jewish community from vile antisemites who may use these events as an excuse for more acts of violence, Poilievre added. Heather McPherson, the NDP foreign affairs critic, said New Democrats condemn Israel's attacks on residential buildings in Tehran that have led to hundreds of casualties, including civilians in a statement released Friday morning. While we have long condemned Iranian leadership, including the IRGC, this illegal act by Israel will only provoke further violence, McPherson added. She called for de-escalation, diplomacy, and the rule of law — all principles that Canada has failed to prioritize in its approach to the Middle East. Anand defends Modi's G7 invite Israel's attack comes days before leaders of the world's most powerful democratic countries gather in Kananaskis, Alta., for a critical G7 meeting led by Prime Minister Mark Carney. Carney has received criticism for inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The RCMP has alleged Indian agents were involved in the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, the Canadian Khalistani separatist who was gunned down outside a Sikh temple in B.C. in 2023. The previous government took a stand that was principled and it was direct, said Balpreet Singh, a spokesperson for the World Sikh Organization of Canada (new window) on Thursday. "When Prime Minister Carney was asked about it, he waffled." Carney said on Wednesday that Canada wants to discuss energy security, critical minerals and the development of artificial intelligence — three of his stated priorities for this meeting of world leaders — and it's hard to have those discussions without India. Anand defended the move and said the safety and security of all Canadians at home and abroad is my top priority and dialogues between countries will rest on the necessity of observing the rule of law and the safety and security of Canadians. The foreign affairs minister added the RCMP investigation is ongoing and that not every conversation is going to be easy at this conference. On the contrary, the discussions will be difficult and our prime minister and I — as his foreign minister — will be at the table to have those conversations, Anand said. Possible Canada-U.S. deal The G7 meeting will also be Carney's next chance to meet face-to-face with U.S. President Donald Trump as Canada tries to convince the United States to drop its tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. CBC News and Radio-Canada have learned about the existence of a working document outlining details of a potential deal. Three sources with direct knowledge of the situation told CBC the document has been sent back and forth between Ottawa and Washington. WATCH | U.S., Canada exchange document outlining possible terms of trade deal: sources: Début du widget Widget. Passer le widget ? Fin du widget Widget. Retourner au début du widget ? U.S., Canada exchange document outlining possible terms of trade deal: sources n a sign that Ottawa and Washington are making progress toward some sort of trade agreement, CBC News and Radio-Canada have learned about the existence of a working document outlining details of a potential deal. Although this is considered a step toward the overall goal of reaching a deal, there are warnings from multiple sources that more work needs to be done before there's an agreement. When asked how close Canada is to reaching a deal with the Americans, Anand said these negotiations are extremely sensitive and extremely important, obviously given that our bilateral trade relationship is extensive and integrated. Carney says Canada will meet 2% NATO spending target by March (new window) The work that is being done to ensure that Canada's interests are paramount in these negotiations is work that is sensitive and will not be work that I discuss here, Anand told Cullen. The foreign affairs minister also said Canada's new commitment to meeting the NATO spending target of two per cent by March (new window) ensures that Canada is a strong and reliable international partner while also bolstering the country's military capacity. Benjamin Lopez Steven (new window) · CBC News
CBC
10 hours ago
- CBC
Can the G7 find order in the chaos?
Can the G7 find order in the chaos? Front Burner 25:42 Can the G7 find order in the chaos? Starting Sunday, political and economic representatives of a world order that Donald Trump is intent on shattering are gathering in Kananaskis, in Alberta's Rocky Mountains. That on its own would be high stakes. But add to it Mark Carney's aggressive national to-do list, and you've got two days that could show us how much Canada and the world have changed since Trump became president a second time. Aaron Wherry, a senior writer with CBC's Parliamentary Bureau, joins the show to unpack what he'll be watching for as he covers the event. Fill out our listener survey here . We appreciate your input! For transcripts of Front Burner, please visit: Subscribe to Front Burner on your favourite podcast app. Listen on Apple Podcasts Listen on Spotify Listen on YouTube
Winnipeg Free Press
15 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The bully is a person in our neighbourhood
Opinion A new kid moves into your neighbourhood. A loudmouth, pretty darned full of himself; 'I'm the best, the bigly-est, the smartest person ever,' but you're used to all sorts, even windbags, so you don't pay him much mind. And then one day as you're walking by, he punches you in the face. Later, he's all smiles, and says 'Let's let bygones be bygones, we could be the bestest of friends.' And things get better for a bit, though he's still insufferable. Demetrius Freeman / The Washington Post U.S. President Donald Trump Not long after, as you're walking by, he comes up and punches you in the face, saying that you were mean to him. A week later, he punches you in the face. And then says, 'We should really be friends.' At some point, tired of being punched in the face, you simply avoid him. Deal him out altogether from your life. Because you have no trust whatsoever that he isn't going to punch you in the face — and, to add insult to injury, also blame you for forcing him to punch you in the face. Enter America. Several media outlets — the CBC among them — are reporting that Canada and the United States are exchanging broad-strokes terms for a joint deal on economic and security issues. No framework deal at this point, just a starting point for what two competing views on what a negotiation might look like. You can understand it from a pragmatic point of view, when we do so much of our business with our largest trading partner to the south. And it is, in a qualified way, good to at least be talking. On the other hand … Sign a trade and security deal with the United States? We already have a binding trade deal with the United States, signed with great Sharpie flourish by the exact same person who has spent the last few months punching us in the face with tariffs. Here's the key point — why would we trust an American leader with a 100 per cent record of punching us in the face to, maybe, not punch us in the face any more? The truth is, we can't. Especially because U.S. President Donald Trump has a lengthy corporate history of punching people in the face as well. It's been his art of the deal — signing contracts and then refusing to honour payment terms, and demanding people settle breached contracts for pennies on the dollar or fight him in the courts for years. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. It's a conundrum we, and many other American trading partners, face: we can't really afford to lose America's business, and we can't really afford trying to keep it, either — because every time we jump one hurdle, we're faced with a new one and are asked to jump even higher. Contrast America's current negotiating style with the Chinese government, which has just announced a zero-tariff policy with virtually every single African country — 53 in all — with the one exception being Eswatini, the former country of Swaziland, because that country has diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Meanwhile, the U.S. is punishing African countries with high tariffs because Americans buy products cheap from them, while the populations of those countries are not in a financial position to make an equal-sized purchase of American goods. (Not only punching them in the face, but kicking them when they're down as well.) It's understandable that we're trying to make a deal in the short term, or maybe our federal government is trying to run out the clock as much as possible. But that's not the answer. Maybe we can't move out of the neighbourhood. But we can make new friends — not necessarily China, but there's a big world out there.
